Stuart MacLeod
Family Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stuart MacLeod.
American Journal of Public Health | 2006
Paul Masotti; Robert Fick; Ana P. Johnson-Masotti; Stuart MacLeod
Naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs) are broadly defined as communities where individuals either remain or move when they retire. Using the determinants of health model as a base, we hypothesize that some environmental determinants have a different impact on people at different ages. Health benefits to living within NORCs have been observed and likely vary depending upon where the specific NORC exists on the NORC to healthy-NORC spectrum. Some NORC environments are healthier than others for seniors, because the NORC environment has characteristics associated with better health for seniors. Health benefits within healthy NORCs are higher where physical and social environments facilitate greater activity and promote feelings of well-being. Compared to the provision of additional medical or social services, healthy NORCs are a low-cost community-level approach to facilitating healthy aging. Municipal governments should pursue policies that stimulate and support the development of healthy NORCs.
PharmacoEconomics | 2008
Deborah A. Marshall; Patrick R. Douglas; Michael Drummond; George W. Torrance; Stuart MacLeod; Orlando Manti; Lokanadha Cheruvu; Ron Corvari
Until now, there has been no standardized method of performing and presenting budget impact analyses (BIAs) in Canada. Nevertheless, most drug plan managers have been requiring this economic data to inform drug reimbursement decisions. This paper describes the process used to develop the Canadian BIA Guidelines; describes the Guidelines themselves, including the model template; and compares this guidance with other guidance on BIAs. The intended audience includes those who develop, submit or use BIA models, and drug plan managers who evaluate BIA submissions.The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) initiated the development of the Canadian BIA Guidelines on behalf of the National Prescription Drug Utilisation Information System (NPDUIS). The findings and recommendations from a needs assessment with respect to BIA submissions were reviewed to inform guideline development. In addition, a literature review was performed to identify existing BIA guidance. The detailed guidance was developed on this basis, and with the input of the NPDUIS Advisory Committee, including drug plan managers from multiple provinces in Canada and a representative from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. A Microsoft® Excel-based interactive model template was designed to support BIA model development. Input regarding the guidelines and model template was sought from each NPDUIS Advisory Committee member to ensure compatibility with existing drug plan needs. Decisions were made by consensus through multiple rounds of review and discussion. Finally, BIA guidance in Canadian provinces and other countries were compared on the basis of multiple criteria.The BIA guidelines consist of three major sections: Analytic Framework, Inputs and Data Sources, and Reporting Format. The Analytic Framework section contains a discussion of nine general issues surrounding BIAs (model design, analytic perspective, time horizon, target population, costing, scenarios to be compared, the characterisation of uncertainty, discounting, and validation methods). The Inputs and Data Sources section addresses methods for market size estimation, comparator selection, scenario forecasting and drug price estimation. The Reporting Format section describes methods for BIA reporting.The new Canadian BIA Guidelines represent a significant departure from the limited guidance that was previously available from some of the provinces, because they include specific details of the methods of performing BIAs. The Canadian BIA Guidelines differ from the Principles of Good Research Practice for BIAs developed by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), which provide more general guidance.The Canadian BIA Guidelines and template build upon existing guidance to address the specific requirements of each of the participating drug plans in Canada. Both have been endorsed by the NPDUIS Steering Committee and the PMPRB for the standardization of BIA submissions.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy | 2006
Deborah A. Marshall; Jacqueline Gough; Paul Grootendorst; Melanie Buitendyk; Barbara Jaszewski; Susan Simonyi; Farah Jivraj; Stuart MacLeod
Objective: In a potential attempt to guide antibiotic prescribing based on current clinical evidence and mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance, in March 2001 the Ontario Drug Benefit programme restricted reimbursement of two fluoroquinolone antibiotics – ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin – to its beneficiaries. Our objective was to determine the impact of this policy on the volume and cost of antibiotic prescribing. Method: Weekly administrative data on antibiotic prescribing volumes and expenditures were analysed between January 1999 and September 2002 to estimate the effect of the policy changes using time series analysis. Results: The policy changes were associated with a statistically significant shift downwards for the fluoroquinolones as a category (1905 fewer prescriptions each week, representing a saving of Can
PLOS Medicine | 2006
Paul Masotti; M. Anne George; Karen Szala-Meneok; A. Michel Morton; Christine Loock; Marilyn Van Bibber; Jennifer Ranford; Michael F. Fleming; Stuart MacLeod
105,707 a week), driven by a decrease in prescriptions for ciprofloxacin (2084 fewer prescriptions a week, saving Can
The Canadian journal of clinical pharmacology | 2009
Michael Drummond; Bill Evans; Jacques LeLorier; Pierre Karakiewicz; Douglas Martin; Peter; Stuart MacLeod
129,421 a week). Nitrofurantoin (200 more prescriptions a week, costing an extra Can
Paediatrics and Child Health | 2001
Lama Abi Khaled; Fida Ahmad; Tom Brogan; Joan Fearnley; John Graham; Stuart MacLeod; Joan McCormick
2082 a week) and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (532 more prescriptions a week, costing an extra Can
Canadian Journal of Cardiology | 2003
Adrian R. Levy; Bernie J. O'Brien; Ed Mcmullen; Frank W. May; Catherine Demers; Deborah A. Marshall; Stuart MacLeod
1473 a week) demonstrated a statistically significant shift upwards. The latter also showed a decrease in trend and nitrofurantoin an increase in trend during the time period. There was no statistically significant change in either the total number of antibiotic prescriptions or expenditures associated with the policy of limiting their use. Conclusions: Although no direct cause and effect can be shown with these observational data, the results suggest that the change in reimbursement policy to restrict prescribing of fluoroquinolones decreased their use and associated expenditures. These decreases were offset by increases in the use of other antibiotics. The balance of consequent benefit and harm of these shifts in prescribing patterns needs to be examined carefully. Alternative solutions to encourage appropriate use of antibiotics deserve exploration.
Paediatrics and Child Health | 2011
Stuart MacLeod
The authors describe their three-year project working collaboratively with Aboriginal communities to prevent fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.
HealthcarePapers | 2011
Ronald R. Lindstrom; Stuart MacLeod; Adrian R. Levy
Alaska medicine | 2007
Paul Masotti; Robert Fick; Ana P. Johnson-Masotti; Stuart MacLeod