Susan E. Cohn

Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index.

Traditional, open-ended provider questions regarding patient symptoms are insensitive. Better methods are needed to measure symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug-event reporting. Our objective was to develop and initially validate a brief, self-reported HIV symptom index tailored to patients exposed to multidrug antiretroviral therapies and protease inhibitors, and to compare the new index to existing symptom measures. The research design was a multistage design including quantitative review of existing literature, qualitative and quantitative analyses of pilot data, and quantitative analyses of a prospective sample. Statistical analyses include frequencies, chi-square tests for significance, linear and logistic regression. The subjects were from a multisite convenience sample (n = 73) within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group and a prospective sample from the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (n = 115). Measures were patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life, physician-assessed disease severity, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. A 20-item, self-completed HIV symptom index was developed based upon prior reports of symptom frequency and bother and expert opinion. When compared with prior measures the index included more frequent and bothersome symptoms, yet was easier to use (self-report rather than provider interview). The index required less than 5 minutes to complete, achieved excellent completion rates, and was thought comprehensive and comprehensible in a convenience sample. It was further tested in a prospective sample of patients and demonstrated strong associations with physical and mental health summary scores and with disease severity. These associations were independent of CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. This 20-item HIV symptom index has demonstrated construct validity, and offers a simple and rational approach to measuring HIV symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug reporting.

Efficacy and Tolerability of 3 Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor–Sparing Antiretroviral Regimens for Treatment-Naive Volunteers Infected With HIV-1: A Randomized, Controlled Equivalence Trial

Background Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy is not suitable for all treatment-naive HIV-infected persons.BACKGROUND Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy is not suitable for all treatment-naive HIV-infected persons. OBJECTIVE To evaluate 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing initial antiretroviral regimens to show equivalence for virologic efficacy and tolerability. DESIGN A phase 3, open-label study randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio with follow-up for at least 96 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00811954). SETTING 57 sites in the United States and Puerto Rico. PATIENTS Treatment-naive persons aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 RNA levels greater than 1000 copies/mL without resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors. INTERVENTION Atazanavir, 300 mg/d, with ritonavir, 100 mg/d; raltegravir, 400 mg twice daily; or darunavir, 800 mg/d, with ritonavir, 100 mg/d, plus combination emtricitabine, 200 mg/d, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 300 mg/d. MEASUREMENTS Virologic failure, defined as a confirmed HIV-1 RNA level greater than 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or greater than 200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks, and tolerability failure, defined as discontinuation of atazanavir, raltegravir, or darunavir for toxicity. A secondary end point was a combination of virologic efficacy and tolerability. RESULTS Among 1809 participants, all pairwise comparisons of incidence of virologic failure over 96 weeks showed equivalence within a margin of equivalence defined as -10% to 10%. Raltegravir and ritonavir-boosted darunavir were equivalent for tolerability, whereas ritonavir-boosted atazanavir resulted in a 12.7% and 9.2% higher incidence of tolerability discontinuation than raltegravir and ritonavir-boosted darunavir, respectively, primarily because of hyperbilirubinemia. For combined virologic efficacy and tolerability, ritonavir-boosted darunavir was superior to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, and raltegravir was superior to both protease inhibitors. Antiretroviral resistance at the time of virologic failure was rare but more frequent with raltegravir. LIMITATION The trial was open-label, and ritonavir was not provided. CONCLUSION Over 2 years, all 3 regimens attained high and equivalent rates of virologic control. Tolerability of regimens containing raltegravir or ritonavir-boosted darunavir was superior to that of the ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients with HIV/AIDS

