Sungho Lim

Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients

OBJECTIVE Although the endovascular aneurysm repair trial 2 (EVAR-2) demonstrated no benefit of EVAR in high-risk (HR) patients, EVAR is still performed widely in this patient cohort. This study compares the midterm outcomes after EVAR in HR patients with those in normal-risk (NR) patients. In turn, these data are compared with the EVAR-2 data. METHODS A retrospective review from January 2006 to December 2013 identified 247 patients (75 HR [30.4%], 172 NR [69.6%]) who underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysm in an academic tertiary institution and its affiliated Veterans Administration hospital. The same HR criteria used in the EVAR-2 trial were employed. Overall survival, graft-related complications, and reintervention rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. HR group outcomes were compared with the EVAR-2 data. RESULTS HR patients had a larger abdominal aortic aneurysm size and had a higher prevalence of cardiac disease (P < .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .02), renal insufficiency (P < .01), and cancer (P < .01). Use of aspirin (63% HR vs 66% NR; P = .6), statin (83% HR vs 72% NR; P = .2), and beta-blockers (71% HR vs 60% NR; P = .2) was similar; in the EVAR-2 trial, the corresponding use of these medications was 58%, 42%, and not available, respectively. Perioperative mortality (0% HR vs 1.2% NR; P = 1.0) and early complication rates (4% HR vs 6% NR; P = .8) were similar. In contrast, perioperative mortality in the EVAR-2 trial was 9%. At a mean follow-up of 3 years, the incidence rates of delayed secondary interventions for aneurysm- or graft-related complications were 7% for HR patients and 10% for NR patients (P = .5). The 1-, 2-, and 4-year survival rates in HR patients (85%, 77%, 65%) were lower than those in NR patients (97%, 97%, 93%; P < .001), but this was more favorable compared with a 36% 4-year survival in the EVAR-2 trial. No difference was seen in long-term reintervention-free survival in HR and NR patients (P = .8). Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis identified five prognostic indicators for post-EVAR death: age, chronic kidney disease stages 4 and 5, congestive heart failure, home oxygen use, and current cancer therapy. CONCLUSIONS EVAR can be performed in patients unfit for open surgical repair with excellent early survival and long-term durability. These outcomes in the HR group compare more favorably to the EVAR-2 trial data. However, not all HR patients for open surgical repair derive the benefit from EVAR. The decision to proceed with EVAR in HR patients should be individualized, depending on the number and severity of risk factors.

Contemporary Management of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in the Endovascular Era

Objective: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a rare disease entity associated with high morbidity and mortality. Disparate etiologies and nonspecific symptoms make the diagnosis challenging and often result in delayed diagnosis and intervention. Open laparotomy with mesenteric revascularization and resection of necrotic bowel has been considered the gold standard of care. With recent advances in percutaneous catheter-directed techniques, multiple retrospective studies have demonstrated the outcomes of endovascular therapy. Herein, we review the etiology, presentation, and diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia with contemporary outcomes associated with both open and endovascular treatments. Methods: The PubMed electronic database was queried in the English language using the search words mesenteric, acute ischemia, embolism, thromboembolism, thrombosis, revascularization, and endovascular in various combinations. Abstracts of the relevant titles were examined to confirm their relevance and the full articles then extracted. References from extracted articles were checked for any additional relevant articles. This systematic review encompassed literature for the past 5 years (between 2011 and 2016). Results: Early diagnosis and intervention improves acute mesenteric ischemia outcomes. Early restoration of mesenteric flow minimizes morbidity and mortality. In comparison to open laparotomy with mesenteric revascularization and resection of necrotic bowel, several retrospective studies using administrative data and single-center chart reviews demonstrate noninferior outcomes of an endovascular first approach in acute arterial mesenteric occlusion. Conclusions: For acute mesenteric arterial occlusive disease, both endovascular and open revascularization techniques are viable options. Although there is lack of level 1 evidence, single-center retrospective studies and administrative database studies demonstrated that an endovascular first approach may have improved outcomes in the immediate postoperative period. However, selection and other bias in these studies necessitate the need for definitive randomized prospective studies between endovascular and open mesenteric intervention. In contrast, mesenteric venous thrombosis may be treated with systemic anticoagulation without surgical revascularization. Catheter-directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis can be considered at the discretion of the clinician.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Catheter-Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Pregnant Woman With Iliofemoral Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

The mortality for open procedures for VEs has also decreased, suggesting improvements in perioperative care. There was, unexpectedly, an increase in mortality for rTAA, suggesting greater utilization of endovascular therapy for high-risk patients who previously may not have been candidates for repair. Further studies evaluating the selection of patients for endovascular repair of rTAA are warranted as mortality increased over time coupled with an increased hospital cost.

Epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of acute limb ischemia in the pediatric population

Objective: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) in a pediatric patient is a rare condition but may result in lifelong disability. A paucity of evidence exists to derive treatment guidelines; some surgeons advocate conservative management over invasive measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of surgical revascularization in the pediatric population and outcomes of conservative vs surgical management. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database (California, Iowa, and New York) between 2007 and 2013 was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: conservative management and surgical management. Each group was further subdivided into three age groups: infant (<24 months), child (<12 years), and adolescent (<18 years). Outcome variables included mortality, amputation status, length of hospital stay, and hospital charge. Results: A total of 1576 pediatric patients with ALI were identified among 6,122,535 pediatric admissions (26 per 100,000 admissions). Average age was 9.9 ± 7.1 years. There were 263 patients who underwent surgical revascularization. The conservative management group was younger (5.8 ± 6.2 vs 9.2 ± 6.1 years; P < .01). Otherwise, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, the amputation rate was low (<2%; n = 28), especially in the upper extremities (<0.2%). Outcomes of conservative management and surgical revascularization were similar for mortality (5.0% vs 3.4%; P = .34), amputation (1.9% vs 1.1%; P = .46), length of hospital stay (15.4 vs 12.9 days; P = .07), and hospital charge (

Deleterious Effects of General Anesthesia on Minor Foot Amputations

281,794 vs

IP209. Through-Knee Amputation: A Feasible Alternative to Above-Knee Amputation

288,507; P = .28). In subgroup analysis, infants had less concomitant orthopedic injury than other age groups. Children demonstrated a higher likelihood of associated upper extremity injury and operative revascularization (P < .01) than infants or adolescents. In infants, mortality was higher and surgical intervention was associated with longer hospital stay (29.5 ± 34.4 days vs 45.6 ± 31.6 days; P = .02) and larger health care expenditure (

Giant Spontaneous Greater Saphenous Vein Aneurysm

467,885 ±

Iliac Stent Migration during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Resulting in Functional Coarctation

638,653 vs

Comparison of supramesenteric aortic cross-clamping with supraceliac aortic cross-clamping for aortic reconstruction

1,099,343 ±

Through-knee amputation is a feasible alternative to above-knee amputation

695,872; P < .01). Conclusions: Pediatric ALI is a rare entity and is associated with low amputation and mortality rates. Among the pediatric age cohorts, infants with ALI are at higher risk of in‐hospital mortality than older age groups are. Surgical intervention is not associated with improved limb salvage or mortality. Nonoperative management may be considered an initial treatment modality, but further research is needed to elucidate which important subset of pediatric patients benefit from open or endovascular operative intervention.