Susan M. Albring

The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams

This study explores the dynamics of virtual teams. We hypothesize that the use of a mixed-incentive reward structure will increase team member satisfaction, affect group cohesion and decrease perceived social loafing in a virtual team environment. We also hypothesize that team member satisfaction and team cohesion will increase and perceived social loafing will decrease with the use of a richer technology medium in a virtual team environment. In addition, we hypothesize that in a virtual team environment, team member satisfaction, group cohesion and perceived social loafing will differ between males and females. Using eighty-nine MBA students at a large southeastern university as participants for our study, we find that perceived social loafing decreases with the use of a mixed-incentive reward structure in a virtual team environment. We also find that perceived social loafing decreases with the use of a richer technology medium in a virtual team environment. Finally, we find that perceived social loafing differs between males and females and that females perceive more social loafing when there is not a mixed-incentive scheme. The results shed light on the role of gender in virtual teams.

IPO Underpricing and Audit Quality Differentiation Within Non-Big 5 Firms

The choice of a non-Big 5 audit firm is optimal for some IPO companies. The choice of audit firm is important because auditor reputation may influence the pricing of the offering. This paper investigates the relationship between IPO underpricing and auditor compensation and proxies for non-Big 5 audit quality. We develop a continuous measure of auditor reputation based on factor analysis. This measure of auditor reputation is associated with lower IPO underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that auditor quality is an important determinant for firms hiring non-Big 5 auditors. We also examine the underlying constructs for auditor quality to determine their separate effects on IPO underpricing and auditor quality. Non-Big 5 national firms are associated with lower underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that these firms are perceived to be quality differentiated from non-national firms. SEC experience for non-national firms is associated with higher audit fees, suggesting this experience is perceived to be valuable.

The Value Relevance of a Non-GAAP Performance Metric to the Capital Markets

Purpose - The study is driven by concerns raised by standard setters and others about the usefulness of performance reporting under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Of primary interest is whether explicitly defining what information should be included in earnings results in an earnings measure that is more relevant than operating earnings computed according to current GAAP. The purpose of this paper is to explore whether reducing management discretion in the reporting of performance adds to the value relevance of the performance measures reported to capital markets. Design/methodology/approach - The value relevance of this non-GAAP earnings measure is examined by estimating market valuation and returns models for 518 US firms included in the Standard & Poors 500 Index over the time period 2002-2007. Findings - Results show that the explicitly defined non-GAAP measure used is significantly associated with equity market values and returns and is significantly more value-relevant than the GAAP measure. Originality/value - The paper contributes to accounting literature assessing the relevance of earnings in setting equity market value. More specifically, it provides evidence consistent with prior results that non-GAAP performance measures are more useful in valuation than GAAP earnings. However, in contrast with prior studies, the more explicit performance measure the paper examines removes some of the classificatory discretion pervasive in other non-GAAP earnings metrics.

Unexpected Fees and the Prediction of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We investigate whether prior year unexpected audit fees help predict new material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting reported under Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX). Predicting material weaknesses may be useful to investors and other financial statement users because these disclosures have adverse economic impacts on disclosing firms. Unexpected fees are significantly associated with material weaknesses reported under Section 404, even after controlling for Section 302 disclosures and other factors associated with internal control weaknesses. Unexpected fees are associated with company-level weaknesses but are not significantly associated with account-specific weaknesses, consistent with differences in the nature and severity of the two types of material weaknesses. Our results are consistent with unexpected audit fees containing information on unobserved audit costs and client control risks, which help predict future internal control weaknesses.

The Effect of the Type and Number of Internal Control Weaknesses and Their Remediation on Audit Fees

Purpose - The implementation of compliance procedures associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 came at a great cost to most publicly-traded firms, largely due to the internal control disclosures required by Section 404 of the Act. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the inquiry on internal control effectiveness by examining the impact of the type (same or different) and number of internal control weaknesses on audit fees. The paper also examines whether firms that remediate continue to incur higher audit fees compared to firms that never disclosed a weakness. Design/methodology/approach - The authors evaluate the impact of internal control weaknesses and their remediation on audit fees using ordinary least squares regression for 9,122 firm year observations (3,096 unique firms) over the time period 2004-2007. Findings - The authors find: an incremental impact on audit fees of additional material weakness disclosures; firms that report the same material weakness pay higher fees than firms reporting a different material weakness in consecutive years; and audit fees remain high one, two, and three years following remediation compared to a firm that never disclosed an internal control weakness. Originality/value - In contrast with prior studies, the sample includes firms that remediated weaknesses, firms that failed to remediate weaknesses, and firms that did not have prior weaknesses. The results suggest that the failure to remediate has greater risk implications than new weaknesses and that material weaknesses are associated with higher audit fees several years after remediation.

Does The Firm Information Environment Influence Financing Decisions? A Test Using Disclosure Regulation

Extant theory claims a firm’s information environment impacts the choice between debt and equity financing. However, empirical evidence supporting this contention is limited. We evaluate this relation within the context of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD), which prohibited the use of selective disclosure. We find that firms with high proprietary costs of public disclosure are more likely to resort to debt financing following the passage of Reg FD. This relation is not sensitive to whether a firm has relied on selective disclosure in the pre-Reg FD regime. We also evaluate changes in firm disclosure policy and find that firms that adopted an expansive public disclosure policy are more likely to turn to equity financing. Overall, our evidence is consistent with the pecking order theory: firms with deteriorated firm information environments increase their use of less information-sensitive debt, whereas firms with improved information environments favor the use of equity financing. This paper was accepted ...