Stuart Fox
Met Office
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stuart Fox.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2017
Steven J. Abel; Ian A. Boutle; Kirk Waite; Stuart Fox; Philip R. A. Brown; Richard Cotton; Gary Lloyd; T. W. Choularton; Keith N. Bower
AbstractAircraft observations in a cold-air outbreak to the north of the United Kingdom are used to examine the boundary layer and cloud properties in an overcast mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud layer and across the transition to more broken open-cellular convection. The stratocumulus cloud is primarily composed of liquid drops with small concentrations of ice particles and there is a switch to more glaciated conditions in the shallow cumulus clouds downwind. The rapid change in cloud morphology is accompanied by enhanced precipitation with secondary ice processes becoming active and greater thermodynamic gradients in the subcloud layer. The measurements also show a removal of boundary layer accumulation mode aerosols via precipitation processes across the transition that are similar to those observed in the subtropics in pockets of open cells. Simulations using a convection-permitting (1.5-km grid spacing) regional version of the Met Office Unified Model were able to reproduce many of the salient feature...
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions | 2018
Stuart Fox; Jana Mendrok; Patrick Eriksson; Robin Ekelund; Sebastian O'Shea; Keith N. Bower; R. Chawn Harlow; Juliet C. Pickering
The next generation of European polar orbiting weather satellites will carry a novel instrument, the Ice Cloud Imager (ICI), which uses passive observations between 183 and 664 GHz to make daily global observations of cloud ice. Successful use of these observations requires accurate modelling of cloud ice scattering, and this study uses airborne observations from two flights of the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe 146 research aircraft to validate radiative transfer simulations of cirrus clouds at frequencies between 325 and 664 GHz using the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS) and a stateof-the-art database of cloud ice optical properties. Particular care is taken to ensure that the inputs to the radiative transfer model are representative of the true atmospheric state by combining both remote-sensing and in situ observations of the same clouds to create realistic vertical profiles of cloud properties that are consistent with both observed particle size distributions and bulk ice mass. The simulations are compared to measurements from the International Submillimetre Airborne Radiometer (ISMAR), which is an airborne demonstrator for ICI. It is shown that whilst they are generally able to reproduce the observed cloud signals, for a given ice water path (IWP) there is considerable sensitivity to the cloud microphysics, including the distribution of ice mass within the cloud and the ice particle habit. Accurate retrievals from ICI will therefore require realistic representations of cloud microphysical properties. Copyright statement. The works published in this journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This license does not affect the Crown copyright work, which is re-usable under the Open Government Licence (OGL). The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and the OGL are interoperable and do not conflict with, reduce or limit each other.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Christophe Bellisario; Helen E. Brindley; Jonathan E. Murray; Juliet C. Pickering; R. Chawn Harlow; Stuart Fox; Cathryn Fox; Stuart M. Newman; Maureen Smith; Doug Anderson; Xianglei Huang
The Tropospheric Airborne Fourier Transform Spectrometer (TAFTS) measured near surface upwelling and downwelling radiances within the far infrared (FIR) over Greenland during two flights in March 2015. Here we exploit observations from one of these flights to provide in-situ estimates of FIR surface emissivity, encompassing the range 80-535 cm-1. The flight campaign and instrumental set-up is described as well as the retrieval method, including the quality control performed on the observations. The combination of measurement and atmospheric profile uncertainties means that the retrieved surface emissivity has the smallest estimated error over the range 360-535 cm-1, (18.7-27.8 μm), lying between 0.89 and 1 with an associated error which is of the order ± 0.06. Between 80 and 360 cm-1, the increasing opacity of the atmosphere, coupled with the uncertainty in the atmospheric state, means that the associated errors are larger and the emissivity values cannot be said to be distinct from 1. These FIR surface emissivity values are, to the best of our knowledge, the first ever from aircraft-based measurements. We have compared them to a recently developed theoretical database designed to predict the infrared surface emissivity of frozen surfaces. When considering the FIR alone, we are able to match the retrievals within uncertainties. However, when we include contemporaneous retrievals from the mid infrared (MIR), no single theoretical representation is able to capture the FIR and MIR behaviour simultaneously. Our results point towards the need for model improvement and further testing, ideally including in-situ characterisation of the underlying surface conditions.
Hyperspectral Imaging and Sounding of the Environment | 2016
Helen E. Brindley; J. E. Murray; Chawn Harlow; Alan Woolley; Stuart Fox; Juliet C. Pickering
We report on efforts to obtain observationally based estimates of far-infrared surface emissivity over snow and ice. We highlight one flight from the CIRCCREX-COSMICS airborne campaign over Greenland during March 2015.
united states national committee of ursi national radio science meeting | 2013
Stuart Fox
The effect of the atmosphere on radar coverage in complex coastal environments is of great importance in many naval applications. Variations in atmospheric refractivity driven by vertical gradients of temperature and moisture can significantly enhance or reduce the range at which a particular target may be detected. Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models can be used to predict the spatial and temporal variation of atmospheric refractivity fields, which form the basis for forecasting radar coverage patterns.
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2016
Stuart Fox; Clare Lee; Brian Moyna; Martin Philipp; Ian Rule; Stuart Rogers; Robert King; M. Oldfield; Simon Rea; Manju Henry; Hui Wang; R. Chawn Harlow
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2017
Manfred Brath; Stuart Fox; Patrick Eriksson; R. Chawn Harlow; Martin Burgdorf; Stefan Buehler
Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad), 2014 13th Specialist Meeting on | 2014
Stuart Fox; Clare Lee; Ian Rule; Robert King; Stuart Rogers; Chawn Harlow; Anthony J. Baran
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Gary Lloyd; T. W. Choularton; Keith N. Bower; Martin Gallagher; Jonathan Crosier; Sebastian O apos; Shea; Steven J. Abel; Stuart Fox; Richard Cotton; Ian A. Boutle
15th Conference on Cloud Physics/15th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation | 2018
Anthony J. Baran; Stephan Havemann; Stuart Fox; Chawn Harlow; Jean-Claude Thelen; Evelyn Hesse; Odran Sourdeval; Hiroshi Ishimoto; Keith N. Bower; Sebastian O'Shea