Sung Uk Cho

Study on the timing of severe blood-brain barrier disruption using cerebrospinal fluid-serum albumin quotient in post cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management

AIM We aimed to evaluate the onset of severe blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using cerebrospinal fluid/serum albumin quotient (Qa) in cardiac arrest patients treated with target temperature management (TTM). METHODS This was a prospective single-centre observational cohort study from October 2017 to September 2018 with the primary endpoint being the onset of severe BBB disruption, determined based on Qa in cardiac arrest patients treated with TTM. Enrolled patients were grouped according to neurologically good and poor outcomes using the cerebral performance category (CPC) at 3 months after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Severe BBB disruption was evaluated using Qa measured immediately (Qa0) and at 24 h (Qa24), 48 h (Qa48), 72 h (Qa72) after ROSC. RESULTS Of 21 patients enrolled, poor outcome group had 10 patients. Qa0 was 0.019 (0.008∼0.024) in the poor outcome group and 0.006 (0.003∼0.008) in the good outcome group (p = 0.09). Qa24 was 0.045 (0.025∼0.115) in the poor outcome group and 0.006 (0.003∼0.006) in the good outcome group (p = 0.03). Qa48 was 0.055 (0.023∼0.276) in the poor outcome group and 0.006 (0.006∼0.009) in the good outcome group (p = 0.02). Qa72 was 0.047 (0.026∼0.431) in the poor outcome group and 0.007 (0.005∼0.011) in the good outcome group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Qa was significantly higher in the poor outcome group at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Severe BBB disruption indicated by Qa ≥ 0.02 in poor outcome group treated with TTM occurred within the first 24 h after ROSC.

Comparison of right and left ventricular enhancement times using a microbubble contrast agent between proximal humeral intraosseous access and brachial intravenous access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults

AIM The present study aimed to compare the ventricular enhancement time between humeral intraosseous access (HIO) and brachial intravenous access (BIV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adult humans. To our knowledge, this is the first such study during CPR in adult humans. METHODS This prospective single-centre observational cohort study assessed the medical records of patients who underwent CPR between January 2018 and March 2018. The primary endpoints were the left and right ventricular enhancement (LVE and RVE, respectively) times after administration of a microbubble contrast agent via HIO or BIV. Continuous variables are reported as means and standard deviations depending on normal distribution, while categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. The paired t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare HIO and BIV. Differences were considered significant at a P-value <0.05. RESULTS The study included 10 patients. The HIO time (15.60 ± 6.45 s) was significantly lower than the BIV time (20.80 ± 7.05 s; P = 0.009). The RVE time was significantly lower with HIO (5.60 ± 1.71 s) than with BIV (15.40 ± 3.24 s; P < 0.001). Additionally, the LVE time was significantly lower with HIO (120.20 ± 4.18 s) than with BIV (132.00 ± 3.09 s; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicated that the arrival times of a drug at the right and left ventricles are significantly lower with HIO than with BIV in an adult cardiac arrest model.

Is it possible to reduce intra-hospital transport time for computed tomography evaluation in critically ill cases using the Easy Tube Arrange Device?

Objective Patients are often transported within the hospital, especially in cases of critical illness for which computed tomography (CT) is performed. Since increased transport time increases the risks of complications, reducing transport time is important for patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of our newly invented device, the Easy Tube Arrange Device (ETAD), to reduce transport time for CT evaluation in cases of critical illness. Methods This prospective randomized control study included 60 volunteers. Each participant arranged five or six intravenous fluid lines, monitoring lines (noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, central venous pressure, arterial catheter), and therapeutic equipment (O2 supply device, Foley catheter) on a Resusci Anne mannequin. We measured transport time for the CT evaluation by using conventional and ETAD method. Results The median transport time for CT evaluation was 488.50 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], 462.75 to 514.75) and, 503.50 seconds (95% CI, 489.50 to 526.75) with 5 and 6 fluid lines using the conventional method and 364.50 seconds (95% CI, 335.00 to 388.75), and 363.50 seconds (95% CI, 331.75 to 377.75) with ETAD (all P<0.001). The time differences were 131.50 (95% CI, 89.25 to 174.50) and 148.00 (95% CI, 116.00 to 177.75) (all P<0.001). Conclusion The transport time for CT evaluation was reduced using the ETAD, which would be expected to reduce the complications that may occur during transport in cases of critical illness.

What are the key elements in suture education? Comparison of cosmetic appearances after facial lacerations repaired by junior residents and experts

Purpose: The technical factors which improve cosmetic outcomes and which need to be emphasized in education of junior residents have yet to be described. We compared cases in which suturing was performed by either junior emergency medicine residents or experts, in order to determine the focus of future education and training. Methods: Wound registry data was reviewed and retrospectively analyzed from September 2015 to February 2016. Only patients who visited the emergency room with facial lacerations were enrolled, and their wound registry data sheets were reviewed. Practitioners were divided into junior resident and expert groups. We assessed the progress using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) 5–10 days following suturing. Results: Sixty‐six patients were enrolled; 43 (65.2%) were men. The median (interquartile range) cosmetic scores (SBSES scale) for suturing performed by junior residents or experts were 3 (2–4) and 5 (4–5), respectively (p = 0.001). The percentage of maximum scores for each SBSES category was significantly lower in the junior resident group than in the expert group for width (68% vs. 86%), hatch marks (68% vs. 93%), and overall appearance (41% vs. 80%) (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: There were significant differences in scar widths and hatch marks, which were attributable to the skill level of the practitioner who performed the suturing of facial lacerations. Junior residents should be educated about maintenance of proper tension, atraumatic technique, and performing appropriate trimming or debridement.

Usefulness of new method of central venous catheter securement using a continuous suture

Introduction To reduce the time required for suture closure for central venous catheterization, a new procedure was developed using a continuous suture technique. The present study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of this method. Method The study was conducted with 90 volunteers among the doctors in the university hospital. Preliminary training (using video) on the two fixation methods was given to the participants prior to the experiment. After applying the central vein of the pig skin, a suture up to the butterfly seal was prepared, and the participant was allowed to fix the suture using the classic method and the new method. The time required for suturing was measured in seconds, and the tension was determined using a tension measuring device after suturing. Result When using the new “one‐time method,” the time required was shortened by about 20.50 s on average compared with the conventional method (P < 0.001). The median and quartile of the tension of the thread for the one‐time method was 1.10 kg (1.00– 1.20 kg) and of the conventional method was 1.10 kg (1.00– 1.20 kg), which showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.476). Conclusion We found that the new one‐time method provided faster and more convenient central catheterization and catheter securement than the conventional methods.