Sue J. Goldie
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sue J. Goldie.
The Lancet | 2013
Dean T. Jamison; Lawrence H. Summers; George Alleyne; Kenneth J. Arrow; Seth Berkley; Agnes Binagwaho; Flavia Bustreo; David B. Evans; Richard Feachem; Julio Frenk; Gargee Ghosh; Sue J. Goldie; Yan Guo; Sanjeev Gupta; Richard Horton; Margaret E. Kruk; Adel A. F. Mahmoud; Linah K. Mohohlo; Mthuli Ncube; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; K. Srinath Reddy; Helen Saxenian; Agnes Soucat; Karene H Ulltveit-Moe; Gavin Yamey
Prompted by the 20th anniversary of the 1993 World Development Report a Lancet Commission revisited the case for investment in health and developed a new investment frame work to achieve dramatic health gains by 2035. The report has four key messages each accompanied by opportunities for action by national governments of low-income and middle-income countries and by the international community. Conclusion 1: there is a very large payoff from investing in health. Conclusion 2: a grand convergence is achievable within our lifetime. Conclusion 3: scale-up of low-cost packages of interventions can enable major progress in NCDs and injuries within a generation. Conclusion 4: progressive universalism is an effi cient way to achieve health and fi nancial protection.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2004
Thomas C. Wright; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; J. Thomas Cox; Francisco M. Garcia; Sue J. Goldie; Kenneth Hatch; Kenneth L. Noller; Nancy Roach; Carolyn Runowicz
Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an adjunct to cytology for cervical cancer screening. To help provide guidance to clinicians and patients when using HPV DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening, a workshop was cosponsored by the National Institutes of Health–National Cancer Institute, American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Cancer Society. Consensus was reached based on a literature review, expert opinion, and unpublished results from large ongoing screening studies. The conclusions of the workshop were that HPV DNA testing may be added to cervical cytology for screening in women aged 30 years or more. Women whose results are negative by both HPV DNA testing and cytology should not be rescreened before 3 years. Women whose results are negative by cytology, but are high-risk HPV DNA positive, are at a relatively low risk of having high-grade cervical neoplasia, and colposcopy should not be performed routinely in this setting. Instead, HPV DNA testing along with cervical cytology should be repeated in these women at 6 to 12 months. If test results of either are abnormal, colposcopy should then be performed. This guidance should assist clinicians in utilizing HPV DNA testing in an effective manner, while minimizing unnecessary evaluations and treatments.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2001
Kenneth A. Freedberg; Elena Losina; Milton C. Weinstein; A. David Paltiel; Calvin Cohen; George R. Seage; Donald E. Craven; Hong Zhang; April D. Kimmel; Sue J. Goldie
BACKGROUND Combination antiretroviral therapy with a combination of three or more drugs has become the standard of care for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the United States. We estimated the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of three-drug antiretroviral regimens. METHODS We developed a mathematical simulation model of HIV disease, using the CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level as predictors of the progression of disease. Outcome measures included life expectancy, life expectancy adjusted for the quality of life, lifetime direct medical costs, and cost effectiveness in dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Clinical data were derived from major clinical trials, including the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study. Data on costs were based on the national AIDS Cost and Services Utilization Survey, with drug costs obtained from the Red Book. RESULTS For patients similar to those in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study (mean CD4 cell count, 87 per cubic millimeter), life expectancy adjusted for the quality of life increased from 1.53 to 2.91 years, and per-person lifetime costs increased from
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2008
Jane J. Kim; Sue J. Goldie
45,460 to
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2007
Philip E. Castle; J. Thomas Cox; Diane D. Davey; Mark H. Einstein; Daron G. Ferris; Sue J. Goldie; Diane M. Harper; Walter Kinney; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Kenneth L. Noller; Cosette M. Wheeler; Terri Ades; Kimberly S. Andrews; Mary Doroshenk; Kelly Green Kahn; Christy Schmidt; Omar Shafey; Robert A. Smith; Edward E. Partridge; Francisco Garcia
77,300 with three-drug therapy as compared with no therapy. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted year of life gained, as compared with no therapy, was
Pediatrics | 1998
John D. Graham; Sue J. Goldie; Maria Segui-Gomez; Kimberly M. Thompson; Toben F. Nelson; Roberta Glass; Ashley Simpson; Leo G. Woerner
23,000. On the basis of additional data from other major studies, the cost-effectiveness ratio for three-drug therapy ranged from
Annals of Internal Medicine | 2001
Milton C. Weinstein; Sue J. Goldie; Elena Losina; Calvin Cohen; John D. Baxter; Hong Zhang; April D. Kimmel; Kenneth A. Freedberg
13,000 to
BMJ | 2009
Jane J. Kim; Sue J. Goldie
23,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained. The initial CD4 cell count and drug costs were the most important determinants of costs, clinical benefits, and cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of HIV infection with a combination of three antiretroviral drugs is a cost-effective use of resources.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2004
Sue J. Goldie; Jane J. Kim; Thomas C. Wright
BACKGROUND The cost-effectiveness of prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus types 16 (HPV-16) and 18 (HPV-18) is an important consideration for guidelines for immunization in the United States. METHODS We synthesized epidemiologic and demographic data using models of HPV-16 and HPV-18 transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to compare the health and economic outcomes of vaccinating preadolescent girls (at 12 years of age) and vaccinating older girls and women in catch-up programs (to 18, 21, or 26 years of age). We examined the health benefits of averting other HPV-16-related and HPV-18-related cancers, the prevention of HPV-6-related and HPV-11-related genital warts and juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis by means of the quadrivalent vaccine, the duration of immunity, and future screening practices. RESULTS On the assumption that the vaccine provided lifelong immunity, the cost-effectiveness ratio of vaccination of 12-year-old girls was
International Journal of Cancer | 2003
Sue J. Goldie; Daniel Grima; Michele Kohli; Thomas C. Wright; Milton C. Weinstein; Eduardo L. Franco
43,600 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as compared with the current screening practice. Under baseline assumptions, the cost-effectiveness ratio for extending a temporary catch-up program for girls to 18 years of age was