Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Susan T. Glassmeyer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Susan T. Glassmeyer.


Environment International | 2009

Disposal practices for unwanted residential medications in the United States

Susan T. Glassmeyer; Elizabeth K. Hinchey; Susan E. Boehme; Christian G. Daughton; Ilene S. Ruhoy; Octavia Conerly; Rebecca L. Daniels; Lisa Lauer; Meg McCarthy; Todd G. Nettesheim; Kathy Sykes; Virginia G. Thompson

The occurrence of trace levels of prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals in the environment began to receive concerted attention nearly two decades ago. The publics growing awareness and concern over the presence of these chemicals, especially in drinking water, has served to catalyze considerable discussion and debate regarding the best practices for disposal of unused or unwanted medications. In the United States, the first federal guidance for consumers was issued in 2007. It recommends discarding unused pharmaceuticals to household trash, after taking precautions to mix the pharmaceuticals with an inert substance and conceal the contents from view. Providing the consumer with additional options for conscientious disposal are various community, city, and state collection events, ongoing programs, and government-funded pilot projects. These strategies include the opportunity to mail or bring unused medications to various collection points, such as pharmacies, for eventual destruction. All of these approaches to medication disposal play roles in reducing the introduction of pharmaceuticals to the environment.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2013

Development of Quantitative PCR Assays Targeting the 16S rRNA Genes of Enterococcus spp. and Their Application to the Identification of Enterococcus Species in Environmental Samples

Hodon Ryu; Michael Henson; Michael Elk; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; John F. Griffith; Denene Blackwood; Rachel T. Noble; Michele Gourmelon; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Jorge W. Santo Domingo

ABSTRACT The detection of environmental enterococci has been determined primarily by using culture-based techniques that might exclude some enterococcal species as well as those that are nonculturable. To address this, the relative abundances of enterococci were examined by challenging fecal and water samples against a currently available genus-specific assay (Entero1). To determine the diversity of enterococcal species, 16S rRNA gene-based group-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays were developed and evaluated against eight of the most common environmental enterococcal species. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of 439 presumptive environmental enterococcal strains were analyzed to study further the diversity of enterococci and to confirm the specificities of group-specific assays. The group-specific qPCR assays showed relatively high amplification rates with targeted species (>98%), although some assays cross-amplified with nontargeted species (1.3 to 6.5%). The results with the group-specific assays also showed that different enterococcal species co-occurred in most fecal samples. The most abundant enterococci in water and fecal samples were Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, although we identified more water isolates as Enterococcus casseliflavus than as any of the other species. The prevalence of the Entero1 marker was in agreement with the combined number of positive signals determined by the group-specific assays in most fecal samples, except in gull feces. On the other hand, the number of group-specific assay signals was lower in all water samples tested, suggesting that other enterococcal species are present in these samples. While the results highlight the value of genus- and group-specific assays for detecting the major enterococcal groups in environmental water samples, additional studies are needed to determine further the diversity, distributions, and relative abundances of all enterococcal species found in water.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States

Susan T. Glassmeyer; Edward T. Furlong; Dana W. Kolpin; Angela L. Batt; Robert Benson; J. Scott Boone; Octavia D. Conerly; Maura J. Donohue; Dawn King; Mitchell S. Kostich; Heath Mash; Stacy Pfaller; Kathleen M. Schenck; Jane Ellen Simmons; Eunice A. Varughese; Stephen Vesper; Eric N. Villegas; Vickie S. Wilson

When chemical or microbial contaminants are assessed for potential effect or possible regulation in ambient and drinking waters, a critical first step is determining if the contaminants occur and if they are at concentrations that may cause human or ecological health concerns. To this end, source and treated drinking water samples from29 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) were analyzed as part of a two-phase study to determine whether chemical and microbial constituents, many of which are considered contaminants of emerging concern, were detectable in the waters. Of the 84 chemicals monitored in the 9 Phase I DWTPs, 27 were detected at least once in the source water, and 21 were detected at least once in treated drinking water. In Phase II, which was a broader and more comprehensive assessment, 247 chemical and microbial analytes were measured in 25 DWTPs, with 148 detected at least once in the source water, and 121 detected at least once in the treated drinking water. The frequency of detection was often related to the analyte’s contaminant class, as pharmaceuticals and anthropogenic waste indicators tended to be infrequently detected and more easily removed during treatment, while per and polyfluoroalkyl substances and inorganic constituents were both more frequently detected and, overall, more resistant to treatment. The data collected as part of this project will be used to help inform evaluation of unregulated contaminants in surface water, groundwater, and drinking water.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Comparison of in vitro estrogenic activity and estrogen concentrations in source and treated waters from 25 U.S. drinking water treatment plants

Justin M. Conley; Nicola Evans; Heath Mash; Laura Rosenblum; Kathleen M. Schenck; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Edward T. Furlong; Dana W. Kolpin; Vickie S. Wilson

In vitro bioassays have been successfully used to screen for estrogenic activity in wastewater and surface water, however, few have been applied to treated drinking water. Here, extracts of source and treated water samples were assayed for estrogenic activity using T47D-KBluc cells and analyzed by liquid chromatography-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LC-FTMS) for natural and synthetic estrogens (including estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol, and ethinyl estradiol). None of the estrogens were detected above the LC-FTMS quantification limits in treated samples and only 5 source waters had quantifiable concentrations of estrone, whereas 3 treated samples and 16 source samples displayed in vitro estrogenicity. Estrone accounted for the majority of estrogenic activity in respective samples, however the remaining samples that displayed estrogenic activity had no quantitative detections of known estrogenic compounds by chemical analyses. Source water estrogenicity (max, 0.47ng 17β-estradiol equivalents (E2Eq) L-1) was below levels that have been linked to adverse effects in fish and other aquatic organisms. Treated water estrogenicity (max, 0.078ngE2EqL-1) was considerably below levels that are expected to be biologically relevant to human consumers. Overall, the advantage of using in vitro techniques in addition to analytical chemical determinations was displayed by the sensitivity of the T47D-KBluc bioassay, coupled with the ability to measure cumulative effects of mixtures, specifically when unknown chemicals may be present.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States: Pharmaceuticals.

Edward T. Furlong; Angela L. Batt; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Mary C. Noriega; Dana W. Kolpin; Heath Mash; Kathleen M. Schenck

Mobile and persistent chemicals that are present in urban wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals, may survive on-site or municipal wastewater treatment and post-discharge environmental processes. These pharmaceuticals have the potential to reach surface and groundwaters, essential drinking-water sources. A joint, two-phase U.S. Geological Survey-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study examined source and treated waters from 25 drinking-water treatment plants from across the United States. Treatment plants that had probable wastewater inputs to their source waters were selected to assess the prevalence of pharmaceuticals in such source waters, and to identify which pharmaceuticals persist through drinking-water treatment. All samples were analyzed for 24 pharmaceuticals in Phase I and for 118 in Phase II. In Phase I, 11 pharmaceuticals were detected in all source-water samples, with a maximum of nine pharmaceuticals detected in any one sample. The median number of pharmaceuticals for all 25 samples was five. Quantifiable pharmaceutical detections were fewer, with a maximum of five pharmaceuticals in any one sample and a median for all samples of two. In Phase II, 47 different pharmaceuticals were detected in all source-water samples, with a maximum of 41 pharmaceuticals detected in any one sample. The median number of pharmaceuticals for all 25 samples was eight. For 37 quantifiable pharmaceuticals in Phase II, median concentrations in source water were below 113ng/L. For both Phase I and Phase II campaigns, substantially fewer pharmaceuticals were detected in treated water samples than in corresponding source-water samples. Seven different pharmaceuticals were detected in all Phase I treated water samples, with a maximum of four detections in any one sample and a median of two pharmaceuticals for all samples. In Phase II a total of 26 different pharmaceuticals were detected in all treated water samples, with a maximum of 20 pharmaceuticals detected in any one sample and a median of 2 pharmaceuticals detected for all 25 samples. Source-water type influences the presence of pharmaceuticals in source and treated water. Treatment processes appear effective in reducing concentrations of most pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals more consistently persisting through treatment include carbamazepine, bupropion, cotinine, metoprolol, and lithium. Pharmaceutical concentrations and compositions from this study provide an important base data set for further sublethal, long-term exposure assessments, and for understanding potential effects of these and other contaminants of emerging concern upon human and ecosystem health.


Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology | 2006

Matrix‐Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time‐of‐Flight Mass Spectrometry‐Based Analysis of Giardia lamblia and Giardia muris

Eric N. Villegas; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Michael W. Ware; Samuel L. Hayes; Frank W. Schaefer

IARDIA is the protozoan parasite that is the etiologic agentof giardiasis. This illness is the most common parasitic dis-ease and is estimated to infect at least 100,000 people each year inthe United States (Furness, Beach, and Roberts 2000). Symptomsof giardiasis range from asymptomatic to severe abdominal pain,chronic diarrhea, andin rarecases,death, withyoung children andimmunocompromised individuals being at the greatest risk of ser-ious illness (Adam 1991; Upcroft and Upcroft 2001). Infectiontypically occurs through the fecal-oral route and has been docu-mented to be associated with many waterborne disease outbreaksworldwide. A majority of these outbreaks occurred due to con-tamination of the drinking water supplies with untreated sewage.There are at least six species of Giardia including Giardia lam-blia (also known as Giardia duodenalis or Giardia intestinalis),which can infect a wide range of hosts including humans (Caccioetal.2005).Thecurrentdetectionmethodemployedtomonitorthepresence of Giardia cysts in surface and drinking water relies pri-marily on microscopic techniquesthat detect thepresenceof Giar-dia cysts in the sample, but the method is not species specific nordoes it determine cyst viability (U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency 1999). More recently, a PCR-based genotyping tool hasbeen developed and used to identify the different Giardia spp.present in environmental water (Sulaiman et al. 2004). This tech-nique however can be prone to contamination and thus other al-ternative approaches are currently being explored. In particular,matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight massspectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been used to identify andclassify bacteria (Donohue et al. 2006) and parasites (Magnuson,Owens,andKelty2000;Mouraetal.2003),althoughthisapproachhas not been applied to study Giardia spp.This manuscript describes a MALDI-TOF MS-based approachthat is used to characterize the mass spectral fingerprints of intactG. lambliaandGiardiamuriscysts.Thisstudy identified commonmass spectral peaks shared by the two species as well as peaksspecific to G. lamblia and others specific to G. muris, which areuseful in differentiating the two organisms. Additional analysesrevealed that the mass spectral profiles of intact cysts consistedpartly of peaks representing trophozoite-derived proteins, basedon comparison with purified trophozoites. These results suggestthe potential application of intact cell MALDI-TOF MS as an al-ternative high throughput approach for species identification ofGiardia spp.MATERIALS AND METHODSCyst propagation and purification. Giardia lamblia (H3strain; assemblage B) and G. muris (obtained from Drs. ErikHewlett and John Andrews, Case Western Reserve School ofMedicine, Cleveland, OH) cysts were propagated using Mongo-lian gerbils or CF-1 mice, respectively (Jackson Laboratories, BarHarbor, ME). Feces from infected rodents were collected andcysts were harvested and purified using a sucrose/percoll (Sigma,St. Louis, MO) gradient (Hayes et al. 2003). Purified cysts used inall experiments were 7 days from the time of collection.In vitro excystation and trophozoite purification. The invitro excystation of cysts was performed as described (Rice andSchaefer 1981) and efficiency of excystation was determinedmicroscopically to routinely be 90% excysted. Following ex-cystation, trophozoite/cyst mixtures were labeled with FITC-con-jugated anti-Giardia antibody (Giardi-a-Glo


Science of The Total Environment | 2016

Microbial pathogens in source and treated waters from drinking water treatment plants in the United States and implications for human health

Dawn King; Maura J. Donohue; Stephen Vesper; Eric N. Villegas; Michael W. Ware; Megan E. Vogel; Edward F. Furlong; Dana W. Kolpin; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Stacy Pfaller

An occurrence survey was conducted on selected pathogens in source and treated drinking water collected from 25 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in the United States. Water samples were analyzed for the protozoa Giardia and Cryptosporidium (EPA Method 1623); the fungi Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus (quantitative PCR [qPCR]); and the bacteria Legionella pneumophila (qPCR), Mycobacterium avium, M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis, and Mycobacterium intracellulare (qPCR and culture). Cryptosporidium and Giardia were detected in 25% and in 46% of the source water samples, respectively (treated waters were not tested). Aspergillus fumigatus was the most commonly detected fungus in source waters (48%) but none of the three fungi were detected in treated water. Legionella pneumophila was detected in 25% of the source water samples but in only 4% of treated water samples. M. avium and M. intracellulare were both detected in 25% of source water, while all three mycobacteria were detected in 36% of treated water samples. Five species of mycobacteria, Mycobacterium mucogenicum, Mycobacterium phocaicum, Mycobacterium triplex, Mycobacterium fortuitum, and Mycobacterium lentiflavum were cultured from treated water samples. Although these DWTPs represent a fraction of those in the U.S., the results suggest that many of these pathogens are widespread in source waters but that treatment is generally effective in reducing them to below detection limits. The one exception is the mycobacteria, which were commonly detected in treated water, even when not detected in source waters.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Human health screening and public health significance of contaminants of emerging concern detected in public water supplies

Robert Benson; Octavia D. Conerly; William Sander; Angela L. Batt; J. Scott Boone; Edward T. Furlong; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Dana W. Kolpin; Heath Mash; Kathleen M. Schenck; Jane Ellen Simmons

The source water and treated drinking water from twenty five drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) across the United States were sampled in 2010-2012. Samples were analyzed for 247 contaminants using 15 chemical and microbiological methods. Most of these contaminants are not regulated currently either in drinking water or in discharges to ambient water by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or other U.S. regulatory agencies. This analysis shows that there is little public health concern for most of the contaminants detected in treated water from the 25 DWTPs participating in this study. For vanadium, the calculated Margin of Exposure (MOE) was less than the screening MOE in two DWTPs. For silicon, the calculated MOE was less than the screening MOE in one DWTP. Additional study, for example a national survey may be needed to determine the number of people ingesting vanadium and silicon above a level of concern. In addition, the concentrations of lithium found in treated water from several DWTPs are within the range previous research has suggested to have a human health effect. Additional investigation of this issue is necessary. Finally, new toxicological data suggest that exposure to manganese at levels in public water supplies may present a public health concern which will require a robust assessment of this information.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

The importance of quality control in validating concentrations of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking water samples

Angela L. Batt; Edward T. Furlong; Heath Mash; Susan T. Glassmeyer; Dana W. Kolpin

A national-scale survey of 247 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including organic and inorganic chemical compounds, and microbial contaminants, was conducted in source and treated drinking water samples from 25 treatment plants across the United States. Multiple methods were used to determine these CECs, including six analytical methods to measure 174 pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and pesticides. A three-component quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program was designed for the subset of 174 CECs which allowed us to assess and compare performances of the methods used. The three components included: 1) a common field QA/QC protocol and sample design, 2) individual investigator-developed method-specific QA/QC protocols, and 3) a suite of 46 method comparison analytes that were determined in two or more analytical methods. Overall method performance for the 174 organic chemical CECs was assessed by comparing spiked recoveries in reagent, source, and treated water over a two-year period. In addition to the 247 CECs reported in the larger drinking water study, another 48 pharmaceutical compounds measured did not consistently meet predetermined quality standards. Methodologies that did not seem suitable for these analytes are overviewed. The need to exclude analytes based on method performance demonstrates the importance of additional QA/QC protocols.


Science of The Total Environment | 2017

Aquatic concentrations of chemical analytes compared to ecotoxicity estimates

Mitchell S. Kostich; Robert W. Flick; Angela L. Batt; Heath Mash; J. Scott Boone; Edward T. Furlong; Dana W. Kolpin; Susan T. Glassmeyer

We describe screening level estimates of potential aquatic toxicity posed by 227 chemical analytes that were measured in 25 ambient water samples collected as part of a joint USGS/USEPA drinking water plant study. Measured concentrations were compared to biological effect concentration (EC) estimates, including USEPA aquatic life criteria, effective plasma concentrations of pharmaceuticals, published toxicity data summarized in the USEPA ECOTOX database, and chemical structure-based predictions. Potential dietary exposures were estimated using a generic 3-tiered food web accumulation scenario. For many analytes, few or no measured effect data were found, and for some analytes, reporting limits exceeded EC estimates, limiting the scope of conclusions. Results suggest occasional occurrence above ECs for copper, aluminum, strontium, lead, uranium, and nitrate. Sparse effect data for manganese, antimony, and vanadium suggest that these analytes may occur above ECs, but additional effect data would be desirable to corroborate EC estimates. These conclusions were not affected by bioaccumulation estimates. No organic analyte concentrations were found to exceed EC estimates, but ten analytes had concentrations in excess of 1/10th of their respective EC: triclocarban, norverapamil, progesterone, atrazine, metolachlor, triclosan, para-nonylphenol, ibuprofen, venlafaxine, and amitriptyline, suggesting more detailed characterization of these analytes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Susan T. Glassmeyer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dana W. Kolpin

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward T. Furlong

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela L. Batt

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heath Mash

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen M. Schenck

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Scott Boone

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric N. Villegas

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael W. Ware

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mitchell S. Kostich

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dawn King

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge