Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sue Hammond is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sue Hammond.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: A National Cancer Institute–Supported Resource for Outcome and Intervention Research

Leslie L. Robison; Gregory T. Armstrong; John D. Boice; Eric J. Chow; Stella M. Davies; Sarah S. Donaldson; Daniel M. Green; Sue Hammond; Anna T. Meadows; Ann C. Mertens; John J. Mulvihill; Paul C. Nathan; Joseph P. Neglia; Roger J. Packer; Preetha Rajaraman; Charles A. Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C. Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K. Zeltzer

Survival for childhood cancer has increased dramatically over the last 40 years with 5-year survival rates now approaching 80%. For many diagnostic groups, rapid increases in survival began in the 1970s with the broader introduction of multimodality approaches, often including combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. With this increase in rates of survivorship has come the recognition that survivors are at risk for adverse health and quality-of-life outcomes, with risk being influenced by host-, disease-, and treatment-related factors. In 1994, the US National Cancer Institute funded the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, a multi-institutional research initiative designed to establish a large and extensively characterized cohort of more than 14,000 5-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer diagnosed between 1970 and 1986. This ongoing study, which reflects the single most comprehensive body of information ever assembled on childhood and adolescent cancer survivors, provides a dynamic framework and resource to investigate current and future questions about childhood cancer survivors.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010

Subsequent Neoplasms in 5-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Debra L. Friedman; John Whitton; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C. Mertens; Sue Hammond; Marilyn Stovall; Sarah S. Donaldson; Anna T. Meadows; Leslie L. Robison; Joseph P. Neglia

BACKGROUND The occurrence of subsequent neoplasms has direct impact on the quantity and quality of life in cancer survivors. We have expanded our analysis of these events in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) to better understand the occurrence of these events as the survivor population ages. METHODS The incidence of and risk for subsequent neoplasms occurring 5 years or more after the childhood cancer diagnosis were determined among 14,359 5-year survivors in the CCSS who were treated from 1970 through 1986 and who were at a median age of 30 years (range = 5-56 years) for this analysis. At 30 years after childhood cancer diagnosis, we calculated cumulative incidence at 30 years of subsequent neoplasms and calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), excess absolute risks (EARs) for invasive second malignant neoplasms, and relative risks for subsequent neoplasms by use of multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 14,359 5-year survivors, 1402 subsequently developed 2703 neoplasms. Cumulative incidence at 30 years after the childhood cancer diagnosis was 20.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.1% to 21.8%) for all subsequent neoplasms, 7.9% (95% CI = 7.2% to 8.5%) for second malignant neoplasms (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), 9.1% (95% CI = 8.1% to 10.1%) for nonmelanoma skin cancer, and 3.1% (95% CI = 2.5% to 3.8%) for meningioma. Excess risk was evident for all primary diagnoses (EAR = 2.6 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI = 2.4 to 2.9 per 1000 person-years; SIR = 6.0, 95% CI = 5.5 to 6.4), with the highest being for Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR = 8.7, 95% CI = 7.7 to 9.8) and Ewing sarcoma (SIR = 8.5, 95% CI = 6.2 to 11.7). In the Poisson multivariable analysis, female sex, older age at diagnosis, earlier treatment era, diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma, and treatment with radiation therapy were associated with increased risk of subsequent neoplasm. CONCLUSIONS As childhood cancer survivors progress through adulthood, risk of subsequent neoplasms increases. Patients surviving Hodgkin lymphoma are at greatest risk. There is no evidence of risk reduction with increasing duration of follow-up.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Second Neoplasms in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Findings From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort

Anna T. Meadows; Debra L. Friedman; Joseph P. Neglia; Ann C. Mertens; Sarah S. Donaldson; Marilyn Stovall; Sue Hammond; Yutaka Yasui; Peter D. Inskip

PURPOSE To review the reports of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) cohort that were made through January 1, 2006, and published before July 31, 2008, and to discuss the host-, disease-, and therapy-related risk factors associated with SNs. PATIENTS AND METHODS SNs were ascertained by survivor self-reports and subsequently confirmed by pathology findings or medical record review. Cumulative incidence of SNs and standardized incidence ratios for second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) were calculated. The impact of host-, disease-, and therapy-related risk factors was evaluated by Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 14,358 cohort members, 730 reported 802 SMNs (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers). This represents a 2.3-fold increase in the number of SMNs over that reported in the first comprehensive analysis of SMNs in the CCSS cohort, which was done 7 years ago. In addition, 66 cases of meningioma and 1,007 cases of nonmelanoma skin cancer were diagnosed. The 30-year cumulative incidence of SMNs was 9.3% and that of nonmelanoma skin cancer was 6.9%. Risk of SNs remains elevated for more than 20 years of follow-up for all primary childhood cancer diagnoses. In multivariate analyses, risks differ by SN subtype, but include radiotherapy, age at diagnosis, sex, family history of cancer, and primary childhood cancer diagnosis. Female survivors whose primary childhood cancer diagnosis was Hodgkins lymphoma or sarcoma and who received radiotherapy are at particularly increased risk. Analyses of risk associated with radiotherapy demonstrated different dose-response curves for specific SNs. CONCLUSION Childhood cancer survivors are at a substantial and increasing risk for SNs, including nonmelanoma skin cancer and meningiomas. Health care professionals should understand the magnitude of these risks to provide individuals with appropriate counseling and follow-up.


The Lancet | 2005

Primary thyroid cancer after a first tumour in childhood (the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study): a nested case-control study

Alice J. Sigurdson; Cécile M. Ronckers; Ann C. Mertens; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A. Smith; Yan Liu; Roger L. Berkow; Sue Hammond; Joseph P. Neglia; Anna T. Meadows; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Peter D. Inskip

BACKGROUND Survivors of malignant disease in childhood who have had radiotherapy to the head, neck, or upper thorax have an increased risk of subsequent primary thyroid cancer, but the magnitude of risk over the therapeutic dose range has not been well established. We aimed to quantify the long-term risk of thyroid cancer after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS In a nested case-control study, 69 cases with pathologically confirmed thyroid cancer and 265 matched controls without thyroid cancer were identified from 14,054 5-year survivors of cancer during childhood from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Childhood cancers were diagnosed between 1970 and 1986 with cohort follow-up to 2000. FINDINGS Risk of thyroid cancer increased with radiation doses up to 20-29 Gy (odds ratio 9.8 [95% CI 3.2-34.8]). At doses greater than 30 Gy, a fall in the dose-response relation was seen. Both the increased and decreased risks were more pronounced in those diagnosed with a first primary malignant disease before age 10 years than in those older than 10 years. Furthermore, the fall in risk remained when those diagnosed with Hodgkins lymphoma were excluded. Chemotherapy for the first cancer was not associated with thyroid-cancer risk, and it did not modify the effect of radiotherapy. 29 (42%) cases had a first diagnosis of Hodgkins lymphoma compared with 49 (19%) controls. 11 (42%) of those who had Hodgkins lymphoma had subsequent thyroid cancers smaller than 1 cm compared with six (17%) of those who had other types of childhood cancer (p=0.07). INTERPRETATION The reduction in radiation dose-response for risk of thyroid cancer after childhood exposure to thyroid doses higher than 30 Gy is consistent with a cell-killing effect. Standard long-term follow-up of patients who have had Hodgkins lymphoma for detection of thyroid cancer should also be undertaken for survivors of any cancer during childhood who received radiotherapy to the thorax or head and neck region.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Risk of Selected Subsequent Carcinomas in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Mylène Bassal; Ann C. Mertens; Leslie Taylor; Joseph P. Neglia; Brian S. Greffe; Sue Hammond; Cécile M. Ronckers; Debra L. Friedman; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L. Robison; Anna T. Meadows; Nina S. Kadan-Lottick

PURPOSE To determine the risk of subsequent carcinomas other than breast, thyroid, and skin, and to identify factors that influence the risk among survivors of childhood cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subsequent malignant neoplasm history was determined in 13,136 participants (surviving > or = 5 years postmalignancy, diagnosed from 1970 to 1986 at age < 21 years) of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. RESULTS In 71 individuals, 71 carcinomas were diagnosed at a median age of 27 years and a median elapsed time of 15 years in the genitourinary system (35%), head and neck area (32%), gastrointestinal tract (23%), and other sites (10%). Fifty-nine patients (83%) had received radiotherapy, and 42 (59%) developed a second malignant neoplasm in a previous radiotherapy field. Risk was significantly elevated following all childhood diagnoses except CNS neoplasms, and was highest following neuroblastoma (SIR = 24.2) and soft tissue sarcoma (SIR = 6.2). Survivors of neuroblastoma had a 329-fold increased risk of renal cell carcinomas; survivors of Hodgkins lymphoma had a 4.5-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal carcinomas. Significantly elevated risk of head and neck carcinoma occurred in survivors of soft tissue sarcoma (SIR = 22.6), neuroblastoma (SIR = 20.9), and leukemia (SIR = 20.9). CONCLUSION Young survivors of childhood cancers are at increased risk of developing subsequent carcinomas typical of later adulthood, underscoring the importance of long-term follow-up and risk-based screening. Follow-up of the cohort is ongoing to determine lifetime risk and delineate individual characteristics that contribute to risk.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 2004

Breast Cancer after Childhood Cancer: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Lisa B. Kenney; Yutaka Yasui; Peter D. Inskip; Sue Hammond; Joseph P. Neglia; Ann C. Mertens; Anna T. Meadows; Debra L. Friedman; Leslie L. Robison; Lisa Diller

Context Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at risk for developing breast cancer and other secondary cancer. Knowing the risk factors for breast cancer in these women may help to formulate screening policies for them. Contribution Among 6068 women who survived childhood cancer, 95 developed breast cancer at a median age of 35 years. Childhood sarcoma, chest irradiation, family history of breast cancer, and personal history of thyroid disease increased the risk for breast cancer. Implications Women who survived childhood cancer and had sarcoma, chest irradiation, family history of breast cancer, or personal history of thyroid disease should consider early, vigilant screening for breast cancer. The Editors Women treated with chest radiation therapy for childhood and adolescent Hodgkin disease are at increased risk for developing breast cancer at a young age (1-12). However, case reports and preliminary studies indicate that survivors of childhood cancer other than Hodgkin disease may also be at risk for secondary breast cancer (1, 13, 14). Practitioners caring for the growing population of young female survivors of childhood cancer are challenged with assessing breast cancer risk in order to recommend screening and preventive strategies. Although recent studies have shown that the risk for radiation-induced breast cancer is directly related to dose of chest radiation, specific details of previous treatment are not always available to clinicians and may not affect screening decisions (11, 12). In addition, whether primary cancer diagnosis, previous treatment other than chest radiation, or other well-established breast cancer risk factors contribute to a childhood cancer survivors risk for breast cancer is unknown. Studies of Hodgkin disease survivors have shown that clinical examination and screening mammography can detect early-stage secondary breast cancer in young women (15-17), and although treatment options may be limited by previous therapy, early-stage secondary breast cancer is curable (16, 17). Thus, identifying specific groups of childhood cancer survivors who would benefit from early mammographic screening might reduce the morbidity and mortality of breast cancer in these young women. In this study, we analyzed a large series of women with secondary breast cancer from a cohort of childhood cancer survivors, the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), to describe clinical and pathologic features of breast cancer and to determine breast cancer risk relative to the general population. We hypothesized that breast cancer risk would be modified by previous treatment and factors unrelated to treatment. Thus, in this large cohort of women, we assessed the influence of primary cancer, previous treatment, family cancer history, and menstrual and reproductive history on breast cancer risk. Methods Study Sample: Childhood Cancer Survivors Study The CCSS is a follow-up study of childhood cancer survivors established in 1994. Eligibility criteria included diagnosis at an age younger than 21 years with leukemia, brain tumor, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, renal tumor, neuroblastoma, or soft-tissue or bone sarcoma and survival of at least 5 years after diagnosis. The 20276 eligible participants received a diagnosis from 1 January 1970 to 31 December 1986 at 1 of 25 collaborating institutions (Appendix). Participants (n= 14054) completed a self-report questionnaire, providing information about their medical history, family medical history, reproductive history, and socioeconomic status. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to patients reporting second cancer diagnoses. Information on the cohort was updated in 2000. We used data available as of May 2002 for this analysis. No men in the CCSS reported breast cancer by that date; thus, this analysis was restricted to women. Detailed information on the study methods and cohort characteristics has been reported (18). The human subjects committee at each participating institution approved the CCSS protocol. Clinical Data We abstracted treatment data from medical records, including chemotherapeutic agents and dose, and radiation therapy dose, and site for primary cancer and relapses. We asked participants who self-reported breast cancer to sign a medical release to confirm the diagnosis. We confirmed all cases of breast cancer in this report and obtained the tumor size, histologic characteristics, hormone receptor status, involvement of axillary nodes, and metastatic sites from pathology records. Statistical Analysis We compared survivors who had breast cancer with those who did not have breast cancer with respect to primary cancer diagnosis, age at diagnosis, years of follow-up, and therapy for the primary cancer. We calculated standardized incidence ratios for breast cancer by using age-, sex-, and calendar-yearspecific incidence rates of the general population (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [SEER], National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland [19]). We considered survivors to be at risk for breast cancer from 5 years after the childhood cancer diagnosis until 1 of the following 3 events: death, breast cancer diagnosis, or completion of the CCSS questionnaire. To make the definition of incidence comparable in the calculation of the observed and expected numbers, we included only the first primary breast cancer diagnosis. We calculated cumulative incidences of breast cancer by attained age (20). We used Poisson multiple regression models for standardized incidence ratios to assess the modification of risk for developing breast cancer by several variables chosen a priori (21). We considered the following risk factors for breast cancer: age at and years since primary cancer diagnosis; age at menarche (<12 years or 12 years); age at first live birth (never, <20 years, 20 to 24 years, or 25 years), as queried in the CCSS questionnaire; history of breast cancer in first-degree female relatives (yes or no); exposure to chest radiation (yes or no); exposure to pelvic radiation (yes or no); family history of sarcoma (yes or no); history of thyroid disease (thyroid nodules, overactive or underactive thyroid, or enlarged thyroid); and exposure to an alkylating agent (alkylating agent score, measured as previously described, accounted for several drug exposures and dose) (22). The Poisson multiple regression incorporated all time-dependent factors by splitting each survivors follow-up period into several time intervals, wherein each factor was assumed constant. We initially evaluated the relative rate of developing breast cancer for each risk factor, adjusting for the exposure to chest radiation (yes or no). We then stratified the analysis by the exposure to chest radiation and assessed the modification of risk with age at and years since primary cancer diagnosis, family history of breast cancer or sarcoma, history of thyroid disease, and exposure to pelvic radiation. The years since primary cancer diagnosis variable was the baseline time factor of the model for which we obtained fitted standardized incidence ratios relative to SEER data. For other variables, we calculated relative rates by comparing standardized incidence ratios across categories of each variable. All significance tests were 2-sided. We used SAS software, version 8 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina), and S-PLUS software, version 6 (Insightful Corp.), for this analysis. Role of the Funding Sources The funding sources had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Results Cohort Characteristics Of the 20276 survivors eligible for the CCSS cohort, 9062 were women. Of those, 6498 women participated, 6068 of whom had signed medical record release to be eligible for this analysis. Of the 6068 eligible women, 95 women had 111 confirmed cases of breast cancer. Primary cancer diagnosis and age at treatment were similar between participants and nonparticipants (Table 1). Survivors with breast cancer were older at diagnosis of primary cancer and at follow-up than those without breast cancer. As expected, a large proportion of the women with breast cancer (65 of 95 [68%] women) were Hodgkin disease survivors, and all but 2 of the 65 women were known to have received chest radiation therapy. However, 30 of 95 (32%) women with breast cancer were survivors of other childhood cancer, and 20 of 95 (21%) women did not receive chest radiation therapy. The proportion of patients exposed to alkylating agents was similar in both groups (49.5% vs. 49.2%) (Table 1). Table 1. Characteristics of Women Who Did and Did Not Develop Breast Cancer and of Eligible Nonparticipants Since the oldest survivors in this cohort were 51 years of age, all cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in relatively young women (median age at diagnosis, 35 years [range, 20 to 49 years]) (Table 2). However, 19% (18 of 95 women) of the breast cancer cases occurred in women 20 to 29 years of age and 64% (61 of 95 women) of cases occurred in women 30 to 39 years of age. Median time from childhood cancer diagnosis to breast cancer diagnosis was 19 years; however, the range extended from 6 years to 29 years after primary cancer diagnosis (Table 2). Table 2. Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Cases Of the 111 cases of breast cancer, 21 cases were ductal carcinoma in situ (Table 2). Of those 21 cases, 19 were diagnosed in Hodgkin disease survivors and 2 in soft-tissue sarcoma survivors. Table 2 shows the distribution of histologic characteristics in the invasive cases. We determined the stage in 66 of 90 (73%) invasive cases from pathology reports (Table 2). Twenty-six (29%) cases involved axillary lymph nodes, and 5 (6%) cases involved distant metastatic disease. Estrogen receptor status was available in 37 cases, and 76% of those were positive. There was no predominant laterality. Sixteen cases (17%) were bilateral, 5 were syn


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Radiation Dose and Breast Cancer Risk in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Peter D. Inskip; Leslie L. Robison; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A. Smith; Sue Hammond; Ann C. Mertens; John Whitton; Lisa Diller; Lisa B. Kenney; Sarah S. Donaldson; Anna T. Meadows; Joseph P. Neglia

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to quantify the risk of breast cancer in relation to radiation dose and chemotherapy among survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS We conducted a case-control study of breast cancer in a cohort of 6,647 women who were 5-year survivors of childhood cancer and who were treated during 1970 through 1986. One hundred twenty patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer were identified and were individually matched to four selected controls on age at initial cancer and time since initial cancer. Medical physicists estimated radiation dose to the breast tumor site and ovaries on the basis of medical records. RESULTS The odds ratio for breast cancer increased linearly with radiation dose, and it reached 11-fold for local breast doses of approximately 40 Gy relative to no radiation (P for trend < .0001). Risk associated with breast irradiation was sharply reduced among women who received 5 Gy or more to the ovaries (P = .002). The excess odds ratio per Gy was 0.36 for those who received ovarian doses less than 5 Gy and was 0.06 for those who received higher doses. Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by age at exposure. Borderline significantly elevated risks were seen for doxorubicin, dactinomycin, dacarbazine, and carmustine. CONCLUSION Results confirm the radiation sensitivity of the breast in girls age 10 to 20 years but do not demonstrate a strong effect of age at exposure within this range. Irradiation of the ovaries at doses greater than 5 Gy seems to lessen the carcinogenic effects of breast irradiation, most likely by reducing exposure of radiation-damaged breast cells to stimulating effects of ovarian hormones.


Radiation Research | 2010

Risk of Second Primary Thyroid Cancer after Radiotherapy for a Childhood Cancer in a Large Cohort Study: An Update from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Parveen Bhatti; Lene H. S. Veiga; Cécile M. Ronckers; Alice J. Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A. Smith; Rita E. Weathers; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C. Mertens; Sue Hammond; Debra L. Friedman; Joseph P. Neglia; Anna T. Meadows; Sarah S. Donaldson; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Peter D. Inskip

Abstract Previous studies have indicated that thyroid cancer risk after a first childhood malignancy is curvilinear with radiation dose, increasing at low to moderate doses and decreasing at high doses. Understanding factors that modify the radiation dose response over the entire therapeutic dose range is challenging and requires large numbers of subjects. We quantified the long-term risk of thyroid cancer associated with radiation treatment among 12,547 5-year survivors of a childhood cancer (leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, central nervous system cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, kidney cancer, bone cancer, neuroblastoma) diagnosed between 1970 and 1986 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study using the most current cohort follow-up to 2005. There were 119 subsequent pathologically confirmed thyroid cancer cases, and individual radiation doses to the thyroid gland were estimated for the entire cohort. This cohort study builds on the previous case-control study in this population (69 thyroid cancer cases with follow-up to 2000) by allowing the evaluation of both relative and absolute risks. Poisson regression analyses were used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIR), excess relative risks (ERR) and excess absolute risks (EAR) of thyroid cancer associated with radiation dose. Other factors such as sex, type of first cancer, attained age, age at exposure to radiation, time since exposure to radiation, and chemotherapy (yes/no) were assessed for their effect on the linear and exponential quadratic terms describing the dose–response relationship. Similar to the previous analysis, thyroid cancer risk increased linearly with radiation dose up to approximately 20 Gy, where the relative risk peaked at 14.6-fold (95% CI, 6.8–31.5). At thyroid radiation doses >20 Gy, a downturn in the dose–response relationship was observed. The ERR model that best fit the data was linear-exponential quadratic. We found that age at exposure modified the ERR linear dose term (higher radiation risk with younger age) (P < 0.001) and that sex (higher radiation risk among females) (P  =  0.008) and time since exposure (higher radiation risk with longer time) (P < 0.001) modified the EAR linear dose term. None of these factors modified the exponential quadratic (high dose) term. Sex, age at exposure and time since exposure were found to be significant modifiers of the radiation-related risk of thyroid cancer and as such are important factors to account for in clinical follow-up and thyroid cancer risk estimation among childhood cancer survivors.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Joanna L. Perkins; Yan Liu; Pauline Mitby; Joseph P. Neglia; Sue Hammond; M. Stovall; A. T. Meadows; Ray Hutchinson; Zo Ann E. Dreyer; Leslie L. Robison; Ann C. Mertens

PURPOSE Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has become the most common type of cancer in many populations throughout the world. Ultraviolet and ionizing radiation are known risk factors. Because NMSCs are rarely lethal and most cancer registries do not routinely report data regarding these cancers, they have received little attention in studies evaluating long-term effects of cancer therapy. This article reports on the occurrence of secondary NMSC as a long-term effect of cancer therapy in survivors of childhood cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) is a cohort study of 5-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer from 25 participating institutions in North America. NMSC patients were defined by a history of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin after primary malignancy treatment. Demographic and treatment data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Among the 13,132 eligible CCSS participants, 213 have reported NMSC; 99 patients (46%) have had multiple occurrences. Median age of occurrence was 31 years (range, 7 to 46 years). Location of NMSC included head and neck (43%), back (24%), chest (22%), abdomen and pelvis (5%), extremity (3%), and unknown (4%). Ninety percent of patients had previously received radiation therapy (RT); 90% of tumors occurred within the RT field. RT was associated with a 6.3-fold increase in risk (95% CI, 3.5- to 11.3-fold). CONCLUSION Long-term survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer who were treated with RT are at highest risk for developing NMSC. Educational efforts need to be directed to this population to facilitate early diagnosis of NMSC and reduction in sun exposure.


Cancer | 2008

Twenty years of follow-up among survivors of childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Daniel A. Mulrooney; Douglas C. Dover; Suwen Li; Yutaka Yasui; Kirsten K. Ness; Ann C. Mertens; Joseph P. Neglia; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Stella M. Davies; Melissa M. Hudson; G. T. Armstrong; Joanna L. Perkins; Maura O'Leary; Debra L. Friedman; Thomas W. Pendergrass; Brian Greffe; Lorrie F. Odom; Kathy Ruccione; John J. Mulvihill; Jill Ginsberg; A. T. Meadows; Jean M. Tersak; A. Kim Ritchey; Julie Blatt; Gregory H. Reaman; Roger J. Packer; Stella Davies; Smita Bhatia; Stephen Qualman

Limited data exist on the comprehensive assessment of late medical and social effects experienced by survivors of childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Collaboration


Dive into the Sue Hammond's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leslie L. Robison

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy Leisenring

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marilyn Stovall

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna T. Meadows

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter D. Inskip

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory T. Armstrong

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Whitton

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge