Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan G. Nayfield is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan G. Nayfield.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2008

Workshop on HIV Infection and Aging: What Is Known and Future Research Directions

Rita B. Effros; Courtney V. Fletcher; Kelly A. Gebo; Jeffrey B. Halter; William R. Hazzard; Frances McFarland Horne; Robin E. Huebner; Edward N. Janoff; Amy C. Justice; Daniel R. Kuritzkes; Susan G. Nayfield; Susan Plaeger; Kenneth E. Schmader; John R. Ashworth; Christine Campanelli; Charles P. Clayton; Beth Rada; Nancy Woolard; Kevin P. High

Highly active antiretroviral treatment has resulted in dramatically increased life expectancy among patients with HIV infection who are now aging while receiving treatment and are at risk of developing chronic diseases associated with advanced age. Similarities between aging and the courses of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome suggest that HIV infection compresses the aging process, perhaps accelerating comorbidities and frailty. In a workshop organized by the Association of Specialty Professors, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the HIV Medical Association, the National Institute on Aging, and the National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases, researchers in infectious diseases, geriatrics, immunology, and gerontology met to review what is known about HIV infection and aging, to identify research gaps, and to suggest high priority topics for future research. Answers to the questions posed are likely to help prioritize and balance strategies to slow the progression of HIV infection, to address comorbidities and drug toxicity, and to enhance understanding about both HIV infection and aging.


Journals of Gerontology Series A-biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | 2011

The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study: Design and Methods

Roger A. Fielding; W. Jack Rejeski; Steven N. Blair; Timothy S. Church; Mark A. Espeland; Thomas M. Gill; Jack M. Guralnik; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jeffrey A. Katula; Abby C. King; Stephen B. Kritchevsky; Mary M. McDermott; Michael I. Miller; Susan G. Nayfield; Anne B. Newman; Jeff D. Williamson; Denise E. Bonds; Sergei Romashkan; Evan C. Hadley; Marco Pahor

Background. As the number of older adults in the United States rises, maintaining functional independence among older Americans has emerged as a major clinical and public health priority. Older people who lose mobility are less likely to remain in the community; demonstrate higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations; and experience a poorer quality of life. Several studies have shown that regular physical activity improves functional limitations and intermediate functional outcomes, but definitive evidence showing that major mobility disability can be prevented is lacking. A Phase 3 randomized controlled trial is needed to fill this evidence gap. Methods. The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study is a Phase 3 multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a supervised moderate-intensity physical activity program with a successful aging health education program in 1,600 sedentary older persons followed for an average of 2.7 years. Results. LIFEs primary outcome is major mobility disability, defined as the inability to walk 400 m. Secondary outcomes include cognitive function, serious fall injuries, persistent mobility disability, the combined outcome of major mobility disability or death, disability in activities of daily living, and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions. Results of this study are expected to have important public health implications for the large and growing population of older sedentary men and women.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2009

Prediction, Progression, and Outcomes of Chronic Kidney Disease in Older Adults

Sharon Anderson; Jeffrey B. Halter; William R. Hazzard; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Frances McFarland Horne; George A. Kaysen; John W. Kusek; Susan G. Nayfield; Kenneth E. Schmader; Ying Tian; John R. Ashworth; Charles P. Clayton; Ryan P. Parker; Erika D. Tarver; Nancy Woolard; Kevin P. High

Chronic kidney disease is a large and growing problem among aging populations. Although progression of chronic kidney disease to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a costly and important clinical event with substantial morbidity, it appears less frequently in aging people compared with cardiovascular mortality. The measurement of kidney function and management of kidney disease in older individuals remain challenging, partly because the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying age-related decline in kidney function, the interactions between age and other risk factors in renal progression, and the associations of chronic kidney disease with other comorbidities in older people are understudied and poorly understood. The Association of Specialty Professors, the American Society of Nephrology, the American Geriatrics Society, the National Institute on Aging, and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases held a workshop, summarized in this article, to review what is known about chronic kidney disease, identify research gaps and resources available to address them, and identify priority areas for future research. Answers to emerging research questions will support the integration of geriatrics and nephrology and thus improve care for older patients at risk for chronic kidney disease.


Journal of Cellular Biochemistry | 1996

Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.

Gary J. Kelloff; Charles W. Boone; James A. Crowell; Susan G. Nayfield; Ernest T. Hawk; Winfred F. Malone; Vernon E. Steele; Ronald A. Lubet; Caroline C. Sigman

Quantifiable, well‐characterized cancer risk factors demonstrate the need for chemoprevention and define cohorts for chemopreventive intervention. For chemoprevention, the important cancer risk factors are those that can be measured quantitatively in the subject at risk. These factors, called risk biomarkers, can be used to identify cohorts for chemoprevention. Those modulated by chemopreventive agents may also be used as endpoints in chemoprevention studies. Generally, the risk biomarkers fit into categories based on those previously defined by Hulka: 1) carcinogen exposure, 2) carcinogen exposure/effect, 3) genetic predisposition, 4) intermediate biomarkers of cancer, and 5) previous cancers.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2010

Bedside‐to‐Bench Conference: Research Agenda for Idiopathic Fatigue and Aging

Neil B. Alexander; George E. Taffet; Frances McFarland Horne; Basil A. Eldadah; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan G. Nayfield; Stephanie A. Studenski

The American Geriatrics Society, with support from the National Institute on Aging and the John A. Hartford Foundation, held its fifth Bedside‐to‐Bench research conference, “Idiopathic Fatigue and Aging,” to provide participants with opportunities to learn about cutting‐edge research developments, draft recommendations for future research, and network with colleagues and leaders in the field.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2012

Biological, Clinical, and Psychosocial Correlates at the Interface of Cancer and Aging Research

William Dale; Supriya G. Mohile; Basil A. Eldadah; Edward L. Trimble; Richard L. Schilsky; Harvey J. Cohen; Hyman B. Muss; Kenneth E. Schmader; Betty Ferrell; Martine Extermann; Susan G. Nayfield; Arti Hurria

In September 2010, the Cancer and Aging Research Group, in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Aging, conducted the first of three planned conferences to discuss research methodology to generate the highest quality research in older adults with cancer and then disseminate these findings among those working in the fields of cancer and aging. Conference speakers discussed the current level of research evidence in geriatric oncology, outlined the current knowledge gaps, and put forth principles for research designs and strategies that would address these gaps within the next 10 years. It was agreed that future oncology research trials that enroll older adults should include: (1) improved standardized geriatric assessment of older oncology patients, (2) substantially enhanced biological assessment of older oncology patients, (3) specific trials for the most vulnerable and/or those older than 75 years, and (4) research infrastructure that specifically targets older adults and substantially strengthened geriatrics and oncology research collaborations. This initial conference laid the foundation for the next two meetings, which will address the research designs and collaborations needed to enhance therapeutic and intervention trials in older adults with cancer.


Community Genetics | 2003

The Cancer Genetics Network: Recruitment results and pilot studies

Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Deborah J. Bowen; Dianne M. Finkelstein; Constance A. Griffin; James W. Hanson; Claudine Isaacs; Carol Kasten-Sportes; Geraldine P. Mineau; Prakash M. Nadkarni; Barbara K. Rimer; Joellen M. Schildkraut; Louise C. Strong; Barbara L. Weber; Deborah M. Winn; Robert A. Hiatt; Susan G. Nayfield

Objective: The National Cancer Institute established the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) to support collaborative investigations into the genetic basis of cancer susceptibility, explore mechanisms to integrate this new knowledge into medical practice, and identify ways of addressing the associated psychosocial, ethical, legal, and public health issues. Subjects and Methods: The CGN has developed the complex infrastructure required to support the projects, including the establishment of guidelines and policies, uniform methods, standard questionnaires to be used by all of the centers, and a standard format for submission of data to the Informatics Center. Cancer patients and their family members have been invited to enroll and be included in a pool of potential study participants. The Information Technology Group is responsible for support of the design, implementation, and maintenance of the multicenter Network-wide research protocols. Results: As of January 2004, the CGN contained data on 23,995 probands (participants) and 425,798 family members. As a resource for cancer genetic studies, the CGN has a large number of probands and first-degree relatives with and without cancer and with multiple ethnicities. Different study designs can be used including case-control, case-case, and family studies. Conclusions: The unique resources of the CGN are available for studies on cancer genetic susceptibility, translational research, and behavioral research. The CGN is now at a point where approved collaborators may have access to enrolled patients and their families for special studies, as well as to the clinical, environmental and family cancer history data banked in the Informatics Center.


Cancer Prevention Research | 2011

Large prospective study of ovarian cancer screening in high-risk women: CA125 cut-point defined by menopausal status

Steven J. Skates; Phuong L. Mai; Nora Horick; Marion Piedmonte; Charles W. Drescher; Claudine Isaacs; Deborah K. Armstrong; Saundra S. Buys; Gustavo C. Rodriguez; Ira R. Horowitz; Andrew Berchuck; Mary B. Daly; Susan M. Domchek; David E. Cohn; Linda Van Le; John O. Schorge; William Newland; Susan A. Davidson; Mack N. Barnes; Wendy R. Brewster; Masoud Azodi; Stacy Nerenstone; Noah D. Kauff; Carol J. Fabian; Patrick M. Sluss; Susan G. Nayfield; Carol Kasten; Dianne M. Finkelstein; Mark H. Greene; Karen H. Lu

Previous screening trials for early detection of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women have used the standard CA125 cut-point of 35 U/mL, the 98th percentile in this population yielding a 2% false positive rate, whereas the same cut-point in trials of premenopausal women results in substantially higher false positive rates. We investigated demographic and clinical factors predicting CA125 distributions, including 98th percentiles, in a large population of high-risk women participating in two ovarian cancer screening studies with common eligibility criteria and screening protocols. Baseline CA125 values and clinical and demographic data from 3,692 women participating in screening studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute–sponsored Cancer Genetics Network and Gynecologic Oncology Group were combined for this preplanned analysis. Because of the large effect of menopausal status on CA125 levels, statistical analyses were conducted separately in pre- and postmenopausal subjects to determine the impact of other baseline factors on predicted CA125 cut-points on the basis of 98th percentile. The primary clinical factor affecting CA125 cut-points was menopausal status, with premenopausal women having a significantly higher cut-point of 50 U/mL, while in postmenopausal subjects the standard cut-point of 35 U/mL was recapitulated. In premenopausal women, current oral contraceptive (OC) users had a cut-point of 40 U/mL. To achieve a 2% false positive rate in ovarian cancer screening trials and in high-risk women choosing to be screened, the cut-point for initial CA125 testing should be personalized primarily for menopausal status (50 for premenopausal women, 40 for premenopausal on OC, and 35 for postmenopausal women). Cancer Prev Res; 4(9); 1401–8. ©2011 AACR.


Chest | 2010

Workshop on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Older Adults

Richard J. Castriotta; Basil A. Eldadah; W. Michael Foster; Jeffrey B. Halter; William R. Hazzard; James P. Kiley; Talmadge E. King; Frances McFarland Horne; Susan G. Nayfield; Herbert Y. Reynolds; Kenneth E. Schmader; Galen B. Toews; Kevin P. High

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical presentation and rates of progression, disproportionately affects older adults. The diagnosis of IPF is descriptive, based on clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic examination, and definitive diagnosis is hampered by poor interobserver agreement and lack of a consensus definition. There are no effective treatments. Cellular, molecular, genetic, and environmental risk factors have been identified for IPF, but the initiating event and the characteristics of preclinical stages are not known. IPF is predominantly a disease of older adults, and the processes underlying normal aging might significantly influence the development of IPF. Yet, the biology of aging and the principles of medical care for this population have been typically ignored in basic, translational, or clinical IPF research. In August 2009, the Association of Specialty Professors, in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Geriatrics Society, the National Institute on Aging, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, held a workshop, summarized herein, to review what is known, to identify research gaps at the interface of aging and IPF, and to suggest priority areas for future research. Efforts to answer the questions identified will require the integration of geriatrics, gerontology, and pulmonary research, but these efforts have great potential to improve care for patients with IPF.


American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2010

Toward an Integrated Research Agenda for Critical Illness in Aging

Eric B Milbrandt; Basil A. Eldadah; Susan G. Nayfield; Evan C. Hadley; Derek C. Angus

Aging brings an increased predisposition to critical illness. Patients older than 65 years of age account for approximately half of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in the United States, a proportion that is expected to increase considerably with the aging of the population. Emerging research suggests that elderly survivors of intensive care suffer significant long-term sequelae, including accelerated age-related functional decline. Existing evidence-based interventions are frequently underused and their efficacy untested in older subjects. Improving ICU outcomes in the elderly will require not only better methods for translating sound science into improved ICU practice but also an enhanced understanding of the underlying molecular, physiological, and pathophysiological interactions of critical illness with the aging process itself. Yet, significant barriers to research for critical illness in aging exist. We review the state of knowledge and identify gaps in knowledge, research opportunities, and barriers to research, with the goal of promoting an integrated research agenda for critical illness in aging.

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan G. Nayfield's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Basil A. Eldadah

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caroline C. Sigman

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles W. Boone

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary J. Kelloff

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Crowell

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vernon E. Steele

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge