Susan Mateika

Site of airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea before and after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

This study describes a simple method, based on a movable catheter technique, for use during routine polysomnography to identify the site of obstruction, and this has been applied to 51 patients with suspected sleep apnea. The obstruction was found to be retropalatal in 30, retrolingual in 7, and could not be determined in 14 patients (12 had no sleep apnea, 1 did not sleep, and 1 had central sleep apnea). Twelve of these patients had uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with preoperative and postoperative polysomnograms to determine the site of obstruction. The preoperative obstruction was retropalatal in nine and retrolingual in three. Postoperatively, four patients (one with retrolingual obstruction and three with retropalatal obstruction) no longer had sleep apnea. In the remaining eight patients, the site of obstruction was unchanged from the preoperative one. Several conclusions result: 1. the movable catheter technique offers a simple way to determine the site of obstruction in patients with significant obstructive sleep apnea, 2. most such patients obstruct in the retropalatal region, and 3. preoperative localization of the site of obstruction to the retropalatal region does not seem to improve the surgical outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.

Snoring and nasal resistance during sleep

Although it is widely accepted that nasal obstruction leads to snoring and sleep apnea, the relationship between these variables is not clear, mainly because of the lack of studies in which nasal resistance (Rna) and snoring were measured concurrently. The authors studied eight nonapneic snoring men with healthy noses by nocturnal polysomnography that included quantitative assessment of snoring and concomitant nasal resistance. In six of these eight patients nasal resistance increased during sleep, but there was no significant change for the group as a whole between wakefulness (0.209 ± 0.224 Pa/cm3 per second) and sleep (0.292 ± 0.203 Pa/cm3 per second). Linear regression analysis showed no significant correlation between sleeping nasal resistance and snoring index (partial R2 = .44, P = .071). We used each subject as his own control and compared the snoring profile at a time during sleep when nasal resistance was at its highest (0.550 ± 0.375 Pa/cm3 per second) and lowest (0.146 ± 0.090 Pa/cm3 per second) levels. Despite the significant (P<.01) differences in nasal resistance, they were not reflected in the number of snores or their sound intensity. It is concluded that nasal obstruction during sleep is not correlated significantly to frequency or intensity of snoring during exclusively nasal breathing.

Postural Changes in Respiratory Airflow Pressure and Resistance in Nasal, Hypopharyngeal, and Pharyngeal Airway in Normal Subjects

We investigated the effect of posture on nasal and pharyngeal resistance in 12 healthy subjects studied during wakefulness. Airway pressure and airflow were measured with subjects seated and in dorsal and left lateral recumbency, during inspiration and expiration. We found that pharyngeal resistance was approximately four to six times lower than the nasal resistance. Only pharyngeal resistance was significantly increased upon assumption of a supine posture, from 0.02 ± 0.01 Pa/mL per second when seated to 0.06 ± 0.05 Pa/mL per second in dorsal recumbency and to 0.05 ± 0.04 Pa/mL per second in left lateral recumbency. Mean nasal and pharyngeal resistances doubled upon assumption of a supine posture, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in pharyngeal resistance beween inspiration and expiration. Finally, there was a strong linear relationship between pharyngeal pressure and pharyngeal resistance (r = .98, p < .0001). We concluded that in normal awake subjects 1) pharyngeal resistance increases with assumption of a supine posture, 2) the walls of the pharynx are not compliant enough to alter their resistance in response to inspiratory and expiratory pressure changes, and 3) it may be possible to infer pharyngeal resistance from measurements of pressure alone, without measurement of airflow.

Sleep and posture

Computer‐assisted open catheter studies of 10 healthy, nose‐breathing men in dorsal and in lateral recumbent sleep demonstrated stable intrasubject transpharyngeal differential pressures and airflow resistances. They averaged 19.6 Pa (± standard deviation [SD] 11.9) and 0.103 Pa/cm3 per second (± SD 0.065) in the dorsal posture and stage II sleep during quiet breathing and were not significantly different in the lateral posture or in stage I sleep. Five subjects were snorers, and their pharyngeal airflow pressures and resistances increased substantially during quiet breathing on assumption of recumbency and much more in sleep. In the 5 subjects who were nonsnorers, postural changes were not significant and sleep increases were moderate. During snoring, transpharyngeal pressures and resistances increased even further, averaging 188 Pa and 1.02 Pa/cm3 per second for the whole group. Transpharyngeal differential pressures and hypopharyngeal transmural pressures frequently exceeded 300 Pa in inspiration and in expiration during periods of snoring. Yet, transpharyngeal differential pressures and resistances did not reveal appreciable differences between phases that would indicate compliant change of pharyngeal cross section. Breathing frequency was unchanged, but ventilation was significantly diminished at elevated upper airway resistances (P<.01). Transpharyngeal resistances and differential pressures varied independently from widely differing nasal resistances. As with our earlier studies, pressure measurements alone clearly demonstrated breathing patterns and events.

Pharyngeal airflow during sleep

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of sleep and nasal resistance on pharyngeal airflow in a group of healthy male adults without complaint of habitual snoring. Twelve subjects aged 21 to 60 years were studied in a sleep laboratory during exclusive nasal breathing. Nasal and pharyngeal airflow variables were measured concomitantly at different stages of sleep. Awake pharyngeal resistance averaged 0.02-0.03 Pa/cm3/s in recumbency. In stage 2 sleep and quiet breathing resistance increased by a factor of 3-4 and by a factor of 7-8 during snoring. Increased nasal loading did not increase pharyngeal resistance further or induce snoring. Mostly, increased pharyngeal resistances were of similar magnitude in both phases of respiration, but in a few instances inspiratory resistance exceeded that in expiration, and in a similar number the reverse was found. Overall, compliance of the pharyngeal airway was not a prominent feature in this group of subjects. The relationship between transpharyngeal pressure and resistance should be studied further in order to simplify future studies of airflow during sleep.