Steven R. Offerman

Immediate and Delayed Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Head Trauma and Preinjury Warfarin or Clopidogrel Use

STUDY OBJECTIVEnPatients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel are considered at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in these patients, however, are unknown. The objective of this study is to address these gaps in knowledge.nnnMETHODSnA prospective, observational study at 2 trauma centers and 4 community hospitals enrolled emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use from April 2009 through January 2011. Patients were followed for 2 weeks. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were calculated from patients who received initial cranial computed tomography (CT) in the ED. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage within 2 weeks after an initially normal CT scan result and in the absence of repeated head trauma.nnnRESULTSnA total of 1,064 patients were enrolled (768 warfarin patients [72.2%] and 296 clopidogrel patients [27.8%]). There were 364 patients (34.2%) from Level I or II trauma centers and 700 patients (65.8%) from community hospitals. One thousand patients received a cranial CT scan in the ED. Both warfarin and clopidogrel groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics, although concomitant aspirin use was more prevalent among patients receiving clopidogrel. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher in patients receiving clopidogrel (33/276, 12.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4% to 16.4%) than patients receiving warfarin (37/724, 5.1%; 95% CI 3.6% to 7.0%), relative risk 2.31 (95% CI 1.48 to 3.63). Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was identified in 4 of 687 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2% to 1.5%) patients receiving warfarin and 0 of 243 (0%; 95% CI 0% to 1.5%) patients receiving clopidogrel.nnnCONCLUSIONnAlthough there may be unmeasured confounders that limit intergroup comparison, patients receiving clopidogrel have a significantly higher prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with patients receiving warfarin. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is rare and occurred only in patients receiving warfarin. Discharging patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications from the ED after a normal cranial CT scan result is reasonable, but appropriate instructions are required because delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage may occur.

Informing the design of clinical decision support services for evaluation of children with minor blunt head trauma in the emergency department

Integration of clinical decision support services (CDSS) into electronic health records (EHRs) may be integral to widespread dissemination and use of clinical prediction rules in the emergency department (ED). However, the best way to design such services to maximize their usefulness in such a complex setting is poorly understood. We conducted a multi-site cross-sectional qualitative study whose aim was to describe the sociotechnical environment in the ED to inform the design of a CDSS intervention to implement the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) clinical prediction rules for children with minor blunt head trauma. Informed by a sociotechnical model consisting of eight dimensions, we conducted focus groups, individual interviews and workflow observations in 11 EDs, of which 5 were located in academic medical centers and 6 were in community hospitals. A total of 126 ED clinicians, information technology specialists, and administrators participated. We clustered data into 19 categories of sociotechnical factors through a process of thematic analysis and subsequently organized the categories into a sociotechnical matrix consisting of three high-level sociotechnical dimensions (workflow and communication, organizational factors, human factors) and three themes (interdisciplinary assessment processes, clinical practices related to prediction rules, EHR as a decision support tool). Design challenges that emerged from the analysis included the need to use structured data fields to support data capture and re-use while maintaining efficient care processes, supporting interdisciplinary communication, and facilitating family-clinician interaction for decision-making.

Risk of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Head Injury and Preinjury Warfarin or Clopidogrel Use

OBJECTIVESnAppropriate use of cranial computed tomography (CT) scanning in patients with mild blunt head trauma and preinjury anticoagulant or antiplatelet use is unknown. The objectives of this study were: 1) to identify risk factors for immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) in patients with mild head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use and 2) to derive a clinical prediction rule to identify patients at low risk for immediate tICH.nnnMETHODSnThis was a prospective, observational study at two trauma centers and four community hospitals that enrolled adult emergency department (ED) patients with mild blunt head trauma (initial ED Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13 to 15) and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use. The primary outcome measure was immediate tICH, defined as the presence of ICH or contusion on the initial cranial CT. Risk for immediate tICH was analyzed in 11 independent predictor variables. Clinical prediction rules were derived with both binary recursive partitioning and multivariable logistic regression.nnnRESULTSnA total of 982 patients with a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of 75.4 (±12.6) years were included in the analysis. Sixty patients (6.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7% to 7.8%) had immediate tICH. History of vomiting (relative risk [RR] = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.80 to 6.94), abnormal mental status (RR = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.65 to 4.92), clopidogrel use (RR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.55 to 4.10), and headache (RR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.96) were associated with an increased risk for immediate tICH. Both binary recursive partitioning and multivariable logistic regression were unable to derive a clinical prediction model that identified a subset of patients at low risk for immediate tICH.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWhile several risk factors for immediate tICH were identified, the authors were unable to identify a subset of patients with mild head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use who are at low risk for immediate tICH. Thus, the recommendation is for urgent and liberal cranial CT imaging in this patient population, even in the absence of clinical findings.

Hospitalized lithium overdose cases reported to the California Poison Control System.

Background.u2002Lithium overdose primarily results in neurologic toxicity; however, cardiac effects have also been reported. Our aim was to describe a large cohort of hospitalized lithium overdose patients. Specifically we were interested in reported cardiac complications, frequency of hemodialysis (HD), and mortality.u2003Methods.u2002This is a retrospective, observational case series of admitted isolated lithium exposure cases reported to the California Poison Control System (CPCS) from 2003 through 2007. Reported lithium exposure cases were identified by a search of our CPCS database. Only those cases resulting in hospital admission were included in this study. Cases with concomitant toxic exposures were excluded. Primary outcome variables were reported cardiac complications (defined as bradycardia with a heart rate ≤50 bpm, atrioventricular (AV) block, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation), administration of cardiovascular intervention (resuscitation, vasopressor medications, or cardiac pacing), and death.u2003Results.u2002In the 5-year-study period 629 lithium cases were reported to the CPCS and 502 hospitalized cases were included in this study. There were 44 [8.8%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 6.3, 11.2] cases of acute lithium exposure, 124 (24.7%; 95% CI 20.9, 28.5) cases of acute on chronic (AC) overdose, and 282 (56.2%; 95% CI 51.8, 60.5) cases of chronic overdose. Sixty-nine patients received hemodialysis. This includes 6 (13.6%) acute, 12 (9.7%) AC, and 45 (16.0%) chronic cases. There were four deaths (0.8%, 95% CI 0.2, 1.6). Cardiac complications were reported in 29 cases (5.7%, 95% CI 3.7, 7.7%) with 18 of these cases (18/29; 62%) being isolated bradycardias (without hypotension). Only seven patients with reported cardiac complication (7/29; 24.1%; 95% CI = 8.6, 39.7) required cardiovascular intervention and all of these were cases of chronic lithium toxicity. Two bradycardic arrests occurred in chronic lithium exposure cases, including one who died.u2003Conclusion.u2002In this cohort of hospitalized lithium exposure patients, death was rare. Reported cardiac complications were unusual with instances requiring cardiovascular intervention occurring only in cases of chronic lithium overdose. The majority of lithium toxicity cases were managed without HD.

Comprehensive analysis of “bath salts” purchased from California stores and the internet

Abstract Study objective. To analyze the contents of “bath salt” products purchased from California stores and the Internet qualitatively and quantitatively in a comprehensive manner. Methods. A convenience sample of “bath salt” products were purchased in person by multiple authors at retail stores in six California cities and over the Internet (U.S. sites only), between August 11, 2011 and December 15, 2011. Liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry was utilized to identify and quantify all substances in the purchased products. Results. Thirty-five “bath salt” products were purchased and analyzed. Prices ranged from

Emergency Physicians’ Knowledge and Attitudes of Clinical Decision Support in the Electronic Health Record: A Survey‐based Study

9.95 to 49.99 (U.S. dollars). Most products had a warning against use. The majority (32/35, 91%) had one (n = 15) or multiple cathinones (n = 17) present. Fourteen different cathinones were identified, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) being the most common. Multiple drugs found including cathinones (buphedrone, ethcathinone, ethylone, MDPBP, and PBP), other designer amines (ethylamphetamine, fluoramphetamine, and 5-IAI), and the antihistamine doxylamine had not been previously identified in U.S. “bath salt” products. Quantification revealed high stimulant content and in some cases dramatic differences in either total cathinone or synthetic stimulant content between products with the same declared weight and even between identically named and outwardly appearing products. Conclusion. Comprehensive analysis of “bath salts” purchased from California stores and the Internet revealed the products to consistently contain cathinones, alone, or in different combinations, sometimes in high quantity. Multiple cathinones and other drugs found had not been previously identified in U.S. “bath salt” products. High total stimulant content in some products and variable qualitative and quantitative composition amongst products were demonstrated.

