Stuart A. Swinamer

Simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization with long-term angiographic follow-up

OBJECTIVE Traditionally integrated coronary artery revascularization has been described as a 2-stage procedure. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of 1-stage, simultaneous, hybrid, robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS Fifty-eight patients underwent simultaneous, integrated coronary artery revascularization in an operating theater equipped with angiographic equipment. Forty-five patients were men. The mean age was 59 years. All internal thoracic arteries were harvested with robotic assistance. All anastomoses were manually constructed through a small anterior non-rib-spreading incision without cardiopulmonary bypass on the beating heart. Immediately after and within the same operative suite, both angiographic confirmation of graft patency and percutaneous coronary intervention were performed. In 52 patients therapeutic anticoagulation was achieved with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin. RESULTS There were no deaths or wound infections. There was 1 perioperative myocardial infarction. One patient had a stroke, and 3 patients required re-exploration for bleeding. The median lengths of intensive care and hospital stay were 1 and 4 days, respectively. All patients were alive and symptom free at follow-up (mean, 20.2 months; range, 1.1-40.8 months). Long-term angiographic follow-up in 54 patients showed 49 (91%) patent grafts (mean, 9.0 months; range, 4.3-40.8 months). There were 7 in-stent restenoses and 2 occluded stents. CONCLUSION For multivessel coronary artery disease, simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization with bivalirudin is safe and feasible. This approach enables complete multivessel revascularization with decreased surgical trauma and postoperative morbidity. Further studies are necessary to better determine patient selection and long-term outcomes.

Cumulative sum failure analysis of a policy change from on-pump to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND Use of the sequential probability cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique may be more sensitive than standard statistical analyses in detecting a cluster of surgical failures. We applied CUSUM methods to evaluate the learning curve after a policy change by a single surgeon from routine on-pump (cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB]) to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). METHODS Fifty-five consecutive first-time coronary artery bypass patients (CPB group) were compared with the next 55 patients undergoing an attempt at routine OPCAB using the same coronary stabilizer. The goal in OPCAB patients was to obtain complete revascularization, albeit with a low threshold for conversion to CPB to maximize patient safety during the learning curve. Preoperative patient risk was calculated using previously validated models of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. The occurrence of operative mortality and nine predefined major complications (myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke, renal failure, balloon pump use, mediastinitis, respiratory failure, life-threatening arrhythmia, and sepsis) was compared between the CPB and OPCAB groups using Wilcoxon, Fisher exact, and two-tailed t tests, as well as CUSUM methodology. An intention to treat analysis was performed. RESULTS The CPB and OPCAB groups had similar predicted mortality and length of stays (2.2% +/- 2.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.5 days versus 2.4% +/- 3.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.4 days, respectively). The mean number of grafts per patient was 3.1 +/- 0.7 in the CPB group versus 3.0 +/- 0.7 in the OPCAB group (p = 0.45). Two of 55 (3.6%) CPB patients died, as opposed to 1 of 55 (1.8%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.99). Eight of 55 CPB patients (14.5%) incurred major complications, as opposed to 4 of 55 (7.3%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.36). Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days in the CPB group versus 5.0 days in the OPCAB group (p = 0.28). On CUSUM analysis, the failure curve in CPB patients approached the upper 80% alert line after eight cases, whereas the curve in OPCAB patients reached below the lower 80% (reassurance) boundary 28 cases after the policy change, indicating superior results in the OPCAB group despite the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS A policy change from coronary artery bypass on CPB to routinely attempting OPCAB can be accomplished safely despite the learning curve. CUSUM analysis was more sensitive than standard statistical methods in detecting a cluster of surgical failures and successes.

Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on risk-adjusted and cumulative sum failure outcomes after coronary artery surgery.

Abstract Background and Aim: We have shown that cumulative sum (CUSUM) failure analysis may be more sensitive than standard statistical methods in detecting a cluster of adverse patient outcomes after cardiac surgical procedures. We therefore applied CUSUM, as well as standard statistical techniques, to analyze a surgeons experience with off‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and on‐pump procedures to determine whether the two techniques have similar or different outcomes. Methods: In 320 patients undergoing nonemergent, first time coronary artery bypass grafting, preoperative patient characteristics, rates of mortality and major complications, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were compared between the on‐pump and OPCAB cohorts using Fishers exact tests and Wilcoxon two sample tests. Predicted mortality and length of stay were determined using previously validated models of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Observed versus expected ratios of both variables were calculated for the two types of procedures. Furthermore, CUSUM curves were constructed for the on‐pump and OPCAB cohorts. A multivariable analysis of the predictors of hospital length of stay was also performed to determine whether the type of coronary artery bypass procedure had an independent impact on this variable. Results: The predicted mortality risk and predicted hospital length of stay were almost identical in the 208 on‐pump patients ( 2.2 ± 3.9% ; 8.2 ± 2.5 days) and the 112 OPCAB patients ( 2.0 ± 2.2% ; 7.8 ± 2.1 days). The incidence of hospital mortality and postoperative stroke were 2.9% and 2.4% in on‐pump patients versus zero in OPCAB patients (p= 0.09 and 0.17, respectively). Mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 hours was significantly less common in OPCAB (1.8%) than in on‐pump patients (7.7%, p= 0.04). The rate of 10 major complications was 14.9% in on‐pump versus 8.0% in OPCAB patients (p= 0.08). OPCAB patients experienced a hospital length of stay that was a median of 1.0 day shorter than on‐pump patients (p= 0.01). The observed versus expected ratio for length of stay was 0.78 in OPCAB patients versus 0.95 in on‐pump patients. On CUSUM analysis, the failure curve in OPCAB patients was negative and was flatter than that of on‐pump patients throughout the duration of the study. Furthermore, OPCAB was an independent predictor of a reduced hospital length of stay on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: OPCAB was associated with better outcomes than on‐pump coronary artery bypass despite a similar predicted risk. This robust finding was documented on sensitive CUSUM analysis, using standard statistical techniques and on a multivariable analysis of the independent predictors of hospital length of stay.(J Card Surg 2002;17:520‐528)

Bivalirudin as an anticoagulant for simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization – a novel approach to an inherent concern

BACKGROUND Simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization combines coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention into a single procedure. This approach provides immediate, complete and optimal myocardial revascularization in a less invasive manner. Because simultaneous integrated coronary revascularization necessitates two distinct anticoagulation protocols for the surgical and percutaneous aspects of the procedure, combining these anticoagulation protocols carries a bleeding risk. Using a single anticoagulant to facilitate the necessities of both aspects of the integrated approach may alleviate this risk. CASE PRESENTATION A 45-year-old man with an occluded left anterior descending artery and a moderately stenotic circumflex artery underwent simultaneous integrated coronary revascularization. Bivalirudin was used to achieve anticoagulation for the duration of the procedure. The patient was asymptomatic with excellent patency of both the bypass graft and the stented circumflex artery via angiography at 10 months. CONCLUSION Bivalirudin can be used to effectively achieve a unified anticoagulation protocol for simultaneous integrated revascularization.

Robotic-assisted left atrial ligation for stroke reduction in chronic atrial fibrillation: a case report.

Patients with atrial fibrillation are at significant risk for sustaining a thromboembolic stroke. More than 90% of thromboemboli form in the left atrial appendage. Ligation of the left atrial appendage to reduce the risk of stroke is often performed in connection with other cardiac surgical procedures. As a stand-alone procedure, however, left atrial ligation has generally been deemed too invasive and has gained little support as an alternative therapeutic option. We report a case of port-access robotic-assisted left atrial ligation as a stand-alone procedure in a patient with chronic atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulation was a contraindication. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of stand-alone robotic-assisted left atrial ligation in the literature.

Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience

Minimally invasive robot‐assisted direct coronary artery bypass (RADCAB) has emerged as a feasible minimally invasive surgical technique for revascularization that might offer several potential advantages over conventional approaches. We present our 18‐year experience in RADCAB.

A Prospective Randomized Study of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Harvesting of the Radial Artery

Objective The aims of the study were to determine whether endoscopic harvesting of the radial artery (RA) reduces morbidity due to pain, infection, and disability with improvement in satisfaction and cosmesis compared to the conventional technique and (2) to compare the 6-month angiographic patency of the RA harvested conventionally and endoscopically. Methods In a prospective randomized study, 119 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using the RA were randomized to have RA harvested either conventionally (n = 59) or endoscopically (n = 60). Results Radial artery harvest time (open wound time) was significantly reduced in the endoscopic group (36.5 ± 9.4 vs 57.7 ± 9.4 minutes, P < 0.001). Only one patient developed wound infection (1.6%) in the endoscopic group compared with six patients (10.2%), P = 0.061, in the conventional group. Although this was not statistically significant, clinically this was relevant in terms of reduction in postoperative morbidity. Postoperative pain in the arm incision was significantly lower in the endoscopic group at postoperative day 2 (P < 0.001) and at discharge (P < 0.001) and similar to the conventional open group at 6 weeks’ follow-up (P = 0.103). Overall patient satisfaction and cosmesis were significantly better in the endoscopic group at postoperative day 2 (P < 0.001), at discharge (P < 0.001), and at 6 weeks’ follow-up (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the arm disability postoperatively (P = 0.505) between the two groups. Six-month angiographic assessment of 23 patients (12 endoscopic and 11 open) revealed no difference in the patency rate (10/12 in endoscopic and 9/11 in open group). Conclusions Endoscopic RA harvesting reduced the incidence of postoperative wound infection and wound pain and improved patient satisfaction and cosmesis compared with conventional harvesting technique. There was no difference in the 6-month angiographic patency of the RA harvested conventionally and endoscopically.