Susanne Bell

An analysis of the in vitro and in vivo phenotypes of mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 lacking glycoproteins gG, gE, gI or the putative gJ.

Mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) lacking glycoproteins gG, gE, gI or the putative gJ were constructed by inserting a lacZ expression cassette within the US4, US8, US7 and US5 genes respectively. Revertant viruses were then constructed by rescue with a wild-type DNA fragment. Each of these mutant viruses, by comparison with the parental virus HSV-1 SC16, exhibited normal particle to infectivity ratios, and had no discernible phenotypic abnormalities in baby hamster kidney-21 cells following high or low multiplicity infections. Infection of mice by scarification of the ear with these mutant viruses showed the following. (i) Interruption of the US5 (gJ) gene has no effect on the ability of HSV-1 to multiply at the inoculation site or its ability to enter or multiply in the peripheral or central nervous system (CNS). This shows that the US5 gene provides a convenient site for the insertion of foreign genes for both in vitro and in vivo studies. (ii) Disruption of the US4 (gG) gene results in marginal attenuation in the mouse ear model. (iii) Disruption of the US7 (gI) or US8 (gE) genes results in pronounced attenuation; virus was rapidly cleared from the inoculation site and was barely detectable in sensory ganglia or in the CNS. The failure of gI-negative or gE-negative viruses to replicate efficiently at the inoculation site in vivo led to the investigation of virus behaviour in epithelial cells in vitro. Viruses lacking gE or gI adsorbed to and entered these cells at normal rates compared with the parental virus, but formed minute plaques. This is consistent with a failure of cell-to-cell spread by the cell contact route. This was confirmed by measurement of the rate of increase in infectious centre numbers following low multiplicity infections. The view that gE and gI influence interactions between cells at the plasma membrane was reinforced by showing that the introduction of disrupted gE or gI genes into a syncytial, but otherwise syngeneic, background resulted in a non-syncytial phenotype. We conclude that the gE-gI complex plays a part, at least in some cell types, in the interactions at the cell surface that allow transmission of the virus from infected to uninfected cells by cell contact. In syncytial strains this leads to uncontrolled membrane fusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Transactivation of programmed ribosomal frameshifting by a viral protein.

Significance Ribosomes synthesize proteins by translating mRNAs into linear chains of amino acids through the decoding of consecutive nucleotide triplets (codons). Specific mRNA signals, however, can stimulate ribosomes to shift into an alternative triplet reading frame (ribosomal frameshifting) resulting in translation of a different protein. Typically, such signals are regions of intramolecular nucleotide base-pairing in the mRNA which form structures that stall ribosome progress. Here we show that the frameshifting signal used to express the nsp2TF and nsp2N proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, an important swine pathogen, requires the action of a transacting viral protein rather than a structured RNA. This novel mechanism of gene expression may also be used by other viruses or in cellular gene expression. Programmed −1 ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) is a widely used translational mechanism facilitating the expression of two polypeptides from a single mRNA. Commonly, the ribosome interacts with an mRNA secondary structure that promotes −1 frameshifting on a homopolymeric slippery sequence. Recently, we described an unusual −2 frameshifting (−2 PRF) signal directing efficient expression of a transframe protein [nonstructural protein 2TF (nsp2TF)] of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) from an alternative reading frame overlapping the viral replicase gene. Unusually, this arterivirus PRF signal lacks an obvious stimulatory RNA secondary structure, but as confirmed here, can also direct the occurrence of −1 PRF, yielding a third, truncated nsp2 variant named “nsp2N.” Remarkably, we now show that both −2 and −1 PRF are transactivated by a protein factor, specifically a PRRSV replicase subunit (nsp1β). Embedded in nsp1β’s papain-like autoproteinase domain, we identified a highly conserved, putative RNA-binding motif that is critical for PRF transactivation. The minimal RNA sequence required for PRF was mapped within a 34-nt region that includes the slippery sequence and a downstream conserved CCCANCUCC motif. Interaction of nsp1β with the PRF signal was demonstrated in pull-down assays. These studies demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that a protein can function as a transactivator of ribosomal frameshifting. The newly identified frameshifting determinants provide potential antiviral targets for arterivirus disease control and prevention. Moreover, protein-induced transactivation of frameshifting may be a widely used mechanism, potentially including previously undiscovered viral strategies to regulate viral gene expression and/or modulate host cell translation upon infection.

The herpes simplex virus type 1 Fc receptor discriminates between IgG1 allotypes.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV‐1) expresses a complex of two virally encoded glycoproteins, gE and gI, which is capable of binding nonimmune human IgG. The gE‐gI complex has thus become known as an Fc receptor (FcR), which reportedly binds human IgG subclasses in the order IgG4 > IgG1 ≥ IgG2 and does not bind IgG3 from many individuals. There is, however, allelic variation in the genes encoding the human IgG1 heavy chain constant region and this gives rise to allotypes of IgG1. Using recombinant monoclonal IgG molecules of known isotype and mutants thereof we have unexpectedly discovered that the HSV‐1 FcR discriminates between IgG1 allotypes. This is evidence of functional differences between IgG1 allotypes that may account for their distribution in populations. Furthermore, these findings suggest HSV‐1 FcR binding sites on the IgG molecule some distance from the proposed binding site in the CH2‐CH3 domain interface.

Analysis of the Requirement for Glycoprotein M in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Morphogenesis

ABSTRACT A mutant of herpes simplex virus type 1 lacking both glycoprotein M and glycoprotein E was marginally compromised in terms of its in vitro growth characteristics. This finding is in marked contrast to a similar mutant of the related alphaherpesvirus, pseudorabies virus (A. R. Brack, J. M. Dijkstra, H. Granzow, B. G. Klupp, and T. C. Mettenleiter, J. Virol. 73:5364-5372, 1999), and suggests that the glycoprotein requirements for virion assembly may vary among different members of this family of viruses.

Glycoprotein M is important for the efficient incorporation of glycoprotein H-L into herpes simplex virus type 1 particles

Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein M (gM) is a type III membrane protein conserved throughout the family Herpesviridae. However, despite this conservation, gM is classed as a non-essential protein in most alphaherpesviruses. Previous data have suggested that gM is involved in secondary envelopment, although how gM functions in this process is unknown. Using transfection-based assays, we have previously shown that gM is able to mediate the internalization and subcellular targeting of other viral envelope proteins, suggesting a possible role for gM in localizing herpesvirus envelope proteins to sites of secondary envelopment. To investigate the role of gM in infected cells, we have now analysed viral envelope protein localization and virion incorporation in cells infected with a gM-deletion virus or its revertant. In the absence of gM expression, we observed a substantial inhibition of glycoprotein H-L (gH-L) internalization from the surface of infected cells. Although deletion of gM does not affect expression of gH and gL, virions assembled in the absence of gM demonstrated significantly reduced levels of gH-L, correlating with defects of the gM-negative virus in entry and cell-to-cell spread. These data suggest an important role of gM in mediating the specific internalization and efficient targeting of gH-L to sites of secondary envelopment in infected cells.

Analysis of the Interaction between the Essential Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Tegument Proteins VP16 and VP1/2

ABSTRACT The incorporation of tegument proteins into the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) virion during virion assembly is thought to be a complex, multistage process occurring via numerous interactions between the tegument and the capsid, within the tegument, and between the tegument and the envelope. Here, we set out to examine if the direct interaction between two essential tegument proteins VP1/2 and VP16 is required for connecting the inner tegument with the outer tegument. By using glutathione S-transferase (GST) pulldowns, we identified an essential role of lysine 343 in VP16, mutation of which to a neutral amino acid abrogated the interaction between VP1/2 and VP16. When the K343A substitution was inserted into the gene encoding VP16 (UL48) of the viral genome, HSV-1 replicated successfully although its growth was delayed, and final titers were reduced compared to titers of wild-type virus. Surprisingly, the mutated VP16 was incorporated into virions at levels similar to those of wild-type VP16. However, the analysis of VP16 on cytoplasmic capsids by fluorescence microscopy showed that VP16 associated with cytoplasmic capsids less efficiently when the VP16-VP1/2 interaction was inhibited. This implies that the direct interaction between VP1/2 and VP16 is important for the efficiency/timing of viral assembly but is not essential for HSV-1 replication in cell culture. These data also support the notion that the incorporation of tegument proteins into the herpesviruses is a very complex process with significant redundancy.

Assembly and Organization of Glycoproteins B, C, D, and H in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Particles Lacking Individual Glycoproteins: No Evidence for the Formation of a Complex of These Molecules

ABSTRACT Glycoprotein B (gB), gC, gD, and gH:L of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) are implicated in virus adsorption and penetration. gB, gD, and gH:L are essential for these processes, and their expression is necessary and sufficient to induce cell fusion. The current view is that these molecules act in concert as a functional complex, and cross-linking studies support this view (C. G. Handler, R. J. Eisenberg, and G. H. Cohen, J. Virol. 70:6067–6075, 1996). We examined the glycoprotein composition, with respect to gB, gC, gD, and gH, of mutant virions lacking individual glycoproteins and the sedimentation characteristics of glycoproteins extracted from these virions. The amounts of gB, gC, gD, or gH detected in virions did not alter when any one of these molecules was absent, and it therefore appears that they are incorporated into the virion independently of each other. The sedimentation characteristics of gB and gD from mutant virions were not different from those of wild-type virions. We confirmed that gB, gC, and gD could be cross-linked to each other on the virion surface but found that the absence of one glycoprotein did not alter the outcome of cross-linking reactions between the remaining molecules. The incorporation and arrangement of these glycoproteins in the virion envelope therefore appear to be independent of the individual molecular species. This is difficult to reconcile with the concept that gB, gC, gD, and gH:L are incorporated as a functional complex into the virion envelope.

A novel role for poly(C) binding proteins in programmed ribosomal frameshifting.

Translational control through programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is exploited widely by viruses and increasingly documented in cellular genes. Frameshifting is induced by mRNA secondary structures that compromise ribosome fidelity during decoding of a heptanucleotide ‘slippery’ sequence. The nsp2 PRF signal of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus is distinctive in directing both −2 and −1 PRF and in its requirement for a trans-acting protein factor, the viral replicase subunit nsp1β. Here we show that the the trans-activation of frameshifting is carried out by a protein complex composed of nsp1β and a cellular poly(C) binding protein (PCBP). From the results of in vitro translation and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we demonstrate that a PCBP/nsp1β complex binds to a C-rich sequence downstream of the slippery sequence and here mimics the activity of a structured mRNA stimulator of PRF. This is the first description of a role for a trans-acting cellular protein in PRF. The discovery broadens the repertoire of activities associated with poly(C) binding proteins and prototypes a new class of virus–host interactions.

Characterization of Ribosomal Frameshifting in Theiler's Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus

ABSTRACT Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) is a member of the genus Cardiovirus in the Picornaviridae, a family of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. Previously, we demonstrated that in the related cardiovirus, Encephalomyocarditis virus, a programmed −1 ribosomal frameshift (−1 PRF) occurs at a conserved G_GUU_UUU sequence within the 2B-encoding region of the polyprotein open reading frame (ORF). Here we show that −1 PRF occurs at a similar site during translation of the TMEV genome. In addition, we demonstrate that a predicted 3′ RNA stem-loop structure at a noncanonical spacing downstream of the shift site is required for efficient frameshifting in TMEV and that frameshifting also requires virus infection. Mutating the G_GUU_UUU shift site to inhibit frameshifting results in an attenuated virus with reduced growth kinetics and a small-plaque phenotype. Frameshifting in the virus context was found to be extremely efficient at 74 to 82%, which, to our knowledge, is the highest frameshifting efficiency recorded to date for any virus. We propose that highly efficient −1 PRF in TMEV provides a mechanism to escape the confines of equimolar expression normally inherent in the single-polyprotein expression strategy of picornaviruses. IMPORTANCE Many viruses utilize programmed −1 ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) to produce different protein products at a defined ratio, or to translate overlapping ORFs to increase coding capacity. With few exceptions, −1 PRF occurs on specific “slippery” heptanucleotide sequences and is stimulated by RNA structure beginning 5 to 9 nucleotides (nt) downstream of the slippery site. Here we describe an unusual case of −1 PRF in Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) that is extraordinarily efficient (74 to 82% of ribosomes shift into the alternative reading frame) and, in stark contrast to other examples of −1 PRF, is dependent upon a stem-loop structure beginning 14 nt downstream of the slippery site. Furthermore, in TMEV-based reporter constructs in transfected cells, efficient frameshifting is critically dependent upon virus infection. We suggest that TMEV evolved frameshifting as a novel mechanism for removing ribosomes from the message (a “ribosome sink”) to downregulate synthesis of the 3′-encoded replication proteins.