Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven L. Solomon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven L. Solomon.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2005

Methicillin-resistant–Staphylococcus aureus Hospitalizations, United States

Matthew J. Kuehnert; Holly A. Hill; Benjamin A. Kupronis; Jerome I. Tokars; Steven L. Solomon; Daniel B. Jernigan

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasingly a cause of nosocomial and community-onset infection with unknown national scope and magnitude. We used the National Hospital Discharge Survey to calculate the number of US hospital discharges listing S. aureus–specific diagnoses, defined as those having at least 1 International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code specific for S. aureus infection. The number of hospital discharges listing S. aureus-specific diagnoses was multiplied by the proportion of methicillin resistance for each corresponding infection site to determine the number of MRSA infections. From 1999 to 2000, an estimated 125,969 hospitalizations with a diagnosis of MRSA infection occurred annually, including 31,440 for septicemia, 29,823 for pneumonia, and 64,706 for other infections, accounting for 3.95 per 1,000 hospital discharges. The method used in our analysis may provide a simple way to assess trends of the magnitude of MRSA infection nationally.


American Journal of Infection Control | 1998

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in hospitals: A Consensus Panel report

William E. Scheckler; Dennis Brimhall; Alfred S. Buck; Barry M. Farr; Candace Friedman; Richard A. Garibaldi; Peter A. Gross; Jo-Ann Harris; Walter J. Hierholzer; William J. Martone; Linda McDonald; Steven L. Solomon

The scientific basis for claims of efficacy of nosocomial infection surveillance and control programs was established by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control project. Subsequent analyses have demonstrated nosocomial infection prevention and control programs to be not only clinically effective but also cost-effective. Although governmental and professional organizations have developed a wide variety of useful recommendations and guidelines for infection control, and apart from general guidance provided by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, there are surprisingly few recommendations on infrastructure and essential activities for infection control and epidemiology programs. In April 1996, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in hospitals. The following report represents the consensus panels best assessment of needs for a healthy and effective hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into eight categories: managing critical data and information; setting and recommending policies and procedures; compliance with regulations, guidelines, and accreditation requirements; employee health; direct intervention to prevent transmission of infectious diseases; education and training of healthcare workers; personnel resources; and nonpersonnel resources. The consensus panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2006

A multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections.

David K. Warren; Sara E. Cosgrove; Daniel J. Diekema; Gianna Zuccotti; Michael W. Climo; Maureen K. Bolon; Jerome I. Tokars; Gary A. Noskin; Edward S. Wong; Kent A. Sepkowitz; Loreen A. Herwaldt; Trish M. Perl; Steven L. Solomon; Victoria J. Fraser

BACKGROUND Education-based interventions can reduce the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. The generalizability of findings from single-center studies is limited. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections. DESIGN An observational study with a planned intervention. SETTING Twelve intensive care units and 1 bone marrow transplantation unit at 6 academic medical centers. PATIENTS Patients admitted during the study period. INTERVENTION Updates of written policies, distribution of a 9-page self-study module with accompanying pretest and posttest, didactic lectures, and incorporation into practice of evidence-based guidelines regarding central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and care. MEASUREMENTS Standard data collection tools and definitions were used to measure the process of care (ie, the proportion of nontunneled catheters inserted into the femoral vein and the condition of the CVC insertion site dressing for both tunneled and nontunneled catheters) and the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. RESULTS Between the preintervention period and the postintervention period, the percentage of CVCs inserted into the femoral vein decreased from 12.9% to 9.4% (relative ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.88); the total proportion of catheter insertion site dressings properly dated increased from 26.6% to 34.4% (relative ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42), and the overall rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections decreased from 11.2 to 8.9 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (relative rate, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93). The effect of the intervention varied among individual units. CONCLUSIONS An education-based intervention that uses evidence-based practices can be successfully implemented in a diverse group of medical and surgical units and reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2003

The Use of Economic Modeling to Determine the Hospital Costs Associated with Nosocomial Infections

Rebecca R. Roberts; R. Douglas Scott; Ralph L. Cordell; Steven L. Solomon; Lynn Steele; Linda M. Kampe; William E. Trick; Robert A. Weinstein

Hospital-associated infection is well recognized as a patient safety concern requiring preventive interventions. However, hospitals are closely monitoring expenditures and need accurate estimates of potential cost savings from such prevention programs. We used a retrospective cohort design and economic modeling to determine the excess cost from the hospital perspective for hospital-associated infection in a random sample of adult medical patients. Study patients were classified as being not infected (n=139), having suspected infection (n=8), or having confirmed infection (n=17). Severity of illness and intensive unit care use were both independently associated with increased cost. After controlling for these confounding effects, we found an excess cost of


Medical Care | 2010

Costs attributable to healthcare-acquired infection in hospitalized adults and a comparison of economic methods.

Rebecca R. Roberts; R. Douglas Scott; Bala Hota; Linda M. Kampe; Fauzia Abbasi; Shari Schabowski; Ibrar Ahmad; Ginevra G. Ciavarella; Ralph L. Cordell; Steven L. Solomon; Reidar Hagtvedt; Robert A. Weinstein

6767 for suspected infection and


The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement | 1996

Improving Hospital-Acquired Infection Rates: The CDC Experience

Robert P. Gaynes; Steven L. Solomon

15,275 for confirmed hospital-acquired infection. The economic model explained 56% of the total variability in cost among patients. Hospitals can use these data when evaluating potential cost savings from effective infection-control measures.


Pediatric Infectious Disease | 1986

Nosocomial fungemia in neonates associated with intravascular pressure-monitoring devices

Steven L. Solomon; Holly Alexander; John W. Eley; Roger L. Anderson; Hewitt C. Goodpasture; Sharon Smart; Rita M. Furman; William J. Martone

Background:Hospitals will increasingly bear the costs for healthcare-acquired conditions such as infection. Our goals were to estimate the costs attributable to healthcare-acquired infection (HAI) and conduct a sensitivity analysis comparing analytic methods. Methods:A random sample of high-risk adults hospitalized in the year 2000 was selected. Measurements included total and variable medical costs, length of stay (LOS), HAI site, APACHE III score, antimicrobial resistance, and mortality. Medical costs were measured from the hospital perspective. Analytic methods included ordinary least squares linear regression and median quantile regression, Winsorizing, propensity score case matching, attributable LOS multiplied by mean daily cost, semi-log transformation, and generalized linear modeling. Three-state proportional hazards modeling was also used for LOS estimation. Attributable mortality was estimated using logistic regression. Results:Among 1253 patients, 159 (12.7%) developed HAI. Using different methods, attributable total costs ranged between


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 1998

Requirements for Infrastructure and Essential Activities of Infection Control and Epidemiology in Hospitals: A Consensus Panel Report

William E. Scheckler; Dennis Brimhall; Alfred S. Buck; Barry M. Farr; Candace Friedman; Richard A. Garibaldi; Peter A. Gross; Jo-Ann Harris; Walter J. Hierholzer; William J. Martone; Linda McDonald; Steven L. Solomon

9310 to


American Journal of Infection Control | 1999

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in out-of-hospital settings: A Consensus Panel report

Candace Friedman; Marcie Barnette; Alfred S. Buck; Rosemary Ham; Jo-Ann Harris; Peggy Hoffman; Debra Johnson; Farrin A. Manian; Lindsay E. Nicolle; Michele L. Pearson; Trish M. Perl; Steven L. Solomon

21,013, variable costs were


Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal | 1996

Risk of infection with hepatitis A, B or C, cytomegalovirus, varicella or measles among child care providers

Lisa A. Jackson; Laurie K. Stewart; Steven L. Solomon; Janice Boase; E. Russell Alexander; Janet L. Heath; Geraldine K. Mcquillan; Patrick J. Coleman; John A. Stewart; Craig N. Shapiro

1581 to

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven L. Solomon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William E. Trick

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William J. Martone

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bess Miller

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward S. Wong

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Douglas Scott

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ralph L. Cordell

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Weinstein

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert P. Gaynes

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge