Susanne G. Carpenter

Is there concordance of invasive breast cancer pathologic tumor size with magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND In the era of breast conservation therapy, preoperative imaging is imperative in planning a single definitive surgical treatment. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients treated at a single institution for invasive breast cancer over 5 years. Clinical and pathologic variables were analyzed with respect to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic tumor size using analysis of variance F tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS Of 190 patients, 53% had concordance of MRI and pathologic cancer size within .5 cm. MRI overestimated 33% and underestimated 15% of tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node status were associated with discordance. Among tumors overestimated by MRI, 65% had additional significant findings in the breast tissue around the main lesion: satellite lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ, and/or lymphovascular invasion. CONCLUSIONS Breast MRI is concordant with pathologic tumor size within .5 cm among 53% of patients. Most patients with tumors overestimated by MRI have significant findings in the surrounding breast tissue, the excision of which would be expected to benefit the patient.

Scientific Presentation Award: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer (IBC). METHOD The IBC patients treated from January 2003-June 2008 were reviewed by a single institution. RESULTS A total of 814 patients were treated, out of which 562 (69%) underwent breast conservation therapy (BCT), 151 (19%) chose mastectomy alone (M), and 101 (12%) chose mastectomy with reconstruction (M+ R). The mean age was comparatively low in M + R patients (P <or= 0.001). The mean tumor size was the lowest in BCT patients (P <or= 0.001). MRI use increased with no significant difference in type of surgery as noted by year. In multivariate analysis, type of surgery was significantly associated with tumor size, multifocality, age, and MRI use. The factors associated with MRI performance were: multifocality, younger age, tumor size, lobular histology, body mass index, and genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS The use of MRI in IBC patients has increased over the past 5 years, without any observable impact on surgical treatment. Similar factors are associated with mastectomy and MRI performance.

Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer

BACKGROUND The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying residual disease after breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear. METHOD Review of an institutional database identified patients with positive or close (<or=2 mm) margins undergoing MRI before re-excision. Histopathologic correlation was performed. RESULTS Forty-three women underwent MRI after BCT. MRI suggested residual disease in 29 patients, of whom 20 (69%) had residual carcinoma pathologically. Nine patients had false-positive MRI as seen by benign pathology findings. Fourteen MRIs indicated no residual disease, of which 6 had residual disease pathologically. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRI was 77% and 69%, respectively. MRI conducted within 28 days of the original surgery was 85% sensitive. MRI performed after 28 days was 69% sensitive. CONCLUSIONS MRI is able to detect residual disease among most patients undergoing re-excision. False-positive results may be caused by inflammatory processes that resemble residual disease.

Factors influencing time between biopsy and definitive surgery for malignant melanoma: do they impact clinical outcome?

BACKGROUND Whether time between biopsy and surgery for malignant melanoma affects clinical outcomes is sparsely defined. This study evaluated factors influencing surgical interval and surgical interval effect on outcomes. METHODS We performed a review of a prospective 10-year, single-institution database. RESULTS There were 473 patients treated for 478 malignant melanomas. The mean surgical interval was 30.5 days. The mean thickness was 2.1 mm; 46% of patients had a surgical interval of more than 28 days whereas 8% had a surgical interval of more than 56 days. Residual melanoma was found at excision in 170 (36%) patients. Age, sex, and referral source significantly affected surgical interval, however, lesion thickness, sentinel lymph node status, ulceration, and residual melanoma at excision did not. In univariate Cox models, neither a surgical interval of 28 or less nor less than 56 days showed better overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate Cox models of OS and DFS including lesion thickness, sentinel lymph node status, ulceration, and residual melanoma at excision, neither a surgical interval of 28 days or fewer nor a surgical interval of 56 days or fewer significantly affected outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Age, sex, referral source, and lesion thickness were associated with surgical interval. Immediate surgery for malignant melanoma does not significantly impact OS or DFS.

Optimal treatment of multiple ipsilateral primary breast cancers.

INTRODUCTION The success of breast-conservation therapy (BCT) for patients with multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancers (MIBC) is sparsely documented. METHODS A retrospective review of single-institution experience. Patients with 2 or more invasive cancers separated by normal breast tissue were included; patients with 1 invasive cancer with additional in situ lesions and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. RESULTS One hundred forty-nine patients were treated over 19 years. Fifty-eight (39%) patients underwent BCT. Preoperatively, multiple tumors were suspected in more mastectomy patients than BCT patients (75% versus 62%). Most patients had 2 tumors and 1 histology. Fifty-five percent of patients with tumors within 1 quadrant underwent BCT versus 10% of patients with tumors in more than 1 quadrant. One hundred eight patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Twenty-seven percent (34) were SLN positive. There were no regional recurrences among the SLN-negative patients. Six patients recurred: 1 nodal, 1 local, and 4 distant. The locoregional BCT recurrence rate was 3.4%. DISCUSSION MIBC patients can safely undergo BCT with low recurrence risk. SLNB can be performed with minimal risk of regional recurrence.

Surgical Management of Tumors Invading the Aorta and Major Arterial Structures

BACKGROUND This study investigates surgical management of tumors arising from or involving the aorta and major arterial structures. METHODS A retrospective single institutional review was conducted of patients undergoing arterial resection for tumors involving the aorta or major arterial structures between January 1992 and May 2009 at a tertiary care center. Patients with tumors abutting arteries without necessitating resection and those involving only venous structures were excluded. Patients were analyzed in groups by vessel involvement: aorta, carotid, external/common iliac, internal iliac, superficial femoral, and miscellaneous. RESULTS Sixty patients were identified and included for review. The iliac arteries were most often resected, and sarcomatous pathology was most common (37 patients, 62%). Twelve patients underwent aortic resection, with eight (67%) of these undergoing graft reconstruction, one (8%) graft patch, and two (17%) primary repair. None of the 17 patients undergoing internal iliac resection underwent reconstruction, whereas the majority of patients in all other groups underwent reconstruction. Thirty-day mortality (TDM) was 0% in all groups, except the aortic (2/12, 17% TDM), and internal iliac arteries (1/17, 6% TDM). Estimated blood loss varied widely and was not significantly different between vessel groups (p = 0.280). Overall, 44 of 60 (73%) patients had negative margins. Fourteen patients (23%) returned to the operating room, most for wound infection or dehiscence. Mean follow-up was 20.25 months (range: 0.5-122.0 months, SD: 23 months). Forty patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Thus, with an overall median follow-up of 12.25 months, overall survival was 60% with disease-free survival of 40%. CONCLUSIONS Resection of tumors involving the aorta and major arterial structures provides a reasonable option for treatment, but with significant perioperative morbidity. In selected patients, this aggressive intervention should be considered.

Barrett’s esophagus following treatment of achalasia with botulinum toxin

Achalasia is an uncommon primary motor disorder of the esophagus with an annual incidence of 0.8/100,000. Very few cases of coexistent Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and achalasia in patients without prior surgical myotomy or pneumatic dilation have been reported. We report the case of a 65 year old female who was diagnosed with achalasia in June 2002. Endoscopy at that time revealed biopsy-confirmed normal esophageal mucosa. The patient subsequently underwent two trials of botox injection with progressively worsening dysphagia. A repeat endoscopy two years later showed a short segment of salmon-colored mucosa in the distal esophagus which was biopsy-confirmed Barrett’s epithelium with no dysplasia. The patient eventually underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Toupet fundoplication. Postoperatively, she recovered well and with significant alleviation of her dysphagia. This study reviews reported cases of coexistent achalasia and BE, and discusses possible etiologies of concurrent BE and achalasia, and implications for treatment.

Surgical Management of Tumors Involving the Aorta and Major Arterial Structures

Background: This study investigates surgical management of tumors arising from or involving the aorta and major arterial structures. Methods: A retrospective single institutional review was conducted of patients undergoing arterial resection for tumors involving the aorta or major arterial structures between January 1992 and May 2009 at a tertiary care center. Patients with tumors abutting arteries without necessitating resection and those involving only venous structures were excluded. Patients were analyzed in groups by vessel involvement: aorta, carotid, external/common iliac, internal iliac, superficial femoral, and miscellaneous. Results: Sixty patients were identified and included for review. The iliac arteries were most often resected, and sarcomatous pathology was most common (37 patients, 62%). Twelve patients underwent aortic resection, with eight (67%) of these undergoing graft reconstruction, one (8%) graft patch, and two (17%) primary repair. None of the 17 patients undergoing internal iliac resection underwent reconstruction, whereas the majority of patients in all other groups underwent reconstruction. Thirty-day mortality (TDM) was 0% in all groups, except the aortic (2/12, 17% TDM), and internal iliac arteries (1/17, 6% TDM). Estimated blood loss varied widely and was not significantly different between vessel groups ( p 1⁄4 0.280). Overall, 44 of 60 (73%) patients had negative margins. Fourteen patients (23%) returned to the operating room, most for wound infection or dehiscence. Mean follow-up was 20.25 months (range: 0.5-122.0 months, SD: 23 months). Forty patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Thus, with an overall median follow-up of 12.25 months, overall survival was 60% with disease-free survival of 40%. Conclusions: Resection of tumors involving the aorta and major arterial structures provides a reasonable option for treatment, but with significant perioperative morbidity. In selected patients, this aggressive intervention should be considered.