Steven Keith
Research Triangle Park
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steven Keith.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | 2011
Ronald J. Pettis; Barry Ginsberg; Laurence Hirsch; Diane E. Sutter; Steven Keith; Elaine McVey; Noel G. Harvey; Marcus Hompesch; Leszek Nosek; Christoph Kapitza; Lutz Heinemann
BACKGROUND This study compared insulin lispro (IL) pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) delivered via microneedle intradermal (ID) injection with subcutaneous (SC) injection under euglycemic glucose clamp conditions. METHODS Ten healthy male volunteers were administered 10 international units (IU) of IL at 3 microneedle lengths (1.25, 1.50, or 1.75 mm) in a randomized, crossover fashion on Days 1-3 followed by a repetitive ID 1.5-mm microneedle dose (Day 4) and an SC dose (Day 5). RESULTS Microneedle ID delivery resulted in more rapid absorption of IL, with decreased time to maximum insulin concentration (ID vs. SC: 36.0-46.4 vs. 64.3 min, P < 0.05) and higher fractional availability at early postinjection times. ID produced more rapid effects on glucose uptake with shorter times to maximal and early half-maximal glucose infusion rates (GIRs) (ID vs. SC: time to maximum GIR, 106-112 vs. 130 min, P < 0.05; early half-maximal GIR, 29-35 vs. 42 min), increased early GIR area under the curve (AUC), and faster offset of insulin action (shorter time to late half-maximal GIR: 271-287 vs. 309 min). Relative total insulin bioavailability (AUC to 360 min and AUC to infinite measurement) did not significantly differ between administration routes. ID PK/PD parameters showed some variation as a function of needle length. Delivery of ID IL was generally well tolerated, although transient, localized wheal formation and redness were observed at injection sites. CONCLUSIONS Microneedle ID insulin lispro delivery enables more rapid onset and offset of metabolic effect than SC therapy and is safe and well tolerated; further study for insulin therapy is warranted.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics | 2011
Kristin Weidemaier; Alexander G. Lastovich; Steven Keith; J. Bruce Pitner; Mark Sistare; Ross W Jacobson; David Kurisko
We report here the first pre-clinical demonstration of continuous glucose tracking by fluorophore-labeled and genetically engineered glucose/galactose binding protein (GGBP). Acrylodan-labeled GGBP was immobilized in a hydrogel matrix at the tip of a small diameter optical fiber contained in a stainless steel needle. The fiber optic biosensors were inserted subcutaneously into Yucatan and Yorkshire swine, and the sensor response to changing glucose levels was monitored at intervals over a 7-day period. Sensor mean percent error on day 7 was 16.4±5.0% using a single daily reference blood glucose value to calibrate the sensor. The GGBP sensors susceptibility to common interferents was tested in a well-plate system using human sera. No significant interference was observed from the tested interferents except for tetracycline at the drugs maximum plasma concentration. The robust performance of the GGBP-based fiber optic sensor in swine models and resistance to interferents indicates the potential of this technology for continuous glucose monitoring in humans.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | 2011
Kevin Judge; Linda Morrow; Alexander G. Lastovich; David Kurisko; Steven Keith; Jacob Hartsell; Bruce Clyde Roberts; Elaine McVey; Kristin Weidemaier; Khin Win; Marcus Hompesch
AIM This study evaluated the performance characteristics of a prototype Becton Dickinson (BD) (Franklin Lakes, NJ) glucose/galactose binding protein (GGBP) sensor placed intradermally (BD-ID) or subcutaneously (BD-SC) for continuous glucose monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS The performance characteristics of the prototype BD GGBP sensor after intradermal or subcutaneous placement were assessed, and its accuracy was compared with that of a glucose oxidase (GOx)-based sensor and a standard laboratory method (YSI STAT2300 analyzer, Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, OH) under glucose clamp conditions and during an off-clamp meal challenge in 40 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes in a 12-h feasibility study. RESULTS BD-ID and BD-SC sensors performed as well as or better than the GOx-based sensor (differences in median absolute percentage error 2-4 points in hyperglycemic and euglycemic regions, ≥ 10 points in the hypoglycemic region). For glucose values ≤ 100 mg/dL, the percentage of measurement values in consensus error plot Zone A was substantially higher with the GGBP sensors than the GOx-based sensor. CONCLUSIONS The BD prototype sensor demonstrated competitive accuracy relative to a GOx-based sensor and a YSI blood standard with a single calibration and minimal warm-up. Current development work is focused on the design and manufacture of a commercially feasible device that will include marked enhancements to device robustness and longevity.
Journal of diabetes science and technology | 2014
Joshua K. Herr; Steven Keith; Rick Klug; Ronald J. Pettis
In this study, the temperature profiles of insulin pump reservoirs during normal wear conditions across multiple seasons were characterized. Thermocouples secured in reservoirs filled with insulin diluent were loaded in infusion pumps worn by volunteers. Reservoir and ambient environmental temperature data and activity levels were logged during the course of normal daily activities in February (winter), April (spring), and August (summer). Each seasonal data set comprised 7 to 14 days of wear from 3 to 5 volunteers. Reservoir temperature profiles were generally higher than ambient temperatures, likely due to heat transfer from the wearer when the pump was placed close to the body. Temperature conditions inside pump reservoirs fluctuated between 25°C and 37°C regardless of seasonal variations. The average reservoir temperature remained close to 30°C across all seasons, notably lower than used in previously published compatibility and stability protocols (37°C). Results from this study could be utilized to develop more accurate stability and compatibility testing procedures for new insulin formulations and/or delivery devices.
Archive | 2003
Steven Keith; Robert S. Parker; Noel G. Harvey; Ronald J. Pettis; John D. Denuzzio; Glenn P. Vonk
Archive | 2003
William J. Allen; Todd M. Chelak; John D. Denuzzio; Lee Griswold; Frederick T. Karl; Steven Keith; Lawrence A. Monahan; Phyllis Palmer; Bill Stewart; Robert E. West; アレン ウィリアム; ディー.デヌジオ ジョン; キース スティーブン; エム.シェラク トッド; スチュワート ビル; パルマー フィリス; カール フレデリック; グリスワルド リー; エー.モナハン ローレンス; イー.ウエスト ロバート
Archive | 2016
Steven Keith; Elaine McVey; Frances Tong; Ronald J. Pettis; Joshua K. Herr; Richard Klug; Christopher Rini; Natasha Bolick; Alfred Harvey; Vincent J. Sullivan; Matthew S. Ferriter
Archive | 2008
Kirstin Weidemaier; Andrea Liebmann-Vinson; Adam Craig Curry; Alexander G. Lastovich; Christian Sandmann; W. Shannon Dillmore; James L. Schram; W. William Stewart; Robert E. Pearson; Helen Hsieh; Steven Keith; Rajendra R. Bhat
Archive | 2008
Kristin Weidemaier; Christian Sandmann; W. Shannon Dillmore; James L. Schram; W. William Stewart; Robert E. Pearson; Helen Hsieh; Steven Keith; Rajendra R. Bhat; Andrea Liebmann-Vinson; Adam Craig Curry; Alexander G. Lastovich
Archive | 2008
Kristin Weidemaier; Andrea Liebmann-Vinson; Adam Craig Curry; Alexander G. Lastovich; Christian Sandmann; W. Shannon Dillmore; James L. Schram; W. William Stewart; Robert E. Pearson; Helen Hsieh; Steven Keith; Rajendra R. Bhat