Sue Kirsa
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sue Kirsa.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice | 2010
Jim Siderov; Sue Kirsa; Robert McLauchlan
Background. The potential for staff exposure to antineoplastic agents exists in the workplace despite current recommended safe handling procedures. Reliance on cytotoxic drug safety cabinets (CDSC) to provide total protection from exposure to hazardous drugs is insufficient. Preventing workplace contamination is the best strategy to minimise exposure. PhaSeal® is a commercially available system for ensuring the leak-free transfer of hazardous drugs, fitting both the NIOSH and ISOPP definitions of a closed system. To date, there have been no published studies examining the use of a closed system drug transfer device (PhaSeal®) under Australian conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a closed system drug transfer device on cytotoxic surface contamination in the cytotoxic preparation areas of two Australian metropolitan public hospitals. Method. This was a pre- and post-intervention study in which chemical contamination was tested at baseline then at five and 12 months after the introduction of the a closed system drug transfer device. Cyclophosphamide was used as a surrogate marker for all cytotoxic drugs. Surface wipe sampling was performed at specified sites within the cytotoxic suite using a standardized technique. Commercial products of cyclophosphamide were also sampled. Results. After five months, contamination was reduced in 13 of the 22 sites sampled (59%), with four of these samples showing undetectable levels of contamination. Two other site samples (9%) remained unchanged. The total contamination of surfaces tested was reduced by 24%. After five months hospital 1 withdrew from the study. After 12 months, surface contamination was reduced in 75% of sample sites. The total contamination of surfaces tested was reduced by 68%. The wipes of the external surface of commercial products detected cyclophosphamide contamination. Conclusion. When used inside a CDSC, the closed system drug transfer device PhaSeal® further reduces surface contamination, in some instances to undetectable levels.
Internal Medicine Journal | 2011
Senthil Lingaratnam; Monica A. Slavin; Linda Mileshkin; Benjamin Solomon; Kate Burbury; John F. Seymour; Raghwa Sharma; Bogda Koczwara; Sue Kirsa; Ian D. Davis; Miles Prince; Jeff Szer; Craig Underhill; Orla Morrissey; Karin Thursky
Background: An abundance of new evidence regarding treatment strategies for neutropenic fever is likely to contribute to variability in practice across institutions and clinicians alike.
Lung Cancer | 2014
Marliese Alexander; Sue Kirsa; Rory Wolfe; Michael MacManus; David Ball; Benjamin Solomon; Kate Burbury
INTRODUCTION Thromboembolism is common in lung cancer. Current thromboprophylaxis guidelines lack specific recommendations for appropriate strategies in this high thrombotic risk patient cohort. We profiled lung cancer patients receiving anti-cancer therapy. Thromboembolism incidence and thromboembolism-related mortality rates are reported and we explored patient, disease, and treatment-related risk factors associated with higher thrombotic rates. METHODS Retrospective review of lung cancer patients referred to a Comprehensive Cancer Centre between 01/07/2011 and 30/06/2012 for anti-cancer therapy. Data were collected from medical, pharmacy, pathology and diagnostic imaging electronic records. RESULTS After a median follow up of 10 months (range: 0.03-32 months), 24/222 patients (10.8%) had developed radiologically confirmed thromboembolism; 131 events per 1000 person-years (95%CI 87-195). Thromboembolism occurred equally in patients with non-small cell and small cell lung cancer (10.8% and 10.5% respectively), and more frequently among patients with adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (14.7% and 5.3% respectively). Chemotherapy-treated patients experienced thromboembolism more often than patients who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 5.7 95%CI 2.2-14.8). Radiotherapy was also associated with more frequent thromboembolism (HR 5.2 95%CI 2.0-13.2). New lung cancer diagnosis, presence of metastatic disease, second primary malignancy and Charlson Index ≥ 5 were also associated with higher rates of thromboembolism. Importantly, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (P-TP) was not routinely or systematically prescribed for ambulant lung cancer patients during any treatment phase, at this institution. The majority (83%) of thromboembolic events occurred in the ambulatory care setting. CONCLUSION Morbidity and mortality from thromboembolism occurs frequently in lung cancer. Thromboprophylaxis guidelines should be developed for the ambulatory care setting.
Journal of pharmacy practice and research | 2002
Karen M O' Leary; Yvonne M Allinson; Sue Kirsa; John Jackson; Naomi G Burgess
To provide a snapshot of current staff utilisation, a questionnaire was sent to 248 Australian hospitals with an identified hospital pharmacy service. The data returned from 101 hospital pharmacy services provided a snapshot of where hospital pharmacists are currently working, what they spend their time doing, and the role of pre‐registration pharmacists and pharmacy support staff in providing hospital pharmacy services.
Journal of pharmacy practice and research | 2004
Paula Doherty; Sue Kirsa; Sarah Chao; Stephanie Wiltshire; David McKnight; David J Maxwell; Jonathan Ga Dartnell; Karen I Kaye; Linda Graudins
INTRODUCTION Drug use evaluation (DUE) is a systematic quality improvement activity. The purpose of DUE is to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of drug (medicine) use, and thereby improve patient care. DUE may be applied to a drug, therapeutic class, disease state or condition, a drug use process or specific outcomes.1 It may be applied in various practice settings, including hospitals, other health facilities, and community practice environments.2 DUE is an essential component of pharmacy service provision, clinical pharmacy practice and pharmacy quality assurance and management programs. These standards supersede the previously published SHP A Standards of Practice for DUE in Australian hospitals. 3
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2013
Siow-Chin Heng; Monica A. Slavin; Daoud Al-Badriyeh; Sue Kirsa; John F. Seymour; Andrew Grigg; Karin Thursky; Ashish Bajel; Roger L. Nation; David C. M. Kong
BACKGROUND Fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole are used prophylactically in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This study evaluated the clinical and economic outcomes of these agents when used in AML patients undergoing consolidation chemotherapy. METHODS A retrospective chart review (2003-10) of AML patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy was performed. Patients were followed through their first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy. Antifungal prescribing patterns, clinical outcomes and resource consumptions were recorded. A decision analytical model was developed to depict the downstream consequences of using each antifungal agent, with success defined as completion of the designated course of initial antifungal prophylaxis without developing invasive fungal disease (IFD). Cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 106 consecutive patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics and predisposing factors for IFD were comparable between groups. Three IFDs (one proven, one probable and one suspected) occurred, all in the posaconazole group. Patients receiving posaconazole had the highest rate of intolerance requiring drug cessation (13% versus 7% in each of the fluconazole and voriconazole groups). Fluconazole conferred overall savings per patient of 26% over posaconazole and 13% over voriconazole. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated a mean cost saving with fluconazole of AU
Journal of pharmacy practice and research | 2009
Jim Siderov; Sue Kirsa; Robert McLauchlan
8430 per patient (95% CI AU
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice | 2016
Julie King; Marliese Alexander; Jenny Byrne; Kent MacMillan; Adele Mollo; Sue Kirsa; Michael Green
5803-AU
Asia-pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Clare Walter; James D Mellor; Carol A Rice; Sue Kirsa; David Ball; Mary Duffy; Alan Herschtal; Linda Mileshkin
11 054) versus posaconazole and AU
Journal of Oncology Practice | 2013
Senthil Lingaratnam; Danielle Murray; Amber Carle; Sue Kirsa; Rebecca Paterson; Danny Rischin
3681 per patient (95% CI AU