The Clinical Management of Acetaminophen Poisoning in a Community Hospital System: Factors Associated with Hospital Length of Stay

OBJECTIVESnThe objective was to investigate clinician knowledge of and attitudes toward clinical decision support (CDS) and its incorporation into the electronic health record (EHR).nnnMETHODSnThis was an electronic survey of emergency physicians (EPs) within an integrated health care delivery system that uses a complete EHR. Randomly assigned respondents completed one of two questionnaires, both including a hypothetical vignette and self-reported knowledge of and attitudes about CDS. One vignette version included CDS, and the other did not (NCDS). The vignette described a scenario in which a cranial computed tomography (CCT) is not recommended by validated prediction rules (the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network [PECARN] rules). In both survey versions, subjects responded first with their likely approach to evaluation and then again after receiving either CDS (the PECARN prediction rules) or no additional support. Descriptive statistics were used for self-reported responses and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of self-reported knowledge and use of the PECARN rules, as well as use of vignette responses.nnnRESULTSnThere were 339 respondents (68% response rate), with 172 of 339 (51%) randomized to the CDS version. Initially, 25% of respondents to each version indicated they would order CCTs. After CDS, 30 of 43 (70%) of respondents who initially would order CCTs changed their management decisions to no CCT versus two of 41 (5%) with the NCDS version (chi-square, p = 0.003). In response to self-report questions, 81 of 338 respondents (24%) reported having never heard of the PECARN prediction rules, 122 of 338 (36%) were aware of the rules but not their specifics, and 135 of 338 (40%) reported knowing the rules and their specifics. Respondents agreed with favorable statements about CDS (75% to 96% agreement across seven statements) and approaches to its implementation into the EHR (60% to 93% agreement across seven statements). In multivariable analyses, EPs with tenure of 5 to 14 years (odds ratio [AOR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30 to 0.86) and for 15 years or more (AOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.70) were significantly less likely to report knowing the specifics of the PECARN prediction rules compared with EPs who practiced for fewer than 5 years. In addition, in the initial vignette responses (across both versions), physicians with ≥15 years of ED tenure compared to those with fewer than 5 years of experience (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.69), and those reporting knowing the specifics of the PECARN prediction rules were less likely to order CCTs (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.92).nnnCONCLUSIONSnEPs incorporated pediatric head trauma CDS via the EHR into their clinical judgment in a hypothetical scenario and reported favorable opinions of CDS in general and their inclusion into the EHR.

The Use of Delayed Telephone Informed Consent for Observational Emergency Medicine Research Is Ethical and Effective

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the most common pharmaceutical poisoning. The objective of this study was to examine the management of patients admitted for treatment of APAP overdose. Factors impacting hospital length of stay (LOS) were of particular interest. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals for APAP overdose from July 2003 through December 2007. Medical records were abstracted for patient demographic data, key factors of overdose, California Poison Control System (CPCS) contact, data regarding hospital course, transfer for liver transplantation, and death. Four hundred thirty-five patients were included. The mean hospital LOS was 66.5xa0h (95% CI 62.1, 71.0). Four patients (0.9%) died. Eight patients (1.8%) were transferred for liver transplantation, but all of these patients later recovered without transplant. Of 289 cases eligible for placement on the Rumack–Matthew nomogram (acute ingestion with known time of ingestion <24xa0h and normal liver enzymes), 161 (55.7%) had APAP levels above the “200” line and 77 (26.6%) fell below the “150” line. CPCS was contacted in 295 cases (67.8%). Mean LOS in cases with CPCS consultation was 61.9xa0h (95% CI 57.2, 66.5xa0h) versus 76.3xa0h (95% CI 66.6, 86.0xa0h) in those without. LOS in cases treated with IV NAC was 67.1xa0h (95% CI 57.7, 76.5xa0h) versus 66.4xa0h (95% CI 61.2, 71.5xa0h) in cases treated with oral NAC. Many patients admitted for APAP overdose had serum APAP levels below the minimum toxicity level. Use of IV NAC did not impact hospital LOS. CPCS consultation appeared to decrease mean hospital LOS.

Emergency Physician Perspectives on Central Venous Catheterization in the Emergency Department: A Survey‐based Study

OBJECTIVESnThe objective was to describe the rate of successful consent using an altered (deferred telephone) consent process in emergency department (ED) patients.nnnMETHODSnThis study evaluated the consent process employed during a prospective, multicenter, observational study of outcomes in anticoagulated patients with blunt head trauma. The study was approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) at all participating centers. Patients were not informed of the study during their enrollment at their index ED visit. Patient names, clinical findings, and contact information were collected at the time of initial ED visits. The patients or their legally designated surrogates were contacted by telephone at least 14 days after ED discharge, given all the elements of informed consent, and then consented for study participation. Study results are presented with simple descriptive statistics.nnnRESULTSnA total of 506 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 75.8 (±12.2) years including 274 female subjects (54.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 49.7% to 58.6%) were enrolled into the study. Patients or their surrogates were successfully contacted by telephone in 501 of 506 cases (99.0%; 95% CI = 97.7% to 99.7%). Consent was obtained in 500 of 501 cases at time of telephone follow-up (99.8%; 95% CI = 98.9% to 100.0%). Surrogates provided consent in 199 cases (39.7%; 95% CI = 35.4% to 44.2%). Median time from ED visit to phone contact was 21 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 17 to 27 days). The median number of phone attempts for successful contact was 1 (IQR = 1 to 2 attempts).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe authors achieved a very high rate of successful telephone follow-up in this predominantly older ED population. Obtaining consent to participate in a research study using a deferred telephone contact process was effective and well received by both subjects and surrogates. IRBs should consider deferred telephone consent for minimal-risk studies requiring telephone follow-up, as opposed to a consent process requiring written documentation at the time of initial ED visit.

Validation of cerebrospinal fluid findings in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECTIVESnThe objective was to assess clinician experience, training, and attitudes toward central venous catheterization (CVC) in adult emergency department (ED) patients in a health system promoting increased utilization of CVC for severely septic ED patients.nnnMETHODSnThe authors surveyed all emergency physicians (EPs) within a 21-hospital integrated health care delivery system that had recently instituted a modified Rivers protocol for providing early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) to patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, including CVC if indicated. This initiative was accompanied by a structured, but optional, systemwide hands-on training for EPs in real-time ultrasound-guided CVC (US CVC). EPs responses to questions regarding self-reported experience with CVC in the ED are reported. Data included frequency of CVC (by type) and US CVC training opportunities: both during and after residency and informal (on-the-job training involving actual ED patients under the oversight of someone more experienced than yourself) and formal (off-the-job training not involving actual ED patients). The survey also asked respondents to report their comfort levels with different types of CVC as well as their agreement with possible barriers (philosophical, time-related, equipment-related, and complication-related) to CVC in the ED. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to identify provider characteristics and responses associated with higher yearly CVC volumes.nnnRESULTSnThe survey response rate among eligible participants was 365 of 465 (78%). Overall, 154 of 365 (42%) respondents reported performing 11 or more CVCs a year, while 46 of 365 (13%) reported doing two or fewer. Concerning CVC techniques, 271 of 358 (76%) of respondents reported being comfortable with the internal jugular approach with US guidance, compared to 200 of 345 (58%) with the subclavian approach without US. Training rates were reported as 1) in residency, formal 167 of 358 (47%) and informal 189 of 364 (52%); and 2) postresidency, formal 236 of 359 (66%) and informal 260 of 365 (71%). The most commonly self-reported barriers to CVC were procedural time (56%) and complication risk (61%). After multivariate adjustment, the following were significantly associated with greater self-reported CVC use (p < 0.01): 1) informal bedside CVC training after residency, 2) male sex, 3) disagreement with complication-related barrier questions, and 4) self-reported comfort with placing US-guided internal jugular catheters.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this cross-sectional survey-based study, EPs reported varying experience with CVC in the ED and reported high comfort with the US CVC technique. Postresidency informal training experience, male sex, negative responses to complication-related barrier questions, and comfort with placing US-guided internal jugular catheters were associated with yearly CVC volume. These results suggest that higher rates of CVC in eligible patients might be achieved by informal training programs in US and/or by disseminating existing evidence about the low risk of complications associated with the procedure.