Susan G. Orel

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy With Metastasis: Can Axillary Dissection Be Avoided in Some Patients With Breast Cancer?

PURPOSE Recent studies have suggested that the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an accurate alternative staging procedure for women with breast cancer. The goal of this study was to identify a subset of breast cancer patients in whom metastatic disease was confined only to the SLN. MATERIALS AND METHODS From two institutions, we recruited 222 women with breast cancer for SLN biopsy. A SLN biopsy was performed in each patient, followed by an axillary dissection in 182 patients. Histologic and immunohistochemical cytokeratin stains were used on all SLNs. RESULTS The SLN was identified in 220 (97. 8%) of the 225 biopsies. Evidence of metastatic breast cancer in the SLN was found in 60 (27.0%) of the 222 patients. Of these patients, 32 (53.3%) had evidence of tumor in the SLN only. By multivariate analysis, two factors were found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of tumor involvement in the non-SLNs: primary tumor size larger than 2.0 cm (P =.0004) and macrometastasis (> 2.0 mm) in the SLN (P =.002). Additional analysis revealed that none (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 18.5%) of the 18 patients with primary tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis to the SLN had remaining axillary lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION The primary tumor size and metastasis size in the SLN are independent factors in predicting the incidence of tumor in the non-SLNs. Therefore, the SLN biopsy alone may be adequate for staging and/or therapy decision making in patients with primary breast tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis in the SLN.

Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

PURPOSE To determine the relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to outcome after breast-conservation treatment (BCT) with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 756 women with early stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ underwent BCT including definitive breast irradiation during 1992 to 2001. At the time of initial diagnosis and evaluation, routine breast imaging included conventional mammography. Of the 756 women, 215 women (28%) had also undergone a breast MRI study, and 541 women (72%) had not undergone a breast MRI study. The median follow-up after treatment was 4.6 years (range, 0.1 to 13.5 years). RESULTS For the women with a breast MRI study compared with the women without a breast MRI study, there were no differences in the 8-year rates of any local failure (3% v 4%, respectively; P = .51) or local-only first failure (3% v 4%, respectively; P = .32). There were also no differences between the two groups for the 8-year rates of overall survival (86% v 87%, respectively; P = .51), cause-specific survival (94% v 95%, respectively; P = .63), freedom from distant metastases (89% v 92%, respectively; P = .16), or contralateral breast cancer (6% v 6%, respectively; P = .39). CONCLUSION The use of a breast MRI study at the time of initial diagnosis and evaluation was not associated with an improvement in outcome after BCT with radiation.

The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer

PURPOSE To assess the impact of young age on outcome in women with early stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1981 and 1991, 980 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation. The median follow-up was 4.6 years, with a range of 1 month to 11 years. The patients were divided into three groups, based on age at the time of diagnosis: (a) age < or = 35 years--64 patients, (b) age 36-50 years--363 patients, and (c) age > 50 years--553 patients. The comparability of the groups was assessed in terms of clinical factors (tumor size and race), histopathologic factors (histologic subtype, final resection margin, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, pathologic nodal status), and treatment related factors (reexcision, median total dose to the primary, region(s) treated with radiation, and the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen). Outcome was evaluated for overall, relapse-free, and cause-specific survival and patterns of first failure (breast, regional nodes, and distant metastasis). RESULTS There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of race, clinical tumor size, pathology of the primary tumor, pathologic nodal status, final margin of resection, progesterone receptor status, median total dose to the primary tumor, or the regions treated. However, younger women were significantly more likely to have estrogen receptor negative tumors, undergo reexcision, and receive adjuvant systemic chemotherapy without tamoxifen. Younger women were found to have a statistically significantly decreased 8-year actuarial relapse-free survival (53% vs. 67% vs. 74%, p = 0.009), cause-specific survival (73% vs. 84% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), freedom from distant metastasis (76% vs. 75% vs. 83%, p = 0.02), and a significantly increased risk of breast recurrence (24% vs. 14% vs. 12%, p = 0.001), and regional node recurrence (7% vs. 1% vs. 1%, p = 0.0002). The patients were further divided on the basis of their pathologic nodal status. There were no statistically significant differences among the three age groups for axillary node-positive patients for overall survival (75% vs. 80% vs. 74%), relapse-free survival (73% vs. 73% vs. 62%), cause-specific survival (76% vs. 85% vs. 80%), and freedom from distant metastasis (75% vs. 75% vs. 72%), or breast recurrence (0% vs. 9% vs. 6%). The findings were identical when the analysis was restricted to node-positive patients who received chemotherapy. However, for axillary node-negative women, young age was associated with a statistically significant decreased overall survival (71% vs. 83% vs. 92%), relapse-free survival (51% vs. 65% vs. 76%), cause-specific survival (71% vs. 86% vs. 93%), freedom from distant metastasis (77% vs. 76% vs. 88%), and a statistically significant increased risk of breast recurrence (40% vs. 16% vs. 13%), and regional node recurrence (3% vs. 1% vs. 0%). The risk of a breast recurrence in axillary node-negative young women was decreased by the addition of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy but not by the use of reexcision. CONCLUSIONS The present analysis demonstrates that young women with early stage breast cancer do significantly worse when compared to older women in terms of relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, distant metastasis and breast and regional node recurrence. However, the adverse effect of young age on outcome appears to be limited to the node-negative patients. These findings suggest that node-negative early stage breast cancer in young women is a more aggressive disease, with an increased risk for all patterns of failure and a decreased survival.

Immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratins improves the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as a staging procedure for breast carcinoma. The authors evaluated whether immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis improves the sensitivity of this procedure.

How experience and training influence mammography expertise

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The authors evaluated the influence of perceptual and cognitive skills in mammography detection and interpretation by testing three groups representing different levels of mammography expertise in terms of experience, training, and talent with a mammography screening-diagnostic task. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred fifty mammograms, composed of unilateral cranial-caudal and mediolateral oblique views, were displayed in pairs on a digital workstation to 19 radiology residents, three experienced mammographers, and nine mammography technologists. One-third of the mammograms showed malignant lesions; two-thirds were malignancy-free. Observers interacted with the display to indicate whether each image contained no malignant lesions or suspicious lesions indicating malignancy. Decision time was measured as the lesions were localized, classified, and rated for decision confidence. RESULTS Compared with performance of experts, alternative free response operating characteristic performance for residents was significantly lower and equivalent to that of technologists. Analysis of overall performance showed that, as level of expertise decreased, false-positive results exerted a greater effect on overall decision accuracy over the time course of image perception. This defines the decision speed-accuracy relationship that characterizes mammography expertise. CONCLUSION Differences in resident performance resulted primarily from lack of perceptual-learning experience during mammography training, which limited object recognition skills and made it difficult to determine differences between malignant lesions, benign lesions, and normal image perturbations. A proposed solution is systematic mentor-guided training that links image perception to feedback about the reasons underlying decision making.

Effect of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Clinical Management of Women With Early-Stage Breast Carcinoma

PURPOSE To determine the impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the clinical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A review was performed of the records of 207 women with early-stage breast cancer (including five women with bilateral disease) who underwent breast MRI during work-up for breast conservation treatment. All patients presented with clinical stage 0, I, or II disease. For each patient, a determination was made whether the breast MRI affected the clinical management, and if so, whether the patient was well served by the change in management. RESULTS The MRI findings affected the clinical management in 43 cases (20% of 212 breast cancers). Based on the pathology findings and the overall clinical course for each case, the breast MRI was judged to have had a strongly favorable effect on management in 18 cases (8%), a somewhat favorable effect in six cases (3%), an uncertain effect in five cases (2%), a somewhat unfavorable effect in 11 cases (5%), and a strongly unfavorable effect in three cases (1%). The effect of MRI was not significantly different for invasive carcinoma compared with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (all P > or =.27). However, the effect of MRI was significantly greater when the MRI was performed before an excisional biopsy (P =.0011) or for larger tumors (P =.0089). CONCLUSIONS Breast MRI alters the clinical management for a sizable fraction of women with early-stage breast cancer and appears to offer clinically useful information for determining optimal local treatment.

Outcome of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to investigate the outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy as a function of the indication for MRI and the MRI features of the lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 154 women (mean age, 51 years) with 172 MRI-detected lesions, MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was attempted. Using the original radiologic report, we evaluated the indication for the original MRI examination and the MRI findings that led to biopsy. We investigated the core and operative histology results and follow-up data. We analyzed the cancer rate as a function of the indication for MRI and the MRI features of the lesions using Fishers exact test. RESULTS In 22 of the 172 lesions (13%), MRI-guided biopsy was deferred due to decreased visualization or nonvisualization of the MRI finding that led to biopsy. Of 150 biopsies in 134 women, core histology revealed 39 malignant (39/150, 26%), 90 benign (90/150, 60%), and 21 high-risk (21/150, 14%) lesions. Through operative histology (n = 13) or follow-up (n = 30), four high-risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy and all deferred lesions except four lost to follow-up were confirmed to be benign. The final number of malignancies was 43 (29%) including 16 in situ and 27 invasive cancers. The probability of malignancy was different in the screening and diagnostic settings (14% vs 36%, respectively; p = 0.05), whereas it was not different according to lesion type (mass, 34%; nonmass, 27%; focus, 19%; p > 0.05) or kinetics (persistent, 23%; plateau, 31%; washout, 29%; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The cancer rate in our cohort of women who underwent MRI-guided breast biopsy was 29%. It varied according to the indication for the original MRI examination, but not according to the MRI features of the lesions.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging--guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more sensitive than mammography for detecting breast cancer and may have an adjunctive role in assessing patients with early-stage disease for breast conservation treatment. This study was performed to analyze the impact of breast MRI on the clinical management of 83 patients being considered for breast conservation treatment. Eighty-three consecutive cases of patients undergoing breast MRI during standard workup and evaluation for breast conservation treatment from 1993 to 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, mammographic findings, MRI findings, timing of MRI study, findings from MRI-guided surgery (when done), and whether the patient underwent breast conservation treatment. MRI definitely altered management in 15 patients (18%), may have affected management in 4 patients (5%), and did not change management in 64 patients (77%). Thirteen patients underwent additional surgery because of MRI findings; the positive predictive value for MRI-guided surgery was 38% (5 of 13). Ultimately, 82% of the patients received breast conservation treatment. No predictive factor was identified to characterize the patients most likely to have management affected by MRI findings. These findings suggest that breast MRI may be useful in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. A larger study population and outcome data will be required to confirm these findings and to define those patients most likely to benefit from breast MRI.

A Combined Architectural and Kinetic Interpretation Model for Breast MR Images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to integrate contrast material kinetic and architectural data from magnetic resonance (MR) images and to assess the improvement in diagnostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS MR imaging data from a diagnostic cohort of 100 patients (50 malignant and 50 benign cases) were analyzed. RESULTS Qualitative classification of the enhancement curve was the most predictive kinetic feature. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the architectural model alone and for the architectural model combined with the qualitative kinetic classification. The results demonstrated a statistically significant increase in ROC area (P = .03) of the combined model compared with that of the architectural model alone. CONCLUSION The addition of qualitative classification of the time-signal intensity curve to an architectural interpretation model results in significant improvement in model performance as measured by the area under the ROC curve.

Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation

During the last two decades, tremendous advances have been made in the performance and interpretation of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Technical requirements for optimal breast imaging including the requirement for a breast MRI biopsy system are now being defined as part of a voluntary American College of Radiology (ACR) breast MRI accreditation program. The ACR BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon for breast MRI has brought uniformity to the interpretation of breast MRI examinations. With these advances in imaging technique, interpretation guidelines, and increasing availability of MR-compatible breast biopsy systems, MRI of the breast is rapidly gaining popularity in clinical practice in both the diagnostic setting and, more recently, in the screening setting. The clinical indications for breast MRI, however, remain to be defined. There are clinical indications that have emerged where MRI, as an adjunct to mammography, seems to be the imaging study of choice. There are other indications, specifically breast cancer staging, in which MRI is being utilized with increasing frequency, but in which controversy persists.