Susanne Rockenschaub

Radical Surgical Therapy of Abdominal Cystic Hydatid Disease: Factors of Recurrence

Abstract. A series of 74 consecutive patients (48 women, 26 men) were operated for abdominal hydatid disease between June 1949 and December 1995. The patients ranged in age from 15 to 81 years (median 49 years). In 69 cases only the liver was affected; two patients had concomitant extrahepatic disease (one spleen, one spleen and lung), and 3 had cysts in the spleen only. Cysts were multiple in 11 patients and calcified in 24. Conservative surgical procedures were used for 22 cysts in 20 patients [open partial (n= 3), open total (n= 6), closed total cystectomy (n= 9), marsupialization (n= 2), drainage (n= 2)] and radical surgical procedures for 72 cysts in 54 patients [pericystectomy (n= 41), wedge liver resection or hemihepatectomy (n= 25), splenectomy (n= 5), radical resection of a lung cyst (n= 1)]. Altogether 37 patients (50%) were given perioperative antihelmintic chemotherapy with mebendazole (18 patients) or albendazole (19 patients). Operative mortality rates were 5.0% after conservative surgery and 1.8% after radical surgery. Morbidity rates were 25.0% following conservative surgery and 24.1% following radical surgery. Antihelmintic therapy was well tolerated by all but five patients. All side effects were entirely reversible. Among the 74 patients, 60 (81.0%) were available for long-term follow-up (median 7.2 years; range 2.0–47.0 years). Recurrence of disease was seen in 9 of 60 patients at an interval of 3 months to 20 years from the first operation. The rate of recurrence was significantly lower after radical surgical procedures (p= 0.03) and after closed removal of the cyst (p= 0.04).

Organ survival after primary dysfunction of liver grafts in clinical orthotopic liver transplantation

Abstract In a retrospective analysis of 632 orthototopic liver transplant procedures performed between 1982 and 1997, the incidence of primary dysfunction (PDF) of the liver and its influence on organ survival were studied. Graft function during the first 3 postoperative days was categorized into four groups: (1) good (GOT max < 1000 U/l, spontaneous PT > 50 %, bile production > 100 ml/day); (2) fair (GOT 1000‐2500 U/l, clotting factor support < 2 days, bile < 100 ml/day); (3) poor (GOT > 2500 U/l, clotting factor support > 2 days, bile < 20 ml/day); (4) primary non‐function (PNF; retransplantation required within 7 days). The aim of this study was to evaluate graft survival comparing organs with PDF (poor function) and PNF vs organs with initial good or fair function. After a median follow‐ up of 45 months, initially good and fair function of liver grafts resulted in a significantly better long‐term graft survival compared with grafts with initially poor function or primary non‐function (if re‐transplanted) (P < 0.01). The Cox model revealed primary function as a highly significant factor in the prediction of long‐term graft survival (P < 0.0001). We conclude that these results confirm the hypothesis that primary graft function is of major importance for the long‐term survival of liver transplants. Patients with a poor primary function have the worst survival prognosis, which leads to the interpretation that these patients may be candidates for early retransplantation.

Comparison between C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo renal transplant recipients: retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.

Background. Monitoring immunosuppression with cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (CsA-MEF) by using 2-hour CsA blood levels (C2) has been strongly recommended after kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of C2 monitoring on the clinical outcome early after transplantation in a single-center setting. Methods. Nonsensitized, consecutive, de novo cadaveric kidney-transplant recipients were treated with CsA-MEF, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patients receiving transplants after January 2002 (n=89) were prospectively monitored by C2 levels (target: 1,500±200 ng/mL [fluorescence-polarization immunoassay]). They were retrospectively compared with the patients receiving transplants during 2001 (n=88) who had been monitored by C0 levels (target: 250±50 ng/mL). Results. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 40 (45.4%) patients in the C0 group and 25 (28.1%) patients in the C2 group received treatment for rejection (P=0.017). The incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 20.45% in the C0 group and 13.48% in the C2 group (P=0.235). In the per-protocol analysis, incidence of treated rejection was 24.7%, and incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 12.35% in the C2 group (P=0.004 and 0.160, respectively, vs. C0). Mean CsA-MEF doses were 1.7 to 2 times higher in the C2 group than in the C0 group throughout follow-up (P=0.019). In the C2 group, target C2 levels were achieved on average 4 days after transplantation, and there was no significant difference in C2 levels between patients who rejected and patients who did not reject. Conclusion. Kidney-transplant recipients monitored by C2 levels receive significantly higher doses of CsA-MEF and have a lower incidence of early acute allograft rejection than patients monitored by C0 levels. In C2 monitored patients, C2 levels are not predictive for the incidence of early allograft rejection.

Genetic detection of lymph node micrometastases : A selection criterion for liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases after colorectal cancer

Background. Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer was abandoned in 1994 on account of high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the genetic detection of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of the primary colon cancer could be applied to select patients for liver transplantation. Methods. We analyzed 21 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone liver transplantation between 1983 and 1994 for liver metastases. Eleven patients were histologically lymph node negative at the time of surgery; ten patients with lymph node metastases served as control group. DNA sequencing was used to screen tumor material for p53 and K-ras mutations. Mutant allele-specific amplification (MASA) was then used to search for micrometastases in DNA from regional lymph nodes of the primary colorectal cancer. Results. p53 and K-ras mutations were detected in 12 (57%) and 3 (14%) of 21 patients in the colorectal cancer, respectively. The mutations were confirmed in the corresponding liver metastases. Of 11 patients with histologically negative lymph nodes, nine were eligible for MASA due to presence of p53 or K-ras mutation. MASA revealed six of nine patients to be genetically positive for micrometastases. Three patients were both genetically and histologically negative. These three patients showed a significantly longer overall survival (P=0.011) of 4, 5, and 20 years, respectively. Conclusions. We conclude that the genetic detection of micrometastases by MASA could be a powerful prognostic indicator for selecting patients with colorectal liver metastases who could benefit from liver transplantation.

Comparison Between C0 And C2 Monitoring In De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Monitoring immunosuppression with cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (CsA-MEF) by using 2-hour CsA blood levels (C2) has been strongly recommended after kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of C2 monitoring on the clinical outcome early after transplantation in a single-center setting. METHODS Nonsensitized, consecutive, de novo cadaveric kidney-transplant recipients were treated with CsA-MEF, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patients receiving transplants after January 2002 (n=89) were prospectively monitored by C2 levels (target: 1,500+/-200 ng/mL [fluorescence-polarization immunoassay]). They were retrospectively compared with the patients receiving transplants during 2001 (n=88) who had been monitored by C0 levels (target: 250+/-50 ng/mL). RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analysis, 40 (45.4%) patients in the C0 group and 25 (28.1%) patients in the C2 group received treatment for rejection (P=0.017). The incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 20.45% in the C0 group and 13.48% in the C2 group (P=0.235). In the per-protocol analysis, incidence of treated rejection was 24.7%, and incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 12.35% in the C2 group (P=0.004 and 0.160, respectively, vs. C0). Mean CsA-MEF doses were 1.7 to 2 times higher in the C2 group than in the C0 group throughout follow-up (P=0.019). In the C2 group, target C2 levels were achieved on average 4 days after transplantation, and there was no significant difference in C2 levels between patients who rejected and patients who did not reject. CONCLUSION Kidney-transplant recipients monitored by C2 levels receive significantly higher doses of CsA-MEF and have a lower incidence of early acute allograft rejection than patients monitored by C0 levels. In C2 monitored patients, C2 levels are not predictive for the incidence of early allograft rejection.

transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis

Abstract In recent years, alcoholic cirrhosis has been accepted as an indication for OLT, compliance of patients suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis is still under discussion, however. 118 patients who had undergone OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis were considered for analysis. The mean follow‐up time of the study population was 53.7 ± 38.9 months. Compliance was defined by 3 parameters: 1. Sobriety. Fifteen (13%) out of 118 recipients suffered an alcohol relapse during the observation period. There was no difference between the groups with or without alcohol relapse concerning compliance with medication, incidence of rejection, or adherence to checkups. 2. Drug‐compliance. Nineteen recipients (16%) were not within the target range with the immunosuppressive medication. Comparison of the compliant‐ and non‐compliant groups produced a significant difference for late acute rejection, the other parameters being similar in the subgroups. 3. Adherence to appointments. Nearly all patients in the study population (>95%) were compliant with both transplant and psychological appointments in the outpatient clinic. In conclusion, analysis of our data indicates that patients with OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis are compliant, although alcohol relapse occurs in 13% of recipients.

Stellenwert der Lebertransplantation bei nichtresezierbaren Lebermetastasen

Zusammenfassung1.OLT ist bei Lebermetastasen im Lausanne-Stadium III anderen Therapieverfahren (systemischer und lokoregionärer Chemotherapie) überlegen.2.Trotz nachgewiesenem Rezidiv besteht eine gute Lebensqualität (palliativer Effekt).3.Das synchrone Auftreten von hämatogenen Lebermetastasen stellt ein mögliches klinisches Selektionskriterium für das Langzeitüberleden dar.4.Bedeutung einer zusätzlichen Chemotherapie unklar und weitere Sekektionskriterien zur Verbesserung der PÜZ notwendig.5.Bei neuroendokrinen Tumoren OLT bei nicht Ansprechen anderer Therapieverfahren (Embolisation, Hormon- und Immuntherapie) und bei Ausschluß extrahepataler Manifestation sinnvoll.6.OLT ist bei nichtresezierbaren Lebermetastasen unter dem Aspekt des bestehenden Organmangels als allgemeine Therapieempfehlung abzulehnen und die Indikation im Einzelfall zu diskutieren.