Steven R. Sparks

Complications of iliac artery stent deployment

PURPOSE This study was performed to determine the primary patency, foot salvage, and complication rates associated with iliac artery stent deployment. METHODS From March 1992 to May 1995, 147 iliac artery stents were deployed in 98 limbs of 72 patients for disabling claudication or limb-threatening ischemia. Procedure-related and late (> 30 days) complications, as well as adjunctive maneuvers required to correct a complication, were tabulated. Stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency and foot salvage rates were calculated with life-table analysis. Factors that impacted early complications, late complications, foot salvage rates, and stented iliac artery primary patency rates were identified with stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A procedure-related complication occurred in 19 (19.4%) limbs. Initial technical success, however, was achieved in all but three of 98 limbs (96.9%). Stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency rates were 87.6%, 61.9%, 55.3%, and foot salvage rates were 97.7%, 85.1%, 76.1%, at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. External iliac artery stent deployment, superficial femoral artery occlusion before treatment, and single-vessel tibial runoff before treatment negatively affected stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency rates. Stented iliac artery primary patency rates were not significantly affected by age, smoking, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, presenting symptom, early complication, number of stents deployed, type of stent deployed, or stent deployment for stenosis versus occlusion. CONCLUSIONS Limb-threatening and life-threatening complications can be associated with iliac artery stent deployment. Stented iliac artery primary patency rates are affected by distal atherosclerotic occlusive disease and the position of the deployed stent within the iliac system. Stent reconstruction of severe iliac artery occlusive disease is feasible but should be thoughtfully selected.

Spontaneous Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a rare occurrence, especially when not associated with aortic dissection [1]. Currently, only 28 cases appear to have been reported. Due to the scarcity of cases in the literature, the natural history of isolated, spontaneous SMA dissection is unclear. CT has been reported to be useful for the initial diagnosis of SMA dissection [2–5]. We present two recent cases of spontaneous SMA dissection in which enhanced spiral CT was instrumental in following the disease process and guiding clinical decision making.

Non-elastic compression: an alternative in management of chronic venous insufficiency.

Non-elastic compression has been used to treat venous insufficiency of the lower extremities for more than 150 years. The best and most recognized example is the Unna boot. When compared with other dressings, the Unna boot has performed as well as or better than other forms of compression. While the Unna boot is used worldwide, a 3- or 4-layer dressing has emerged as the dressing of choice in treating severe chronic venous insufficiency in the United States and English-speaking European countries. In the United States, non-elastic compression can also be applied as a CircAid legging. This semirigid support has been compared with heavyweight class 3 below-knee medical stockings. At 2 and 6 hours after application, inelastic compression maintained limb size and reduced venous volume better than did stockings. At 6 hours, the ejection fraction of the calf muscle pump was increased and venous filling index significantly improved with inelastic compression compared with stockings. Comparison of elastic stockings with short-stretch bandages has also been completed. The short-stretch bandage was found to be similar but not identical to the semirigid inelastic support device. The studies have shown that venous filling index improved by short-stretch bandaging and that venous reflux time was prolonged more by the short-stretch bandages than by stockings. The findings of these studies demonstrate that the inelastic support dressing mimics the action of the Unna boot in providing counter-pressure to perforating vein outflow. This may improve cutaneous and subcutaneous microcirculation in a manner similar to perforating vein surgery, which has been shown to accelerate leg ulcer healing.