Sujani Kakumanu

Similar colds in subjects with allergic asthma and nonatopic subjects after inoculation with rhinovirus-16.

BACKGROUND Rhinovirus infections are frequent causes of asthma exacerbations. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to test whether subjects with and without allergic asthma have different responses to infection and to identify baseline patient risk factors that predict cold outcomes. METHODS Twenty subjects with mild persistent allergic asthma and 18 healthy subjects were experimentally inoculated with rhinovirus-16. Subjects were evaluated at baseline, during the acute infection, and during recovery for asthma and cold symptoms by using a validated questionnaire. Sputum and nasal lavage fluid were evaluated for viral shedding, cytokines, and cellular inflammation. RESULTS There were no group-specific significant differences in peak cold symptom scores (10.0 +/- 5.8 vs 11.1 +/- 6.2, asthmatic vs healthy subjects), peak nasal viral titers (log(10) 4.3 +/- 0.8 vs 3.7 +/- 1.4 50% tissue culture infective dose/mL, respectively), or changes in peak flow during the study (10% +/- 10% vs 8% +/- 6%, respectively). Rhinovirus-16 infection increased peak asthma index values in the asthmatic group (median, 6 --> 13; P = .003) but only marginally in the healthy group (median, 4 --> 7; P = .09). More asthmatic subjects had detectable eosinophils in nasal lavage and sputum samples at baseline and during infection, but otherwise, cellular and cytokine responses were similar. Baseline sputum eosinophilia and CXCL8 (IL-8) levels were positively associated with cold symptoms, whereas CCL2 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1) levels were inversely associated with nasal viral shedding. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that subjects with mild allergic asthma and healthy subjects have similar cold symptoms and inflammatory and antiviral responses. In addition, eosinophilia and other selective baseline measures of airway inflammation in subjects with or without asthma might predict respiratory outcomes with rhinovirus infection.

Creation and implementation of SAMPRO™: A school-based asthma management program

Clinicians who care for children with asthma have an obligation to coordinate asthma care with the schools. Aside from routine clinical care of asthmatic children, providers must educate the family and child about the need for an asthma treatment plan in school and support the school nurse meeting the needs of the student requiring school-based asthma care. The following article was developed by multiple stakeholders to address this need. It describes the 4 components of the School-based Asthma Management Program (SAMPRO™). SAMPRO™ details elements necessary for the education of children, families, clinicians, and school-based personnel based on a “circle of support” that would enhance multidirectional communication and promote better care for children with asthma within the school setting.

Building school health partnerships to improve pediatric asthma care: the School-based Asthma Management Program

Purpose of reviewChildren with asthma require care that is seamlessly coordinated so that asthma symptoms are recognized and managed at home and at school. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent consensus recommendations in school-based asthma care. Recent findingsThe School-based Asthma Management Program (SAMPRO) provides a widely endorsed framework to coordinate care with schools and consists of four components: establishing a circle of support around the child with asthma; facilitating bidirectional communication between clinicians and schools; comprehensive asthma education for schools; and assessment and remediation of environmental asthma triggers at school. SAMPRO standardizes recommendations for school-based asthma care coordination and provides a toolkit with websites and resources useful for the care of children with asthma in the school setting. SummaryThe review will discuss the need for coordinated school asthma partnerships, the inception and development of SAMPRO, and its vision to improve pediatric asthma care coordination within the circle of support, comprising clinicians, school nurses, families, and communities.

The influence of atopy and asthma on immune responses in inner‐city adults

Asthma in the inner‐city population is usually atopic in nature, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the underlying immune abnormalities that underlie asthma in urban adults have not been well defined. We investigated the influence of atopy and asthma on cytokine responses of inner‐city adult women to define immune abnormalities associated with asthma and atopy. Blood samples were collected from 509 of 606 inner‐city women enrolled in the Urban Environment and Childhood Asthma (URECA) study. We tested for associations between atopy and asthma status and cytokine responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells incubated ex vivo with a panel of innate and adaptive immune stimulants. Atopic subjects had heightened Th2 cytokine responses (IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐13) to cockroach and dust mite antigens, tetanus toxoid, and phytohemagglutinin (P < 0.05 for all). Differences in cytokine responses were greatest in response to stimulation with cockroach and dust mite. In a multivariate analysis, atopy was broadly related to increased Th2‐like responses to all antigens and PHA, while asthma was only weakly related to mitogen‐induced IL‐4 and IL‐5 responses. There were few asthma or allergy‐related differences in responses to innate stimuli, including IFN‐α and IFN‐γ responses. In this inner‐city adult female population, atopy is associated with enhanced Th2 responses to allergens and other stimuli, and there was little or no additional signal attributable to asthma. In particular, these data indicate that altered systemic interferon and innate immune responses are not associated with allergies and/or asthma in inner‐city women.