Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan F. Greenhut is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan F. Greenhut.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002

An anatomy of normal and malignant gene expression

Kathy Boon; Elisson Osório; Susan F. Greenhut; Carl F. Schaefer; Jennifer Shoemaker; Kornelia Polyak; Patrice J. Morin; Kenneth H. Buetow; Robert L. Strausberg; Sandro J. de Souza; Gregory J. Riggins

A genes expression pattern provides clues to its role in normal physiology and disease. To provide quantitative expression levels on a genome-wide scale, the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project (CGAP) uses serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Over 5 million transcript tags from more than 100 human cell types have been assembled. To enhance the utility of this data, the CGAP SAGE project created SAGE Genie, a web site for the analysis and presentation of SAGE data (http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/SAGE). SAGE Genie provides an automatic link between gene names and SAGE transcript levels, accounting for alternative transcription and many potential errors. These informatics advances provide a rapid and intuitive view of transcript expression in the human body or brain, displayed on the SAGE Anatomic Viewer. We report here an easily accessible view of nearly any genes expression in a wide variety of malignant and normal tissues.


American Journal of Pathology | 2002

Evaluation of Non-Formalin Tissue Fixation for Molecular Profiling Studies

John W. Gillespie; Carolyn J.M. Best; Verena E. Bichsel; Kristina A. Cole; Susan F. Greenhut; Stephen M. Hewitt; Mamoun Ahram; Yvonne Gathright; Maria J. Merino; Robert L. Strausberg; Jonathan I. Epstein; Stanley R. Hamilton; Gallya Gannot; Galina V. Baibakova; Valerie S. Calvert; Michael J. Flaig; Rodrigo F. Chuaqui; Judi Herring; John Pfeifer; Emmanuel F. Petricoin; W. Marston Linehan; Paul H. Duray; G. Steven Bova; Michael R. Emmert-Buck

Using a general strategy for evaluating clinical tissue specimens, we found that 70% ethanol fixation and paraffin embedding is a useful method for molecular profiling studies. Human prostate and kidney were used as test tissues. The protein content of the samples was analyzed by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis, immunoblot, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and layered expression scanning. In each case, the fixed and embedded tissues produced results similar to that obtained from snap-frozen specimens, although the protein quantity was somewhat decreased. Recovery of mRNA was reduced in both quantity and quality in the ethanol-fixed samples, but was superior to that obtained from formalin-fixed samples and sufficient to perform reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. Recovery of DNA from ethanol-fixed specimens was superior to formalin-fixed samples as determined by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis and polymerase chain reaction. In conclusion, specimens fixed in 70% ethanol and embedded in paraffin produce good histology and permit recovery of DNA, mRNA, and proteins sufficient for several downstream molecular analyses. Complete protocols and additional discussion of relevant issues are available on an accompanying website (http://cgap-mf.nih.gov/).


Steroids | 2002

Measurement of steroid sex hormones in serum: a comparison of radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry.

Joanne F. Dorgan; Thomas R. Fears; Robert P. McMahon; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Blossom H. Patterson; Susan F. Greenhut

Concern has been raised about the adequacy of radioimmunoassays to measure steroid sex hormones in population studies. We compared steroid sex hormone measurements in serum by radioimmunoassay with mass spectrometry. Four male and four female serum pools with known relative concentrations of steroid sex hormones were measured multiple times by both methods. Because measurements are expected to increase linearly with concentration for each sex, we examined whether the linear regressions of hormone measurements on concentration were the same for radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry. Estradiol, estrone, androstenedione, testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were measured in female pools; testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were measured in male pools. Regression slopes for radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry measurements were comparable for all hormones except androstenedione, which had a steeper slope when measured by mass spectrometry (P < or = 0.02). Intercepts for radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry were similar and close to zero for estradiol, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and in male samples, testosterone. For testosterone in female samples, estrone, and dihydrotestosterone, radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry intercepts differed significantly. Standard deviations of individual measurements by radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry differed by hormone and serum concentration; neither method consistently measured hormone concentrations with less variability. Our findings suggest that although absolute concentrations may differ for some hormones, radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry can yield similar estimates of between subject differences in serum concentrations of most steroid sex hormones commonly measured in population studies. Relative power of studies using radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry will depend on the hormones measured and their serum concentrations.


American Journal of Pathology | 2000

Molecular profiling of clinical tissue specimens: feasibility and applications.

Michael R. Emmert-Buck; Robert L. Strausberg; David B. Krizman; M. Fatima Bonaldo; Robert F. Bonner; David G. Bostwick; Monica R. Brown; Kenneth H. Buetow; Rodrigo F. Chuaqui; Kristina A. Cole; Paul H. Duray; Chad R. Englert; John W. Gillespie; Susan F. Greenhut; Lynette H. Grouse; LaDeana W. Hillier; Kenneth S. Katz; Richard D. Klausner; Vladimir Kuznetzov; Alex E. Lash; Greg Lennon; W. Marston Linehan; Lance A. Liotta; Marco A. Marra; Peter J. Munson; David K. Ornstein; Vinay V. Prabhu; Christa Prange; Gregory D. Schuler; Marcelo B. Soares

The relationship between gene expression profiles and cellular behavior in humans is largely unknown. Expression patterns of individual cell types have yet to be precisely measured, and, at present, we know or can predict the function of a relatively small percentage of genes. However, biomedical research is in the midst of an informational and technological revolution with the potential to increase dramatically our understanding of how expression modulates cellular phenotype and response to the environment. The entire sequence of the human genome will be known by the year 2003 or earlier. 1,2 In concert, the pace of efforts to complete identification and full-length cDNA sequencing of all genes has accelerated, and these goals will be attained within the next few years. 3-7 Accompanying the expanding base of genetic information are several new technologies capable of global gene expression measurements. 8-16 Taken together, the expanding genetic database and developing expression technologies are leading to an exciting new paradigm in biomedical research known as molecular profiling.


The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics | 2000

Molecular Profiling of Clinical Tissue Specimens : Feasibility and Applications

Michael R. Emmert-Buck; Robert L. Strausberg; David B. Krizman; M. Fatima Bonaldo; Robert F. Bonner; David G. Bostwick; Monica R. Brown; Kenneth H. Buetow; Rodrigo F. Chuaqui; Kristina A. Cole; Paul H. Duray; Chad R. Englert; John W. Gillespie; Susan F. Greenhut; Lynette H. Grouse; LaDeana W. Hillier; Kenneth S. Katz; Richard D. Klausner; Vladimir Kuznetzov; Alex E. Lash; Greg Lennon; W. Marston Linehan; Lance A. Liotta; Marco A. Marra; Peter J. Munson; David K. Ornstein; Vinay V. Prabhu; Christa Prange; Gregory D. Schuler; Marcelo B. Soares

The relationship between gene expression profiles and cellular behavior in humans is largely unknown. Expression patterns of individual cell types have yet to be precisely measured, and, at present, we know or can predict the function of a relatively small percentage of genes. However, biomedical research is in the midst of an informational and technological revolution with the potential to increase dramatically our understanding of how expression modulates cellular phenotype and response to the environment. The entire sequence of the human genome will be known by the year 2003 or earlier. 1, 2 In concert, the pace of efforts to complete identification and full-length cDNA sequencing of all genes has accelerated, and these goals will be attained within the next few years. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Accompanying the expanding base of genetic information are several new technologies capable of global gene expression measurements. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Taken together, the expanding genetic database and developing expression technologies are leading to an exciting new paradigm in biomedical research known as molecular profiling.


Trends in Cell Biology | 2001

In silico analysis of cancer through the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project

Robert L. Strausberg; Susan F. Greenhut; Lynette H. Grouse; Carl F. Schaefer; Kenneth H. Buetow

The Cancer Genome Anatomy Project (CGAP) was designed and implemented to provide public datasets, material resources and informatics tools to serve as a platform to support the elucidation of the molecular signatures of cancer. This overview of CGAP describes the status of this effort to develop resources based on gene expression, polymorphism identification and chromosome aberrations, and we describe a variety of analytical tools designed to facilitate in silico analysis of these datasets.


Cancer Investigation | 2002

The cancer genome anatomy project: Online resources to reveal the molecular signatures of cancer

Robert L. Strausberg; Kenneth H. Buetow; Susan F. Greenhut; Lynette H. Grouse; Carl F. Schaefer

Four years ago, the National Cancer Institute implemented the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project (CGAP), which was designed to build an interface between genomics and cancer research.1 It was evident that new approaches to science, based on comprehensive molecular analysis, promised remarkable new opportunities to enhance our fundamental understanding of cancer. New technologies offered the potential to delineate specific types of genetic changes, including patterns of altered gene expression and function that could be used to define any cancer in the context of, but not strictly dependent upon, its site of origin. Therefore, we anticipated that these new technologies would elucidate the molecular features of an individual tumor, and profile progression and response to therapy. The molecular information generated could be used by basic and clinical researchers to define the molecular signatures that distinguish different cancers. Pivotal to this approach is the availability of a robust database and analysis tools. The goal of such an electronic database is to seamlessly integrate molecular and clinical data. Essential to the utility of such a database is the availability of analysis tools that allow researchers to perform in silico analysis to correlate alterations in genes and their expression products with clinical data about the tumor. The challenge would be to extract and integrate all of the relevant information from those dataset to enrich our understanding of cancer. Here, we describe the progress CGAP has made toward building such a database and designing analysis tools.


Pharmacogenomics Journal | 2002

An international database and integrated analysis tools for the study of cancer gene expression

Robert L. Strausberg; A. A. Camargo; G. J. Riggins; Carl F. Schaefer; S. J. de Souza; L. H. Grouse; A. Lal; Kenneth H. Buetow; K. Boon; Susan F. Greenhut; A. J G Simpson

Researchers working collaboratively in Brazil and the United States have assembled an International Database of Cancer Gene Expression. Several strategies have been employed to generate gene expression data including expressed sequence tags (ESTs), serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), and open reading-frame expressed sequence tags (ORESTES). The database contains six million gene tags that reflect the gene expression profiles in a wide variety of cancerous tissues and their normal counterparts. All sequences are deposited in the public databases, GenBank and SAGEmap. A suite of informatics tools was designed to facilitate in silico analysis of the gene expression datasets and are available through the NCI Cancer Genome Anatomy Project web site (http://cgap.nci.nih.gov).


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2003

Diet and sex hormones in girls: findings from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Joanne F. Dorgan; Sally Hunsberger; Robert P. McMahon; Peter O. Kwiterovich; Ronald M. Lauer; Linda Van Horn; Norman L. Lasser; Victor J. Stevens; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Jack A. Yanovski; Susan F. Greenhut; Donald W. Chandler; Frank A. Franklin; Bruce A. Barton; Dennis W. Buckman; Linda Snetselaar; Blossom H. Patterson; Arthur Schatzkin; Philip R. Taylor


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 1996

Reliability and Validity of Serum Sex Hormone Measurements

Lisa M. McShane; Joanne F. Dorgan; Susan F. Greenhut; James J. Damato

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan F. Greenhut's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert L. Strausberg

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth H. Buetow

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynette H. Grouse

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Gillespie

Science Applications International Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kristina A. Cole

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul H. Duray

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rodrigo F. Chuaqui

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl F. Schaefer

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge