Suhag Patel

The Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Hepatocellular carcinoma: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) and/or its individual components have been linked to the development of cancer. Recent studies have suggested a similar link to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the direction and magnitude of the association between the MetS and HCC. Methods: Two reviewers independently conducted a systemic search to identify the available evidence from databases from January 1980 to June 2012. Search terms included “Metabolic syndrome,” “insulin resistance syndrome,” “metabolic abnormalities” combined with “hepatocellular carcinoma,” and “liver cancer.” No language restriction was applied to the search. Only studies reporting an effect measure for the association between MetS and HCC were eligible for inclusion. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg and Egger tests, with a visual inspection of funnel plot. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis version 2 software. Results: Four studies (3 cohort and 1 case control) with a total of 829,651 participants were included in the analysis. The age range of participants was between 30 and 84 years. The combined analysis showed an overall 81% increased risk of HCC in cases with MetS (relative risk, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.41). After excluding the single case-control study from analysis, the overall risk ratio remained statistically significant (relative risk, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.74). Funnel plot inspection, Begg and Egger tests showed no evidence of publication bias for combined analysis. Conclusions: Though studies are scarce, currently available epidemiologic data are suggestive of significantly higher risk of HCC among patients with MetS.

Insulin Resistance is Associated With Significant Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The role of insulin resistance (IR) on fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, this systemic review aimed to summarize the available epidemiologic evidence to evaluate the strength of association between IR and advanced liver fibrosis in these patients. Methods: We performed a systemic literature search in PubMed, OvidSP, and MEDLINE from January 1990 to April 2015 without language restriction using the following search terms: insulin resistance, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, and chronic hepatitis C. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg and Egger tests and with a visual inspection of funnel plot. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 2 software. Results: A total of 3659 participants with HCV infection from 14 studies were included in the analysis. After adjusting for publication bias, the relative risk (RR) for significant hepatic fibrosis among HCV subjects with IR was 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-2.01]. Subgroup analysis by genotypes showed RR of 2.16 (95% CI, 1.52-3.06) for genotype 1; however, the association was no longer significant when we analyzed the data for HCV genotype 3; RR=1.40 (95% CI, 0.8-2.45). Conclusion: Our study showed significant association between IR and significant hepatic fibrosis in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection.

Tu1047 Assessing Key Barriers to Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) With Next Generation Agents in a Veteran Population

variability was noted in the responses, with some waiting as long as 5 years to repeat screening in the presence of a high-risk adenoma with IBP. Awareness of MSTF recommendations or adherence to these guidelines still remains weak among GI physicians and physician-extenders. Publicity of guidelines and further data to support their recommendations are warranted. REFERENCES 1.Lebwohl B, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73(6):1207-1214. 2.Neerincx M, et al. Endoscopy 2010;42(9):730-735. 3.Lieberman DA, et al. Gastroenterology 2012;143(3):844-57.

Overestimate of Fibrosis by FIBROSpect® II in African Americans Complicates the Management of their Chronic Hepatitis C

Background: Evaluation of advanced fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is used to facilitate decisions on treatment strategy and to initiate additional screening measures. Unfortunately, most studies have predominately Caucasian (Cau) patients and may not be as relevant for African Americans (AA). Aims: This study specifically addresses the issue of defining minimal vs. significant fibrosis in African Americans (AA) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) using noninvasive assays. Methods: All patients (n = 319) seen between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2013 for whom a FibroSpect II® (FSII) assay was performed and had data for calculation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were identified using the medical records. Results: When liver biopsy score and FSII assay results for the AA patients with CHC were compared, 31% of AA had advanced FSII fibrosis scores (F2-F4) despite a biopsy score of F0-F1. In contrast, 10% of Cau over-scored. The AA false positive rate was 14% for APRI and 34% for FIB-4. Combining FSII with either APRI (7% false positive) or FIB-4 (10% false positive) improved the false positive rate in AA to 7% (FSII + APRI) and 10% (FSII + FIB-4) but reduced the sensitivity for significant fibrosis. Conclusions: The FSII assay overestimates fibrosis in AA and should be used with caution since these patients may not have significant fibrosis. If the APRI or FIB-4 assay is combined with the FSII assay, minimal fibrosis in AA can be defined without subjecting the patients to a subsequent biopsy.