Steven Živko Pavletić

Malnutrition in patients with chronic GVHD.

Malnutrition is a known complication of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), but has not been well described in the context of organ-specific manifestations and the recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria. Here, 210 cGVHD patients were analyzed, in a cross-sectional study design, for demographics, transplant-related history, clinical assessments, symptoms, function, quality-of-life, laboratory values and survival in order to determine their associations with nutritional status. Most patients had long-standing, moderate or severe cGVHD and had failed many lines of therapy. Twenty-nine percent (60/210) of subjects were malnourished, using the subjective Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaire and evaluation. No demographic or transplant characteristics were associated with malnutrition; cGVHD of the lungs, gastrointestinal (GI) tract and mouth, NIH global score, cGVHD symptoms, worse functioning, low albumin, poorer survival and low BMI were associated with malnutrition. A predictive model was developed from all variables of significance: cGVHD of the lungs, GI tract, mouth and BMI accurately predicted 84.2% of malnourished patients as well as 87.2% of well-nourished patients. The PG-SGA questionnaire may be a useful tool in diagnosing nutritional deficits in cGVHD patients undergoing one-time evaluations. Longitudinal prospective studies should assess the utility of nutritional support interventions in cGVHD.

Validation of the National Institutes of Health chronic GVHD Oral Mucosal Score using component-specific measures

Oral chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is a common, late complication of alloSCT that is associated with significant patient morbidity. The NIH Oral Mucosal Score (NIH OMS) was developed to assess oral cGVHD therapeutic response, but has not been fully validated. This study’s purpose was to conduct a rigorous construct validity and internal consistency analysis of this score and its components (erythema, lichenoid, ulcers, mucoceles) using established measures of oral pain, oral function, oral-related quality-of-life, nutrition and laboratory parameters in 198 patients with cGVHD. The construct validity of the NIH OMS was supported: a moderate correlation was observed between NIH OMS and mouth pain (rho=0.43), while a weaker correlation was observed with low albumin (rho=−0.26). Total NIH OMS, erythema and lichenoid components were associated with malnutrition, oral pain and impaired oral QOL, while ulcers were only associated with oral pain. No associations were found between mucoceles and any indicator evaluated, including salivary function or xerostomia. Kappa determined between scale components was low overall (all ⩽0.35), supporting a conclusion that each component measures a distinct manifestation of oral cGVHD. This study supports the use of the NIH OMS and its components (erythema, lichenoid and ulcerations) to measure clinician-reported severity of oral cGVHD.

NIH response criteria measures are associated with important parameters of disease severity in patients with chronic GVHD

Lack of standardized criteria measuring therapeutic response remains an obstacle to the development of better treatments for chronic GVHD (cGVHD). This cross-sectional prospective study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of 18 clinician-reported (‘Form A’) and 8 patient-reported (‘Form B’) response measures proposed by NIH criteria. Concurrent parameters of interest were NIH global score, cGVHD activity, Lee symptom score and SF36 PCS. Patient cohort included 193 adults with moderate-to-severe cGVHD. Measures associated with the highest number of outcomes were lung function score (LFS), 2-min walk, grip strength, 4-point health-care provider (HCP) and patient global scores, 11-point clinician- and patient-reported global symptom severity scores, and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Measures associated with survival in univariate analyses led to a Cox model containing skin erythema, LFS, KPS, eosinophil count and interval from cGVHD diagnosis to enrollment as jointly associated with survival. In conclusion, 4-point HCP and patient global scores and 11-point clinician- and patient-reported global symptom severity scores are associated with the majority of concurrent outcomes. Skin erythema is a potentially reversible sign of cGVHD that is associated with survival. These results define a subset of measures that should be prioritized for evaluation in future studies.

Which questionnaires should we use to evaluate quality of life in patients with chronic graft- vs-host disease?

Aim To investigate the ability of two standard quality of life (QOL) questionnaires – The Short Form (36-item) Health Survey (SF-36) and The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) to evaluate QOL in patients with chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD) graded according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria. Methods In this cross-sectional study, QOL was assessed in patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb and were alive and in complete remission for more than one year after allo-SCT. Results The study included 58 patients, 38 patients with cGVHD and 20 controls, patients without cGVHD. Patients with cGVHD scored according to the NIH criteria had significantly lower scores of global health status and lower QOL on all SF-36 subscales and most of QLQ C30 functional subscales (Pu2009<u20090.050 for all comparisons). Furthermore, patients with active cGVHD had significantly lower QOL scores than patients with inactive cGVHD, and this difference was most evident in physical functioning subscale of SF-36 (Pu2009=u20090.0007) and social functioning subscale of QLQ C30 (Pu2009=u20090.009). Conclusion cGVHD scored according to the NIH criteria is correlated with patient-reported QOL, particularly in the physical domains as detected by SF-36. QLQ C30 questionnaire adds more information on social functioning and should be used as a valuable tool in the evaluation of social domains in cGVHD patients.

Chronic graft-vs-host disease in 2016: a major challenge and an opportunity.

Despite major advances in the treatment of hematological diseases over the last decades, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) still remains the only curative option for many of them. According to the recent survey of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), nearly 15u2009000 alloHSCT are currently performed each year across Europe and EBMT-affiliated countries (1).

Potential of glycosylation research in graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUNDnGlycans, complex oligosaccharides, are directly involved in almost every biological process, have a fundamental role in the immune system, and are probably involved in nearly every human disease. However, glycosylation has been greatly ignored in the area of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and graft versus host disease (GVHD). Both acute and chronic GVHD are multisystemic debilitating immunological disturbances arising after alloHSCT.nnnSCOPE OF REVIEWnIn this paper, we review the glycosylation research already done in the field of alloHSCT and GVHD and evaluate further potential of glycan analysis in GVHD by looking into resembling inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.nnnMAJOR CONCLUSIONSnGlycan research could bring significant improvement in alloHSCT procedure with reduction in following complications, such as GVHD. Identifying glycan patterns that induce self-tolerance and the ones that cause the auto- and allo-immune response could lead to innovative and tissue-specific immunomodulative therapy instead of the current immunosuppressive treatment, enabling preservation of the graft-versus-tumor effect. Moreover, improved glycan pattern analyses could offer a more complete assessment and greatly needed dynamic biomarkers for GVHD.nnnGENERAL SIGNIFICANCEnThis review is written with a goal to encourage glycan research in the field of alloHSCT and GVHD as a perspective tool leading to improved engraftment, discovery of much needed biomarkers for GVHD, enabling an appropriate therapy and improved monitoring of therapeutic response. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Glycans in personalised medicine Guest Editor: Professor Gordan Lauc.