Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sue Ashley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sue Ashley.


The Lancet | 1998

Interim analysis of the incidence of breast cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen randomised chemoprevention trial

Trevor J. Powles; Ros Eeles; Sue Ashley; Doug Easton; Jenny Chang; Mitch Dowsett; Alwynne Tidy; Jenny Viggers; Jane B. Davey

BACKGROUND Tamoxifen, a drug with antioestrogenic effects, is predicted to prevent the occurrence of breast cancer. We have undertaken a trial of tamoxifen in healthy women who are at increased risk of breast cancer because of family history. We report a planned interim analysis. METHODS Between October, 1986, and April, 1996, we accrued 2494 healthy women aged between 30 and 70 with a family history of breast cancer. They have been randomised (double blind) to receive tamoxifen 20 mg per day orally or placebo for up to 8 years. Follow-up included clinical assessment, annual mammography, and assessment of toxicity and compliance. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breast cancer, which was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with a survival curve. FINDINGS With a median follow-up of 70 months, 2471 women (tamoxifen 1238, placebo 1233) were suitable for analysis. The groups were evenly matched at baseline, and compliance was good. The overall frequency of breast cancer is the same for women on tamoxifen or placebo (tamoxifen 34, placebo 36, relative risk 1.06 [95% CI 0.7-1.7], p=0.8). Participants who were already on hormone-replacement therapy when they entered the study had an increased risk of breast cancer compared with non-users. Those participants who started such therapy while on trial had a significantly reduced risk. The safety profile of tamoxifen was as expected. INTERPRETATION We have been unable to show any effect of tamoxifen on breast-cancer incidence in healthy women, contrary to the report from the NSABP-P1 study showing a 45% reduction in healthy women given tamoxifen versus placebo. Differences in the study populations for the two trials may underlie these conflicting findings: eligibility in our trial was based predominantly on a strong family history of breast cancer whereas in the NSABP trial was mostly based on non-genetic risk factors. The importance of oestrogen promotion may vary between such populations.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996

Effect of tamoxifen on bone mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in healthy premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Trevor J. Powles; Tamas Hickish; John A. Kanis; Alwynne Tidy; Sue Ashley

PURPOSE Tamoxifen is an effective treatment for metastatic and primary breast cancer and is now being evaluated as a chemoprevention agent in healthy women. Any long-term effects on estrogen-sensitive tissues such as bone may have important therapeutic implications. METHODS We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and hip using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in premenopausal and postmenopausal healthy women who participated in our placebo-controlled tamoxifen chemoprevention of breast cancer trial. RESULTS BMD data are now available from 179 women for this analysis. In premenopausal women, BMD decreased progressively in the lumbar spine (P < .001) and in the hip (P < .05) for women on tamoxifen, but not those on placebo. The mean annual loss in lumbar BMD per year over the 3-year study period in tamoxifen-treated compliant women who remained premenopausal throughout the study period was 1.44% (1.88% calculated on an intent-to-treat basis) compared with a small gain of 0.24% per annum for women on placebo (P < .001). Tamoxifen had the opposite effect in postmenopausal women. The mean annual increase in BMD for women on tamoxifen was 1.17% in the spine (P < .005) and 1.71% in the hip (P < .001) compared with a noninsignificant loss for women on placebo. CONCLUSION These results indicate that tamoxifen treatment is associated with a significant loss of BMD in premenopausal women, whereas it prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. These adverse and beneficial effects of tamoxifen should be considered in the assessment of the therapeutic benefits for both the adjuvant treatment and the chemoprevention of breast cancer.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of clodronate in patients with primary operable breast cancer.

Trevor J. Powles; Sandy Paterson; John A. Kanis; Eugene McCloskey; Sue Ashley; Alwynne Tidy; Kirsi Rosenqvist; Ian E. Smith; Lars Ottestad; Sandra Legault; Marjo Pajunen; Auli Nevantaus; Esa Männistö; Anne Suovuori; Sari Atula; Jaakko Nevalainen; Liisa Pylkkänen

PURPOSE The development of bone metastases depends on tumor-induced osteoclastic resorption of bone, which may be inhibited by the antiosteolytic bisphosphonate clodronate. Given to patients with primary breast cancer, clodronate might reduce the subsequent incidence of bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS This double-blind, multicenter trial accrued 1,069 assessable patients with operable breast cancer between 1989 and 1995. All patients received surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tamoxifen as required. Patients were randomized to receive oral clodronate 1,600 mg/d or a placebo for 2 years starting within 6 months of primary treatment. The primary end point was relapse in bone, analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, during the medication period and during the total follow-up period (median follow-up, 2,007 days). Secondary end points were relapse in other sites, mortality, and toxicity. RESULTS During the total follow-up period, there was a nonsignificant reduction in occurrence of bone metastases (clodronate, n = 63; placebo, n = 80; hazards ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.08; P =.127). During the medication period there was a significant reduction in the occurrence of bone metastases (clodronate, n = 12; placebo, n = 28; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86; P =.016). The occurrence of nonosseous metastases was similar (clodronate, n = 112; placebo, n = 128; P =.257), but there was a significant reduction in mortality (clodronate, n = 98; placebo, n = 129; P =.047) during the total follow-up period. CONCLUSION Clodronate, given to patients with primary operable breast cancer, may reduce the occurrence of bone metastases, although this reduction was only significant during this medication period. There was a significant reduction in mortality.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2006

Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy

Susana Banerjee; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Sue Ashley; Dawn Steele; Alan Ashworth; Sunil R. Lakhani; Ian E. Smith

Background: Grade-III invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDCs-NST) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours with different clinical behaviour and response to chemotherapy. As many as 25% of all grade-III IDCs-NST are known to harbour a basal-like phenotype, as defined by gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry for basal cytokeratins. Patients with basal-like breast carcinomas (BLBC) are reported to have a shorter disease-free and overall survival. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 49 patients with BLBC (as defined by basal cytokeratin expression) and 49 controls matched for age, nodal status and grade was carried out. Histological features, immunohistochemical findings for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2, and clinical outcome and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy were compared between the two groups. Results: It was more likely for patients with BLBCs to be found negative for ER (p<0.0001), PgR (p<0.0001) and HER2 (p<0.01) than controls. Patients with BLBCs were found to have a significantly higher recurrence rate (p<0.05) and were associated with significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival (both p<0.05). In the group of patients who received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy (BLBC group, n = 47; controls, n = 49), both disease-free and overall survival were found to be significantly shorter in the BLBC group (p<0.05). Conclusions: BLBCs are a distinct clinical and pathological entity, characterised by high nuclear grade, lack of hormone receptors and HER2 expression and a more aggressive clinical course. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be less effective in these tumours and new therapeutic approaches are indicated.


British Journal of Cancer | 1989

A pilot trial to evaluate the acute toxicity and feasibility of tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer

Trevor J. Powles; Janet Hardy; Sue Ashley; G. M. Farrington; D. Cosgrove; J. B. Davey; M. Dowsett; J. A. McKinna; A. G. Nash; H. D. Sinnett

Epidemiological and experimental evidence indicates that oestrogens are involved in the carcinogenic promotion of human breast cancer. We have undertaken a pilot trial of tamoxifen, an anti-oestrogen, compared to placebo given to 200 women at a high risk of developing breast cancer. The results of this trial show that acute toxicity is low and that accrual and compliance are satisfactory. Furthermore, biochemical monitoring of lipids and clotting factors indicate that tamoxifen may reduce the risk of cardiovascular deaths. At this stage no untoward long-term risks have been identified, and it is therefore proposed that a large multicentre trial should be started.


Palliative Medicine | 2004

A randomized controlled trial of aromatherapy massage in a hospice setting

Katie Soden; Karen Vincent; Stephen Craske; Caroline Lucas; Sue Ashley

Research suggests that patients with cancer, particularly in the palliative care setting, are increasingly using aromatherapy and massage. There is good evidence that these therapies may be helpful for anxiety reduction for short periods, but few studies have looked at the longer term effects. This study was designed to compare the effects of four-week courses of aromatherapy massage and massage alone on physical and psychological symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. Forty-two patients were randomly allocated to receive weekly massages with lavender essential oil and an inert carrier oil (aromatherapy group), an inert carrier oil only (massage group) or no intervention. Outcome measures included a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain intensity, the Verran and Snyder-Halpern (VSH) sleep scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL). We were unable to demonstrate any significant long-term benefits of aromatherapy or massage in terms of improving pain control, anxiety or quality of life. However, sleep scores improved significantly in both the massage and the combined massage (aromatherapy and massage) groups. There were also statistically significant reductions in depression scores in the massage group. In this study of patients with advanced cancer, the addition of lavender essential oil did not appear to increase the beneficial effects of massage. Our results do suggest, however, that patients with high levels of psychological distress respond best to these therapies.


Breast Cancer Research | 2006

Reduction in bone relapse and improved survival with oral clodronate for adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer [ISRCTN83688026]

Trevor J. Powles; Alexander H.G. Paterson; Eugene McCloskey; Phil Schein; Bobbi Scheffler; Alwynne Tidy; Sue Ashley; Ian E. Smith; Lars Ottestad; John A. Kanis

IntroductionExperimental and clinical data show that the oral bisphosphonate clodronate (Bonefos®) can inhibit tumor-induced osteoclastic bone resorption. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was designed to determine if the addition of oral clodronate to standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer could reduce the subsequent occurrence of bone metastases and thereby improve overall survival.Methods1,069 patients with primary operable stage I-III breast cancer were randomized to receive oral clodronate (1,600 mg/day) or placebo for 2 years, in conjunction with standard treatment for primary breast cancer including surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or tamoxifen. All patients were assessed for bone metastases at two and five years and additionally when clinically indicated. Survival status was determined as of the close of the study on 30 June 2000 with a median follow up of 5.6 years. The treatment arms were compared using the unstratified log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.ResultsOral clodronate significantly reduced the risk of bone metastases in all patients over the 5 year study period (51 patients versus 73 patients with placebo; HR = 0.692, P = 0.043); the difference was also statistically significant over the 2 year medication period (19 patients versus 35 patients with placebo; HR = 0.546, P = 0.031). These differences were most pronounced in patients with stage II/III disease (39 patients versus 64 patients with placebo, HR = 0.592, P = 0.009 over 5 years; 16 patients versus 32 patients with placebo, HR= 0.496, P = 0.020 over 2 years). Survival data also favoured the clodronate arm (HR for all patients = 0.768, P = 0.048; HR for stage II/III disease = 0.743, P = 0.041), although this was not significant due to multiple analyses. Oral clodronate was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate diarrhoea being the most frequently reported adverse event.ConclusionThese results confirm that oral clodronate will significantly improve the 5 year bone relapse free survival when used as a supplementary adjuvant treatment for patients receiving standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer.


Cancer | 2000

Apoptosis and Proliferation as Predictors of Chemotherapy Response in Patients with Breast Carcinoma

Jenny C. Chang; M. Ormerod; Trevor J. Powles; D. C. Allred; Sue Ashley; Mitch Dowsett

Laboratory evidence suggests that many anticancer agents exert their effect by altering the ratio between apoptosis and cellular proliferation. The objective of this clinical study was to examine in vivo changes in apoptotic index (AI), Bcl‐2 expression, proliferation (Ki‐67 and S‐phase fraction [SPF]), and ploidy as potential indicators of chemoresponsiveness.


British Journal of Cancer | 1995

Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

P. A. Ellis; I. E. Smith; Janet Hardy; Marianne Nicolson; Denis C. Talbot; Sue Ashley; K Priest

The role of chemotherapy in the palliation of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have carried out a chemotherapy study emphasising symptom relief, a topic not normally discussed in previous similar studies. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a moderate-dose palliative chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (alternate courses), vinblastine 6 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Thirty-eight of 118 assessable patients (32%) achieved an objective response. Patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) had a significantly better response rate (52%) than those with metastatic disease (25%) (P < 0.01). In 76 out of 110 (69%) patients, with tumour-related symptoms including 24 out of 31 patients (78%) with locally advanced disease, symptoms completely disappeared or substantially improved. In only 15 patients (14%) did symptoms progress during treatment. Symptomatic improvement was achieved after one course of chemotherapy in 61% and after two courses in 96% of responding patients. The schedule was well tolerated. Only 19% developed WHO grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, and only 3% developed significant alopecia. Other toxicities were minimal. MVP is a pragmatic inexpensive chemotherapy regimen that offers useful symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC and merits a 1-2 course therapeutic trial in such patients. The schedule should also be assessed as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC in a randomised trial.


Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 1994

The Royal Marsden Hospital pilot tamoxifen chemoprevention trial

T. J. Powles; Alison L. Jones; Sue Ashley; Mary O'Brien; V. A. Tidy; J. Treleavan; D. Cosgrove; A. G. Nash; N.P.M. Sacks; Michael Baum; J. A. McKinna; Jane B. Davey

A pilot randomised placebo controlled trial using tamoxifen in healthy women at increased risk of developing breast cancer, has been undertaken in order to evaluate the problems of accrual, acute symptomatic toxicity, compliance, and safety as a basis for subsequent large national multicentre trials designed to test whether tamoxifen can chemoprevent breast cancer.From October 1986 until June 1993, 2012 healthy women with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, usually because of a strong family history, were randomly allocated to receive tamoxifen 20 mgs/day or placebo for up to 8 years if possible.Accrual remained high in spite of extensive informed consent regarding potential risk. Acute symptomatic toxicity was low for participants on tamoxifen or placebo and compliance remained correspondingly high with a predicted 77% of women on tamoxifen and 82% of women on placebo continuing medication at 5 years. There was a significant increase in hot flushes (34% versus 20%) mostly in premenopausal women (p < 0.005), vaginal discharge (16% versus 4%, p < 0.005), and menstrual irregularities (14% versus 9%, p < 0.005). The requirements for hormone replacement therapy for women on tamoxifen or placebo were the same.Safety monitoring indicates no adverse anti oestrogenic effects of tamoxifen. There was no obvious effect of tamoxifen on bone mineral densities (single photon radial absorption). The fibrinogen and antithrombin III were both lowered, resulting in no observed detrimental effect on the ratio of these clotting factors. There was a significant reduction in the serum cholesterol maintained out to 5 years. Annual pelvic assessment using transvaginal ultrasound indicates an increased incidence of uterine fibromata and benign ovarian cysts. These results have encouraged the commencement of the NSABP national trial in the USA, and the subsequent start of national trials in Italy and the UK, which together should provide sufficient evidence to evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sue Ashley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian E. Smith

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor J. Powles

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Brada

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. J. Powles

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mitch Dowsett

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alwynne Tidy

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Judson

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay Popat

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Norton

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Dowsett

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge