Suenje Dallmeier-Tiessen

Enabling Sharing and Reuse of Scientific Data

The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of the current state of scientific data sharing that stakeholders could use to develop and implement effective data sharing strategies and policies. The study developed a conceptual model to describe the process of data sharing, and the drivers, barriers, and enablers that determine stakeholder engagement. The conceptual model was used as a framework to structure discussions and interviews with key members of all stakeholder groups. Analysis of data obtained from interviewees identified a number of themes that highlight key requirements for the development of a mature data sharing culture.

Enabling scientific data sharing and re-use

Higher sensor throughput has increased the demand for cyberinfrastructure, requiring those unfamiliar with large database management to acquire new skills or outsource. Some have called this shift from sensor-limited data collection the “data deluge.” As an alternative, we propose that the deluge is the result of sensor control software failing to keep pace with hardware capabilities. Rather than exploit the potential of powerful embedded operating systems and construct intelligent sensor networks that harvest higher quality data, the old paradigm (i.e. collect everything) is still dominant. To mitigate the deluge, we present an adaptive sampling algorithm based on the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem. We calibrate the algorithm for both data reduction and increased sampling over “hot moments,” which we define as periods of elevated signal activity, deviating from previous works which have emphasized adaptive sampling for data compression via minimization of signal reconstruction error. Under the feature extraction concept, samples drawn from user-defined events carry greater importance and effective control requires the researcher to describe the context of events in the form of both an identification heuristic (for calibration) and a real-time sampling model. This event-driven approach is important when observation is focused on intermittent dynamics. In our case study application, we develop a heuristic to identify hot moments from historical data and use it to train and evaluate the adaptive model in an offline analysis using soil moisture data. Results indicate the adaptive model is superior to uniform sampling, capable of extracting 20% to 100% more samples during hot moments at equivalent levels of overall efficiency.

Integrating Scholarly Publications and Research Data – Preparing for Open Science, a Case Study from High-Energy Physics with Special Emphasis on (Meta)data Models

There is an emerging need in the research communitiy to have access to the research material beyond a publication. In an ideal scenario, scientists should have access to more than the full text: data, code, documentation and any other research output. We present here a case-study of our approach to facilitate seamless access to more than “just the paper” by integrating two complementary, heavily used, systems: Inspire and HEPData. On the one hand, Inspire, a digital library of High-Energy Physics, allows access to metadata about publications and full-text documents. On the other hand, the HEPData project has concentrated on gathering datasets behind figures and tables. We allow both systems to take advantage of a sum of their data and present a new infrastructure in Inspire making datasets equally important as publications. We also present mechanisms allowing long-term preservation of datasets and their unique identification, being an important step towards the open linked data in Inspire.

A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows

Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.