Susanne Taucher

Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer

Objective:The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic relevance of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in a large cohort of breast cancer patients. Introduction:Invasion of tumor cells into blood and lymphatic vessels is one of the critical steps for metastasis. The presence or absence of lymph node metastasis is one of the main decision criteria for further therapy. One shortcoming of previous morphologic studies was the lack of specific markers that could exact discriminate between blood and lymphatic vessels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer patients. Methods:We investigated 374 tissue specimens of patients suffering from invasive breast cancer by immunostaining for the lymphatic endothelial specific marker podoplanin. Lymphangiogenesis, quantified by evaluating the lymphatic microvessels density (LMVD), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were correlated with various clinical parameters and prognostic relevance. Results:LMVD correlated significantly with LVI (P = 0.001). LVI was associated significantly with a higher risk for developing lymph-node metastasis (P = 0.004). Calculating the prognostic relevance, LVI presented as an independent prognostic parameter for disease free as well as overall survival (P = 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion:Our data provide evidence that the biologic system of lymphangiogenesis constitutes a potential new target for development of anti-breast cancer therapeutic concepts. Our results further suggest that young, premenopausal patients with low differentiated breast tumors and high LMVD and LVI would, in particular, benefit from lymphangiogenesis-associated therapeutic strategies.

Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12

BACKGROUND Zoledronic acid (ZOL) plus adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 48- and 62-month follow-up in the ABCSG-12 trial. We present efficacy results of a final additional analysis after 94.4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were premenopausal women who had undergone primary surgery for stage I/II estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive breast cancer with <10 positive lymph nodes, and were scheduled for standard goserelin therapy. All 1803 patients received goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days) and were randomized to tamoxifen (20 mg/days) or anastrozole (1 mg/days), both with or without ZOL (4 mg every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was DFS; recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS After 94.4-month median follow-up (range, 0-114 months), relative risks of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.99; P = 0.042] and of death (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.02; P = 0.064) are still reduced by ZOL although no longer significant at the predefined significance level. Overall, 251 DFS events and 86 deaths were reported. Absolute risk reductions with ZOL were 3.4% for DFS and 2.2% for OS. There was no DFS difference between tamoxifen alone versus anastrozole alone, but there was a pronounced higher risk of death for anastrozole-treated patients (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.05-1.45; P = 0.030). Treatments were generally well tolerated, with no reports of renal failure or osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION These final results from ABCSG 12 suggest that twice-yearly ZOL enhances the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine treatment, and this benefit is maintained long-term. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT00295646 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=00295646).

Do we need HER-2/neu testing for all patients with primary breast carcinoma?

HER‐2/neu is a valuable prognostic marker in primary breast carcinoma. Controversy surrounds the correlation between HER‐2/neu expression and other prognostic markers, as has been discussed in preclinical and clinical studies. The objective of the current study was to investigate the probability, calculated using parameters that are assessed routinely in clinical practice, that patients with breast carcinoma had positive HER‐2/neu status.

Expression of MRP1, LRP and Pgp in breast carcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy

Our purpose was to determine the expression of the drug resistance factors multidrug resistance protein (MRP1), lung resistance protein (LRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in breast carcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. We have studied the expression of these proteins in breast carcinomas by immunohistochemistry both prior (n = 80) and after (n = 68) preoperative chemotherapy and compared their expression with response to preoperative chemotherapy. In paired samples prior and after chemotherapy expression of drug resistance factors was significantly lower in prechemotherapy samples as compared with postchemotherapy specimens. This was observed for MRP1 (62% vs. 88%, P < 0.001), LRP (65% vs. 97%, P < 0.001) and Pgp (55% vs. 100%, P < 0.001). Prechemotherapy expression of MRP1 was more frequently observed in patients with distant metastases than in those without (50% vs. 8%, P = 0.02). No associations were observed between LRP expression and clinical parameters. Pgp expression was more frequently detected in lobular carcinomas than in ductal carcinomas (93% vs. 46%, P = 0.001) and in patients with positive lymph nodes than in patients with negative lymph nodes (65% vs. 31%, P = 0.008) but was independent of other clinical parameters. No significant associations were found between the prechemotherapy or postchemotherapy expression of either of these three proteins and response to preoperative chemotherapy. However, prechemotherapy MRP1 expression was significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival of the patients (P = 0.02), whereas no such associations were observed for either LRP or Pgp. In conclusion, preoperative chemotherapy increases the expression of MRP1, LRP and Pgp. Response to chemotherapy is not associated with pre- or postchemotherapy expression levels of these drug resistance proteins but time to progression may be influenced by prechemotherapy MRP1 expression.

Tamoxifen and Anastrozole As a Sequencing Strategy: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Postmenopausal Patients With Endocrine-Responsive Early Breast Cancer From the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE Anastrozole (ANA) alone delivers significant disease-free survival benefits over tamoxifen (TAM) monotherapy in postmenopausal women with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The ABCSG-8 (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8) study is a large phase III clinical trial addressing the sequence strategy containing ANA in comparison with 5 years of TAM in a low- to intermediate-risk group of postmenopausal patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Endocrine receptor-positive patients with G1 or G2 tumors were eligible. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to 5 years of TAM or 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA. Adjuvant chemotherapy and G3 and T4 tumors were exclusion criteria. Intention-to-treat and censored analyses of on-treatment recurrence-free survival (RFS) were performed, and exploratory survival end points and toxicity were investigated. RESULTS Information from 3,714 patients, including 17,563 woman-years, with a median of 60 months of follow-up was available for this analysis. Median age was 63.8 years, 75% were node negative, and 75% had T1 tumors. Sequencing of ANA after identical 2-year treatment with TAM in both arms did not result in a statistically significant improvement of RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.01; P = .06). Exploratory analyses of distant relapse-free survival indicated a 22% improvement (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00). On-treatment adverse events and serious adverse events were consistent with known toxicity profiles of ANA and TAM treatment. CONCLUSION Despite a low overall rate of recurrence in a population with breast cancer at limited risk of relapse, the a priori sequence strategy of 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA led to small outcome and toxicity benefits.

Expression of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins in Breast Carcinomas Before and After Preoperative Chemotherapy

Molecular markers predicting response to preoperative chemotherapy would be of major clinical relevance in breast cancer. Therefore, we studied the relationship between the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. Expression of p21Waf1, p27Kip1, p53, cyclin D3 and Ki-67 was determined in breast carcinomas by means of immunohistochemistry both prior and after preoperative chemotherapy. Expression data were compared with both clinical parameters and response to preoperative chemotherapy with either cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF, n = 29) or epirubicin/docetaxel (ED, n = 36). In paired samples before and after preoperative chemotherapy, the percentage of p21Waf1, p27Kip1, p53 and cyclin D3 positive nuclei of tumor cells in postchemotherapy specimens was significantly higher than the percentage in prechemotherapy samples but no change in Ki-67 expression was observed. High Ki-67 expression (p = 0.02), negative estrogen receptor status (p = 0.01) and negative progesterone receptor status (p = 0.04) were associated with complete pathologic response to chemotherapy, whereas the other markers did not predict response. In conclusion, expression levels of p21Waf1, p27Kip1, p53 and cyclin D3 significantly increased after preoperative chemotherapy in breast carcinomas but only high Ki-67 expression, negative estrogen receptor status and negative progesterone receptor status were associated with complete pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy.

Prognostic markers in breast cancer: the reliability of HER2/neu status in core needle biopsy of 325 patients with primary breast cancer

ZusammenfassungHintergrundDie Bestimmung einer HER2/neu-Überexpression im Gewebe eines Mammakarzinoms gibt Aufschluss über einen wichtigen prognostischen und prädiktiven Marker. Eine Überexpression von HER2/neu ist beim Mammakarzinom mit einer schlechten Prognose assoziiert. Da die Nadelbiopsie zunehmend in der Diagnostik des Mammakarzinoms angewandt wird, war es unser Ziel die Zuverlässigkeit der HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie bei Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom zu evaluieren.Patienten und MethodenWir untersuchten an 325 Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom die Genauigkeit der immunhistochemischen HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie verglichen mit dem Operationspräparat. Bei Patientinnen mit stark positivem HER2/neu Status wurde zusätzlich eine Fluoreszenz in situ Hybridisierung (FISH) der Nadelbiopsie durchgeführt.ErgebnisseDie Genauigkeit der HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie verglichen mit dem Operationspräparat durch Immunhistochemie alleine war 92% und konnte durch zusätzliche FISH Analyse auf 96% und werden (gewichteter Kappa Koeffizient: 0,86).DiskussionWir konnten an diesem großen Patientenkollektiv zeigen, dass die Bestimmung von HER2/neu in der Nadelbiopsie beim Mammakarzinom verlässlich ist. Bei immunhistochemisch stark positivem HER2/neu Status in der Nadelbiopsie sollte dies durch FISH überprüft werden, um die Zahl der falsch positiven Ergebnisse zu minimieren.SummaryIntroductionThe assessment of HER2/neu overexpression in tissue provides information about one of the most relevant prognostic and predictive markers in breast cancer: overexpression of HER2/neu is associated with worse prognosis in primary breast cancer. Since core needle biopsy is increasingly used for the diagnosis of breast cancer, the purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of HER2/neu evaluation using this technique in patients with primary breast cancer.Patients and methodsWe investigated the accuracy of immunohistochemical assessment of HER2/neu in core needle biopsies compared with surgically obtained specimens in 325 patients with primary breast cancer. In patients strongly positive for HER2/neu, additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of needle biopsies was performed.ResultsUsing immunohistochemistry alone, accuracy of HER2/neu assessment in core biopsies in relation to surgically removed specimens was 92% and increased to 96% with additional FISH analysis (weighted Kappa coefficient: 0.86).DiscussionAs proven with this large series of patients, the assessment of HER2/neu status by core needle biopsy in breast cancer is accurate. Notwithstanding, in order to minimize the number of false-positive results, strongly positive core needle biopsies identified using immunohistochemistry should be confirmed by FISH analysis.

Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer

Previous cancer in one breast is a strong known risk factor for cancer in the contralateral breast. Differences in tumor histology and nuclear grading are applied to distinguish between a metastatic spread and a second primary cancer, although cancers of the breast often share the same histological features. Comparison of genetic alterations in paired tumors may provide the most reliable approach for discerning clonal relationships, hence uncovering the presence or absence of multiple primary cancers. We compared tumors from 33 patients with cancer in both breasts for mutations in the p53 gene. With this molecular approach, we were able to define the relationship within paired tumors in 13 patients. The paired tumors of two patients shared the same mutation, revealing the second lesion in one case as a contralateral metachronous lymph node metastasis appearing 29 months after first surgery, and in the other as a spread to the opposite breast. In 11 patients, mutations were either discordant or solely present in one of the lesions, confirming the diagnosis of bilateral breast cancer. Histopathological evaluation had failed to provide firm diagnosis in nine out of 11 instances on account of concordances in pathological parameters such as histological type and grading.In our study, we could show that bilateral breast malignancies most frequently represent two primary breast cancers. We could also demonstrate that contralateral breast cancer spread does occur. Standard pathological assessment allowed a firm diagnosis only in the presence of different histological types.

Randomized trial of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide as adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with hormone receptor-positive disease: Austrian breast and colorectal cancer study group trial 6.

PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of aminoglutethimide to tamoxifen is able to improve the outcome in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2,021 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen for 5 years alone or tamoxifen in combination with aminoglutethimide (500 mg/d) for the first 2 years of treatment. Tamoxifen was administered at 40 mg/d for the first 2 years and at 20 mg/d for 3 years. RESULTS All randomized and eligible patients were included in the analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the 5-year disease-free survival in the aminoglutethimide plus tamoxifen group was 83.6% versus 83.7% in the monotherapy group (P =.89). The corresponding data for overall survival at 5 years were 91.4% and 91.2%, respectively (P =.74). More patients failed to complete combination treatment (13.7%) because of side effects as compared to tamoxifen alone (5.2%; P =.0001). CONCLUSION Aminoglutethimide given for 2 years in addition to tamoxifen for 5 years does not improve the prognosis of postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive, lymph node-negative or lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Influence of neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin and docetaxel on the expression of HER2/neu in patients with breast cancer.

AbstractBackground. In primary breast cancer, the expression levels of biological markers relevant to the progression of the disease may be altered by administration of anticancer drugs. Since neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel is increasingly used in advanced breast cancer, our purpose was to assess the influence of this neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the expression of the growth factor receptor HER2/neu. Patients and methods. We investigated changes of HER2/neu status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and applied additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with potential modulation of HER2/neu status after administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin in 97 breast cancer patients. The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HER2/neu expression was calculated by correlation of HER2/neu status before and after chemotherapy. Results. The accuracy of HER2/neu assessment before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by IHC combined with FISH analysis in selected cases was 100%. The evaluation of HER2/neu status in these patients by IHC alone yielded accuracy of 93%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel caused no significant modulation of HER2/neu status (p = 0.66). Discussion. The administration of epirubicin and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting is not associated with significant changes of HER2/neu status in primary breast cancer. As a consequence, drug resistance or sensitivity is not induced by modulation of HER2/neu expression. Moreover, the time of assessment of the HER2/neu status is not a critical factor under neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin and docetaxel.