Steven Patton Knabe
Halliburton
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steven Patton Knabe.
SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition | 2013
Marko Maucec; A. P. Singh; Gustavo Carvajal; S. Mirzadeh; Steven Patton Knabe; R. Chambers; G. Shi; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; I. H. Hossam El Din; H. Nasr
Traditional reconciliation of geomodels with production data is one of the most laborious tasks in reservoir engineering. The uncertainty associated with the great majority of model variables only adds to the overall complexity. This paper introduces an engineering workflow for probabilistic assisted history matching that captures inherent model uncertainty and allows for better quantification of production forecasts. The workflow is applied to history matching of the pilot area in a major, structurally complex Middle East (ME) carbonate reservoir. The simulation model combines 49 wells in five waterflood patterns to match 50 years of oil production and 12 years of water injection and to predict eight years of production. Initially, the reservoir model was calibrated to match oil production by modifying permeability and/or porosity at well locations and by fine-tuning rock-type properties and water saturation. The second level history match implemented two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) stochastic optimization to minimize the misfit in water cut on a well-by-well basis. While relative to evolutionary algorithms or the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), the McMC methods provide a statistically rigorous alternative for sampling posterior distribution; when deployed in direct simulation, they impose a high computational cost. The approach presented here accelerates the process by parameterizing the permeability using discrete cosine transform (DCT), constraining the proxy model using streamline-based sensitivities and utilizing parallel and cluster computing. While probabilistic assisted history matching (AHM) successfully reduced the misfit for most producing wells, the computational convergence was sensitive to the level of preserved geological detail. The optimal number of representative history-matched models was identified to capture the uncertainty in reservoir spatial connectivity using rigorous optimization and dynamic model ranking based on forecasted oil recovery factors (ORFs). The reduced set of models minimized the computational load for forecast-based analysis, while retaining the knowledge of the uncertainty in the recovery factor. The comprehensive probabilistic AHM workflow was implemented at the operator’s North Kuwait Integrated Digital Oilfield (KwIDF) collaboration center. It delivers an optimized reservoir model for waterflood management and automatically updates the model quarterly with geological, production, and completion information. This allows engineers to improve the reservoir characterization and identify the areas that require more data capture. Introduction As part of a comprehensive strategy to transform the Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) through the application of digital oilfield (DOF) concepts, KOC initiated an assessment of the major Sabriyah-Mauddud (SaMa) reservoir for conversion to an integrated digital oilfield (iDOF) master platform, with the goal of increasing effectiveness through automating work processes and shortening observation-to-action cycle time. The group of nine first-generation production engineering workflows focuses on production and operational activities and was launched at KwIDF in 2012. The workflows are introduced in Al-Abbasi et al. (2013) and described in greater detail in Al-Jasmi et al. (2013) and references therein. With the vision to drive future KOC operations to the next level of excellence and to realize a large return on the investment in iDOF, the operator’s senior management endorsed the development of a family of advanced integrated asset management (IAM) workflows, referred to as “smartflows,” to optimize and integrate the subsurface models with well models and network surface systems in various time horizons.
SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference | 2013
Marko Maucec; Ajay Pratap Singh; Gustavo Carvajal; S. Mirzadeh; Steven Patton Knabe; Aneesh Mahajan; Joydeep Dhar; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; Ibrahim Hossam El Din
Traditional reconciliation of geomodels with production data is one of the most laborious tasks in reservoir engineering. The uncertainty associated with the great majority of model variables only adds to the overall complexity. This paper describes the conceptualization, implementation, and visualization characteristics of the multilevel assisted history matching (AHM) technique that captures inherent model uncertainty and allows for better quantification of production forecasts. The workflow is applied to history matching of the pilot area in a major, structurally complex Middle East (ME) carbonate reservoir. The simulation model combines 49 wells in five waterflood patterns to match 50 years of oil production and 12 years of water injection and to predict eight years of production. Initially, the reservoir model was calibrated to match oil production by modifying permeability and/or porosity at well locations and by fine-tuning rock-type properties and water saturation. The second level history match implemented two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) stochastic optimization to minimize the misfit in water cut on a well-by-well basis. The inversion process is dramatically accelerated by the efficient parameterization of permeability, constraining the proxy model using streamline-based sensitivities and using parallel and cluster computing. The optimal number of representative history-matched models was identified to capture the uncertainty in reservoir spatial connectivity using rigorous optimization and dynamic model ranking based on forecasted oil recovery factors (ORFs). The reduced set of models minimized the computational load for forecast-based analysis, while retaining the knowledge of the uncertainty in the recovery factor. The comprehensive probabilistic AHM workflow was implemented at the operator’s North Kuwait Integrated Digital Oilfield (KwIDF) collaboration center. It delivers an optimized reservoir model for waterflood management and automatically updates the model quarterly with geological, production, and completion information. This allows engineers to improve the reservoir characterization and identify the areas that require more data capture. Introduction With the vision to transform the Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) through the application of integrated digital oilfield (iDOF) concepts and drive the future KOC operations to the next level of excellence, the operator’s senior management endorsed the development of a family of advanced integrated asset management (IAM) workflows, referred to as “smart flows,” to optimize and integrate the subsurface models of the major Sabriyah-Mauddud (SaMa) reservoir with well models and network surface systems in various time horizons. The objective is to increase the effectiveness through automating work processes and shortening observation-to-action cycle time. The group of nine first-generation production engineering workflows focuses on production and operational activities and was launched at KwIDF in 2012. The workflows are introduced in Al-Abbasi et al. (2013) and described in greater detail in Al-Jasmi et al. (2013) and references therein. The second generation of smart flows combines subsurface waterflooding optimization (SWFO) (Khan et al. 2013), integrated production optimization (IPO), and simulation model update and ranking (SMUR). The preceding publication, Maucec et al. (2013), briefly discusses the outstanding challenges of the model reconciliation and history matching and reviews the recent approaches the oil industry is taking to quantify the uncertainty and increase the accuracy of reservoir models. Moreover, in Maucec et al. (2013), the engineering concepts of SMUR smart flow are described in detail, combining the processes of building the high-resolution geocellular model and the associated reservoir simulation model, leading into a history-matching case study of the SaMa field. The design of the SMUR smart flow is leveraged with the technology for
Archive | 2014
Marko Maucec; Ajay Pratap Singh; Gustavo Carvajal; S. Mirzadeh; Steven Patton Knabe; Richard Chambers; Genbao Shi; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; Harish Kumar Goel; Hossam El-Din
We present a probabilistic, computer-assisted history-matching method that captures inherent model uncertainty, enhances the predictive value of reconciled models, and renders more accurate production forecasts that help reservoir characterization and ultimately improve oil recovery factor. The workflow interfaces between the geo-modeling application and reservoir simulator, preserves the geological detail by updating high-resolution models and identifies models with highest potential in oil-recovery. We successfully apply this automated workflow to history matching 50 years of oil production, 12 years of water injection and 8 years of forecasting in the pilot area in major, structurally complex Middle East carbonate reservoir.
information processing and trusted computing | 2014
A. P. Singh; Marko Maucec; Gustavo Carvajal; S. Mirzadeh; Steven Patton Knabe; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; I. H. Hossam El Din
Archive | 2016
Gustavo Carvajal; Michael Konopczynski; Alejandro Chacon; Steven Patton Knabe
information processing and trusted computing | 2014
S. Mirzadeh; R. Chambers; Gustavo Carvajal; A. P. Singh; Marko Maucec; Steven Patton Knabe; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; I. H. Hossam El Din
Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference | 2014
Ajay Pratap Singh; Marko Maucec; Steven Patton Knabe
SPE Intelligent Energy Conference & Exhibition | 2014
Gustavo Carvajal; I. Boisvert; Steven Patton Knabe
SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition | 2013
Hasnain Khan; Luigi Saputelli; Gustavo Carvajal; Priyesh Ranjan; Feng Wang; Steven Patton Knabe
information processing and trusted computing | 2014
Gustavo Carvajal; Marko Maucec; A. P. Singh; Aneesh Mahajan; Joydeep Dhar; Miguel Villamizar; S. Mirzadeh; Steven Patton Knabe; F. Md-Adnan; Ahmad Al-Jasmi; Hatem Nasr; H. K. Goel