Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stijn Reinhard is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stijn Reinhard.


American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 1999

Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms

Stijn Reinhard; C. A. Knox Lovell; Geert Thijssen

In this article we estimate the technical and environmental efficiency of a panel of Dutch dairy farms. Nitrogen surplus, arising from the application of excessive amounts of manure and chemical fertilizer, is treated as an environmentally detrimental input. A stochastic translog production frontier is specified to estimate the output-oriented technical efficiency. Environmental efficiency is estimated as the input-oriented technical efficiency of a single input, the nitrogen surplus of each farm. The mean output-oriented technical efficiency is rather high, 0.894, but the mean input-oriented environmental efficiency is only 0.441. Intensive dairy farms are both technically and environmentally more efficient than extensive farms. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.


European Journal of Operational Research | 2000

Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA

Stijn Reinhard; C. A. Knox Lovell; Geert Thijssen

Abstract The objective of this paper is to estimate comprehensive environmental efficiency measures for Dutch dairy farms. The environmental efficiency scores are based on the nitrogen surplus, phosphate surplus and the total (direct and indirect) energy use of an unbalanced panel of dairy farms. We define environmental efficiency as the ratio of minimum feasible to observed use of multiple environmentally detrimental inputs, conditional on observed levels of output and the conventional inputs. We compare two methods for the calculation of efficiency; namely Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This paper reveals the strengths and weaknesses for estimating environmental efficiency of the methods applied. Both SFA and DEA can estimate environmental efficiency scores. The mean technical efficiency scores (output-oriented, SFA 89%, DEA 78%) and the mean comprehensive environmental efficiency scores (SFA 80%, DEA 52%) differ between the two methods. SFA allows hypothesis testing, and the monotonicity hypothesis is rejected for the specification including phosphate surplus. DEA can calculate environmental efficiency scores for all specifications, because regularity is imposed in this method.


American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2002

Analysis of Environmental Efficiency Variation

Stijn Reinhard; C. A. Knox Lovell; Geert Thijssen

In this article, we develop and implement a methodology for analyzing the sources of variation in environmental efficiency across producers. We formulate a two-stage model. In the first stage, we use stochastic frontier analysis to estimate both technical and environmental efficiency. In the second stage, we again use stochastic frontier analysis to regress estimated environmental efficiency scores against a variety of technology, physical environment, and management variables. In this stage we estimate the impact of each explanatory variable on environmental efficiency, and we derive conditional estimates of environmental efficiency from the one-sided error component. We illustrate our methodology with an empirical application to a panel of Dutch dairy farms. We find evidence of relatively low levels of environmental efficiency, and we find that environmental efficiency can be improved through a number of policy options, including the provision of farmers with more insight into the nutrient balance of their farms.


Agricultural Systems | 2004

Investigating technical efficiency and potential technological change in Dutch pig farming

Alfons Oude Lansink; Stijn Reinhard

This paper uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to investigate the possibilities for improving the technical, economic and environmental performance of Dutch pig farms relative to currently applied technologies and relative to currently available but not yet applied technologies. First, the efficiency is computed relating observed pig farms to the current best practice frontier. This frontier is computed from a sample of observed pig farms, using DEA based on linear programming. Second, potential technological change is computed as the change of the frontier due to addition of virtual farms (based on technologies that are available but not applied in practice yet) to the dataset. It is found that the mean technical efficiency of farms is rather high relative to the currently available technologies. Overall technical performance increases slightly when new technologies are introduced. Environmental performance increases importantly when applying new technologies. In particular, the ammonia emissions can be reduced largely by utilising the up-to-date housing techniques.


Land Use Policy | 2010

Estimating the costs and benefits of soil conservation in Europe

Tom Kuhlman; Stijn Reinhard; Aris Gaaff


1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT | 1998

RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY OF DUTCH DAIRY FARMS; A PARAMETRIC DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH

Stijn Reinhard; Geert Thijssen


Ecological Economics | 2012

Incorporating the value of ecological networks into cost–benefit analysis to improve spatially explicit land-use planning

Aris Gaaff; Stijn Reinhard


Archive | 2018

Regioscan zoetwatermaatregelen : Verkennen van het perspectief van kleinschalige zoetwatermaatregelen voor de regionale zoetwateropgave

J. Delsman; Erwin van Boekel; Stijn Reinhard; Tine te Winkel; Arnaut van Loon; R.P. Bartholomeus; Martin Mulder; H.T.L. Massop; Nico Polman; Femke Schasfoort


Island Studies Journal | 2016

Governance of ecosystem services on small islands : Three contrasting cases for St. Eustatius in the Dutch Caribbean

Nico Polman; Stijn Reinhard; L.K.J. van Bets; Tom Kuhlman


Archive | 2017

Agricultural policy objectives on productivity, climate change adaptation and mitigation

Nico Polman; Rolf Michels; Carla Boonstra; Elmar Theune; Gabe Venema; Stijn Reinhard; Nico van der Velden; Huib Silvis; Maarten Vrolijk

Collaboration


Dive into the Stijn Reinhard's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Geert Thijssen

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nico Polman

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Esther Boere

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alfons Oude Lansink

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H.T.L. Massop

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Delsman

VU University Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Mulder

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge