Sujal M. Nanavati
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sujal M. Nanavati.
American Journal of Surgery | 2010
Jeffery S. Russell; Rajiv Sawhney; Alexander Monto; Sujal M. Nanavati; J. Ben Davoren; Rizwan Aslam; Carlos U. Corvera
BACKGROUND For patients with compensated cirrhosis, transcatheter arterial embolization with and without additive chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival. The aim of this study was to compare periprocedural complications in a population with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma to evaluate for differences in complications by severity of liver disease. METHODS Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial embolization with or without additive chemotherapy procedures from 2003 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed and compared by Child-Pugh (CP) class. A total of 141 embolizations were done in 76 patients. RESULTS Complication rates were seen in 27% of CP class A and 17% of CP class B patients. There was no significant difference in the grade of complications between the 2 groups or between procedure types. Survival rate was dependent on the degree of liver dysfunction (3-year CP class A, 49%; CP class B, 13%; P = .0048). CONCLUSION Embolization procedures to treat hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma can be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality rates, even in patients with a compromised hepatic reserve.
Gastroenterology Clinics of North America | 2014
Sujal M. Nanavati
Since the 1960s, interventional radiology has played a role in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. What began primarily as a diagnostic modality has evolved into much more of a therapeutic tool. And although the frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding has diminished thanks to management by pharmacologic and endoscopic methods, the need for additional invasive interventions still exists. Transcatheter angiography and intervention is a fundamental step in the algorithm for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2015
Ryan Kohlbrenner; K. Pallav Kolli; Andrew G. Taylor; Maureen P. Kohi; Nicholas Fidelman; Jeanne M. LaBerge; Robert K. Kerlan; V.K. Agarwal; Evan Lehrman; Sujal M. Nanavati; David E. Avrin; Robert G. Gould
PURPOSE To evaluate radiation dose reduction in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization with the use of a new image acquisition and processing platform. MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiation-dose data were obtained from 176 consecutive chemoembolization procedures in 135 patients performed in a single angiography suite. From January 2013 through October 2013, 85 procedures were performed by using our institutions standard fluoroscopic settings. After upgrading the x-ray fluoroscopy system with an image acquisition and processing platform designed to reduce image noise and reduce skin entrance dose, 91 chemoembolization procedures were performed from November 2013 through December 2014. Cumulative dose-area product (CDAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), and total fluoroscopy time were recorded for each procedure. Image quality was assessed by three interventional radiologists blinded to the x-ray acquisition platform used. RESULTS Patient radiation dose indicators were significantly lower for chemoembolization procedures performed with the novel imaging platform. Mean CDAP decreased from 3,033.2 dGy·cm(2) (range, 600.3-9,404.1 dGy·cm(2)) to 1,640.1 dGy·cm(2) (range, 278.6-6,779.9 dGy·cm(2); 45.9% reduction; P < .00001). Mean CAK decreased from 1,445.4 mGy (range, 303.6-5,233.7 mGy) to 971.7 mGy (range, 144.2-3,512.0 mGy; 32.8% reduction; P < .0001). A 20.3% increase in mean total fluoroscopy time was noted after upgrading the imaging platform, but blinded analysis of the image quality revealed no significant degradation. CONCLUSIONS Although a small increase in fluoroscopy time was observed, a significant reduction in patient radiation dose was achieved by using the optimized imaging platform, without image quality degradation.
Emergency Radiology | 2018
Eric T. Foo; Vishal Kumar; Sujal M. Nanavati; Eugene Huo; Mark W. Wilson; Miles Conrad
Management of splenic pseudoaneurysms in hemodynamically stable patients has shifted toward nonoperative management, including watchful waiting and endovascular embolization. Standard of treatment does not include percutaneous embolization for splenic pseudoaneurysm repair. In this case report, we document a successful percutaneous embolization of a post traumatic splenic pseudoaneurysm with thrombin. Percutaneous embolization of splenic pseudoaneurysms can be considered a viable technique in patients who fail endovascular embolization or have lesions inaccessible to endovascular repair.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2013
Andrew M. Surman; Miles Conrad; Christopher F. Barnett; John S. MacGregor; Sujal M. Nanavati; Mark W. Wilson
echocardiography. The first follow-up CT angiogram 3 hours after the intervention showed an unchanged type A aortic dissection and LVA occlusion (Fig 4). There was no extension of the dissection to the coronary arteries, no significant compression of the true aortic lumen, and no pericardial effusion. A second follow-up scan 3 days after the intervention showed regression of the false lumen and an open LVA with antegrade flow (Fig 5). There was no connection between the true and the false lumen. A third follow-up CT angiogram after 2 months showed a normal ascending aorta and open supraaortic vessels except the proximal LSA occlusion (Fig 6). At an outpatient clinic visit 6 months after the intervention, the patient reported no symptoms besides the preexisting claudication. The aortic dissection injury
Archive | 2012
Sujal M. Nanavati; Rajiv Sawhney; Christopher D. Owens
Monitoring radiation exposure is a concern for the health care worker and patients. Health care workers are usually monitored and restricted to 100 mSv effective dose every 5 years and a maximum of 50 mSv in any given year. Patients on the other hand are exposed to ever increasing utilization of radiographic procedures for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The effects of radiation exposure are cumulative and no level of exposure can be considered to be “safe.” Therefore vigilance of radiation exposure is absolutely critical in the safe performance of cardiovascular fluoroscopy.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2008
Rajiv Sawhney; Derrick Allen; Sujal M. Nanavati
Emergency Radiology | 2016
Erik Velez; Andrew M. Surman; Sujal M. Nanavati; Vishal Kumar; Evan Lehrman; Mark W. Wilson; Miles Conrad
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2018
Adam J. Yen; Miles Conrad; Patricia A. Loftus; Vishal Kumar; Sujal M. Nanavati; Mark W. Wilson; Daniel L. Cooke
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2016
M. Quezada; P. Curl; M. Kohn; Vishal Kumar; Sujal M. Nanavati; Miles Conrad; Mark W. Wilson