Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sunil W. Dutta is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sunil W. Dutta.


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2017

National trends in radiotherapy for brain metastases at time of diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer

Daniel M. Trifiletti; Jason P. Sheehan; Surbhi Grover; Sunil W. Dutta; Chad G. Rusthoven; Brian D. Kavanagh; Arjun Sahgal; Timothy N. Showalter

BACKGROUND To analyze the national trends of patients treated radiotherapy for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that were found at diagnosis. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with NSCLC diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 that received brain irradiation for metastases and patients grouped into having had received fractionated brain radiotherapy (5-15 fractions with or without radiosurgery) or intracranial radiosurgery alone (1-5 fractions). Univariable and multivariable (MVA) analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with the receipt of SRS alone, and temporal/regional trends. RESULTS 47,746 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 42,148 received fractionated brain irradiation (88%) and 5,598 received radiosurgery (12%). 345 patients received fractioned brain irradiation with a radiosurgical boost (0.8%). The utilization of radiosurgery-alone increased over time owing to increases in each radiosurgery modality. On MVA, several factors were associated with increased odds of receiving intracranial radiosurgery-alone over fractionated brain radiotherapy including more recent year of diagnosis, increased median income, eastern U.S. regions, further distance to the hospital, and the receipt of chemotherapy (each p<0.001). Patients of Asian descent were less likely to receive radiosurgery alone (p=0.044). CONCLUSIONS In the management of brain metastases from NSCLC, overall utilization of an intracranial radiosurgery alone treatment strategy has increased over the past decade. Despite this, there appear to be significant geographic variations and disparities remain based on patient income level and race. Further study is needed to define the reasons for these disparities and appropriate actions to mitigate them.


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2018

Central neurocytoma: Clinical characteristics, patterns of care, and survival

Sunil W. Dutta; Tasneem Kaleem; Donald A. Muller; Jennifer L. Peterson; Anna C. Harrell; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Daniel M. Trifiletti

PURPOSE To investigate clinical characteristics and patterns of care among patients with central neurocytomas in a large cohort of patients. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with biopsy confirmed neurocytoma from 2004 to 2015. Patterns of care were described and univariable and multivariable models were performed to investigate the impact of prognostic factors on overall survival. RESULTS Among 223,404 patients with brain tumors in the NCDB, 868 patients were diagnosed with biopsy-proven neurocytoma and analyzed (0.4% or approximately 75 patients annually). Median age at diagnosis was 31 years and median tumor size was 4-5 cm. Diagnosis was similar between male (49.5%) and female (50.5%). Regarding location, 622 (72%) tumors were intraventricular, 168 (19%) were extra-ventricular, and 78 (9%) overlapping or unspecified. Five-year overall survival among all patients was 89%. On multivariable analysis tumor location, extent of resection, and use of radiation, were not predictive for improved survival (each p > 0.05); however, patient age (p < 0.001), WHO grade (p < 0.001), and medical comorbidity scores (p = 0.002) were independently associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Patients with central neurocytoma often present as young adults with sizable tumor burden and are well managed with surgery alone. Considering their favorable survival, efforts to improve tumor control should be carefully weighed against the long-term risks associated with adjuvant therapy like radiation.


Brachytherapy | 2018

Time-driven activity-based cost comparison of prostate cancer brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Sunil W. Dutta; Kristine Bauer-Nilsen; Jason C. Sanders; Daniel M. Trifiletti; Bruce Libby; Donna H. Lash; Melody Lain; Deborah Christodoulou; Constance Hodge; Timothy N. Showalter

PURPOSE To evaluate the delivery cost of frequently used radiotherapy options offered to patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer using time-driven activity-based costing and compare the results with Medicare reimbursement and relative value units (RVUs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Process maps were created to represent each step of prostate radiotherapy treatment at our institution. Salary data, equipment purchase costs, and consumable costs were factored into the cost analysis. The capacity cost rate was determined for each resource and calculated for each treatment option from initial consultation to its completion. Treatment options included low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy single fraction boost with 25-fraction intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HDR-BT-IMRT), moderately hypofractionated 28-fraction IMRT, conventionally fractionated 39-fraction IMRT, and conventionally fractionated (2 Gy/fraction) 23-fraction pelvis irradiation with 16-fraction prostate boost. RESULTS The total cost to deliver LDR-BT, HDR-BT-IMRT, moderately hypofractionated 28-fraction IMRT, conventionally fractionated 39-fraction IMRT, conventionally fractionated 39-fraction IMRT, and conventionally fractionated (2 Gy/fraction) 23-fraction pelvis irradiation with 16-fraction prostate boost was


Medical Physics | 2018

Quality assurance tool for organ at risk delineation in radiation therapy using a parametric statistical approach

Cheukkai Hui; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; William T. Watkins; Daniel M. Trifiletti; Clayton E. Alonso; Sunil W. Dutta; Jeffrey V. Siebers

2719,


Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2018

Integration of MRI target delineation into rapid workflow cervical cancer brachytherapy: Impact on clinical outcomes

Sunil W. Dutta; Daniel M. Trifiletti; Kelly J. Pugh; Kara D. Romano; Bruce Libby; Timothy N. Showalter

6517,


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2018

National care among patients with WHO grade I intracranial meningioma

Sunil W. Dutta; Jennifer L. Peterson; Laura A. Vallow; Anita Mahajan; Steven S. Rosenfeld; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Daniel M. Trifiletti

4173,


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2018

Impact of academic facility type and volume on post-surgical outcomes following diagnosis of glioblastoma

Alan Hauser; Sunil W. Dutta; Timothy N. Showalter; Jason P. Sheehan; Surbhi Grover; Daniel M. Trifiletti

5507, and


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2018

Evolution in the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with multiple brain metastases: An international survey

Sunil W. Dutta; Jason P. Sheehan; Ajay Niranjan; L. Dade Lunsford; Daniel M. Trifiletti

5663, respectively. Total reimbursement for each course was


Expert Review of Medical Devices | 2018

Prostate cancer high dose-rate brachytherapy: review of evidence and current perspectives

Sunil W. Dutta; Clayton E. Alonso; Bruce Libby; Timothy N. Showalter

3123,


Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2018

Short-course Versus Long-course Neoadjuvant Therapy for Non-metastatic Rectal Cancer: Patterns of Care and Outcomes From the National Cancer Database

Sunil W. Dutta; Clayton E. Alonso; Taylor Jones; M.R. Waddle; Einsley-Marie Janowski; Daniel M. Trifiletti

10,156,

Collaboration


Dive into the Sunil W. Dutta's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce Libby

University of Virginia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Surbhi Grover

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge