Sunil Jeswani
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sunil Jeswani.
Neurosurgery | 2013
Sunil Jeswani; Miriam Nuño; Vanessa Folkerts; Debraj Mukherjee; Keith L. Black; Chirag G. Patil
BACKGROUND Cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme (cGBM) is rare, and although there is a general belief that these tumors have a worse prognosis than supratentorial GBM (sGBM), few studies have been published to support this belief. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of cerebellar location on survival through a case-control design comparing overall survival time of cGBM and sGBM patients. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was used to identify 132 patients with cGBM (1973-2008). Each cGBM patient was matched with an sGBM patient from among 20,848 sGBM patients on the basis of age, extent of resection, decade of diagnosis, and radiation therapy using propensity score matching. RESULTS Within the cGBM, 37% were older than 65 years of age, 62% were men, and 87% were white. Most patients underwent surgery and radiation (74%), whereas only 26% underwent surgical resection only. The median survival time for the cGBM and sGBM matched cohort was 8 months; however, the survival distributions differed (log-rank P = .04). Survival time for cGBM vs sGBM at 2 years was 21.5% vs 8.0%, and 12.7% vs 5.3% at 3 years. Multivariate analysis of survival among cGBM patients showed that younger age (P < .0001) and having radiation therapy (P < .0001) were significantly associated with reduced hazard of mortality. Among all patients, multivariate analysis showed that tumor location (P = .03), age (P < .0001), tumor size (P = .009), radiation (P < .0001), and resection (P < .0001) were associated with survival time in the unmatched cohort. CONCLUSION Median survival time for cGBM and sGBM patients was 8 months, but cGBM patients had a survival time advantage as the study progressed. These findings suggest that cGBM patients should be treated as aggressively as sGBM patients with surgical resection and radiation therapy.
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2016
Sunil Jeswani; Miriam Nuño; Wu A; Bonert; John D. Carmichael; Keith L. Black; Ray Chu; King W; Adam N. Mamelak
OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas and similar midline suprasellar tumors have traditionally been resected via transcranial approaches. More recently, expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches have gained interest. Surgeons have advocated for both approaches, and at present there is no consensus whether one approach is superior to the other. The authors therefore compared surgical outcomes between craniotomy and endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) for suprasellar tumors treated at their institution. METHODS A retrospective review of patients undergoing resection of suprasellar lesions at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center between 2000 and 2013 was performed. Patients harboring suspected craniopharyngioma were selected for extensive review. Other pathologies or predominantly intrasellar masses were excluded. Cases were separated into 2 groups, based on the surgical approach taken. One group underwent EETS and the other cohort underwent craniotomy. Patient demographic data, presenting symptoms, and previous therapies were tabulated. Preoperative and postoperative tumor volume was calculated for each case based on MRI. Student t-test and the chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and outcomes between the 2 cohorts. To assess for selection bias, 3 neurosurgeons who did not perform the surgeries reviewed the preoperative imaging studies and clinical data for each patient in blinded fashion and indicated his/her preferred approach. These data were subject to concordance analysis using Cohens kappa test to determine if factors other than surgeon preference influenced the choice of surgical approach. RESULTS Complete data were available for 53 surgeries; 19 cases were treated via EETS, and 34 were treated via craniotomy. Patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts, except that fewer operations for recurrent tumor were observed in the craniotomy cohort compared with EETS (17.6% vs 42.1%, p = 0.05). The extent of resection was similar between the 2 groups (85.6% EETS vs 90.7% craniotomy, p = 0.77). An increased rate of cranial nerve injury was noted in the craniotomy group (0% EETS vs 23.5% craniotomy, p = 0.04). Postoperative CSF leak rate was higher in the EETS group (26.3% EETS vs 0% craniotomy, p = 0.004). The progression-free survival curves (log-rank p = 0.99) and recurrence rates (21.1% EETS vs 23.5% craniotomy, p = 1.00) were similar between the 2 groups. Concordance analysis of cases reviewed by 3 neurosurgeons indicated that individual surgeon preference was the only factor that determined surgical approach (kappa coefficient -0.039, p = 0.762) CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcomes were similar for tumors resected via craniotomy or EETS, except that more CSF leaks occurred in the EETS cohort, whereas more neurological injuries occurred in the craniotomy cohort. Surgical approach appears to mostly reflect surgeon preference rather than specific tumor characteristics. These data support the view that EETS is a viable alternative to craniotomy, providing a similar extent of resection with less neurological injury.
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy | 2012
Zhenhua Li; Jang-Won Lee; Debraj Mukherjee; Jianfei Ji; Sunil Jeswani; Keith L. Black; John S. Yu
Introduction: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal primary malignant brain tumor. Although progress has been made in current conventional therapies for GBM patients, the effect of these advances on clinical outcomes has been disappointing. Recent research into the origin of cancers suggest that GBM cancer stem cells (GSC) are the source of initial tumor formation, resistance to current conventional therapeutics and eventual patient relapse. Currently, there are very few studies that apply immunotherapy to target GSC. Areas covered: CD133, a cell surface protein, is used extensively as a surface marker to identify and isolate GSC in malignant glioma. We discuss biomarkers such as CD133, L1-cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM), and A20 of GSC. We review developing novel treatment modalities, including immunotherapy strategies, to target GSC. Expert opinion: There are very few reports of preclinical studies targeting GSC. Identification and validation of unique molecular signatures and elucidation of signaling pathways involved in survival, proliferation and differentiation of GSC will significantly advance this field and provide a framework for the rational design of a new generation of antigen-specific, anti-GSC immunotherapy- and nanotechnology-based targeted therapyies. Combined with other therapeutic avenues, GSC-targeting therapies may represent a new paradigm to treat GBM patients.
Case reports in orthopedics | 2013
Ali Shirzadi; Doniel Drazin; Sunil Jeswani; Leah Lovely; John C. Liu
Modern imaging has revealed that thoracic disc herniation (TDH) has a prevalence of 11–37% in asymptomatic patients. Pain, sensory disturbances, myelopathy, and lower extremity weakness are the most common presenting symptoms, but other atypical extraspinal complaints, such as gastrointestinal or cardiopulmonary discomfort, may be reported. Our objective is to make providers familiar with TDHs atypical symptoms to help avoid potential serious consequences created by a delay in diagnosis. We report the cases of two patients who each presented with atypical extraspinal symptoms secondary to a TDH. One patient presented with a chronic history of nausea, emesis, and chest tightness and MRI showed a large right paramedian disc herniation at T7-8. A second patient reported chronic constipation, buttock and leg burning pain, gait instability, and urinary frequency; an MRI of his thoracic spine demonstrated a central disc herniation at T10-11. TDH can present with vague extraspinal symptoms and unfamiliarity with these symptoms can lead to misdiagnosis with progression of the disease and unnecessary diagnostic tests and medical procedures. Therefore, TDH should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with negative gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and cardiopulmonary system basic studies.
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2011
Sunil Jeswani; Michael J. Alexander
As the usage of intracranial stents continue to expand for wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease and other pathologies, an enigmatic problem that remains is in-stent stenosis (ISS). Most commonly, this phenomenon seems to take place as a result of neointimal proliferation. However, it has been postulated that the constituents of the metal alloys used in intracranial stents may also induce an inflammatory reaction that results in ISS. Thus, nickel ions, which are present in many of the metal alloys in intracranial stents, may cause a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction leading to ISS. Studies examining the rate of ISS secondary to hypersensitivity reactions induced by nickel ion release in coronary stents have been equivocal. Based on the available data, we cannot conclude that prescreening for nickel sensitivity before the intracranial stent deployment is indicated, but further studies may be indicated, since the amount of nickel in coronary stents is far less than in the nitinol stents used in the cerebral circulation. The use of intracranial stents has expanded significantly over the past few years, especially with the advent of more flexible nitinol stents.1 Intracranial stents have been shown to be an effective and safe method of revascularization in intracranial vessel disease secondary to atherosclerotic lesions and dissections.2–6 Many studies have shown greater efficacy in revascularization of intracranial stenoses than just angioplasty alone, as well as a decrease in rate of complications such as distal embolization and dissection.7 Additionally, the use of intracranial stents in the treatment of aneurysms has grown dramatically. Studies as early as 1994 demonstrated the use of stents in the cerebrovascular circulation for dissecting aneurysms.5 In 1997, Higashida et al demonstrated the use of an intracranial stent as a scaffold through which coils were placed into an aneurysm in order to treat a …
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2013
Doniel Drazin; Kevin Spitler; Sunil Jeswani; Ali Shirzadi; Sergei I. Bannykh; Chirag G. Patil
Intracranial metastases are rare from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We report a 60-year-old male with a history of stomach GIST who presented with ataxia 2.5 years after a partial gastrectomy. MRI revealed enhancing masses in the cerebellum and frontal lobe. A suboccipital craniotomy revealed metastatic GIST. With subsequent radiosurgical boost to the resection cavity and frontal lobe lesion, the patient is doing well 15 months postoperatively. To our knowledge, this is one of only a few reports on cerebral GIST metastases from the stomach.
Journal of Neuroimaging | 2014
Doniel Drazin; Sunil Jeswani; Ali Shirzadi; Armen Choulakian; Michael J. Alexander; David Palestrant; Wouter I. Schievink
Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVF) in the cervical spine are known to cause subarachnoid hemorrhage. Vasospasm after rupture of a DAVF, however, has not previously been reported.
Case reports in infectious diseases | 2013
Doniel Drazin; George Hanna; Faris Shweikeh; Sunil Jeswani; Leah Lovely; Richard Sokolov; John C. Liu
Varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 are neurotropic viruses that can be reactivated after a surgical or stressful intervention. Although such cases are uncommon, consequences can be debilitating, and variable treatment responses merit consideration. We describe a 41-year-old male with a history of varicella-mediated skin eruptions, who presented with continuing right arm pain, burning, and numbness in a C6 dermatomal distribution following a C5-6 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and epidural steroid injections. The operative course was uncomplicated and he was discharged home on postoperative day 1. Approximately ten days after surgery, the patient presented to the emergency department complaining of severe pain in his right upper extremity and a vesicular rash from his elbow to his second digit. He was started on Acyclovir and discharged home. On outpatient follow-up, his rash had resolved though his pain continued. The patient was started on a neuromodulating agent for chronic pain. This case adds to the limited literature regarding this rare complication, brings attention to the symptoms for proper diagnosis and treatment, and emphasizes the importance of prompt antiviral therapy. We suggest adding a neuromodulating agent to prevent long-term sequelae and resolve acute symptoms.
Neurosurgical Focus | 2011
Doniel Drazin; Ali Shirzadi; Sunil Jeswani; Harry Ching; Jack Rosner; Alexandre Rasouli; Terrence Kim; Robert S. Pashman; J. Patrick Johnson
Neurosurgical Focus | 2014
Sunil Jeswani; Doniel Drazin; Joseph C. Hsieh; Faris Shweikeh; Eric S. Friedman; Robert S. Pashman; J. Patrick Johnson; Terrence T. Kim