Stuart J. Forbes

Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover and regeneration.

In order to establish whether extra‐renal cells contribute to the turnover and repair of renal tissues, this study examined kidneys of female mice that had received a male bone marrow transplant and kidney biopsies from male patients who had received kidney transplants from female donors. By using in situ hybridization to detect Y‐chromosomes it could be demonstrated that circulating stem cells frequently engraft into the kidney and differentiate into renal parenchymal cells. In the human renal grafts it was confirmed that some of the recipient‐derived cells within the kidney exhibited a tubular epithelial phenotype, by combining in situ hybridization with immunostaining for the epithelial markers CAM 5.2 and the lectin Ulex europaeus. Female mouse recipients of male bone marrow grafts showed co‐localization of Y‐chromosomes and tubular epithelial markers Ricinus communis and Lens culinaris, and a specific cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP1A2) indicating an appropriate functional capability of clustered newly formed marrow‐derived tubular epithelial cells. Y‐chromosome‐containing cells were observed within glomeruli, with morphology and location appropriate for podocytes. Within the murine kidney, these Y‐chromosome‐positive cells were negative for the mouse macrophage marker F4/80 antigen and leukocyte common antigen, but were vimentin‐positive. The presence of bone marrow‐derived cells was noted in both histologically normal mouse kidneys and in human transplanted kidneys suffering damage from a variety of causes. These data indicate that bone marrow cells contribute to both normal turnover of renal epithelia and regeneration after damage, and it is suggested that this could be exploited therapeutically. Copyright

Adult stem cell plasticity

Observations made in the last few years support the existence of pathways, in adult humans and rodents, that allow adult stem cells to be surprisingly flexible in their differentiation repertoires. Termed plasticity, this property allows adult stem cells, assumed, until now, to be committed to generating a fixed range of progeny, to switch, when they have been relocated, to make other specialized sets of cells appropriate to their new niche. Reprogramming of some adult stem cells can occur in vivo; the stem cells normally resident in bone marrow appear particularly flexible and are able to contribute usefully to multiple recipient organs. This process produces cells with specialized structural and metabolic adaptations commensurate with their new locations. In a few examples, the degree of support is sufficient to assist or even rescue recipient mice from genetic defects. Some studies provide evidence for the expansion of the reprogrammed cells locally, but in most it remains possible that cells arrive and redifferentiate, but are no longer stem cells. Nevertheless, the fact that appropriately differentiated cells are delivered deep within organs simply by injection of bone marrow cells should make us think differently about the way that organs regenerate and repair. Migratory pathways for stem cells in adult organisms may exist that could be exploited to effect repairs using an individuals own stem cells, perhaps after gene therapy. Logical extensions of this concept are that a transplanted organ would become affected by the genetic susceptibilities of the recipient, alleles that re‐express themselves via marrow‐derived stem cells, and that plasticity after bone marrow transplantation would also transfer different phenotypes, affecting important parameters such as susceptibility to long‐term complications of diabetes, or the ability to metabolize drugs in the liver. This article reviews some of the evidence for stem cell plasticity in rodents and man. Copyright

Bone marrow derivation of pericryptal myofibroblasts in the mouse and human small intestine and colon

Background and aims: In order to establish whether extraintestinal cells contribute to the turnover and repair of gastrointestinal tissues, we studied the colons and small intestines of female mice that had received a male bone marrow transplant, together with gastrointestinal biopsies from female patients that had developed graft versus host disease after receiving a bone marrow transplant from male donors. Methods: Using in situ hybridisation to detect Y chromosomes and immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated that cells derived from injected bone marrow frequently engrafted into the intestine and differentiated into pericryptal myofibroblasts. Results: In the human intestine, we confirmed by combining in situ hybridisation with immunostaining for smooth muscle actin that the bone marrow derived cells within the intestine exhibited a myofibroblast phenotype. In female mouse recipients of male bone marrow grafts, we observed colocalisation of Y chromosomes and clusters of newly formed marrow derived myofibroblasts. While few of these were present at seven days after bone marrow transplantation, they were numerous at 14 days, and by six weeks entire columns of pericryptal myofibroblasts could be seen running up the sides of crypts in both the small intestine and colon. These columns appeared to extend into the villi in the small intestine. Within the intestinal lamina propria, these Y chromosome positive cells were negative for the mouse macrophage marker F4/80 antigen and CD34. Conclusions: Bone marrow derived pericryptal myofibroblasts were present in the mouse intestine following irradiation and bone marrow transplant, and in the intestines of human patients suffering graft versus host disease following a bone marrow transplant. Our data indicate that bone marrow cells contribute to the regeneration of intestinal myofibroblasts and epithelium after damage, and we suggest that this could be exploited therapeutically.

Multiple Organ Engraftment by Bone‐Marrow‐Derived Myofibroblasts and Fibroblasts in Bone‐Marrow‐Transplanted Mice

Myofibroblasts are ubiquitous cells with features of both fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. We suggest that the bone marrow can contribute to myofibroblast populations in a variety of tissues and that this is exacerbated by injury. To assess this, female mice were transplanted with male bone marrow and the male cells were tracked throughout the body and identified as myofibroblasts. Skin wounding and paracetamol administration were used to assess whether myofibroblast engraftment was modulated by damage. Following radiation injury, a proportion of myofibroblasts in the lung, stomach, esophagus, skin, kidney, and adrenal capsule were bone‐marrow derived. In the lung, there was significantly greater engraftment following paracetamol administration (17% versus 41% p < 0.005). Bone‐marrow‐derived fibroblasts were also found. We suggest that bone marrow contributes to a circulating population of cells and, in the context of injury, these cells are recruited and contribute to tissue repair.

Hepatic stem cells

The liver in an adult healthy body maintains a balance between cell gain and cell loss. Though normally proliferatively quiescent, hepatocyte loss such as that caused by partial hepatectomy, uncomplicated by virus infection or inflammation, invokes a rapid regenerative response to restore liver mass. This restoration of moderate cell loss and ‘wear and tear’ renewal is largely achieved by hepatocyte self‐replication. Furthermore, hepatocyte transplants in animals have shown that a certain proportion of hepatocytes can undergo significant clonal expansion, suggesting that hepatocytes themselves are the functional stem cells of the liver. More severe liver injury can activate a potential stem cell compartment located within the intrahepatic biliary tree, giving rise to cords of bipotential so‐called oval cells within the lobules that can differentiate into hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells. A third population of stem cells with hepatic potential resides in the bone marrow; these haematopoietic stem cells can contribute to the albeit low renewal rate of hepatocytes, make a more significant contribution to regeneration, and even completely restore normal function in a murine model of hereditary tyrosinaemia. How these three stem cell populations integrate together to achieve a homeostatic balance is not known. This review focuses on two major aspects of liver stem cell biology: firstly, the identity of the liver stem cells, and secondly, their potential value in the treatment of major liver disease. Copyright

An introduction to stem cells

1998 saw the publication of two papers describing the growth in vitro of human embryonic stem (ES) cells derived either from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the early blastocyst or the primitive gonadal regions of early aborted fetuses. Work on murine ES cells over many years had already established the amazing flexibility of ES cells, essentially able to differentiate into almost all cells that arise from the three germ layers. The realization of such pluripotentiality (see below) has, of course, resulted in the field of stem cell research going into overdrive, the establishment of many new biotechnology companies (http://www.stemcellresearchnew.com/catalog1677.html), and a genuine belief that stem cell research will deliver a revolution in terms of how we treat cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, cancer, diabetes, and the like. However, many people believe that early human embryos should be accorded the same status as any sentient being and thus their ‘harvesting’ for stem cells is morally unjustifiable. With this in mind, other sources of malleable stem cells have been sought. In the adult, organ formation and regeneration was thought to occur through the action of organ‐ or tissue‐restricted stem cells (i.e. haematopoietic stem cells giving rise to all the cells of the blood, neural stem cells making neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes). However, it is now believed that stem cells from one organ system, for example the haematopoietic compartment can develop into the differentiated cells within another organ system, such as the liver, brain or kidney. Thus, certain adult stem cells may turn out be as malleable as ES cells and so also be useful in regenerative medicine. This brief overview summarizes the important attributes of tissue‐based stem cells and clarifies the terms used. Copyright

Hepatic stem cells: from inside and outside the liver?

Abstract.u2002 u2002The liver is normally proliferatively quiescent, but hepatocyte loss through partial hepatectomy, uncomplicated by virus infection or inflammation, invokes a rapid regenerative response from all cell types in the liver to perfectly restore liver mass. Moreover, hepatocyte transplants in animals have shown that a certain proportion of hepatocytes in foetal and adult liver can clonally expand, suggesting that hepatoblasts/hepatocytes are themselves the functional stem cells of the liver. More severe liver injury can activate a potential stem cell compartment located within the intrahepatic biliary tree, giving rise to cords of bipotential transit amplifying cells (oval cells), that can ultimately differentiate into hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells. A third population of stem cells with hepatic potential resides in the bone marrow; these haematopoietic stem cells may contribute to the albeit low renewal rate of hepatocytes, but can make a more significant contribution to regeneration under a very strong positive selection pressure. In such instances, cell fusion rather than transdifferentiation appears to be the underlying mechanism by which the haematopoietic genome becomes reprogrammed.

The new stem cell biology: something for everyone

The ability of multipotential adult stem cells to cross lineage boundaries (transdifferentiate) is currently causing heated debate in the scientific press. The proponents see adult stem cells as an attractive alternative to the use of embryonic stem cells in regenerative medicine (the treatment of diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, etc). However, opponents have questioned the very existence of the process, claiming that cell fusion is responsible for the phenomenon. This review sets out to provide a critical evaluation of the current literature in the adult stem cell field.

The sources of parenchymal regeneration after chronic hepatocellular liver injury in mice

After liver injury, parenchymal regeneration occurs through hepatocyte replication. However, during regenerative stress, oval cells (OCs) and small hepatocyte like progenitor cells (SHPCs) contribute to the process. We systematically studied the intra‐hepatic and extra‐hepatic sources of liver cell replacement in the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg‐tg) mouse model of chronic liver injury. Female HBsAg‐tg mice received a bone marrow (BM) transplant from male HBsAg‐negative mice, and half of these animals received retrorsine to block indigenous hepatocyte proliferation. Livers were examined 3 and 6 months post‐BM transplantation for evidence of BM‐derived hepatocytes, OCs, and SHPCs. In animals that did not receive retrorsine, parenchymal regeneration occurred through hepatocyte replication, and the BM very rarely contributed to hepatocyte regeneration. In mice receiving retrorsine, 4.8% of hepatocytes were Y chromosome positive at 3 months, but this was frequently attributable to cell fusion between indigenous hepatocytes and donor BM, and their frequency decreased to 1.6% by 6 months, as florid OC reactions and nodules of SHPCs developed. By analyzing serial sections and reconstructing a 3‐dimensional map, continuous streams of OCs could be seen that surrounded and entered deep into the nodules of SHPCs, connecting directly with SHPCs, suggesting a conversion of OCs into SHPCs. In conclusion, during regenerative stress, the contribution to parenchymal regeneration from the BM is minor and frequently attributable to cell fusion. OCs and SHPCs are of intrinsic hepatic origin, and OCs can form SHPC nodules. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;43:316–324.)

Hepatic and renal differentiation from blood-borne stem cells

The recognition that adult bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) can traffic into the liver and kidney and differentiate into a variety of cell types such as epithelial cells, endothelial cells and myofibroblasts has caused excitement. This has expanded our knowledge of how these organs regenerate following damage and provides new opportunities for therapeutic exploitation. BMSC transplants have already been used to correct a murine model of metabolic liver disease. Bone marrow stem cells that transdifferentiate into long-lasting cells within the liver and kidney are proposed as suitable targets for gene therapy and may be used in the correction of single gene defects, or the delivery of antiviral and anti-inflammatory genes to the liver and kidney. There is growing evidence that BMSCs can repopulate the endothelium of transplanted livers and kidneys and thus may potentially be manipulated to induce graft tolerance within solid organ transplants. However, there are technical barriers to be overcome before the theoretical benefits of this exiting new area becomes a practical prospect.