Background: In studies evaluating the general US population, patients in primary care, and patients with chronic conditions, women consistently report poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than men; however, studies evaluating HRQoL in patients with HIV/AIDS have not completely corroborated those findings. The objective of this study was to evaluate gender differences in HRQoL for participants in a large randomized trial comparing antiretroviral regimens. Methods: AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 320 was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing the 3-drug regimen of indinavir + zidovudine (or stavudine) + lamivudine with the 2-drug combination of zidovudine (or stavudine) + lamivudine in subjects with CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/μl and no prior treatment with protease inhibitors. Nine quality of life domains scored on 0–100 scales were assessed using the ACTG QOL 601-602 Health Survey at 3 points in the trial: baseline, 24 weeks and 40 weeks. Differences between men and women in HRQoL scores were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. Results: Overall, 202 females and 976 males were randomized to one of two treatment arms. Female participants were more likely to be black or Hispanic and tended to be younger. At baseline, females reported lower HRQoL scores than males in all of the domains except social functioning, and at week 40, women scored lower in all of the domains except overall health. In repeated measures models, women were found to score lower in all HRQoL domains except overall health, with significant differences of 3.5–6.7 points in 3 of the 9 quality of life domains: physical functioning, pain, and energy/fatigue. HRQoL scores improved for participants in the study over time and in response to potent treatment, and the improvements were similar for men and women. Conclusions: Women with HIV/AIDS report substantially poorer HRQoL than men with HIV/AIDS in several HRQoL domains. However, changes in domain scores over time and in response to treatment do not differ significantly by gender, implying that changes in domain scores may be better HRQoL outcomes to compare between HIV-infected men and women in clinical trials than mean domain scores.

Incomplete Immune Reconstitution after Initiation of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients with Severe CD4+ Cell Depletion

Immune function was observed for 144 weeks in 643 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects who (1) had nadir CD4+ cell counts of <50 cells/mm3, followed by a sustained increase to > or =100 cells/mm3 after the initiation of HAART, and (2) were enrolled in a randomized trial of continued azithromycin prophylaxis versus withdrawal for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex disease. The median CD4+ cell count was 226 cells/mm3 at entry and 358 cells/mm3 at week 144. Anergy (80.2% of patients) and lack of lymphoproliferative response to tetanus toxoid (TT; 73%) after immunization and impaired antibody responses after receipt of hepatitis A (54%) and TT (86%) vaccines were considered to be evidence of impaired immune reconstitution. Receipt of azithromycin did not have an effect on CD4+ cell count but was associated with higher rates of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to TT (25% of subjects who received azithromycin vs. 15% of those who did not; P=.009) and mumps skin test antigen (29% vs. 17%; P=.001). Although the subjects had only partial responses to immune function testing, the rate of opportunistic infections was very low, and none of the tests was predictive of risk.

Adherence to Antiretrovirals Among US Women During and After Pregnancy

Background:Antiretrovirals (ARVs) are recommended for maternal health and to reduce HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission, but suboptimal adherence can counteract its benefits. Objectives:To describe antepartum and postpartum adherence to ARV regimens and factors associated with adherence. Methods:We assessed adherence rates among subjects enrolled in Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 1025 from August 2002 to July 2005 on tablet formulations with at least one self-report adherence assessment. Perfectly adherent subjects reported no missed doses 4 days before their study visit. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare antepartum with postpartum adherence rates and to identify factors associated with perfect adherence. Results:Of 519 eligible subjects, 334/445 (75%) reported perfect adherence during pregnancy. This rate significantly decreased 6, 24, and 48 weeks postpartum [185/284 (65%), 76/118 (64%), and 42/64 (66%), respectively (P < 0.01)]. Pregnant subjects with perfect adherence had lower viral loads. The odds of perfect adherence were significantly higher for women who initiated ARVs during pregnancy (P < 0.01), did not have AIDS (P = 0.02), never missed prenatal vitamins (P < 0.01), never used marijuana (P = 0.05), or felt happy all or most of the time (P < 0.01). Conclusions:Perfect adherence to ARVs was better antepartum, but overall rates were low. Interventions to improve adherence during pregnancy are needed.

Specialty training and specialization among physicians who treat HIV/AIDS in the United States

AbstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the association of specialty training and experience in the care of HIV disease with HIV-specific knowledge, referral patterns, and HIV-related education activities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians caring for patients in the HIV Costs and Service Utilization Study, a study of a probability sample of HIV-infected individuals in the United States. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures included physicians’ reports of specialty training and HIV caseload, scores on an HIV-specific knowledge test, referral patterns, and attendance rates at HIV-related educational activities. Approximately 72% (379) of the eligible physicians completed a survey. Of these, 152 (40%) had infectious disease (ID) training, and 213 (56%) were generalists; 4% of ID-trained physicians and 37% of generalist physicians did not consider themselves HIV experts. The median current caseloads were 150 and 200 patients for ID experts and generalist experts, respectively. In contrast, the median caseload for non-expert generalists was 5. Mean scores on the knowledge scale were similar for ID and generalist experts (9.0 items correct out of 11 vs 8.5; P=not significant), but lower for generalist non-experts (6.5 items correct; P<.01). Experts had attended more local and national HIV meetings than non-experts (9.3 vs 2.7; P<.01, and 2.3 vs .40; P<.01, respectively) in the past year. Fewer ID experts ever referred than generalist experts (13.0% vs 27.3%; P=.01). In multivariable models that included specialty training and caseload, physicians with caseloads of 20 to 49 and >50 were more likely to have a high knowledge score (defined as 80% or more correct, odds ratio [OR], 2.8; P=.04 and OR, 5.7; P<.001, respectively), and the effect of specialty was attenuated (OR, 2.7; P=.02 decreased from OR, 7.8; P<.001 in a model without caseload). In the models predicting referral practices, both experience (OR, .25; P<.01 and OR, .17; P<.01 for caseloads of 20 to 49 and >50, respectively) and specialty (OR, .19; P<.01 and OR, .09; P<.01 for generalist and ID experts, respectively) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: In a national sample of physicians, HIV-specific knowledge was more strongly associated with HIV caseload than with specialty training. In addition, although referral practices were related to both experience and specialty, generalist experts and ID physicians reported similar behaviors. This suggests that generalist physicians, through clinical experience and self-education, can develop specialized knowledge in HIV care.

HIV suppression by HAART preserves cognitive function in advanced, immune-reconstituted AIDS patients.

Introduction:HIV can damage neurons leading to cognitive impairment. Epidemiological observations suggest that neuropsychological impairment might progress despite successful HAART therapy, but available prevalence estimates are based on populations that were selected for impairment. Methods:Of 433 advanced AIDS patients with documented immune reconstitution (CD4 lymphocyte counts < 50 before and > 100 cells/μl after HAART), 286 had brief assessments of cognition (Trailmaking A/B and Digit Symbol Tests) at least once, no confounding neurological conditions, and available neuropsychological norms with comprehensive demographic corrections. At entry, most were immune reconstituted on HAART (median CD4 cell count 230 cells/μl) and HIV was suppressed (65% < 500; only 14% > 20 000 RNA copies/ml). Results:Over one quarter (27%) of participants exhibited impairment at their initial neuropsychological assessment, a rate nearly twice that expected in a normal (HIV-uninfected) reference population (14%). These impaired participants did not differ from the unimpaired group with respect to age, sex, education, race, CD4 lymphocyte counts, or HIV-RNA levels. Improved performance on neuropsychological tests was documented over a 2-year period 3–5 years after initiating HAART. This improvement was marginally associated with the continued or improving control of plasma HIV-RNA levels, but not with concurrent levels of immune recovery (CD4 lymphocyte counts). Conclusion:Most advanced AIDS patients responding to HAART for prolonged periods have stable or improving cognition, but remain more likely to be impaired than the general population. During HAART, improving test performance probably reflects both practice effects and continuing neurological recovery after more than 3 years of HAART.

Physician specialization and antiretroviral therapy for HIV.

AbstractBACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the first protease inhibitor in January 1996, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment of persons infected with HIV. The changing nature of HIV care has important implications for the types of physicians that can best care for patients with HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of specialty training and experience in the care of HIV disease with the adoption and use of highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (HAART). DESIGN: Observational cohort study of patients under care for HIV infection and their physicians. PATIENTS AND SETTING: This analysis used data collected from a national probability sample of noninstitutionalized persons with HIV infection participating in the HIV Costs and Service Utilization Study and their primary physicians. We analyzed 1,820 patients being cared for by 374 physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of HAART use at 12 months and 18 months after the approval of the first protease inhibitor. RESULTS: Forty percent of the physicians were formally trained in infectious diseases (ID), 38% were general medicine physicians with self-reported expertise in the care of HIV, and 22% were general medicine physicians without self-reported expertise in the care of HIV. The majority of physicians (69%) reported a current HIV caseload of 50 patients or more. In multivariable models controlling for patient characteristics, there were no differences between generalist experts and ID physicians in rates of HAART use in December 1996. When compared to ID physicians, however, patients being treated by non-expert general medicine physicians were less likely to be on HAART (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.17 to 0.61). Patients being treated by low-volume physicians were also much less likely to be on HAART therapy than those treated by high-volume physicians (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.48). These findings were attenuated by June 1997, suggesting that over time, the broader physician community successfully adopted HAART therapy. This finding is consistent with prior research on the diffusion of innovations. CONCLUSIONS: Similar proportions of patients treated by expert generalists and ID specialists were on appropriate HAART therapy by December 1996 and July 1997. Patients treated by non-expert generalists, most of whom were the lowest-volume physicians, were much less likely to be on appropriate ARV therapy in the earlier time period. Our findings demonstrate that generalists who develop specialized expertise are able to provide care of quality comparable to that of specialists.

Depo-medroxyprogesterone in women on antiretroviral therapy: effective contraception and lack of clinically significant interactions.

We conducted an open‐label, steady‐state pharmacokinetic (PK) study of drug interactions among HIV‐infected women treated with depo‐medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) while on nucleoside analogues plus nelfinavir (N=21), efavirenz (N=17), or nevirapine (N=16); or nucleosides only or no antiretroviral therapy as a control group (N=16). PK parameters were estimated using non‐compartmental analysis, with between‐group comparisons of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) PKs and within‐subject comparisons of ARV PKs before and 4 weeks after DMPA dosing. Plasma progesterone levels were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks after DMPA dosing. There were no significant changes in MPA area under the concentration curve, peak or trough concentrations, or apparent clearance in the nelfinavir, efavirenz, or nevirapine groups compared to the control group. Minor changes in nelfinavir and nevirapine drug exposure were seen after DMPA, but were not considered clinically significant. Suppression of ovulation was maintained.

Evidence That Intermittent Structured Treatment Interruption, but Not Immunization with ALVAC-HIV vCP1452, Promotes Host Control of HIV Replication: The Results of AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5068

BACKGROUND The ability to control human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication in vivo in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a measure of the efficiency of antiviral immunity. In a study of patients with chronic, ART-suppressed HIV infection, AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5068 investigated the effects of immunization with an exogenous HIV vaccine and pulse exposure to the subjects unique viral epitopes, by means of structured treatment interruptions (STIs), on the dynamics of viral rebound during a subsequent analytical treatment interruption (ATI). METHODS Ninety-seven subjects receiving stable ART with an HIV-1 RNA load <50 copies/mL and CD4(+) T lymphocyte count >400 cells/mm(3) were randomized to undergo continued ART, STIs, ALVAC-HIV vCP1452 immunization, or STIs and ALVAC-HIV vCP1452 immunization. RESULTS Subjects in the 2 STI arms had a significantly longer median doubling time in the period of the initial rise of viral load, a significantly lower median peak viral load, a significantly lower median end-of-ATI viral load set point, and a greater proportion of subjects with an end-of-ATI viral load set point <1,000 copies/mL, compared with the subjects in the 2 arms without STIs. With an immunization schedule of 3 sets of 3 weekly injections, ALVAC-HIV vCP1452 did not affect viral load measures. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized, controlled study of intermittent STI as a therapeutic autoimmunization strategy, evidence of enhanced immunologic control of HIV replication was demonstrated.