Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan Davis Lenski is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan Davis Lenski.


Reading Research and Instruction | 1998

Literacy orientation survey: A survey to clarify teachers’ beliefs and practices

Susan Davis Lenski; Mary Ann Wham; David C. Griffey

Abstract The development of the Literacy Orientation Survey (LOS) is described. The LOS is an instrument for assessing teachers’ beliefs about literacy learning and classroom practices as they relate to constructivism. Content validity of the LOS was established by a panel of experts who reviewed the items, judging how well items reflected principles of constructivist approaches to literacy instruction. A draft survey of 44 items was administered to 110 teachers. Responses were factor analyzed. Thirty items, 15 belief statements and 15 practice statements, that respectively loaded at a .80 level were retained. The resulting LOS survey was administered to 30 different teachers in order to determine the reliability of the instrument. A test‐retest reliability coefficient was computed as r = .927. The LOS was subsequently administered to 95 teachers. Correlation between belief and practice items was .65. While the LOS was determined to have robust internal validity and reliability, questions remained about e...


Reading Research and Instruction | 1997

Patterns of reading‐to‐write

Susan Davis Lenski; Jerry L. Johns

Abstract The purpose of this article is to determine what patterns of researching proficient middle school students conducting a school research task use and whether the organizational pattern of the final written text follows the researching pattern. Six middle school students were interviewed and observed while they were conducting a reading‐to‐write activity. Students were interviewed before and after seven researching sessions. While they were researching, investigators took field notes and videotaped their actions to record their searching, reading, and writing strategies. From the data, individual researching profiles were established. Of the six students in the study, one used a sequential approach, four used a spiral approach, and one used a recursive approach to researching. The students who used a sequential or spiral pattern wrote summary papers, and the student who used a recursive researching pattern wrote an integrated paper. This study concludes that at least three separate researching patt...


Reading Psychology | 1998

STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE WHEN READING IN ORDER TO WRITE

Susan Davis Lenski

Abstract Students who are asked to write research reports need to apply both social and cognitive strategic knowledge to the task. They must interpret the social context and use their knowledge of the process of researching and the content of the subject as they negotiate the complex task of reading in order to write a report. This case study describes six high‐achieving eighth‐grade students who were asked to write a short report (3‐5 pages) about a significant person they would like as a personal mentor in high school. During the seven 40‐minute sessions, the investigators used a variety of sources (field notes, student interviews on audiotapes, and videotapes) for data collection. Results indicated that the students choose their research topics rapidly and all students but one created a task impression of the assigned report with little difficulty. Interview data revealed students using both content- and procedural-related goals to accomplish their task. The social and cognitive dimensions these studen...


Middle School Journal | 1996

Informal Assessment at the Middle School Level

Susan Davis Lenski; Mary Ann Wham; Steve Layne; Debbie Layne

Because of our increased understanding of the learning process, assessment practices in todays schools are in a state of transition. No longer do we view stu dents as vessels to be filled, but rather as active inquirers. The traditional proce dure of viewing knowledge as a static entity is outmoded. As a result, the role of assessment has changed to become an exploration into the fluid processes involved in acquiring knowledge. Historically, teachers who believed that learning was a memorization activity assessed students using formal measures. Conversely, teachers who view learning as a process where students construct their own meaning through exploring thought have frequently employed informal assessment measures. Informal assessment has


Archive | 2011

Reading AND Learning Strategies: Middle Grades Through High School

Susan Davis Lenski; Mary Ann Wham; Jerry L. Johns; Micki M. Caskey


Archive | 2010

Improving reading : interventions, strategies, and resources

Jerry L. Johns; Susan Davis Lenski


Reading Horizons | 1994

Dialogue Journals as a Vehicle for Preservice Teachers to Experience the Writing Process (I Like Him; Should I Tell Him at Recess?).

Mary Ann Wham; Susan Davis Lenski


Archive | 1999

Reading & Learning Strategies for Middle & High School Students.

Susan Davis Lenski; Mary Ann Wham; Jerry L. Johns


Archive | 2000

Improving Writing: Resources, Strategies, Assessments.

Susan Davis Lenski; Jerry L. Johns


Reading Horizons | 2001

Brain Surfing: A Strategy for Making Cross-Curricular Connections

Susan Davis Lenski

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan Davis Lenski's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jerry L. Johns

Northern Illinois University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Ann Wham

University of Wisconsin–Whitewater

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David C. Griffey

University of Wisconsin–Whitewater

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge