Subhakar Mutyala

Change in Seroma Volume During Whole-Breast Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE After breast-conserving surgery, a seroma often forms in the surgical cavity. If not drained, it may affect the volume of tumor bed requiring a boost after whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT). Our objective was to evaluate the change in seroma volume that occurs during WBRT, before boost planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective review was performed of women receiving breast-conserving therapy with evidence of seroma at the time of WBRT planning. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was performed before WBRT and before the tumor bed boost. All patients received either a hypofractionated (42.4 Gy/16 fraction + 9.6 Gy/4 fraction boost) or standard fractionated (50.4 Gy/28 fraction + 10 Gy/5 fraction boost) regimen. Seroma volumes were contoured and compared on CT at the time of WBRT simulation and tumor bed boost planning. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with evidence of seroma were identified and all patients received WBRT without drainage of the seroma. Mean seroma volume before WBRT and at boost planning were significantly different at 65.7 cm(3) (SD, 50.5 cm(3)) and 35.6 cm(3) (SD, 24.8 cm(3)), respectively (p < 0.001). Mean and median reduction in seroma volume during radiation were 39.6% (SD, 23.8%) and 46.2% (range, 10.7-76.7%), respectively. Fractionation schedule was not correlated with change in seroma volume. Length of time from surgery to start of radiation therapy showed an inverse correlation with change in seroma volume (Pearson correlation r = -0.53, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The volume of seroma changes significantly during WBRT. Consequently, the accuracy of breast boost planning is likely affected, as is the volume of normal breast tissue irradiated. CT-based boost planning before boost irradiation is suggested to ensure appropriate coverage.

Dose volume histogram analysis of normal structures associated with accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered by high dose rate brachytherapy and comparison with whole breast external beam radiotherapy fields

PurposeTo assess the radiation dose delivered to the heart and ipsilateral lung during accelerated partial breast brachytherapy using a MammoSite™ applicator and compare to those produced by whole breast external beam radiotherapy (WBRT).Materials and methodsDosimetric analysis was conducted on patients receiving MammoSite breast brachytherapy following conservative surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma. Cardiac dose was evaluated for patients with left breast tumors with a CT scan encompassing the entire heart. Lung dose was evaluated for patients in whom the entire lung was scanned. The prescription dose of 3400 cGy was 1 cm from the balloon surface. MammoSite dosimetry was compared to simulated WBRT fields with and without radiobiological correction for the effects of dose and fractionation. Dose parameters such as the volume of the structure receiving 10 Gy or more (V10) and the dose received by 20 cc of the structure (D20), were calculated as well as the maximum and mean doses received.ResultsFifteen patients were studied, five had complete lung data and six had left-sided tumors with complete cardiac data. Ipsilateral lung volumes ranged from 925–1380 cc. Cardiac volumes ranged from 337–551 cc. MammoSite resulted in a significantly lower percentage lung V30 and lung and cardiac V20 than the WBRT fields, with and without radiobiological correction.ConclusionThis study gives low values for incidental radiation received by the heart and ipsilateral lung using the MammoSite applicator. The volume of heart and lung irradiated to clinically significant levels was significantly lower with the MammoSite applicator than using simulated WBRT fields of the same CT data sets.Trial registrationDana Farber Trial Registry number 03-179

PERMANENT IODINE-125 INTERSTITIAL PLANAR SEED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CLOSE OR POSITIVE MARGINS FOR THORACIC MALIGNANCIES

PURPOSE To assess toxicity and outcome following permanent iodine-125 seed implant as an adjunct to surgical resection in cases of advanced thoracic malignancy. METHODS AND MATERIALS An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed. Fifty-nine patients were identified as having undergone thoracic brachytherapy seed implantation between September 1999 and December 2006. Data for patient demographics, tumor details, and morbidity and mortality were recorded. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients received 64 implants. At a median follow-up of 17 months, 1-year and 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of estimated overall survival were 94.1% and 82.0%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 80.1% and 67.4%, respectively. The median time to develop local recurrence was 11 months. Grades 3 and 4 toxicity rates were 12% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS This review shows relatively low toxicity for interstitial planar seed implantation after thoracic surgical resection. The high local control results suggest that an incomplete oncologic surgery plus a brachytherapy implant for treating advanced thoracic malignancy merit further investigation.

Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data

PURPOSE We correlated rectal and bladder point and volumetric dose data in patients treated for advanced cervix cancers with combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). The results are compared with published Vienna applicator data. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed 30 individual combined intracavitary plus interstitial implants from 10 patients treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by HDR BT for locally advanced cervix carcinoma. EBRT consisted of 45 Gy to the pelvis followed by 9-14.4 Gy boost to involved parametria. BT consisted of a total dose of 21 Gy delivered in 7 Gy fraction. For each implant, CT-image-based simulation and image-guided BT treatment planning was performed. Bladder and rectal doses were evaluated and analyzed using both International commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference points and dose-volume histograms. The cumulative doses to the rectum and bladder were calculated by combining contributions from external beam therapy and BT. To facilitate comparison with published literature, the total doses were normalized to equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) using the equation EQD2total = EQD2EBRT + EQD2BT. RESULTS For the patient population considered, the mean ICRU bladder dose was 75 (+/-4) Gy3 compared to bladder D0.1 cc and D2 cc doses of 84 (+/-4) and 78 (+/-3) Gy3, respectively. The mean ICRU rectal dose was 73 (+/-4) Gy3 compared to rectal D0.1 cc and D2 cc doses of 79 (+/-5) and 74 (+/-4) Gy3, respectively. For rectum, the mean dose ratios (D0.1 cc/D(ICRU)) and (D2 cc/D(ICRU)) were 1.08 and 1.01, respectively, compared to Vienna applicator study mean dose ratios of 1.08 and 0.93, respectively. ICRU rectal dose correlated with volumetric rectal doses and best with volumetric D2 cc dose (rS = 0.91, p = 0.0003); however, ICRU bladder dose did not correlate with volumetric bladder dose. CONCLUSIONS Our study findings reveal a strong correlation between ICRU rectal reference dose and volumetric rectal D2 cc dose in combined intracavitary-interstitial HDR brachytherapy. This surrogate rectal-dose relationship is valuable in establishing rectal tolerance dose levels in transitioning from traditional two-dimensional to image-based three-dimensional dose planning.

Intraoperative seed placement for thoracic malignancy—A review of technique, indications, and published literature

PURPOSE This review examines the role of permanent radioactive seed implantation in thoracic malignancy. This technique can be used intraoperatively to provide additional highly localized radiation therapy in cases where optimal oncologic margins are unattainable or to palliate unresectable disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS Relevant trials were identified through a systematic literature search using Pubmed. RESULTS The intraoperative placement of brachytherapy seeds has been described after sublobar resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where surgical margins are close or microscopically positive and in the presence of macroscopic residual disease. This brachytherapy technique is currently the focus of a randomized prospective trial in the USA in patients unfit for lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the methods of brachytherapy seed placement and the published experience of brachytherapy implants within the thorax, also examining radiation safety and postoperative dosimetry. This technique has the potential to improve local control with optimal sparing of normal tissue owing to its highly conformal radiotherapy delivery.

ICRU reference dose in an era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy clinical trials: correlation with planning target volume mean dose and suitability for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE IMRT clinical trials lack dose prescription and specification standards similar to ICRU standards for two- and three-dimensional external beam planning. In this study, we analyzed dose distributions for patients whose treatment plans incorporated IMRT, and compared the dose determined at the ICRU reference point to the PTV doses determined from dose-volume histograms. Additionally, we evaluated if ICRU reference type single-point dose prescriptions are suitable for IMRT dose prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this study, IMRT plans of 117 patients treated at our institution were randomly selected and analyzed. The treatment plans were clinically applied to the following disease sites: abdominal (11), anal (10), brain (11), gynecological (15), head and neck (25), lung (15), male pelvis (10) and prostate (20). The ICRU reference point was located in each treatment plan following ICRU Report 50 guidelines. The reference point was placed in the central part of the PTV and at or near the isocenter. In each case, the dose was calculated and recorded to this point. For each patient--volume and dose (PTV, PTV mean, median and modal) information was extracted from the planned dose-volume histogram. RESULTS The ICRU reference dose vs PTV mean dose relationship in IMRT exhibited a weak positive association (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.63). In approximately 65% of the cases studied, dose at the ICRU reference point was greater than the corresponding PTV mean dose. The dose difference between ICRU reference and PTV mean doses was 2% in approximately 79% of the cases studied (average 1.21% (+/-1.55), range -4% to +4%). Paired t-test analyses showed that the ICRU reference doses and PTV median doses were statistically similar (p=0.42). The magnitude of PTV did not influence the difference between ICRU reference and PTV mean doses. CONCLUSIONS The general relationship between ICRU reference and PTV mean doses in IMRT is similar to that in 3D CRT distributions. Point doses in IMRT are influenced by the degree of intensity modulation as well as calculation grid size utilized. Although the ICRU reference point type prescriptions conceptually may be extended for IMRT dose prescriptions and used as a representative of tumor dose, new universally acceptable dose prescription and specification standards for IMRT based on RTOG IMRT prescription model incorporating dose-volume specification would likely lead to greater consistency among treatment centers.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSE To update brachytherapy recommendations for pretreatment evaluation, treatment, and dosimetric issues for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in thoracic brachytherapy updated recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy based on literature review and clinical experience. RESULTS The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines recommend the use of endobronchial brachytherapy for disease palliation in patients with central obstructing lesions, particularly in patients who have previously received external beam radiotherapy. The use of interstitial implants after incomplete resection may improve outcomes and provide enhanced palliation. Early reports support the use of CT-guided intratumoral volume implants within clinical studies. The use of brachytherapy routinely after sublobar resection is not generally recommended, unless within the confines of a clinical trial or a registry. CONCLUSIONS American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy are provided. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these guidelines and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality to increase the evidence base for its use.

A New Approach to Reduce Number of Split Fields in Large Field IMRT

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been applied for treatments of primary head with neck nodes, lung with supraclavicular nodes, and high-risk prostate cancer with pelvis wall nodes, all of which require large fields. However, the design of the Varian multileaf collimator requires fields >14 cm in width to be split into 2 or more carriage movements. With the split-field technique, both the number of monitor units (MUs) and total treatment time are significantly increased. Although many different approaches have been investigated to reduce the MU, including introducing new leaf segmentation algorithms, none have resulted in widespread success. In addition, for most clinics, writing such algorithms is not a feasible solution, particularly with commercial treatment planning systems. We introduce a new approach that can minimize the number of split fields and reduce the total MUs, thereby reducing treatment time. The technique is demonstrated on the Eclipse planning system V7.3, but could be generalized to any other system.

A multidisciplinary approach to fertility-sparing therapy for a rare vulvar tumor

OBJECTIVE Case report of a young woman with a rare vulvar malignancy who received treatment with a personalized multidisciplinary approach to balance management of her malignancy without compromising survival with her desire for future pregnancy. DESIGN Case report. SETTING University hospital. PATIENT(S) A 33-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 1-0-1-1, who had a diagnosis of synovial cell sarcoma of the vulva and who desired future fertility. INTERVENTION(S) At multiple steps, treatment was planned to try to maximize fertility preservation without potentially affecting initial treatment, which included a radical hemivulvectomy with bilateral lymph node dissection, brachytherapy with interstitial needles (20 Gy), and external beam radiation therapy (50 Gy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Treatment and eradication of the malignancy and achievement of a successful subsequent pregnancy and live birth. RESULT(S) The patient had no evidence of disease for 2 years after treatment. During that time she received preconception counseling by both a perinatologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. She conceived with the use of ultrasound monitoring to time intercourse specifically with ovulation from the contralateral ovary and had an uncomplicated pregnancy with a term delivery. CONCLUSION(S) By using several disciplines and subspecialists, this patient received personalized treatment for a rare cancer, focused at curing her cancer and optimizing her future fertility.

Effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with SIB technique on local control and toxicity for neoadjuvant pelvic radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy for rectal cancer compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapies.

632 Background: To compare the areas of residual disease after neoadjuvant pelvic radiation with 5-FU based chemotherapy for rectal cancer using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique compared to 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Methods: Fourty nine (49) consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with pelvic radiation and concurrent 5-FU based chemotherapy were analyzed. We compared twenty-eight (28) patients treated on an institutional IMRT protocol versus twenty-one (21) patients treated with 3DCRT. All patients received 45-50.4 Gy to the pelvis in 3DCRT group. All patients with IMRT received 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvic no des. The primary rectal tumor recieved a simultaneous integrated boost to a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. IMRT planning was done with dose constraints for bladder, rectum, and small bowel and bone marrow. All patients in both groups received 5-FU based chemotherapy during radiation. Evaluation of toxicity was base...