Steven P. Newman
Newcastle University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steven P. Newman.
Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2005
Michael James Barker; Samuel H. Gruber; Steven P. Newman; Vera Schluessel
SynopsisWe compared growth rates of the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, from Bimini, Bahamas and the Marquesas Keys (MK), Florida using data obtained in a multi-year annual census. We marked new neonate and juvenile sharks with unique electronic identity tags in Bimini and in the MK we tagged neonate and juvenile sharks. Sharks were tagged with tiny, subcutaneous transponders, a type of tagging thought to cause little, if any disruption to normal growth patterns when compared to conventional external tagging. Within the first 2 years of this project, no age data were recorded for sharks caught for the first time in Bimini. Therefore, we applied and tested two methods of age analysis: (1) a modified ‘minimum convex polygon’ method and (2) a new age-assigning method, the ‘cut-off technique’. The cut-off technique proved to be the more suitable one, enabling us to identify the age of 134 of the 642 previously unknown aged sharks. This maximised the usable growth data included in our analysis. Annual absolute growth rates of juvenile, nursery-bound lemon sharks were almost constant for the two Bimini nurseries and can be best described by a simple linear model (growth data was only available for age-0 sharks in the MK). Annual absolute growth for age-0 sharks was much greater in the MK than in either the North Sound (NS) and Shark Land (SL) at Bimini. Growth of SL sharks was significantly faster during the first 2 years of life than of the sharks in the NS population. However, in MK, only growth in the first year was considered to be reliably estimated due to low recapture rates. Analyses indicated no significant differences in growth rates between males and females for any area.
Journal of Animal Ecology | 2015
Steven P. Newman; Erik H. Meesters; Charlie S. Dryden; Stacey M. Williams; Cristina Sanchez; Peter J. Mumby; Nicholas Polunin
There has been ongoing flattening of Caribbean coral reefs with the loss of habitat having severe implications for these systems. Complexity and its structural components are important to fish species richness and community composition, but little is known about its role for other taxa or species-specific responses. This study reveals the importance of reef habitat complexity and structural components to different taxa of macrofauna, total species richness, and individual coral and fish species in the Caribbean. Species presence and richness of different taxa were visually quantified in one hundred 25-m(2) plots in three marine reserves in the Caribbean. Sampling was evenly distributed across five levels of visually estimated reef complexity, with five structural components also recorded: the number of corals, number of large corals, slope angle, maximum sponge and maximum octocoral height. Taking advantage of natural heterogeneity in structural complexity within a particular coral reef habitat (Orbicella reefs) and discrete environmental envelope, thus minimizing other sources of variability, the relative importance of reef complexity and structural components was quantified for different taxa and individual fish and coral species on Caribbean coral reefs using boosted regression trees (BRTs). Boosted regression tree models performed very well when explaining variability in total (82·3%), coral (80·6%) and fish species richness (77·3%), for which the greatest declines in richness occurred below intermediate reef complexity levels. Complexity accounted for very little of the variability in octocorals, sponges, arthropods, annelids or anemones. BRTs revealed species-specific variability and importance for reef complexity and structural components. Coral and fish species occupancy generally declined at low complexity levels, with the exception of two coral species (Pseudodiploria strigosa and Porites divaricata) and four fish species (Halichoeres bivittatus, H. maculipinna, Malacoctenus triangulatus and Stegastes partitus) more common at lower reef complexity levels. A significant interaction between country and reef complexity revealed a non-additive decline in species richness in areas of low complexity and the reserve in Puerto Rico. Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs will result in substantial species losses, with few winners. Individual structural components have considerable value to different species, and their loss may have profound impacts on population responses of coral and fish due to identity effects of key species, which underpin population richness and resilience and may affect essential ecosystem processes and services.
Chelonian Conservation and Biology | 2009
Peter B. Richardson; Michael William Bruford; Marta C. Calosso; Lisa M. Campbell; Wesley V. Clerveaux; Angela Formia; Brendan J. Godley; Aaron C. Henderson; Kate McClellan; Steven P. Newman; Kristene T. Parsons; Martin Pepper; Susan Ranger; Jennifer J. Silver; Lorna Slade; Annette C. Broderick
Abstract This study reviews the status of marine turtles in the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) using data gathered during a multidisciplinary study involving field surveys, questionnaire-based interviews, and molecular genetics between 2002 and 2006. Large aggregations of foraging turtles in the archipelagos waters are dominated by juvenile green (Chelonia mydas) and hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata), with provisional mixed-stock analysis of these species suggesting that the aggregations originate predominantly from larger and relatively proximate source rookeries in the Wider Caribbean region. This study also suggests that the islands host remnant nesting populations of turtles, with hawksbill turtle nests recorded more frequently than green and loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) nests. The TCI islanders retain a culture of turtle use, with the current regulated and legitimate harvest likely to be one of the largest among the Caribbean Islands. This study suggests that historic and current harvest of turtles and their eggs in the TCI may have contributed to the apparent decline in the countrys nesting populations. In order to address this conservation concern, changes to the regulation and management of the TCIs turtle fishery are necessary, but further research is needed to inform these changes.
Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2012
Steven P. Newman; Richard D. Handy; Samuel H. Gruber
Ontogenetic variations in shark diet are often qualitatively inferred from dietary analysis and hindered by high levels of unidentified prey or small sample sizes. This study focused on nursery bound lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris, n = 396), enabling some control over the confounding variables of prey choice associated with ontogeny. Nursery bound lemon sharks exhibited weak ontogenetic variation in dietary composition with high levels of dietary overlap. Variation in prey preference of lemon sharks with ontogeny was complex, but revealed a continuous shift from predominantly opportunistic benthic foraging as neonates to more selective piscivory with increasing shark size while in the nursery. Lemon sharks demonstrated a discrete ontogenetic shift in the number of prey consumed and stomach content weight (Kruskal-Wallis tests p < 0.01), as well as prey size (ANOVA, p < 0.001). All sizes of sharks exhibited positive size selection of prey (Mann–Whitney U tests, p < 0.01). However, the lack of size preference by all but the largest lemon sharks for their major prey (yellowfin mojarra, Gerres cinereus), suggests neonate sharks, while capable of occasionally foraging on large prey, are relatively inept opportunistic foragers. This was evident in high diet breadth, low diversity of consumed prey and lower trophic level than larger sharks. This study represents the first quantitative analysis of ontogenetic variation in prey preference and size selection in sharks, indicating a flexible foraging tactic in lemon sharks and the importance of hunting ability and predator size in prey choice.
Nature | 2015
M. Aaron MacNeil; Nicholas A. J. Graham; Joshua E. Cinner; Shaun K. Wilson; Ivor D. Williams; Joseph Maina; Steven P. Newman; Alan M. Friedlander; Stacy D. Jupiter; Nicholas Polunin; Tim R. McClanahan
Marine Ecology Progress Series | 2010
Steven P. Newman; Richard D. Handy; Samuel H. Gruber
Bulletin of Marine Science | 2007
Steven P. Newman; Richard D. Handy; Samuel H. Gruber
Journal of Fish Biology | 2004
Steven P. Newman; Samuel H. Gruber; Richard D. Handy
Marine Ecology | 2017
Stacey M. Williams; Cristina Sánchez-Godínez; Steven P. Newman; Jorge Cortés
Archive | 2014
Peter J. Mumby; J. Flower; Iliana Chollett; S.J. Box; Y.M. Bozec; Clare Fitzsimmons; Johanna Forster; David Gill; R. Griffith-Mumby; H.A. Oxenford; Angelie Peterson; Selina M. Stead; Rachel A. Turner; P. Townsley; P.J.H. van Beukering; F. Booker; Hannah J. Brocke; N. Cabañillas-Terán; S.W.J. Canty; Juan P. Carricart-Ganivet; J. Charlery; Charlie S. Dryden; Fc van Duyl; S. Enríquez; J. den Haan; Roberto Iglesias-Prieto; Emma V. Kennedy; Robin Mahon; Benjamin Mueller; Steven P. Newman