Sung-Seo Mo

Stress distribution and displacement by different bone-borne palatal expanders with micro-implants: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.

The aim of this study was to analyze stress distribution and displacement of the maxilla and teeth according to different designs of bone-borne palatal expanders using micro-implants. A three-dimensional (3D) finite-element (FE) model of the craniofacial bones and maxillary teeth was obtained. Four designs of rapid maxillary expanders: one with micro-implants placed lateral to mid-palatal suture (type 1), the second at the palatal slope (type 2), the third as in type 1 with additional conventional Hyrax arms (type 3), and the fourth surgically assisted tooth-borne expander (type 4) were added to the FE models. Expanders were activated transversely for 0.25mm. Geometric nonlinear theory was applied to evaluate Von-Mises Stress distribution and displacement. All types exhibited downward displacement and demonstrated more horizontal movement in the posterior area. Type 3 showed the most transverse displacement. The rotational movement of dentoalveolar unit was larger in types 1 and 3, whereas it was relatively parallel in types 2 and 4. The stresses were concentrated around the micro-implants in types 1 and 3 only. Type 2 had the least stress concentrations around the anchorage and showed alveolar expansion without buccal inclination. It is recommended to apply temporary anchorage devices to the palatal slopes to support expanders for efficient treatment of maxillary transverse deficiency.

Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study

The purposes of this study were to mechanically evaluate distalization modalities through the application of skeletal anchorage using finite element analysis. Base models were constructed from commercial teeth models. A finite element model was created and three treatment modalities were modified to make 10 models. Modalities 1 and 2 placed mini-implants in the buccal side, and modality 3 placed a plate on the palatal side. Distalization with the palatal plate in modality 3 showed bodily molar movement and insignificant displacement of the incisors. Placing mini-implants on the buccal side in modalities 1 and 2 caused the first molar to be distally tipped and extruded, while the incisors were labially flared and intruded. Distalization with the palatal plate rather than mini-implants on the buccal side provided bodily molar movement without tipping or extrusion. It is recommended to use our findings as a clinical guide for the application of skeletal anchorage devices for molar distalization.

Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate

In this article, we describe the treatment of a woman, aged 25 years 8 months, with a Class II malocclusion, severe anterior protrusion, and a high mandibular plane angle. The treatment plan consisted of extracting both maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars. En-masse retraction of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth was performed with a lingual approach combining a C-lingual retractor and a C-palatal plate (C-plate). However, the mandibular dentition was treated with conventional labial fixed appliances. After the maxillary anterior retraction, labial fixed appliances were placed on the maxillary dentition only during the finishing stage. Correct overbite and overjet, facial balance, and improved lip protrusion were obtained. The active treatment period was 17 months, and the results were stable for 13 months after debonding. This C-lingual retractor and C-plate combined retraction method can be effective for intrusive retraction of the anterior teeth.

Resistance to Immediate Orthodontic Loading of Surface-Treated Mini-Implants

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the stability and resistance to orthodontic forces of immediately loaded sandblasted and acid-etched (SAE) mini-implants and those of machined-surface implants of the same size and shape. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two types of mini-implants were used in the tibiae of 44 rabbits; some had an SAE surface and some had machined surfaces. Orthodontic loading of 150 g was applied immediately after placement. The success rates and maximum removal torque values (RTVs) of 412 mini-implants were recorded and compared immediately after placement, 3 days after placement, and 1, 6, and 10 weeks after placement. The RTV data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis to evaluate differences with respect to surface treatment, loading, and loading periods (P < .05). Multiple comparisons using the Scheffé method were performed to evaluate the RTVs for the subsequent loading periods. RESULTS Thirteen mini-implants failed during the experimental period. The SAE group had a higher RTV than the machined group, and there was significant difference in RTVs in accordance with loading periods (P < .001). However, there was no significant RTV difference between loaded and unloaded mini-implants. CONCLUSIONS The hypothesis was supported. Both SAE mini-implants and machined mini-implants can be loaded immediately and experience similar success rates. RTVs were higher for the SAE mini-implants than for the machined mini-implants. The latter finding suggests that, for immediate loading, SAE mini-implants may provide more stable retention than machined mini-implants.

Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyse the displacement and stress distribution in the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal and palatal plates using three-dimensional finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three anchorage appliance models-palatal plate (Type A), miniplate at the infrazygomatic crest (Type B), and conventional tooth-borne appliance (Type C)-were designed and integrated into a skull model. Protraction force was 500 g per side and force direction was forward and 30 degree downward to the maxillary occlusal plane. The stress distribution around the circum-maxillary sutures and the displacement of the surface landmarks were analysed. RESULTS All models showed forward and upward displacement at anterior nasal spine, Point A, and prosthion and forward and downward displacement at posterior nasal spine resulting in a counter-clockwise rotation. This anterior displacement was greatest in Type A. At the maxillary process of the zygoma, upward movement was shown only in Type A, whereas downward movement was observed in Types B and C. The greatest stresses in Type A were at the pterygomaxillary and the zygomaticotemporal sutures. Type B showed the greatest stress at the frontomaxillary suture. LIMITATIONS Type A showed asymmetric results; however, it was not of clinical significance. CONCLUSION The palatal plate resulted in wider stress distribution and more forward displacement compared to miniplate at the infrazygomatic crest area and conventional tooth-borne appliances. It might be recommended to consider the application of the palatal plate for maxillary protraction in Class III patients.

Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique.

INTRODUCTION Our objective was to evaluate the factors that affect effective torque control during en-masse anterior retraction by using intrusion overlay archwire and partially osseointegrated C-implants as the exclusive sources of anchorage without posterior bonded or banded attachments. METHODS Base models were constructed from a dental study model. No brackets or bands were placed on the posterior maxillary dentition during retraction. Different heights of the anterior retraction hooks to the working segment archwire and different intrusion forces with an overlay archwire placed in the 0.8-mm diameter hole of the C-implant were applied to generate torque on the anterior segment of the teeth. The amount of tooth displacement after finite element analysis was exaggerated 70 times and compared with tooth axis graphs of the central and lateral incisors and the canine. RESULTS The height of the anterior retraction hook and the amount of intrusion force had a combined effect on the labial crown torque applied to the incisors during en-masse retraction. The difference of anterior retraction hook length highly affected the torque control and also induced a tendency for canine extrusion. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth as an independent segment can be accomplished by using partially osseointegrated C-implants as the only source of anchorage, an intrusion overlay archwire, and a retraction hook (biocreative therapy type II technique).

Factors controlling anterior torque during C-implant-dependent en-masse retraction without posterior appliances

INTRODUCTION Our objective was to evaluate the factors that affect effective torque control during en-masse incisor and canine retraction when using partially osseointegrated C-implants (Cimplant, Seoul, Korea) as the exclusive source of anchorage without posterior bonded or banded appliances. METHODS Base models were constructed from a dental study model. No brackets or bands were placed on the maxillary posterior dentition during retraction. The working archwire was modeled by using a 3-dimensional beam element (ANSYS beam 4, Swanson Analysis System, Canonsburg, Pa) with a cross section of 0.016 × 0.022-in stainless steel. Different heights of anterior retraction hooks and different degrees of gable bends were applied to the working utility archwire that was placed into the 0.8-mm diameter hole of the C-implant to generate anterior torque on the anterior segment of the teeth. The amount of tooth displacement after finite element analysis was exaggerated 70 times and compared with tooth-axis graphs of the central and lateral incisors and the canine. RESULTS The height of the anterior retraction hook and the degree of the gable bend had a combined effect on the labial crown torque applied to the incisors during en-masse retraction. By using 30° gable bends and the longest hook, lingual root movement of the 6 anterior teeth occurred. By using 20° gable bends, the 6 anterior teeth showed a translation tendency during retraction. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional en-masse retraction of the 6 anterior teeth can be accomplished by using partially osseointegrated C-implants as the only source of anchorage, gable bends, and a long retraction hook (biocreative therapy type I technique).

An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.

The purpose of this study was to compare preferred facial profiles rated by different age groups. An average profile of each gender was constructed from subjects with normal occlusions. Each average profile was located in the centre, and then the lips were protruded or retruded in six 1mm increments in each direction. 70 lay people were divided into 3 groups: young adult (20-39 years); middle-aged (40-54 years); and senior (55-70 years). They were asked to rank their 3 most preferred profiles for each gender. The distribution of the most pleasing profile was compared according to age groups by the Kruskal-Wallis test and according to the raters gender by the Mann-Whitney U-test. There was a significant difference between the three age groups regarding the preferred male and female profiles (P<0.001). Both the middle-aged and the senior groups tended to select a slightly more retruded lip/flat profile than the young adult group. There was no gender dimorphism in the selection of the preferred profile. The young adult group preferred the straight profile while the middle-aged and senior groups favoured the slightly retruded profile. This may provide useful information for treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) position of the center of resistance of 4 mandibular anterior teeth, 6 mandibular anterior teeth, and the complete mandibular dentition by using 3D finite-element analysis. Methods Finite-element models included the complete mandibular dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. The crowns of teeth in each group were fixed with buccal and lingual arch wires and lingual splint wires to minimize individual tooth movement and to evenly disperse the forces onto the teeth. Each group of teeth was subdivided into 0.5-mm intervals horizontally and vertically, and a force of 200 g was applied on each group. The center of resistance was defined as the point where the applied force induced parallel movement. Results The center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.0 mm apical and 6.0 mm posterior, that of the 6 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.5 mm apical and 8.5 mm posterior, and that of the complete mandibular dentition group was 13.5 mm apical and 25.0 mm posterior to the incisal edge of the mandibular central incisors. Conclusions Finite-element analysis was useful in determining the 3D position of the center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group, 6 mandibular anterior teeth group, and complete mandibular dentition group.

A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage

Objective This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of maxillary second and third molar eruption status on the distalization of first molars with a modified palatal anchorage plate (MPAP), and (2) compare the results to the outcomes of the use of a pendulum and that of a headgear using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods Three eruption stages were established: an erupting second molar at the cervical one-third of the first molar root (Stage 1), a fully erupted second molar (Stage 2), and an erupting third molar at the cervical one-third of the second molar root (Stage 3). Retraction forces were applied via three anchorage appliance models: an MPAP with bracket and archwire, a bone-anchored pendulum appliance, and cervical-pull headgear. Results An MPAP showed greater root movement of the first molar than crown movement, and this was more noticeable in Stages 2 and 3. With the other devices, the first molar showed distal tipping. Transversely, the first molar had mesial-out rotation with headgear and mesial-in rotation with the other devices. Vertically, the first molar was intruded with an MPAP, and extruded with the other appliances. Conclusions The second molar eruption stage had an effect on molar distalization, but the third molar follicle had no effect. The application of an MPAP may be an effective treatment option for maxillary molar distalization.