Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan Jeffers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan Jeffers.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1997

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer: antitumor activity and toxicity modification by liposomal encapsulation.

Franco M. Muggia; J D Hainsworth; Susan Jeffers; P Miller; Susan Groshen; M Tan; Lynda D. Roman; B Uziely; Laila I. Muderspach; Agustin A. Garcia; A Burnett; F A Greco; C P Morrow; L J Paradiso; Li-Jung Liang

PURPOSE A phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin was conducted in patients with ovarian cancer who failed to respond to platinum- and paclitaxel-based regimens. Liposomal doxorubicin was selected as a result of its superior activity against ovarian cancer xenografts relative to free doxorubicin and activity in refractory ovarian cancer patients that was noted during the phase I study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five consecutive patients were accrued in two institutions (22 in one and 13 in the other). All had progressive disease after either cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel, or at least one platinum-based and one paclitaxel-based regimen. Patients received intravenous (I.V.) liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with a dose reduction to 40 mg/m2 in the event of grade 3 or 4 toxicities, or a lengthening of the interval to 4 weeks (and occasionally to 5 weeks) with persistence of grade 1 or 2 toxicities beyond 3 weeks. RESULTS Nine clinical responses (one complete response [CR], eight partial responses [PRs]) were observed in 35 patients (25.7%), with seven of these having been confirmed by two consecutive computed tomographic (CT) measurements. The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months with an overall survival of 1.5 to 24+ months (median, 11 months). Although 13 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic skin and mucosal toxicities (either hand-foot syndrome or stomatitis), with dose modifications, the treatment was very well tolerated. Nausea that was clearly attributable to the drug, hair loss, extravasation necrosis, or decreases in ejection fraction did not occur. CONCLUSION Liposomal doxorubicin has substantial activity against ovarian cancer refractory to platinum and paclitaxel. The responses achieved with liposomal doxorubicin were durable and maintained with minimal toxicity. This liposomal formulation should be evaluated further in combination with other drugs in less refractory patients.


Annals of Oncology | 2000

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2.

Tamar Safra; Franco M. Muggia; Susan Jeffers; D. D. Tsao-Wei; Susan Groshen; O. Lyass; R. Henderson; G. Berry; Alberto Gabizon

BACKGROUND The indications for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) are expanding. We, therefore, wished to assess the safety of delivering doses exceeding 500 mg/m2 of doxil to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects accrued to eight phase I and II protocol studies conducted at two institutions, were assessed for cardiac function at baseline and at specified intervals by MUGA scans. In this retrospective analysis, the findings of 42 patients, from the total of 237 entered, who had reached or exceeded cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2 (range 500-1500 mg/m2) were reviewed. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and in clinical cardiac status were analyzed. Six patients, three who had received prior doxorubicin, also underwent endomyocardial biopsies after cumulative doses of 490-1320 mg/m2. RESULTS None of the 42 patients had clinical congestive heart failure (CHF) secondary to cardiomyopathy. Post doxil MUGA scans were available for 41 of the 42 patients. Five had a drop of 10% or more in LVEF; three of these had received prior doxorubicin. Billingham endomyocardial biopsy scores ranged from 0-1 in five patients, while the sixth had a score of 1.5 after both 900 mg/m2 and 1320 mg/m2 doxil. Of a remaining 195 patients, 1 episode of CHF was recorded in a patient who had received 312 mg/m2 doxil over 120 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone and chest radiation. CONCLUSIONS Cumulative doses in excess of 500 mg/m2 of doxil appear to carry a considerably lesser risk of cardiomyopathy as judged by serial LVEFs and clinical follow-up, than is generally associated with free doxorubicin. Heart biopsies have provided reassuring data in a small number of patients, even if pretreated with doxorubicin. However, since three doxorubicin pretreated patients were among the five experiencing drops in LVEF, more data are warranted on such patients.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1995

Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies.

Beatrice Uziely; Susan Jeffers; Rut Isacson; Kimberlea Kutsch; Denise Wei-Tsao; Zohar Yehoshua; Eugene Libson; Franco M. Muggia; Alberto Gabizon

PURPOSE The purpose of our studies was to define the maximal-tolerated dose of liposomal doxorubicin (DOX-SL; Liposome Technology Inc, Menlo Park, CA), a doxorubicin formulation of polyethyleneglycol-coated liposomes, characterize the toxicities associated with this formulation, and evaluate any indication of antitumor activity within a phase I setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two separate phase I studies were conducted following the initial human pharmacokinetic testing at one of the sites (Hadassah). The starting dose of 20 mg/m2 at the University of Southern California was just below the dose without toxicity in the pharmacokinetic study. At Hadassah, the phase I starting dose was just above their earlier safe single doses, 60 mg/m2. Both studies involved cohorts of at least three patients and redosing every 3 to 4 weeks. To determine the recommended dose for phase II trials, an additional level of 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was explored, and the level of 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was expanded. RESULTS A total of 56 patients receiving 281 courses of DOX-SL was accrued and evaluated for toxicity. Hand-foot (H-F) syndrome and stomatitis are the two main dose-limiting factors of DOX-SL. Stomatitis was dose-limiting for high single doses of DOX-SL greater than 70 mg/m2. Skin toxicity manifested primarily as H-F syndrome was dose-limiting for repetitive dosing, but acceptable at either 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Attenuation of acute subjective symptoms and lack of alopecia were generally observed. Patients with carcinomas of the breast, ovary, prostate, and head and neck were among those showing objective antitumor responses or improvement based, in part, on blood levels of tumor markers. CONCLUSION The toxicity profile of DOX-SL differs prominently from that of the free drug administered by bolus or rapid infusion and with some differences, resembles that of prolonged continuous infusion. This finding, as well as the antitumor activity observed, supports wide phase II testing of DOX-SL in solid tumors.


Investigational New Drugs | 1994

Phase I and pharmacologic study of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome).

Perry Guaglianone; Kenneth K. Chan; Eduardo DelaFlor-Weiss; Rosemarie Hanisch; Susan Jeffers; Desh Sharma; Franco M. Muggia

SummaryWe have completed a phase I and pharmacology study of liposomally-encapsulated daunorubicin (DaunoXome). Of 32 patients entered, 30 were evaluable. No toxicity was encountered at the initial doseescalation steps from 10 to 60 mg/m2. At 80 mg/m2, two patients manifested grade 2 neutropenia. At least grade 3 neutropenia occurred in all patients receiving 120 mg/m2. Alopecia and subjective intolerance were mild. Cardiotoxicity was not observed except for an episode of arrhythmia in a patient with lung cancer and prior radiation. Only one minor objective response was observed in this population of refractory solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics differed from those of the free drug with no detection of daunorubicinol. We recommend future phase II studies with a dose of 100 mg/m2 in previously treated and 120 mg/m2 of DaunoXome in previously untreated patients with solid tumors.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1995

Intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FUDR) and (S)-leucovorin for disease predominantly confined to the peritoneal cavity: a pharmacokinetic and toxicity study

Valerie Israel; Chun Jiang; Franco M. Muggia; Anil Tulpule; Susan Jeffers; Lawrence Leichman; C.Paul Morrow; Lynda D. Roman; C. Gail Leichman; Kenneth K. Chan

Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of fluorinated pyrimidines has been evaluated for ovarian and gastrointestinal malignancies in phase I, II, and III trials. The tolerance and pharmacokinetic profile of IP 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FUDR) alone and with (R,S)-leucovorin ((R,S)-LV) have each been evaluated in previous phase I studies. FUDR doses of 3 g per day with and without (R,S)-LV doses up to 640 mg per day given IP are well tolerated. The current phase I study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles and clinical tolerance of escalating doses of the pure biologically activeS-isomer of leucovorin ((S)-LV) given IP with the same dosing schedule of FUDR. A group of 16 patients with disease confined to the abdominal cavity were treated in this study. Pharmacokinetic studies of blood and peritoneal fluid, toxicity profiles, and clinical response for the first three cycles are reported here. The toxicity profile did not significantly differ from the prior two studies. All nonhematologic toxicities, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal discomfort were less than grade 4, and most were less than grade 3. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon and observed only in patients with compromised bone marrow reserve. The pharmacokinetic profiles were also congruent with the previous studies and indicate a three-log advantage for FUDR. The (S)-LV profiles in the peritoneal cavity paralleled those of FUDR. Antitumor effects or absence of progression until after cessation of therapy were documented in 11 patients. At a median follow-up of 18 months 44% of patients were alive. IP administration of 3-g of FUDR and up to 640 mg (S)-LV daily for three days was well tolerated. The tolerance and antitumor effects observed during IP FUDR and LV in these studies encourage further exploration of this regimen against ovarian and gastrointestinal malignancies. The actual role and optimal dose of LV as an enhancer of the antitumor actions of FUDR administered by this route remain unknown.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1991

Phase I and pharmacologic evaluation of intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine

Franco M. Muggia; Kenneth K. Chan; Russell C; Nicoletta Colombo; James L. Speyer; Sehgal K; Susan Jeffers; Sorich J; Lawrence Leichman; Uziel Beller

SummaryIntraperitoneal (i.p.) 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (Floxuridine, FUdR, FdUrd) was evaluated in a phase I study at a starting level of 500 mg given on 1 day in 2 I 1.5% dialysate. Escalations within patients were allowed every other cycle. A total of 23 patients (age, 32–78 years) received 108 treatment courses. Local tolerance at all dose levels was excellent, with no cases of drug-related peritonitis being observed. Nausea and vomiting increased in severity in relation to dose and was universal at >3,000 mg ×3 days. One patient each developed grade 1 mucositis as well as diarrhea at a dose of 3,000 mg×3 days and leukopenia and thrombocytopenia at 5,000 mg×3 days. Peritoneal fluid (PF) and plasma (PL) FdUrd profiles were monitored by an HPLC method in 13 subjects, with 7 being studied serially at 2–4 increment doses for up to 6 h. Profiles that exhibited apparent linear pharmacokinetics gave PF drug levels 2–4 logs higher than the PL counterparts, with the latter essentially declining in parallel to the former, indicating that the disposition of FdUrd from the peritoneal compartment is rate-determining. The mean terminal half-life for PF FdUrd was found to be 115 min and mean peritoneal clearance was 25 ml/min. The vast differences in drug levels and AUC found between the PF and the PL profiles suggests a high systemic clearance of FdUrd, which was confirmed in two patients receiving 2 g FdUrd by short i.v. infusion. A disproportionate increase in the plasma FdUrd levels and the corresponding AUC values was found with increasing dose, suggesting a disproportionate increase in the systemic partitioning of FdUrd when doses were escalated within a patient. Substantial levels of peritoneal 5-fluorouracil (FUra) were also detected in most of the subjects. Thus, FdUrd was found to have several desirable properties for i.p. administration: (1) a 2- to 4-log pharmacologic advantage, (2) the absence of local toxicities, and (3) a favorable antitumor spectrum and some evidence of antitumor effects in this phase I and pharmacology study. A 3,000-mg dose given in 2 l 1.5% dialysate for 3 consecutive days exhibited antitumor activity and produced no systemic toxicity except nausea and vomiting, which was controlled by antiemetics. This dose schedule is therefore recommended for phase II trials directed against small-volume disease in the peritoneal cavity, such as may be found in some stages of ovarian and gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, it is suitable for further exploration as a part of regimens including systemic therapy or drugs that modulate the action of fluoropyrimidines.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1990

Biological Modification of protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil with weekly leucovorin

Cynthia Gail Leichman; Lawrence Leichman; C. Paul Spears; Peter Rosen; Franco M. Muggia; Susan Jeffers; William Waugh

SummaryA clinical trial was designed to find the maximally tolerated dose of weekly leucovorin (LV) that could be combined with 4 weeks of protracted infusion (PI) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at a fixed soe of 200 mg/m2. A total of 36 patients with disseminated gastrointestinal malignancies were treated; 9 either progressed or died before receiving 4 weeks of treatment leaving 27 patients evaluable for toxicity and response. 5FU was given as a protracted infusion using an ambulatory infusion pump and indwelling venous access. LV doses included 20, 25, 50, and 75 mg/m2 given as an i. v. push at the time of weekly pump fill with 5FU. In all, 72% of the patients tolerated LV at 20 mg/m2 for 4 continous weeks, whereas the higher doses required treatment rests prior to 4 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity at all doses was stomatitis. No significant myelosuppression was seen; diarrhea was infrequent. Overall, 40% of the patients with measurable cancer had partial responses. In view of evidence of biologic and therapeutic effects of these weekly doses of 20 mg/m2 LV with 200 mg/m2 5FU per day given as a protracted infusion over 4 weeks, phase II trials and multimodality studies for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies are being initiated at our institution using this dose and schedule.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1996

Abdomino-pelvic hypertherma and intraperitoneal carboplatin in epithelial ovarian cancer: Feasibility, tolerance and pharmacology☆

Silvia C. Formenti; Prakash N. Shrivastava; Michael D. Sapozink; Gabor Jozsef; Kenneth K. Chan; Susan Jeffers; Paul C. Morrow; Franco M. Muggia

PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal (i.p.) carboplatin (CB) with concomitant abdomino-pelvic hyperthermia (HT) in advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with residual disease mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity after platinum based chemotherapy received an initial course of i.p. CB for baseline pharmacokinetics followed by three cycles of i.p. CB with concomitant regional hyperthermia. The goal of HT was to achieve at least 45 min of intraperitoneal temperature > 42 degrees but < 50 degrees C while maintaining normal tissue temperatures < 43 degrees C and systemic body temperatures < 38 degrees C. No analgesic premedication was used. Thermometry was recorded by multisensor fiberoptic probes placed within the peritoneal cavity, bladder, vagina, and oral cavity. RESULTS Thirteen patients received a total of 31 sessions. Our intraperitoneal temperature goal could not be achieved because of patient intolerance. At best, we could maintain intraperitoneal temperatures > 40 degrees C, for more than 40 min in 7 of 31 sessions. The average values of thermal variables were T90 = 40 degrees C, TAVE = 41 degrees C, TMIN = 38.2 degrees C, and TMAX = 42.9 degrees C. The mean maximum systemic temperature was 38 degrees C. Acute thermal toxicities requiring early interruption of hyperthermia were systemic temperature exceeding 38 degrees C (11 of 31), abdominal pain or generalized distress (20 of 31), and vomiting (2 of 31). Hematological toxicities were not increased by hyperthermia. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with enhanced clearance of CB by HT. Lower radio frequencies (< 75 MHz) achieved better heat deposition in the peritoneal cavity than higher frequencies (> 75 MHz). Two of the 13 patients (a Stage III and a Stage IV patient) are alive with no evidence of disease at 40 and 43 months from treatment. CONCLUSIONS Intraperitoneal temperatures in the range of 40 degrees C maintained for approximately 40 min can be achieved within the described setting. The probability of successful induction of therapeutic intraperitoneal temperatures appears to be higher when frequencies below 75 MHz are used. Patients who are potentially platinum sensitive and have minimal residual disease could potentially benefit from the combined treatment under the conditions studied. However, this temperature-time range appears inadequate against platinum resistant disease, and/or bulky residual pelvic disease. Alternative approaches such as whole body hyperthermia and carboplatin are warranted to overcome some of the obstacles observed.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1998

Phase I and pharmacologic study of estramustine phosphate and short infusions of paclitaxel in women with solid tumors.

Agustin A. Garcia; S Keren-Rosenberg; D Parimoo; M Rogers; Susan Jeffers; R Koda; Franco M. Muggia

PURPOSE We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1990

Phase I toxicity and pharmacology study of trimethylcolchicinic acid in patients with advanced malignancies

Eddie Hu; Richard H. Ko; Robert T. Koda; Peter Rosen; Susan Jeffers; Mark Scholtz; Franco M. Muggia

SummaryA phase I study of trimethylcolchicinic acid (TMCA) given orally once daily for 5 days every 3rd week was performed in 19 patients with advanced malignancies. Myelosuppression and mucositis were the major toxicities observed. Serum TMCA levels were monitored and appear to be useful in predicting toxicities. A partial response was seen in one lymphoma patient and stabilization of disease was noted in one patient each with prostatic and ovarian cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan Jeffers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Franco M. Muggia

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Agustin A. Garcia

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence Leichman

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynda D. Roman

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth K. Chan

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.Paul Morrow

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laila I. Muderspach

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tamar Safra

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Gail Leichman

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge