Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven Kirshblum is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven Kirshblum.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2011

International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)

Steven Kirshblum; Stephen P. Burns; Fin Biering-Sørensen; William H. Donovan; Daniel E. Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei V. Krassioukov; M. J. Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring

This article represents the content of the booklet, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2011, published by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). For further explanation of the clarifications and changes in this revision, see the accompanying article (Kirshblum S., et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011:doi 10.1179/107902611X13186000420242 The spinal cord is the major conduit through which motor and sensory information travels between the brain and body. The spinal cord contains longitudinally oriented spinal tracts (white matter) surrounding central areas (gray matter) where most spinal neuronal cell bodies are located. The gray matter is organized into segments comprising sensory and motor neurons. Axons from spinal sensory neurons enter and axons from motor neurons leave the spinal cord via segmental nerves or roots. In the cervical spine, there are 8 nerve roots. Cervical roots of C1-C7 are named according to the vertebra above which they exit (i.e. C1 exits above the C1 vertebra, just below the skull and C6 nerve roots pass between the C5 and C6 vertebrae) whereas C8 exists between the C7 and T1 vertebra; as there is no C8 vertebra. The C1 nerve root does not have a sensory component that is tested on the International Standards Examination. The thoracic spine has 12 distinct nerve roots and the lumbar spine consists of 5 distinct nerve roots that are each named accordingly as they exit below the level of the respective vertebrae. The sacrum consists of 5 embryonic sections that have fused into one bony structure with 5 distinct nerve roots that exit via the sacral foramina. The spinal cord itself ends at approximately the L1-2 vertebral level. The distal most part of the spinal cord is called the conus medullaris. The cauda equina is a cluster of paired (right and left) lumbosacral nerve roots that originate in the region of the conus medullaris and travel down through the thecal sac and exit via the intervertebral foramen below their respective vertebral levels. There may be 0, 1, or 2 coccygeal nerves but they do not have a role with the International Standards examination in accordance with the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Each root receives sensory information from skin areas called dermatomes. Similarly each root innervates a group of muscles called a myotome. While a dermatome usually represents a discrete and contiguous skin area, most roots innervate more than one muscle, and most muscles are innervated by more than one root. Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects conduction of sensory and motor signals across the site(s) of lesion(s), as well as the autonomic nervous system. By systematically examining the dermatomes and myotomes, as described within this booklet, one can determine the cord segments affected by the SCI. From the International Standards examination several measures of neurological damage are generated, e.g., Sensory and Motor Levels (on right and left sides), NLI, Sensory Scores (Pin Prick and Light Touch), Motor Scores (upper and lower limb), and ZPP. This booklet also describes the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) Impairment Scale (AIS) to classify the severity (i.e. completeness) of injury. This booklet begins with basic definitions of common terms used herein. The section that follows describes the recommended International Standards examination, including both sensory and motor components. Subsequent sections cover sensory and motor scores, the AIS classification, and clinical syndromes associated with SCI. For ease of reference, a worksheet (Appendix 1) of the recommended examination is included, with a summary of steps used to classify the injury (Appendix 2). A full-size version for photocopying and use in patient records has been included as an enclosure and may also be downloaded from the ASIA website (www.asia-spinalinjury.org). Additional details regarding the examination and e-Learning training materials can also be obtained from the website15.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2011

Reference for the 2011 revision of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury

Steven Kirshblum; William Waring; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Stephen P. Burns; Mark Johansen; Mary Schmidt-Read; William H. Donovan; Daniel E. Graves; Amitabh Jha; Linda Jones; M. J. Mulcahey; Andrei V. Krassioukov

Abstract The latest revision of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) was available in booklet format in June 2011, and is published in this issue of the Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. The ISNCSCI were initially developed in 1982 to provide guidelines for the consistent classification of the neurological level and extent of the injury to achieve reliable data for clinical care and research studies. This revision was generated from the Standards Committee of the American Spinal Injury Association in collaboration with the International Spinal Cord Societys Education Committee. This article details and explains the updates and serves as a reference for these revisions and clarifications.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 1998

Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: A randomized pilot study

Gerard S. Francisco; John Chae; Harmeen Chawla; Steven Kirshblum; Richard D. Zorowitz; Gerald Lewis; Schone Pang

OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of electromyogram (EMG)-triggered neuromuscular stimulation (EMG-stim) in enhancing upper extremity motor and functional recovery of acute stroke survivors. DESIGN A pilot randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. SETTING Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility. PATIENTS Nine subjects who were within 6 weeks of their first unifocal, nonhemorrhagic stroke were randomly assigned to either the EMG-stim (n = 4) or control (n = 5) group. All subjects had a detectable EMG signal (>5 microV) from the surface of the paretic extensor carpi radialis and voluntary wrist extension in synergy or in isolation with muscle grade of <3/5. INTERVENTION All subjects received two 30-minute sessions per day of wrist strengthening exercises with EMG-stim (experimental) or without (control) for the duration of their rehabilitation stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer motor assessment and the feeding, grooming, and upper body dressing items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were assessed at study entry and at discharge. RESULTS Subjects treated with EMG-stim exhibited significantly greater gains in Fugl-Meyer (27.0 vs 10.4; p = .05), and FIM (6.0 vs 3.4; p = .02) scores compared with controls. CONCLUSION Data suggest that EMG-stim enhances the arm function of acute stroke survivors.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2010

2009 Review and Revisions of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury

William Waring; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Stephen P. Burns; William H. Donovan; Daniel E. Graves; Amitabh Jha; Linda Jones; Steven Kirshblum; Ralph J. Marino; M. J. Mulcahey; Ronald K. Reeves; William M. Scelza; Mary Schmidt-Read; Adam Stein

Abstract Summary: The International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) were recently reviewed by the ASIAs Education and Standards Committees, in collaboration with the International Spinal Cord Societys Education Committee. Available educational materials for the ISNCSCI were also reviewed. The last citable reference for the ISNCSCIs methodology is the ISNCSCI Reference Manual, published in 2003 by ASIA. The Standards Committee recommended that the numerous items that were revised should be published and a precedent established for a routine published review of the ISNCSCI. The Standards Committee also noted that, although the 2008 reprint pocket booklet is current, the reference manual should be revised after proposals to modify/revise the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS as modified from Frankel) are considered. In addition, the Standards Committee adopted a process for thorough and transparent review of requests to revise the ISNCSCI.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2004

Shoulder Pain In Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Part 1: Epidemiology, Etiology, And Pathomechanics

Trevor A. Dyson-Hudson; Steven Kirshblum

Abstract Study Design: Review of the literature. Background/Objective: Shoulder pain is extremely common in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and is a source of morbidity and fundianal loss. The purpose of this review is to outline the present knowledge of the epidemiology, etiology, and pathomechanics of musculoskeletal shoulder pain inindividuals with chronic SCI. Methods: Review of the Iiterature using PubMed/ MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographies of selected articles. Results: Shoulder pain is more common in individuals with tetraplegia and complete injuries and may occur more frequently in women. Musculoskeletal conditions, primarily injuries to the rotator cuff, are most common. Risk factors include the duration of injury, older age, higher body mass index, the use of a manual wheelchair, poor seated posture, decreased flexibility, and muscle imbalances in the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizing muscles. Conclusion: With a better understanding of the epidemiology, etiology, and basic pathomechanics of shoulder pain in SCI, physicians are in a better position to evaluate, treat, and prevent these disorders.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 1998

Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Steven Kirshblum; Kevin O'Connor

OBJECTIVE Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) affects 8,000 to 10,000 individuals per year in the United States. One of the most difficult tasks confronting the clinician is the discussion of neurologic recovery and prognosis with the patient and/or family. Our objective is to provide a guide for practitioners to accurately predict neurologic outcome in acute traumatic cervical SCI (tetraplegia). DATA SOURCE Published reports obtained through MEDLINE search, texts, and studies presented at national conferences. STUDY SELECTION Peer reviewed studies, in English language, that discussed prognosis after traumatic SCI. CONCLUSION A comprehensive physical examination of the acute SCI patient is essential in determining the initial level and classification of the injury and is the most accurate method to predict neurologic recovery. Other diagnostic tests, including somatosensory evoked potentials, magnetic resonance imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation, may be helpful in further determining outcome when used in association with the clinical examination. The understanding of neurologic recovery should help predict ultimate functional capability and potential needs.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2012

International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury

Andrei V. Krassioukov; Fin Biering-Sørensen; William H. Donovan; Michael J. Kennelly; Steven Kirshblum; Klaus Krogh; Marca Sipski Alexander; Lawrence C. Vogel; Jill M. Wecht

Abstract This is the first guideline describing the International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI). This guideline should be used as an adjunct to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) including the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), which documents the neurological examination of individuals with SCI. The Autonomic Standards Assessment Form is recommended to be completed during the evaluation of individuals with SCI, but is not a part of the ISNCSCI. A web-based training course (Autonomic Standards Training E Program (ASTeP)) is available to assist clinicians with understanding autonomic dysfunctions following SCI and with completion of the Autonomic Standards Assessment Form (www.ASIAlearningcenter.com).


Spinal Cord | 2012

Autologous incubated macrophage therapy in acute, complete spinal cord injury: results of the phase 2 randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Daniel P. Lammertse; Linda Jones; S B Charlifue; Steven Kirshblum; David F. Apple; K T Ragnarsson; S P Falci; R F Heary; T F Choudhri; A L Jenkins; Randal R. Betz; D Poonian; J P Cuthbert; Amitabh Jha; D A Snyder; N Knoller

Study design:Randomized controlled trial with single-blinded primary outcome assessment.Objectives:To determine the efficacy and safety of autologous incubated macrophage treatment for improving neurological outcome in patients with acute, complete spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Six SCI treatment centers in the United States and Israel.Methods:Participants with traumatic complete SCI between C5 motor and T11 neurological levels who could receive macrophage therapy within 14 days of injury were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the treatment (autologous incubated macrophages) or control (standard of care) groups. Treatment group participants underwent macrophage injection into the caudal boundary of the SCI. The primary outcome measure was American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A–B or better at ⩾6 months. Safety was assessed by analysis of adverse events (AEs).Results:Of 43 participants (26 treatment, 17 control) having sufficient data for efficacy analysis, AIS A to B or better conversion was experienced by 7 treatment and 10 control participants; AIS A to C conversion was experienced by 2 treatment and 2 control participants. The primary outcome analysis for subjects with at least 6 months follow-up showed a trend favoring the control group that did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.053). The mean number of AEs reported per participant was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.942).Conclusion:The analysis failed to show a significant difference in primary outcome between the two groups. The study results do not support treatment of acute complete SCI with autologous incubated macrophage therapy as specified in this protocol.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 1999

Predictors of dysphagia after spinal cord injury

Steven Kirshblum; Mark V. Johnston; John Brown; Kevin O'Connor; Paul Jarosz

OBJECTIVE To quantify the incidence of swallowing deficits (dysphagia) and to identify factors that predict risk for dysphagia in the rehabilitation setting following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. SETTING Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS Data were collected on 187 patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury admitted for rehabilitation over a 4-year period who underwent a swallowing screen, in which 42 underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES VFSS was performed on patients with suspected swallowing problems. Possible antecedents of dysphagia were recorded from the medical record including previous history of spine surgery, surgical approach and technique, tracheostomy and ventilator status, neurologic level of injury, ASIA Impairment Classification, orthosis, etiology of injury, age, and gender. RESULTS On admission to rehabilitation 22.5% (n = 42) of spinal cord injury patients had symptoms suggesting dysphagia. In 73.8% (n = 31) of these cases, testing confirmed dysphagia (aspiration or requiring a modified diet), while VFSS ruled out dysphagia in 26.2% (n = 11) cases. Logistic regression and other analyses revealed three significant predictors of risk for dysphagia: age (p < .028), tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation (p < .001), and spinal surgery via an anterior cervical approach (p < .016). Other variables analyzed had no relation or at best a slight relation to dysphagia. Tracheostomy at admission was the strongest predictor of dysphagia. The combination of tracheostomy at rehabilitation admission and anterior surgical approach had an extremely high rate of dysphagia (48%). CONCLUSION Swallowing abnormalities are present in a significant percentage of patients presenting to rehabilitation with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Patients with a tracheostomy appear to have a substantially increased risk of development of dysphagia, although other factors are also relevant. Risk of dysphagia should be evaluated to decrease the potential for morbidity related to swallowing abnormalities.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2004

Evaluation of cranberry supplement for reduction of urinary tract infections in individuals with neurogenic bladders secondary to spinal cord injury. A prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Todd A. Linsenmeyer; Barbara H. Harrison; Anne Oakley; Steven Kirshblum; Jeffrey A. Stock; Scott R. Millis

Abstract Objective: To determine the effectiveness of cranberry supplement at preventing urinary tract infections (UTis) in persans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: A prospective, double–blinded, placebo–controlled, crossover study. Participants: 21 individuals with neuragenie bladders secondary to SCI. Main Outcome Measures: Favorable or unfavorable response of cranberry supplement vs placebo on urinary bacterial counts and white blood cell (WBC) counts and the combination of bacterial and WBC counts. Methods: lndividuals with neuragenie bladders due to SCI were recruited and randomly assigned to standardized 400–mg cranberry tablets or placebo 3 times a day for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks and an additional 1–week “washout period,” participants were crossed over to the other group. Participants were seen weekly, during which a urine analysis was obtained. UTI was defined as significant bacterial or yeast colony counts in the urine and elevated WBC counts (WBC count 2: 1 0 perhigh power field) in centrifuged urine. Participa nts with symptomatic infections were treated with appropriate antibiotics for 7 days and restarted on the cranberry tablet/ placebo after a 7–day washaut period. Urinary pH between the cranberry and placebo groups was compared weekly. Data were analyzed using the Ezzet and Whitehead’s random effect approach. Results: There was no statistically significant treatment (favorable) effect for cranberry supplement beyond placebo when evaluating the 2 treatment groups for bacterial count, WBC count, or WBC and bacterial counts in combination. Urinary pH did not differ between the placebo and cranberry groups. Conclusion: Cranberry tablets were not found to be effective at changing urinary pH or reducing bacterial counts, urinary WBC counts, or UTis in individuals with neuragenie bladders. Further Long–term studies evaluating specific types of bladder management and UTis will help to determine whether there is any role for the use of cranberries in individuals with neuragenie bladders.

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven Kirshblum's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher M. Cirnigliaro

Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William A. Bauman

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann M. Spungen

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joel A. DeLisa

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William O. McKinley

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sudesh Sheela Jain

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suzanne L. Groah

Santa Clara Valley Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge