Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven L. Markstrom is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven L. Markstrom.


Water Air and Soil Pollution | 1996

The modular modeling system (MMS) : The physical process modeling component of a database-centered decision support system for water and power management

George H. Leavesley; Steven L. Markstrom; M. S. Brewer; Roland J. Viger

The Modular Modeling System (MMS) is an integrated system of computer software that is being developed to provide the research and operational framework needed to support development, testing, and evaluation of physical-process algorithms, and to facilitate integration of user-selected sets of algorithms into operational physical-process models. MMS uses a module library that contains compatible modules for simulating a variety of water, energy, and biogeochemical processes. A model is created by selectively linking modules from the library using MMS model-building tools. A geographic information system (GIS) interface also is being developed for MMS to support a variety of GIS tools for use in characterizing and parameterizing topographic, hydrologic, and ecosystem features, visualizing spatially and temporally distributed model parameters and variables, and analyzing and validating model results. MMS is being coupled with the Power Reservoir System Model (PRSYM) to provide a database-centered decision support system for making complex operational decisions on multipurpose reservoir systems and watersheds. The U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Reclamation are working collaboratively on a project titled the Watershed Modeling Systems Initiative to develop and apply the coupled MMS — PRSYM models to the San Juan River basin in Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah.


Earth Interactions | 2011

Watershed-Scale Response to Climate Change through the Twenty-First Century for Selected Basins across the United States

Lauren E. Hay; Steven L. Markstrom; Christian Ward-Garrison

AbstractThe hydrologic response of different climate-change emission scenarios for the twenty-first century were evaluated in 14 basins from different hydroclimatic regions across the United States using the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS), a process-based, distributed-parameter watershed model. This study involves four major steps: 1) setup and calibration of the PRMS model in 14 basins across the United States by local U.S. Geological Survey personnel; 2) statistical downscaling of the World Climate Research Programme’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 climate-change emission scenarios to create PRMS input files that reflect these emission scenarios; 3) run PRMS for the climate-change emission scenarios for the 14 basins; and 4) evaluation of the PRMS output.This paper presents an overview of this project, details of the methodology, results from the 14 basin simulations, and interpretation of these results. A key finding is that the hydrological response of the different geogra...


Earth Interactions | 2011

Hydrologic Effects of Urbanization and Climate Change on the Flint River Basin, Georgia

Roland J. Viger; Lauren E. Hay; Steven L. Markstrom; John W. Jones; Gary R. Buell

AbstractThe potential effects of long-term urbanization and climate change on the freshwater resources of the Flint River basin were examined by using the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS). PRMS is a deterministic, distributed-parameter watershed model developed to evaluate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, temperature, and land cover on streamflow and multiple intermediate hydrologic states. Precipitation and temperature output from five general circulation models (GCMs) using one current and three future climate-change scenarios were statistically downscaled for input into PRMS. Projections of urbanization through 2050 derived for the Flint River basin by the Forecasting Scenarios of Future Land-Cover (FORE-SCE) land-cover change model were also used as input to PRMS. Comparison of the central tendency of streamflow simulated based on the three climate-change scenarios showed a slight decrease in overall streamflow relative to simulations under current conditions, mostly ca...


Water Resources Research | 2015

Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic modeling

Stacey A. Archfield; Martyn P. Clark; Berit Arheimer; Lauren E. Hay; Hilary McMillan; Julie E. Kiang; Jan Seibert; Kirsti Hakala; Andrew R. Bock; Thorsten Wagener; William H. Farmer; Vazken Andréassian; Sabine Attinger; Alberto Viglione; Rodney R. Knight; Steven L. Markstrom; Thomas M. Over

In the past, hydrologic modeling of surface water resources has mainly focused on simulating the hydrologic cycle at local to regional catchment modeling domains. There now exists a level of maturity among the catchment, global water security, and land surface modeling communities such that these communities are converging toward continental domain hydrologic models. This commentary, written from a catchment hydrology community perspective, provides a review of progress in each community toward this achievement, identifies common challenges the communities face, and details immediate and specific areas in which these communities can mutually benefit one another from the convergence of their research perspectives. Those include: (1) creating new incentives and infrastructure to report and share model inputs, outputs, and parameters in data services and open access, machine-independent formats for model replication or reanalysis; (2) ensuring that hydrologic models have: sufficient complexity to represent the dominant physical processes and adequate representation of anthropogenic impacts on the terrestrial water cycle, a process-based approach to model parameter estimation, and appropriate parameterizations to represent large-scale fluxes and scaling behavior; (3) maintaining a balance between model complexity and data availability as well as uncertainties; and (4) quantifying and communicating significant advancements toward these modeling goals.


Journal of The American Water Resources Association | 2015

Effects of Climate and Land Cover on Hydrology in the Southeastern U.S.: Potential Impacts on Watershed Planning

Jacob H. LaFontaine; Lauren E. Hay; Roland J. Viger; R. Steve Regan; Steven L. Markstrom

The hydrologic response to statistically downscaled general circulation model simulations of daily surface climate and land cover through 2099 was assessed for the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin located in the southeastern United States. Projections of climate, urbanization, vegetation, and surface-depression storage capacity were used as inputs to the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System to simulate projected impacts on hydrologic response. Surface runoff substantially increased when land cover change was applied. However, once the surface depression storage was added to mitigate the land cover change and increases of surface runoff (due to urbanization), the groundwater flow component then increased. For hydrologic studies that include projections of land cover change (urbanization in particular), any analysis of runoff beyond the change in total runoff should include effects of stormwater management practices as these features affect flow timing and magnitude and may be useful in mitigating land cover change impacts on streamflow. Potential changes in water availability and how biota may respond to changes in flow regime in response to climate and land cover change may prove challenging for managers attempting to balance the needs of future development and the environment. However, these models are still useful for assessing the relative impacts of climate and land cover change and for evaluating tradeoffs when managing to mitigate different stressors.


Earth Interactions | 2011

Impacts of Climate Change on the Growing Season in the United States

Daniel E. Christiansen; Steven L. Markstrom; Lauren E. Hay

AbstractUnderstanding the effects of climate change on the vegetative growing season is key to quantifying future hydrologic water budget conditions. The U.S. Geological Survey modeled changes in future growing season length at 14 basins across 11 states. Simulations for each basin were generated using five general circulation models with three emission scenarios as inputs to the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS). PRMS is a deterministic, distributed-parameter, watershed model developed to simulate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, climate, and land use on watershed response. PRMS was modified to include a growing season calculation in this study. The growing season was examined for trends in the total length (annual), as well as changes in the timing of onset (spring) and the end (fall) of the growing season. The results showed an increase in the annual growing season length in all 14 basins, averaging 27–47 days for the three emission scenarios. The change in the spring and...


Earth Interactions | 2011

Characterizing Climate-Change Impacts on the 1.5-yr Flood Flow in Selected Basins across the United States: A Probabilistic Approach

John F. Walker; Lauren E. Hay; Steven L. Markstrom; Michael D. Dettinger

AbstractThe U.S. Geological Survey Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) model was applied to basins in 14 different hydroclimatic regions to determine the sensitivity and variability of the freshwater resources of the United States in the face of current climate-change projections. Rather than attempting to choose a most likely scenario from the results of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an ensemble of climate simulations from five models under three emissions scenarios each was used to drive the basin models.Climate-change scenarios were generated for PRMS by modifying historical precipitation and temperature inputs; mean monthly climate change was derived by calculating changes in mean climates from current to various future decades in the ensemble of climate projections. Empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) were fitted to the PRMS model output driven by the ensemble of climate projections and provided a basis for randomly (but representatively) generating realizations of hydrolog...


Earth Interactions | 2014

Evaluation of Statistically Downscaled GCM Output as Input for Hydrological and Stream Temperature Simulation in the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin (1961–99)

Lauren E. Hay; Jacob H. LaFontaine; Steven L. Markstrom

AbstractThe accuracy of statistically downscaled general circulation model (GCM) simulations of daily surface climate for historical conditions (1961–99) and the implications when they are used to drive hydrologic and stream temperature models were assessed for the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River basin (ACFB). The ACFB is a 50 000 km2 basin located in the southeastern United States. Three GCMs were statistically downscaled, using an asynchronous regional regression model (ARRM), to ⅛° grids of daily precipitation and minimum and maximum air temperature. These ARRM-based climate datasets were used as input to the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS), a deterministic, distributed-parameter, physical-process watershed model used to simulate and evaluate the effects of various combinations of climate and land use on watershed response. The ACFB was divided into 258 hydrologic response units (HRUs) in which the components of flow (groundwater, subsurface, and surface) are computed in response to ...


Earth Interactions | 2011

Effects of Baseline Conditions on the Simulated Hydrologic Response to Projected Climate Change

Kathryn M. Koczot; Steven L. Markstrom; Lauren E. Hay

AbstractChanges in temperature and precipitation projected from five general circulation models, using one late-twentieth-century and three twenty-first-century emission scenarios, were downscaled to three different baseline conditions. Baseline conditions are periods of measured temperature and precipitation data selected to represent twentieth-century climate. The hydrologic effects of the climate projections are evaluated using the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS), which is a watershed hydrology simulation model. The Almanor Catchment in the North Fork of the Feather River basin, California, is used as a case study.Differences and similarities between PRMS simulations of hydrologic components (i.e., snowpack formation and melt, evapotranspiration, and streamflow) are examined, and results indicate that the selection of a specific time period used for baseline conditions has a substantial effect on some, but not all, hydrologic variables. This effect seems to be amplified in hydrologic variab...


Computers & Geosciences | 2002

Web-based distribution of geo-scientific models

Steven L. Markstrom; Gregory J. McCabe; Olaf David

Scientific model developers have learned that the time required for the science and research phases of software development is relatively short when compared with the time needed to develop GUIs, writing documentation, developing support programs (e.g. pre-processors, visualization tools, and reports), debugging source code, and modifying the software for various computer operating systems. Another component of model development that requires a great deal of time and effort is the distribution and maintenance of model software. Consider the example of the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) Modular Modeling System (MMS). MMS allows a user to build a hydrologic model by selecting a set of modules that simulate a number of hydrologic processes. MMS is currently being used on various computer systems (e.g. Windows, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, and AIX). Because each of these operating systems is slightly different, several versions of the software have been developed and maintained. When updates occur, they need to be added and tested for each version of the model. This process is time consuming. MMS is distributed via the internet from a web page. Users download MMS from the web page and then go through the task of installing the model on their system and then running it. Because so many different computer systems are used, the developers spend a considerable amount of time dealing with software bugs and trying to update various versions of the software. Each time the software is loaded onto a new system there are new problems to deal with, none of which have to do with the physics of the model; all are related to differences in computer operating systems. These problems are time consuming and take scientists away from further development of the physics included in the models. To overcome these problems, a method is needed whereby model developers can distribute an executable version of a model that will operate on all computer systems. The advent of the Internet and Java programming language makes this type of model distribution possible. This method of model distribution allows the delivery of (1) executable programs; (2) model documentation and (3) a robust GUI for model operation, all in a single Java archive file. Additionally, there is the issue of security related to the distribution of a model from the internet. For a model to be useful to a user, the user must be able to both input their own data files to a model and write output to his/her own computer. Sitraka Software (2001) proposes several guidelines for choosing an effective deployment strategy. Based on the anticipated end user and the nature of the application, Java Web Start (JWS) provides a way to address the security issues. JWS is a platform independent way to launch a wide variety of Java applications from a computer desktop or a web browser. The following sections describe the procedures necessary to implement and distribute a model with this method.

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven L. Markstrom's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roland J. Viger

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George H. Leavesley

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John F. Walker

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Steve Regan

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew R. Bock

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory J. McCabe

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacob H. LaFontaine

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Steven Regan

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathryn M. Koczot

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge