Susan B. Waltzman

Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.

Objective The study investigated the hypothesis that threshold and comfortable levels recorded from cochlear implant patients would reduce, and dynamic range increase, as distance of the electrode from the modiolar wall (radial distance) decreases. Two groups of cochlear implant patients participated; one group using the Nucleus® 24 Contour™ electrode array, and one group using the Nucleus standard straight (banded) array. The Nucleus 24 Contour array has been shown in temporal bone studies to lie closer to the modiolus than the banded array. The relationship of electrode impedance and radial distance is also investigated. Design The study, conducted at three centers, evaluated 21 patients using the Contour array, and 36 patients using the banded array. For each patient, threshold, comfortable levels and dynamic range were measured at four time points. Common ground electrode impedance was recorded clinically from each patient, at time intervals up to 12 wk. An estimate of the radial distance of the electrode from the modiolus was made by analysis of Cochlear view x-rays. Results Threshold and comfortable levels were significantly lower for the Nucleus 24 Contour array than for the banded array. However, dynamic range measurements did not show the predicted increase. In a majority of subjects, a significant correlation was found between the estimated radial distance of the electrode from the modiolus and the measured threshold and comfortable levels. This trend was not observed for dynamic range. The analysis indicates that other factors than radial distance are involved in the resultant psychophysical levels. Clinical impedance measures (common ground) were found to be significantly higher for the Contour array. However, the electrodes on the Contour array are half-rings, which are approximately only half the geometric size of the full rings as electrodes of the standard array. When the geometric electrode area in the two array designs are normalized, the trends in the electrode impedance behavior are similar. Conclusions The results support the hypothesis that the relationship between the radial distance of the electrode and the psychophysical measures are influenced by patterns of fibrous tissue growth and individual patient differences, such as etiology and neural survival. Impedance measures for the Nucleus 24 Contour electrode array were higher than the banded electrode array, but this is primarily due to the reduction in electrode surface area. The different outcomes in impedance over time suggest differences in the relative contributions of the components of impedance with the two arrays.

Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children

OBJECTIVE: Since 1987, when the use of multichannel cochlear implants was initiated in children, candidacy has expanded; many thousands of children have received these devices, and results have revealed a wide range of performance. However, few long-term studies exist on a large population of these children. There have been concerns expressed that cochlear implant function might degrade over time, that devices and electrodes might migrate and extrude in the growing child, or that there might even be a deleterious effect of long-term stimulation of the cochlear nerve. The purpose of this study was to explore the long-term effects of implantation as a function of performance over time, reimplantation, and educational factors. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied 81 children who received implants at a major academic medical center and were followed for 5 to 13 years. RESULTS: Results revealed significant gains in speech perception, use of oral language, and ability to function in a mainstream environment. There was no decrease in performance over time and no significant incidence of device or electrode migration or extrusion, and device failure did not cause a deterioration in long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Multichannel cochlear implants in children provide perception, linguistic, and educational advantages, which are not adversely affected by long-term electrical stimulation.

Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis.

Objective: To examine speech perception outcomes and determine the impact of length of deafness and time between implants on performance in the sequentially bilateral implanted population. Study Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Patients: Forty-three children (age, <18 yr) and 22 adults underwent sequential bilateral implantation with at least 6 months between surgeries. The mean age at the time of the second implant in children was 7.83 years, and mean time between implants was 5.16 years. Five children received the first side implant (C1) below 12 months of age; 16, at 12 to 23 months; 9, between the ages of 24 and 35 months; and 11, at 36 to 59 months; 2 were implanted above the age of 5 years. In adults, mean age at second implant was 46.6 years, and mean time between implants was 5.6 years. Intervention: Sequential implantation with 6 months or more between implantations. Main Outcome Measures: Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively before the second implantation and at 3 months postoperatively. Results: Results revealed significant improvement in the second implanted ear and in the bilateral condition, despite time between implantations or length of deafness; however, age of first-side implantation was a contributing factor to second ear outcome in the pediatric population. Conclusion: Sequential bilateral implantation leads to significantly better speech understanding. On average, patients improved, despite length of deafness, time between implants, or age at implantation.

Auditory abilities after cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness: a pilot study.

Objective This pilot study examined speech recognition, localization, temporal and spectral discrimination, and subjective reports of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral deafness. Study Design Three adult male participants with short-term unilateral deafness (<5 yr) participated. All had sudden onset of severe-to-profound hearing loss in 1 ear, which then received a CI, and normal or near normal hearing in the other ear. Speech recognition in quiet and noise, localization, discrimination of temporal and spectral cues, and a subjective questionnaire were obtained over several days. Listening conditions were CI, normal hearing (NH) ear, and bilaterally (CI and NH). Results All participants had open-set speech recognition and excellent audibility (250–6,000 Hz) with the CI. Localization improved bilaterally compared with the NH ear alone. Word recognition in noise was significantly better bilaterally than with the NH ear for 2 participants. Sentence recognition in various noise conditions did not show significant bilateral improvement; however, the CI did not hinder performance in noise even when noise was toward the CI side. The addition of the CI improved temporal difference discrimination for 2 participants and spectral difference discrimination for all participants. Participants wore the CI full time, and subjective reports were positive. Conclusion Overall, the CI recipients with unilateral deafness obtained open-set speech recognition, improved localization, improved word recognition in noise, and improved perception of their ability to hear in everyday life. A larger study is warranted to further quantify the benefits and limitations of cochlear implantation in individuals with unilateral deafness.

Cochlear Reimplantation: Surgical Techniques and Functional Results

Objectives/Hypothesis The most common indication for cochlear reimplantation is device failure. Other, less frequent indications consist of “upgrades” (e.g., single to multichannel), infection, and flap breakdown. Although the percentage of failures has decreased over time, an occasional patient requires reimplantation because of device malfunction. The varying designs of internal receiver/stimulators and electrode arrays mandate an examination of the nature and effects of reimplantation for the individual designs. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the reimplantation of several implant designs and to determine whether differences in surgical technique, anatomical findings, and postoperative performance exist.

Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults.

Objective To determine the efficacy of cochlear implants with current processing strategies in children and adults with long-term congenital deafness, and to determine whether the growth of auditory perceptual skills in these patients is similar to the data reported for patients who have undergone implantation with earlier devices and coding strategies. Study Design A prospective study of children and adults fulfilling the study inclusion criteria. Setting University medical center. Patients Thirty-five congenitally deaf children who received implants after the age of 8 years and 14 congenitally deaf adults who received implants as adults participated in this study. Length of device use ranged from 6 months to 3 years. Main Outcome Measures Open set phoneme, word recognition tests, and sentence recognition tests were administered in quiet and noise auditory only conditions preoperatively and postoperatively. Changes in test scores were examined by paired t tests, and differences between groups were compared by Students t tests. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to identify associations between scores and subject characteristics. A two-sided &agr; of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The results indicated significant improvement in open set speech perception skills in the children after implantation; the adults demonstrated improved mean scores on both word and sentence recognition. A shorter length of deafness correlated with better postoperative performance, but all subjects continued to improve over time. The improvement in test scores was similar between the devices, and no significant differences were detected between the different processing strategies. Conclusion Children and adults with long-term congenital deafness can obtain considerable open set speech understanding after implantation. Length of deafness (age at implantation), length of device use, and mode of communication contribute to outcome.

The Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether significant differences in cochlear implant (CI) performance exist between older and younger CI recipients.

Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population

Fourteen children and three adults, each congenitally and prelinguistically deaf, received the Nucleus® multichannel implant. All underwent extensive evaluations and rehabilitation. The surgery was uneventful, and no patients have been lost to follow‐up.

Sound-direction Identification with Bilateral Cochlear Implants

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of sound-direction identification in the horizontal plane by bilateral cochlear implant users when localization was measured with pink noise and with speech stimuli. Design: Eight adults who were bilateral users of Nucleus 24 Contour devices participated in the study. All had received implants in both ears in a single surgery. Sound-direction identification was measured in a large classroom by using a nine-loudspeaker array. Localization was tested in three listening conditions (bilateral cochlear implants, left cochlear implant, and right cochlear implant), using two different stimuli (a speech stimulus and pink noise bursts) in a repeated-measures design. Results: Sound-direction identification accuracy was significantly better when using two implants than when using a single implant. The mean root-mean-square error was 29° for the bilateral condition, 54° for the left cochlear implant, and 46.5° for the right cochlear implant condition. Unilateral accuracy was similar for right cochlear implant and left cochlear implant performance. Sound-direction identification performance was similar for speech and pink noise stimuli. Conclusions: The data obtained in this study add to the growing body of evidence that sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants is better than with a single implant. The similarity in localization performance obtained with the speech and pink noise supports the use of either stimulus for measuring sound-direction identification.

The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population.

The deterioration of speech-understanding abilities in the aged that results from factors such as reduced speed and accuracy in processing has been well documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the geriatric population could benefit from a cochlear implant, despite the possibility of reduced processing abilities. Twenty patients, ages 65 to 85 years, with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear prosthesis at NYU Medical Center. All patients underwent extensive preoperative medical and audiologic assessments to determine candidacy. The surgical procedure was well-tolerated by all patients. Mean postoperative test results revealed significant improvements in both auditory performance and quality of life as a result of implant usage. These data support the concept that although a reduction in the processing of sensory stimulation might exist, the elderly can process a new auditory code delivered by means of a cochlear implant.