Suresh Ramalingam

Outcomes for Elderly, Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel: Analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599

PURPOSEnFit elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from platinum-based, two-drug chemotherapy. Bevacizumab (B) in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) improves survival for advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC, as evidenced in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4599. We conducted a subset analysis of ECOG 4599 to determine the outcome for elderly patients.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnECOG 4599 randomly assigned patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC to PC or to PCB. We analyzed outcome in patients who were at least 70 years of age at the time of study entry. Patient characteristics, efficacy, and toxicity data were compared between PC and PCB for the elderly. Outcomes for elderly and younger patients (< 70 years) treated with PCB were also compared.nnnRESULTSnAmong elderly patients (n = 224; 26%), there was a trend towards higher response rate (29% v 17%; P = .067) and progression-free survival (5.9 v 4.9 months; P = .063) with PCB compared with PC, although overall survival (PCB = 11.3 months; PC = 12.1 months; P = .4) was similar. Grade 3 to 5 toxicities occurred in 87% of elderly patients with PCB versus 61% with PC (P < .001), with seven treatment-related deaths in the PCB arm compared with two with PC. Elderly patients had higher incidence of grade 3 to 5 neutropenia, bleeding, and proteinuria with PCB compared with younger patients.nnnCONCLUSIONnIn elderly NSCLC patients, PCB was associated with a higher degree of toxicity, but no obvious improvement in survival compared with PC. Data from this unplanned, retrospective analysis justify prospective evaluation of the therapeutic index of PCB regimen in elderly patients.

Systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: recent advances and future directions.

Systemic therapy improves the survival and quality of life of patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several new therapeutic options have emerged for advanced NSCLC, incorporating novel cytotoxic agents (taxanes, gemcitabine, pemetrexed) and molecular-targeted agents (erlotinib, bevacizumab). Efforts to improve the outcome of first-line therapy for advanced and metastatic NSCLC have primarily focused on the addition of targeted agents to platinum-based two-drug regimens. Bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, is the first drug to demonstrate superior outcomes when added to systemic chemotherapy in advanced disease. Evaluation of the role of maintenance therapy following four to six cycles of first-line combination chemotherapy is ongoing. Both cytotoxic agents and targeted agents are suitable for evaluation in the maintenance setting. Promising results have been noted with single-agent paclitaxel as maintenance therapy following four cycles of combination therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Phase III studies are now under way to evaluate the roles of gemcitabine, pemetrexed, and erlotinib as maintenance therapies for patients who experience a response or disease stabilization after four cycles of combination chemotherapy. Whether this approach will be successful in extending the survival of a select group of patients remains to be seen.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Vorinostat, A Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, in Combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced Solid Malignancies

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to determine the recommended phase II doses of the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat when administered in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Experimental Design: Patients (N = 28) with advanced solid malignancies were treated with vorinostat, administered orally once daily for 2 weeks or twice daily for 1 week, every 3 weeks. Carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered i.v. once every 3 weeks. Doses of vorinostat and paclitaxel were escalated in sequential cohorts of three patients. The pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, its metabolites, and paclitaxel were characterized. Results: Vorinostat was administered safely up to 400 mg qd or 300 mg bd with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Two of 12 patients at the 400 mg qd schedule experienced dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 emesis and grade 4 neutropenia with fever. Non–dose-limiting toxicity included nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Of 25 patients evaluable for response, partial responses occurred in 11 (10 non–small cell lung cancer and 1 head and neck cancer) and stable disease occurred in 7. Vorinostat pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied. Vorinostat area under the concentration versus time curve and half-life increased when vorinostat was coadministered with carboplatin and paclitaxel, but vorinostat did not alter paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. Conclusions: Both schedules of vorinostat (400 mg oral qd × 14 days or 300 mg bd × 7 days) were tolerated well in combination with carboplatin (area under the concentration versus time curve = 6 mg/mL × min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2). Encouraging anticancer activity was noted in patients with previously untreated non–small cell lung cancer.

Phase I and Pharmacodynamic Study of 17-(Allylamino)-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Adult Patients with Refractory Advanced Cancers

Purpose: The primary objective was to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG) given twice a week. Experimental Design: Escalating doses of 17AAG were given i.v. to cohorts of three to six patients. Dose levels for schedule A (twice weekly × 3 weeks, every 4 weeks) were 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2 and for schedule B (twice weekly × 2 weeks, every 3 weeks) were 150, 200, and 250 mg/m2. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected for assessment of heat shock protein (HSP) 90 and HSP90 client proteins. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled, 32 on schedule A and 12 on schedule B. On schedule A at 200 mg/m2, DLTs were seen in two of six patients (one grade 3 thrombocytopenia and one grade 3 abdominal pain). On schedule B, both patients treated at 250 mg/m2 developed DLT (grade 3 headache with nausea/vomiting). Grade 3/4 toxicities seen in >5% of patients were reversible elevations of liver enzymes (47%), nausea (9%), vomiting (9%), and headache (5%). No objective tumor responses were observed. The only consistent change in PBMC proteins monitored was a 0.8- to 30-fold increase in HSP70 concentrations, but these were not dose dependent. The increase in PBMC HSP70 persisted throughout the entire cycle of treatment but returned to baseline between last 17AAG dose of cycle 1 and first 17AAG dose of cycle 2. Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses of 17AAG are 175 to 200 mg/m2 when given twice a week and consistently cause elevations in PBMC HSP70.

Radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung metastases.

Spinal metastases are a common source of pain as well as neurologic deficit in patients with lung cancer. Metastases from lung cancer traditionally have been believed to be relatively responsive to radiation therapy. However, conventional external beam radiotherapy lacks the precision to allow delivery of large single‐fraction doses of radiation and simultaneously limit the dose to radiosensitive structures such as the spinal cord. The current study evaluated the efficacy of single‐fraction radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung cancer metastases.

A first in human study of SB-743921, a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, to determine pharmacokinetics, biologic effects and establish a recommended phase II dose

PurposeTo determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SB-743921 when administered as a 1-h infusion every 21xa0days to patients with advanced solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma.MethodsPatients who failed prior standard therapy or those without any standard options were eligible. Forty-four patients were enrolled using an initial accelerated dose-escalation phase followed by a standard dose-escalation phase. An additional 20 patients were enrolled at the recommended phase II dose to obtain additional safety and pharmacokinetic data. The doses evaluated ranged from 2 to 8xa0mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of SB-743921 was evaluated at 19 time-points over 48xa0h following during administration during cycle 1. Toxicity was assessed by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria version 3.0. Response evaluation was performed every 6xa0weeks.ResultsThe most common and consistent DLT was neutropenia. Other DLTs observed included hypophosphatemia, pulmonary emboli, SVC syndrome, transaminitis, hyponatremia, and hyperbilirubinemia. The MTD of SB-743921 as a 1-h infusion every 21xa0days was established as 4xa0mg/m2. The maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration time curve appeared to increase proportionally to dose. One durable objective response was seen in a patient with metastatic cholangiocarcinoma who was on treatment 11xa0months and 6 patients had stable disease for over four cycles.ConclusionsThe recommended phase II dose of SB-743921 on this specific schedule of a 1-h infusion every 3xa0weeks is 4xa0mg/m2. The promising efficacy and lack of severe toxicities in this study warrant the continued development of SB-743921.

Dual Inhibition of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor with Cetuximab, an IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody, and Gefitinib, A Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Refractory Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Phase I Study

Purpose: To determine the optimal doses of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib when administered as a combination for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC treated with prior platinum-based chemotherapy received escalating doses of weekly cetuximab (100, 200, and 250 mg/m2, IV) and fixed doses of gefitinib (250 mg/d, PO) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Available tumor samples were analyzed for EGFR expression, EGFR gene copy number and mutations, and K-RAS mutations. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled in three cohorts. Treatment was generally well-tolerated at all doses. One grade 3 headache, observed on the first treatment cycle was initially considered dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); this event was eventually determined to be caused by a brain metastasis, not toxicity. Three cases of grade 3/4 hypomagnesemia and 1 case of grade 3 skin rash occurred in the highest-dose cohort. Grade 1/2 infusion reactions occurred in three patients without requiring treatment discontinuation. Four patients (31%) achieved stable disease, no responses were observed. None of the patients had EGFR mutations or gene amplification in their tumor samples. Conclusion: Dual EGFR inhibition with cetuximab and gefitinib is feasible; the combination can be safely administered and may have modest activity in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly IV and gefitinib 250 mg/d PO is the recommended phase II dose, although the potential for late-onset hypomagnesemia warrants close monitoring of patients receiving this combined dosage.

Effect of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover drug—drug interaction study

BACKGROUNDnThe proteasome inhibitor bortezomib undergoes oxidative biotransformation via multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, with CYP3A4 identified as a partial, yet potentially important, contributor based on in vitro drug metabolism studies.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of concomitant administration of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bortezomib.nnnMETHODSnThis was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in patients with advanced solid tumors. All patients received bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) IV (on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of two 21-day cycles) and were randomized to receive concomitant ketoconazole 400 mg on days 6, 7, 8, and 9 of cycle 1 or 2. Serial blood samples were collected over the day-8 dosing interval (immediately prior to bortezomib administration, and from 5 minutes to 72 hours after administration) in cycles 1 and 2 for measurement of plasma bortezomib concentrations for noncompartmental PK analysis and blood 20S proteasome inhibition for PD analysis. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded during each cycle including serious AEs and all neurotoxicity events for up to 30 days after the last dose of bortezomib.nnnRESULTSnTwenty-one patients (median age, 57 years; sex, 67% male; race, 86% white; median body surface area, 2.01 m(2)) were randomized to treatment. Twelve patients completed the protocol-specified dosing and PK sampling in both cycles 1 and 2. Assessment of the effect of ketoconazole on bortezomib PK and PD was based on data in these 12 PK-evaluable patients. The ratio of geometric mean bortezomib AUC(0-tlast)(AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration) for bortezomib plus ketoconazole versus bortezomib alone was 1.352 (90% CI, 1.032-1.772). Consistent with this observed mean increase in bortezomib exposure, concomitant administration of ketoconazole was associated with a corresponding increase (24%-46%) in the blood proteasome inhibitory effect.nnnCONCLUSIONnConcomitant administration of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole with bortezomib resulted in a mean increase of 35% in bortezomib exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00129207.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pegylated Liposomal CKD-602 in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

Purpose: S-CKD602 is a pegylated liposomal formulation of CKD602, a semisynthetic camptothecin analogue. Pegylated (STEALTH) liposomes can achieve extended drug exposure in plasma and tumor. Based on promising preclinical data, the first phase I study of S-CKD602 was done in patients with refractory solid tumors. Experimental Design: S-CKD602 was administered i.v. every 3 weeks. Modified Fibonacci escalation was used (three to six patients/cohort), and dose levels ranged from 0.1 to 2.5 mg/m2. Serial plasma samples were obtained over 2 weeks and total (lactone + hydroxyl acid) concentrations of encapsulated, released, and sum total (encapsulated + released) CKD602 measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Forty-five patients (21 males) were treated. Median age, 62 years (range, 33-79 years) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, 0 to 1 (43 patients) and 2 (2 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 mucositis occurred in one of six patients at 0.3 mg/m2, grade 3 and 4 bone marrow suppression in two of three patients at 2.5 mg/m2, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia and anemia in one of six patients at 2.1 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was 2.1 mg/m2. Partial responses occurred in two patients with refractory ovarian cancer (1.7 and 2.1 mg/m2). High interpatient variability occurred in the pharmacokinetic disposition of encapsulated and released CKD602. Conclusions: S-CKD602 represents a promising new liposomal camptothecin analogue with manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. Phase II studies of S-CKD602 at 2.1 mg/m2 i.v. once every 3 weeks are planned. Prolonged plasma exposure over 1 to 2 weeks is consistent with STEALTH liposomes and provides extended exposure compared with single doses of nonliposomal camptothecins.

Bidirectional pharmacodynamic interaction between pegylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and monocytes in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Background:u2002STEALTH® liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analog, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells, including monocytes. We evaluated the relationship between monocyte and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in the blood and pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD602) in patients. Methods:u2002As part of a phase I study of S-CKD602 and phase I and II studies of NL-CKD602, the percent decreases in ANC and monocytes at their nadir were calculated. After S-CKD602, the amount of CKD-602 recovered in urine was measured. Results:u2002For S-CKD602 in patients <60 years, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 43u2009±u200931 and 58u2009±u200926%, respectively (Pu2009=u20090.001). For S-CKD602 in patients ≥60, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 41u2009±u200931 and 45u2009±u200936%, respectively (Pu2009=u20090.50). For NL-CKD602 (nu2009=u200942), the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were similar (Pu2009>u20090.05). For S-CKD602, the relationship between the percent decrease in monocytes and CKD-602 recovered in urine was stronger in patients <60 (R2u2009=u20090.82), compared with patients ≥60 (R2u2009=u20090.30). Conclusions:u2002Monocytes are more sensitive to S-CKD602, compared with neutrophils, and the increased sensitivity is related to the liposomal formulation, not CKD-602. These results suggest that monocytes engulf S-CKD602, which causes the release of CKD-602 from the liposome and toxicity to the monocytes, and that the effects are more prominent in patients <60.