Stuart A. Willison
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stuart A. Willison.
Water Science and Technology | 2015
Kelsey L Duckworth; Michael Spencer; Christopher Bates; Michael E. Miller; Catherine B. Almquist; Michael R. Grimaila; Matthew L. Magnuson; Stuart A. Willison; Rebecca Phillips; LeeAnn Racz
Ultraviolet (UV) light emitting diodes (LEDs) may be a viable option as a UV light source for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) utilizing photocatalysts or oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide. The effect of UV-LED duty cycle, expressed as the percentage of time the LED is powered, was investigated in an AOP with hydrogen peroxide, using methylene blue (MB) to assess contaminant degradation. The UV-LED AOP degraded the MB at all duty cycles. However, adsorption of MB onto the LED emitting surface caused a linear decline in reactor performance over time. With regard to the effect of duty cycle, the observed rate constant of MB degradation, after being adjusted to account for the duty cycle, was greater for 5 and 10% duty cycles than higher duty cycles, providing a value approximately 160% higher at 5% duty cycle than continuous operation. This increase in adjusted rate constant at low duty cycles, as well as contaminant fouling of the LED surface, may impact design and operational considerations for pulsed UV-LED AOP systems.
Environment International | 2014
Matthew L. Magnuson; Romy Campisano; John Griggs; Schatzi Fitz-James; Kathy Hall; Latisha Mapp; Marissa Mullins; Tonya Nichols; Sanjiv Shah; Erin Silvestri; Terry Smith; Stuart A. Willison; Hiba S. Ernst
Catastrophic incidents can generate a large number of samples of analytically diverse types, including forensic, clinical, environmental, food, and others. Environmental samples include water, wastewater, soil, air, urban building and infrastructure materials, and surface residue. Such samples may arise not only from contamination from the incident but also from the multitude of activities surrounding the response to the incident, including decontamination. This document summarizes a range of activities to help build laboratory capability in preparation for sample analysis following a catastrophic incident, including selection and development of fit-for-purpose analytical methods for chemical, biological, and radiological contaminants. Fit-for-purpose methods are those which have been selected to meet project specific data quality objectives. For example, methods could be fit for screening contamination in the early phases of investigation of contamination incidents because they are rapid and easily implemented, but those same methods may not be fit for the purpose of remediating the environment to acceptable levels when a more sensitive method is required. While the exact data quality objectives defining fitness-for-purpose can vary with each incident, a governing principle of the method selection and development process for environmental remediation and recovery is based on achieving high throughput while maintaining high quality analytical results. This paper illustrates the result of applying this principle, in the form of a compendium of analytical methods for contaminants of interest. The compendium is based on experience with actual incidents, where appropriate and available. This paper also discusses efforts aimed at adaptation of existing methods to increase fitness-for-purpose and development of innovative methods when necessary. The contaminants of interest are primarily those potentially released through catastrophes resulting from malicious activity. However, the same techniques discussed could also have application to catastrophes resulting from other incidents, such as natural disasters or industrial accidents. Further, the high sample throughput enabled by the techniques discussed could be employed for conventional environmental studies and compliance monitoring, potentially decreasing costs and/or increasing the quantity of data available to decision-makers.
Water Research | 2014
Allen K. Janeczko; Edward B. Walters; Steven Schuldt; Matthew L. Magnuson; Stuart A. Willison; Lisa M. Brown; Oscar N. Ruiz; Daniel L. Felker; LeeAnn Racz
Journal of Chromatography A | 2012
Stuart A. Willison
Archive | 2011
Karolin K. Kroening; Renee N. Easter; Douglas D. Richardson; Stuart A. Willison; Joseph A. Caruso
Analysis of Chemical Warfare Degradation Products | 2011
Karolin K. Kroening; Renee N. Easter; Douglas D. Richardson; Stuart A. Willison; Joseph A. Caruso
Building and Environment | 2016
Daniel Baseley; Luke Wunderlich; Grady T. Phillips; Kevin C. Gross; Glen P. Perram; Stuart A. Willison; Rebecca Phillips; Matthew L. Magnuson; Sang Don Lee; Willie F. Harper
Archive | 2015
Stuart A. Willison; Matthew L. Magnuson; Adrian Hanley; David Nehrkorn
Analysis of Chemical Warfare Degradation Products | 2011
Karolin K. Kroening; Renee N. Easter; Douglas D. Richardson; Stuart A. Willison; Joseph A. Caruso
Analysis of Chemical Warfare Degradation Products | 2011
Karolin K. Kroening; Renee N. Easter; Douglas D. Richardson; Stuart A. Willison; Joseph A. Caruso