Susan F. Assmann

Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 3445 patients with symptomatic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more to receive either spironolactone (15 to 45 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. RESULTS With a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary outcome occurred in 320 of 1722 patients in the spironolactone group (18.6%) and 351 of 1723 patients in the placebo group (20.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.04; P=0.14). Of the components of the primary outcome, only hospitalization for heart failure had a significantly lower incidence in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (206 patients [12.0%] vs. 245 patients [14.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99, P=0.04). Neither total deaths nor hospitalizations for any reason were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with increased serum creatinine levels and a doubling of the rate of hyperkalemia (18.7%, vs. 9.1% in the placebo group) but reduced hypokalemia. With frequent monitoring, there were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, a serum creatinine level of 3.0 mg per deciliter (265 μmol per liter) or higher, or dialysis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.).

Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Decreases Mortality and Morbidity in Patients with Advanced HIV Disease

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection revolutionized treatment of AIDS and HIV disease. Such treatment, which usually includes two nucleoside analogue inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase and at least one HIV protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase, is called highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Early cohort and registry-based studies showed a lower incidence of AIDS and decreased rates of AIDS-related mortality after the introduction of HAART in late 1995 in the United States (1-3), France (4), Australia (5), Germany (6), and Switzerland (7). However, ecologic studiesthose that measured use of HAART and mortality in groups rather than in individual patientsmay be subject to confounding by calendar period changes in other unmeasured variables. In addition, many studies that directly measured the effects of HAART on survival of patients with AIDS did not provide specific evidence of such effects in the patients with the most advanced cases (8-10), with the exception of small cohorts of patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis (11) and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (12). We therefore studied the effect of HAART in a large multicenter trial of blood transfusion in patients with advanced HIV disease who were also anemic, an indicator of poor prognosis (13, 14). Because the study spanned the period before and after the introduction of HAART, we could directly assess the effect of HAART status on subsequent death or opportunistic events. In addition, because our person-year analysis was controlled for calendar time, our estimates of the magnitude of the effect of HAART on mortality and morbidity are less likely to be confounded by changes in patient mix or medical practice compared with previously published studies. Methods Patients and Study Design The Viral Activation Transfusion Study (VATS) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of leukoreduced versus nonleukoreduced red blood cell transfusion in HIV-infected patients who required a first transfusion for anemia. Details of the study design have been published elsewhere (15, 16). In brief, we enrolled patients who were HIV seropositive, were CMV seropositive or had a history of documented CMV disease, had an expected survival of at least 1 month, and required red blood cell transfusion for anemia. Data on clinical end points and prescribed medications were obtained by interview and medical record review at baseline and every 3 months thereafter. Ophthalmologic examinations to detect CMV retinitis were done at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. In patients who did not return for follow-up visits, vital status was ascertained by review of the medical record, a search for a death certificate, and tracing by using public databases. Of 528 patients, 58 were excluded before death or end of the study, including 29 for whom no follow-up information on opportunistic events was available and 3 for whom follow-up for death but not for opportunistic events was complete. The CD4+ lymphocyte count and plasma HIV RNA level were measured by using frozen blood specimens at the central study laboratory, as described elsewhere (15). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the 11 participating medical centers, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Definitions of HAART and End Points The VATS did not dictate the choice of antiretroviral therapy for enrolled patients, except that prescription of new antiretroviral drugs was discouraged during the 2 weeks after the first two transfusion episodes. Highly active antiretroviral therapy was defined as prescription of at least three antiretroviral medications with activity against HIV, at least one of which was an HIV protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Medication history collected at each quarterly visit included the names and start and stop dates of any HIV antiretroviral medications taken since the previous visit or in the 30 days before entry into the study. Patients taking no HIV antiretroviral medications and those taking HIV antiretroviral medications that did not fulfill our definition of HAART were classified as before HAART until the day that they began HAART. Once a patient initiated HAART, all of his or her subsequent follow-up time remained designated as after HAART even if they discontinued HAART, to approximate an intention-to-treat analysis. We made this conservative decision to avoid overestimating the effect of HAART, which would occur if patients who stopped HAART because of intolerance subsequently contributed outcomes to the before HAART person-years. Adherence to prescribed medications was not measured. End points of the current study were death, opportunistic events, and recurrent transfusions. Opportunistic events were defined a priori and confirmed by expert reviewers; they included clinical diagnoses corresponding to the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions AIDS-defining conditions (17), with some modifications. Presumptive diagnoses of central nervous system toxoplasmosis were allowed according to the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions definition. For CMV retinitis, progression of disease requiring initiation of or a change in anti-CMV medication counted as a clinical event. For analysis, end points were grouped as follows: CMV opportunistic events; non-CMV opportunistic events; all opportunistic events; death; and any end point, including death and all opportunistic events. We analyzed recurrent red blood cell transfusion (that is, occurring after the enrollment transfusion event) as a separate end point. Statistical Analysis We used a person-years approach to analyze event rates. The denominator for these rates was not the individual patient but was person-years of observation time, defined as study follow-up time for each patient classified as before or after initiation of HAART and summed over all patients. For example, patients who started HAART during the study contributed observation time to both the post-HAART and pre-HAART categories, in effect serving as their own controls. Patients who began HAART before study entry and those who never began HAART during the study period contributed only post-HAART or pre-HAART observation time, respectively. Observation time for a patient extended from the date of study entry to death or the end of follow-up. Because some patients had no follow-up information for opportunistic events and a few had less follow-up for opportunistic events than for mortality, the total observation time for opportunistic events was shorter than that for overall survival. Events were assigned to the time period during which they occurred, and incidence was reported as the number of events per person-year of observation time. A single patient could contribute multiple events (except for the mortality analysis) to the same or to different time periods. The association between HAART use and incidence rates was expressed as a rate ratio. Confidence intervals and P values were calculated from a Poisson regression model using generalized estimating equations with exchangeable correlation structure to adjust for correlated observations across time within the same patient (18, 19). All P values are two sided. Because the use of HAART increased dramatically over the 4 years of the study, the comparison of post-HAART and pre-HAART data is confounded with calendar time. In addition, the mixture of HIV risk groups, prevalence of prophylaxis against opportunistic infections, diagnostic testing accuracy, and physician experience may have changed over time. To evaluate and control for these and other calendar time effects, each patients observation time was further categorized as four 1-year calendar time periods, starting in July 1995. Similarly, a patients time since entering the study was divided into five study time periods (0 to 6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, 19 to 24, or >24 months from randomization). The Poisson regression generalized estimating equations method was then used to calculate the rate ratios associated with CD4 T-cell count, plasma HIV RNA level, calendar time, and time on study and to adjust the comparisons of post-HAART and pre-HAART data for these covariates, both in pairs and combined with patient characteristics. Results Participants The VATS enrolled patients with anemia and HIV infection who received a first red blood cell transfusion between August 1995 and July 1998. Patients were followed until death or their last scheduled quarterly visit before 30 June 1999. Of 531 patients enrolled in VATS, we excluded 3 patients for whom no data on medication were available; thus, the sample for analysis in this study was 528 patients. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study sample. Most patients were 30 to 49 years of age and male, and equal proportions of patients were of white and nonwhite ethnicity. Half of the patients were men who reported sex with other men as their only HIV risk factor; 19% each were injection drug users or sexually active heterosexuals without other risk factors for HIV; and 12% had multiple or other risk factors. At baseline, the median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 0.015 109 cells/L, and 69% of patients had a CD4+ lymphocyte count less than 0.050 109 cells/L. The median HIV RNA level was 4.8 log10 copies/mL, and only 8% of patients had plasma levels of HIV RNA levels less than 200 copies/mL. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of 528 Patients in the Viral Activation Transfusion Study At baseline, most patients had previously taken antiretroviral medication; more than half had taken such medication for 12 months or longer. The proportion of patients taking prophylaxis or treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Mycobacterium avium complex infection decreased from 95% and 49%, respectively, in 19951996 to 82% and 44% in 19

Dose of Prophylactic Platelet Transfusions and Prevention of Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND We conducted a trial of prophylactic platelet transfusions to evaluate the effect of platelet dose on bleeding in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. METHODS We randomly assigned hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or chemotherapy for hematologic cancers or solid tumors to receive prophylactic platelet transfusions at a low dose, a medium dose, or a high dose (1.1x10(11), 2.2x10(11), or 4.4x10(11) platelets per square meter of body-surface area, respectively), when morning platelet counts were 10,000 per cubic millimeter or lower. Clinical signs of bleeding were assessed daily. The primary end point was bleeding of grade 2 or higher (as defined on the basis of World Health Organization criteria). RESULTS In the 1272 patients who received at least one platelet transfusion, the primary end point was observed in 71%, 69%, and 70% of the patients in the low-dose group, the medium-dose group, and the high-dose group, respectively (differences were not significant). The incidences of higher grades of bleeding, and other adverse events, were similar among the three groups. The median number of platelets transfused was significantly lower in the low-dose group (9.25x10(11)) than in the medium-dose group (11.25x10(11)) or the high-dose group (19.63x10(11)) (P=0.002 for low vs. medium, P<0.001 for high vs. low and high vs. medium), but the median number of platelet transfusions given was significantly higher in the low-dose group (five, vs. three in the medium-dose and three in the high-dose group; P<0.001 for low vs. medium and low vs. high). Bleeding occurred on 25% of the study days on which morning platelet counts were 5000 per cubic millimeter or lower, as compared with 17% of study days on which platelet counts were 6000 to 80,000 per cubic millimeter (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Low doses of platelets administered as a prophylactic transfusion led to a decreased number of platelets transfused per patient but an increased number of transfusions given. At doses between 1.1x10(11) and 4.4x10(11) platelets per square meter, the number of platelets in the prophylactic transfusion had no effect on the incidence of bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00128713.)

Regional Variation in Patients and Outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) Trial

Background— Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction assigned to spironolactone did not achieve a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome (time to cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for management of heart failure) compared with patients receiving placebo. In a post hoc analysis, an ≈4-fold difference was identified in this composite event rate between the 1678 patients randomized from Russia and Georgia compared with the 1767 enrolled from the United States, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina (the Americas). Methods and Results— To better understand this regional difference in clinical outcomes, demographic characteristics of these populations and their responses to spironolactone were explored. Patients from Russia/Georgia were younger, had less atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus, but were more likely to have had prior myocardial infarction or a hospitalization for heart failure. Russia/Georgia patients also had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and creatinine but higher diastolic blood pressure (all P<0.001). Hyperkalemia and doubling of creatinine were more likely and hypokalemia was less likely in patients receiving spironolactone in the Americas with no significant treatment effects in Russia/Georgia. All clinical event rates were markedly lower in Russia/Georgia, and there was no detectable impact of spironolactone on any outcomes. In contrast, in the Americas, the rates of the primary outcome, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Conclusions— This post hoc analysis demonstrated greater potassium and creatinine changes and possible clinical benefits with spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from the Americas. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Effects of Red-Cell Storage Duration on Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND Some observational studies have reported that transfusion of red-cell units that have been stored for more than 2 to 3 weeks is associated with serious, even fatal, adverse events. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery may be especially vulnerable to the adverse effects of transfusion. METHODS We conducted a randomized trial at multiple sites from 2010 to 2014. Participants 12 years of age or older who were undergoing complex cardiac surgery and were likely to undergo transfusion of red cells were randomly assigned to receive leukocyte-reduced red cells stored for 10 days or less (shorter-term storage group) or for 21 days or more (longer-term storage group) for all intraoperative and postoperative transfusions. The primary outcome was the change in Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS; range, 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe organ dysfunction) from the preoperative score to the highest composite score through day 7 or the time of death or discharge. RESULTS The median storage time of red-cell units provided to the 1098 participants who received red-cell transfusion was 7 days in the shorter-term storage group and 28 days in the longer-term storage group. The mean change in MODS was an increase of 8.5 and 8.7 points, respectively (95% confidence interval for the difference, -0.6 to 0.3; P=0.44). The 7-day mortality was 2.8% in the shorter-term storage group and 2.0% in the longer-term storage group (P=0.43); 28-day mortality was 4.4% and 5.3%, respectively (P=0.57). Adverse events did not differ significantly between groups except that hyperbilirubinemia was more common in the longer-term storage group. CONCLUSIONS The duration of red-cell storage was not associated with significant differences in the change in MODS. We did not find that the transfusion of red cells stored for 10 days or less was superior to the transfusion of red cells stored for 21 days or more among patients 12 years of age or older who were undergoing complex cardiac surgery. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; RECESS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00991341.).

Cardiac Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Baseline Findings From the Echocardiographic Study of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial

Background— Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Existing data on cardiac structure and function in HFpEF suggest significant heterogeneity in this population. Methods and Results— Echocardiograms were obtained from 935 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) enrolled in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial before initiation of randomized therapy. Average age was 70±10 years, 49% were women, 14% were of African descent, and comorbidities were highly prevalent. Centralized quantitative analysis in a blinded core laboratory demonstrated a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 59.3±7.9%, with prevalent concentric left ventricular remodeling (34%) and hypertrophy (43%), and left atrial enlargement (53%). Diastolic dysfunction was present in 66% of gradable participants and was significantly associated with greater left ventricular hypertrophy and a higher prevalence of left atrial enlargement. Doppler evidence of pulmonary hypertension was present in 36%. At least 1 measure of structural heart disease was present in 93% of patients. Conclusions— Patients enrolled in TOPCAT demonstrated heterogeneous patterns of ventricular remodeling, with high prevalence of structural heart disease, including left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement, in addition to pulmonary hypertension, each of which has been associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Diastolic function was normal in approximately one third of gradable participants, highlighting the heterogeneity of the cardiac phenotype in this syndrome. These findings deepen our understanding of the TOPCAT trial population and expand our knowledge of the diversity of the cardiac phenotype in HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00094302][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00094302&atom=%2Fcirchf%2F7%2F1%2F104.atomBackground— Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Existing data on cardiac structure and function in HFpEF suggest significant heterogeneity in this population. Methods and Results— Echocardiograms were obtained from 935 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) enrolled in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial before initiation of randomized therapy. Average age was 70±10 years, 49% were women, 14% were of African descent, and comorbidities were highly prevalent. Centralized quantitative analysis in a blinded core laboratory demonstrated a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 59.3±7.9%, with prevalent concentric left ventricular remodeling (34%) and hypertrophy (43%), and left atrial enlargement (53%). Diastolic dysfunction was present in 66% of gradable participants and was significantly associated with greater left ventricular hypertrophy and a higher prevalence of left atrial enlargement. Doppler evidence of pulmonary hypertension was present in 36%. At least 1 measure of structural heart disease was present in 93% of patients. Conclusions— Patients enrolled in TOPCAT demonstrated heterogeneous patterns of ventricular remodeling, with high prevalence of structural heart disease, including left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement, in addition to pulmonary hypertension, each of which has been associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Diastolic function was normal in approximately one third of gradable participants, highlighting the heterogeneity of the cardiac phenotype in this syndrome. These findings deepen our understanding of the TOPCAT trial population and expand our knowledge of the diversity of the cardiac phenotype in HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Rationale and design of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial: A randomized, controlled study of spironolactone in patients with symptomatic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND Despite increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (PEF), there are no available therapies proven to reduce morbidity and mortality. Aldosterone, a potent stimulator of myocardial and vascular fibrosis, may be a key mediator of HF progression in this population and is therefore an important therapeutic target. OBJECTIVE The TOPCAT trial is designed to evaluate the effect of spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist, on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life in patients with HF-PEF. METHODS Up to 3,515 patients with HF-PEF will be randomized in double-blind fashion to treatment with spironolactone (target dose 30 mg daily) or matching placebo. Eligible patients include those with age ≥50 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, symptomatic HF, and either a hospitalization for HF within the prior year or an elevated natriuretic peptide level (B-type natriuretic peptide ≥100 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥360 pg/mL) within the 60 days before randomization. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension and those with known infiltrative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are excluded. The primary end point is the composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for HF, or aborted cardiac arrest. Key secondary end points include quality of life, nonfatal cardiovascular events, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Ancillary studies of echocardiography, tonometry, and cardiac biomarkers will provide more insight regarding this understudied population and the effects of spironolactone therapy. CONCLUSION TOPCAT is designed to assess definitively the role of spironolactone in the management of HF-PEF.

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Results From the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial

Background—The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial demonstrated the survival advantage of emergency revascularization versus initial medical stabilization in patients developing cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. The relative merits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with shock have not been defined. The objective of this analysis was to compare the effects of PCI and CABG on 30-day and 1-year survival in the SHOCK trial. Methods and Results—Of the 302 trial patients, 128 with predominant left ventricular failure had emergency revascularization. The selection of revascularization procedures was individualized. Eighty-one patients (63.3%) had PCI, and 47 (36.7%) had CABG. The median time from randomization to intervention was 0.9 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 0.3 to 2.2 hours) for PCI and 2.7 hours (IQR, 1.3 to 5.5 hours) for CABG. Baseline demographics and hemodynamics were similar, except that there were more diabetics (48.9% versus 26.9%; P=0.02), 3-vessel disease (80.4% versus 60.3%; P=0.03), and left main coronary disease (41.3% versus 13.0%; P=0.001) in the CABG group. In the PCI group, 12.3% had 2-vessel and 2.5% had 3-vessel interventions. In the CABG group, 84.8% received ≥2 grafts, 52.2% received ≥3 grafts, and 87.2% were deemed completely revascularized. The survival rates were 55.6% in the PCI group compared with 57.4% in the CABG group at 30 days (P=0.86) and 51.9% compared with 46.8%, respectively, at 1 year (P=0.71). Conclusions—Among SHOCK trial patients randomized to emergency revascularization, those treated with CABG had a greater prevalence of diabetes and worse coronary disease than those treated with PCI. However, survival rates were similar. Emergency CABG is an important component of an optimal treatment strategy in patients with cardiogenic shock, and should be considered a complementary treatment option in patients with extensive coronary disease.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of universal WBC reduction.

BACKGROUND : Recipient exposure to allogeneic donor WBCs results in transfusion complications for selected populations of recipients. Whether or not WBC reduction should be universally applied is highly controversial.

Cardiac Structure and Function and Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background—Abnormalities in cardiac structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction may help identify patients at particularly high risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methods and Results—Cardiac structure and function were assessed by echocardiography in a blinded core laboratory at baseline in 935 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) enrolled in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial and related to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest, and its components. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 244 patients experienced the primary outcome. Left ventricular hypertrophy (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–2.00), elevated left ventricular filling pressure (E/E′; adjusted hazard ratio 1.05 per 1 integer increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.07), and higher pulmonary artery pressure assessed by the tricuspid regurgitation velocity (hazard ratio, 1.23 per 0.5 m/s increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.49) were associated with the composite outcome and heart failure hospitalization alone after adjusting for clinical and laboratory variables. The risk of adverse outcome associated with left ventricular hypertrophy was additive to the risk associated with elevated E/E′. Conclusions—Among heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients enrolled in TOPCAT, left ventricular hypertrophy, higher left ventricular filling pressure, and higher pulmonary artery pressure were predictive of heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death, or aborted cardiac arrest independent of clinical and laboratory predictors. These features, both alone and in combination, identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients at particularly high risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.