Susan M. Moore

Rabies-specific antibodies: measuring surrogates of protection against a fatal disease.

Antibodies play a central role in prophylaxis against many infectious agents. While neutralization is a primary function of antibodies, the Fc- and complement-dependent activities of these multifunctional proteins may also be critical in their ability to provide protection against most viruses. Protection against viral pathogens in vivo is complex, and while virus neutralization—the ability of antibody to inactivate virus infectivity, often measured in vitro—is important, it is often only a partial contributor in protection. The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) remains the “gold standard” assay to measure rabies virus–neutralizing antibodies. In addition to neutralization, the rabies-specific antigen-binding activity of antibodies may be measured through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), as well as other available methods. For any disease, in selecting the appropriate assay(s) to use to assess antibody titers, assay validation and how they are interpreted are important considerations—but for a fatal disease like rabies, they are of paramount importance. The innate limitations of a one-dimensional laboratory test for rabies antibody measurement, as well as the validation of the method of choice, must be carefully considered in the selection of an assay method and for the interpretation of results that might be construed as a surrogate of protection.

Adult dogs receiving a rabies booster dose with a recombinant adenovirus expressing rabies virus glycoprotein develop high titers of neutralizing antibodies.

Retired greyhound dogs, with low or absent antibody titers to rabies virus following previous vaccinations with commercially available vaccines, were immunized either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with a replication-defective recombinant adenovirus expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein termed Adrab.gp. Immunized animals developed high titers (geometric mean titers of 2630 and 5329) of viral neutralizing antibodies (VNA) against rabies virus by 10 days after vaccination. The antibody titers were even higher (geometric mean titers of 19349 and 122086) by 21 days after vaccination. The results indicate that the recombinant adenovirus expressing rabies virus glycoprotein is capable of inducing antibody immune responses in dogs and therefore may be developed as a rabies virus vaccine for dogs.

Antibodies induced by vaccination with purified chick embryo cell culture vaccine (PCECV) cross-neutralize non-classical bat lyssavirus strains

Tissue-culture vaccines like purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV) have been shown to provide protection against classical rabies virus (RABV) via pre-exposure or post-exposure prophylaxis. A cross-neutralization study was conducted using a panel of 100 human sera, to determine, to what extent after vaccination with PCECV protection exists against non-classical bat lyssavirus strains like European bat lyssavirus (EBLV) type 1 and 2 and Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV). Virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) concentrations against the rabies virus variants CVS-11, ABLV, EBLV-1 and EBLV-2 were determined by using a modified rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. For ABLV and EBLV-2, the comparison to CVS-11 revealed almost identical results (100% adequate VNA concentrations >or=0.5 IU/mL; correlation coefficient r(2)=0.69 and 0.77, respectively), while for EBLV-1 more scattering was observed (97% adequate VNA concentrations; r(2)=0.50). In conclusion, vaccination with PCECV produces adequate VNA concentrations against classical RABV as well as non-classical lyssavirus strains ABLV, EBLV-1, and EBLV-2.

Induction of protective immunity by topic application of a recombinant adenovirus expressing rabies virus glycoprotein.

The objective of this study was to determine if a replication defective recombinant adenovirus expressing rabies virus glycoprotein (Adrab.gp) given through a non-invasive vaccination route (by topical application) onto the skin (NIVS) could elicit an immune response and/or protection against rabies. Groups of mice were immunized by NIVS with various doses of Adrab.gp. For comparison, groups of mice were immunized intramuscularly, subcutaneously, or intradermally with Adrab.gp. Mice received two booster immunizations at 1 and 2 months after the first immunization. Virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers were measured at day 21 after the first and second immunizations and at day 14 after the third immunization. Fifty percent of the mice immunized by NIVS with 2 x 10(7) and 2 x 10(8)pfu Adrab.gp vaccine developed VNA, whereas none of the control mice or the mice immunized by NIVS with the lowest dose (2 x 10(6)pfu) of Adrab.gp virus developed VNA. However, this low dose induced high titers of VNA in mice immunized by parenteral routes. Two weeks after the last immunization, all the mice were challenged with a lethal dose of rabies virus. More than 70% of the animals immunized by NIVS with > or = 2 x 10(7)pfu Adrab.gp virus survived the challenge, whereas all the mice in the negative control group and the group immunized by NIVS with the lowest dose of Adrab.gp succumbed to rabies. Taken together, the results suggest that NIVS with Adrab.gp can induce VNA production and protection against lethal challenge with rabies virus in mice.

Validation of the Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test for Rabies Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Clinical Samples

ABSTRACT Monoclonal antibodies are successful biologics in treating a variety of diseases, including the prevention or treatment of viral infections. CL184 is a 1:1 combination of two human monoclonal IgG1 antibodies (CR57 and CR4098) against rabies virus, produced in the PER.C6 human cell line. The two antibodies are developed as replacements of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and equine rabies immune globulin (ERIG) in postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) is a cell-based virus neutralization assay which is usually performed to determine the biological potency of a vaccine and to measure the levels of protection against rabies in humans and animals. In order to confirm the suitability of this assay as a pharmacodynamic assay, we conducted a validation using both HRIG- and CL184-spiked serum samples and sera from vaccinated donors. The validation results met all analytical acceptance criteria and showed that HRIG and CL184 serum concentrations can be compared. Stability experiments showed that serum samples were stable in various suboptimal conditions but that rabies virus should be handled swiftly once thawed. We concluded that the assay is suitable for the measurement of polyclonal and monoclonal rabies neutralizing antibodies in clinical serum samples.

EXPOSURE OF HOODED CAPUCHIN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA CAY) TO A RABID BAT AT A ZOOLOGICAL PARK

Abstract On 27 May 1999, a big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) was discovered on an island exhibit at the Denver Zoo that contained a troop of 15 hooded capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella cay). The monkeys were attacking the bat when it was discovered. The bat was collected and humanely euthanatized without direct handling and submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Virology Laboratory for rabies evaluation. The monkeys had not been vaccinated against rabies virus. The next day, the laboratory confirmed that the bat was positive for rabies. The recommendations from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were to euthanatize the monkeys or quarantine them and comply with the human nonvaccinated postexposure protocol. A 1-ml dose of a killed rabies vaccine was administered i.m. in the hip on each of days 2, 7, 12, 19, and 33 postexposure, and a single dose of human rabies immune globulin was administered i.m. 5 days postexposure. Blood was collected under anesthesia in order to evaluate the immune response after rabies vaccination from six monkeys 5 days postexposure, six monkeys 19 days postexposure (five of the six monkeys were the same monkeys bled 5 days postexposure), 15 monkeys 67 days postexposure, and 13 monkeys approximately 1 yr postexposure. All of the monkeys developed and maintained levels of rabies virus neutralizing antibody above 0.05 IU/ml by 67 days postexposure. Although a serologic titer of 0.05 IU/ml indicates an adequate human response after rabies vaccination, no similar information is available for nonhuman primates. To date, none of the monkeys has succumbed to rabies.

Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife

Both cell-mediated and humoral immune effectors are important in combating rabies infection, although the humoral response receives greater attention regarding rabies prevention. The principle of preventive vaccination has been adopted for strategies of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) of wildlife reservoir populations for decades to control circulation of rabies virus in free-ranging hosts. There remains much debate about the levels of rabies antibodies (and the assays to measure them) that confer resistance to rabies virus. In this paper, data from published literature and our own unpublished animal studies on the induction of rabies binding and neutralizing antibodies following oral immunization of animals with live attenuated or recombinant rabies vaccines, are examined as correlates of protection against lethal rabies infection in captive challenge settings. Analysis of our studies suggests that, though serum neutralization test results are expected to reflect in vivo protection, the blocking enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) result at Day 28 was a better predictor of survival. ELISA kits may have an advantage of greater precision and ability to compare results among different studies and laboratories based on the inherent standardization of the kit format. This paper examines current knowledge and study findings to guide meaningful interpretation of serology results in oral baiting monitoring.

Humoral immune response to oral rabies vaccination in raccoon kits: problems and implications.

Little is known about the immunogenicity of RABORAL V-RG(®) (V-RG), an oral rabies vaccine, in raccoon kits (Procyon lotor). The objectives of this study were to characterize the immunogenicity of V-RG in young kits and investigate the potential impact of maternal antibodies on response to vaccination of nursing raccoon kits. Raccoon kits (n=30) were vaccinated at either 3 weeks of age, 7 weeks of age, or assigned as contact controls. Nineteen kits (73%) that were whelped by unvaccinated mothers responded to V-RG exposure (orally or indirect contact) by production of detectable rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) while 7 (27%) kits did not respond to V-RG exposure. Four kits were whelped by a mother with high levels of RVNA and all four kits acquired maternal rabies antibodies. At approximately 9 months of age, all kits were inoculated with a killed rabies vaccine, IMRAB3(®). The kits which initially responded to V-RG oral vaccination or contact with vaccinated littermates demonstrated a rapid anamnestic response. In contrast, the V-RG non-responders and those with acquired maternal antibodies exhibited a primary immune response to IMRAB3(®), where RVNA levels were substantially lower on days 5 and 7 than the levels in the animals with an anamnestic response. These findings suggest that the naïve contact kits and the nonresponsive kits most likely remained susceptible to rabies virus infection whereas the ones demonstrating response to V-RG would not have been susceptible to a rabies virus infection.

VACCINATION OF EGYPTIAN FRUIT BATS (ROUSETTUS AEGYPTIACUS) WITH MONOVALENT INACTIVATED RABIES VACCINE

Abstract Twenty-six captive, adult Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) were tested for the presence of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test before and after vaccination. The bats were randomly assigned into three treatment groups: group A (n = 10) bats each received one 0.1-ml dose of monovalent inactivated rabies vaccine, group B (n = 10) bats each received two 0.1-ml doses of vaccine given 30 days apart, and group C (n = 6) bats remained unvaccinated. Plasma was collected from all bats before vaccination and on days 14, 30, 60, and 360. All bats were seronegative before vaccination, and all unvaccinated animals remained negative throughout the study. Rabies virus neutralization titers remained above 0.5 IU/ml from day 30 through day 360 for both vaccinated groups. Group B had significantly higher titers on day 60. This study demonstrated a measurable humoral immune response after vaccination with an inactivated rabies vaccine, with two doses producing a higher level of RVNA. This study confirms the feasibility of a rabies vaccination program for Egyptian fruit bats.

The Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test

Measurement of the immune response to rabies vaccination or exposure to rabies virus (RABV) antigens was initially accomplished by the mouse neutralization test (MNT). Since the development of the Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT), it has been the method of choice for the majority of samples tested for rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA). It is a cell-based assay requiring live RABV and a permissive cell line, a fluorescence microscope, and performance in Biosafety Level 2 facilities. Because the test system mimics the virus–antibody-cell interactions that determine the function of the RVNA (prevention of infection), it is the best assay to determine the level of response. Selection and maintenance of critical reagents, as well as meticulous performance of the assay steps, are essential for accurate and precise results.