Sushrut Patil

Dual epigenetic targeting with panobinostat and azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Therapeutic options are limited for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A phase Ib/II study was undertaken to evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of the pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) in combination with azacitidine in patients with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) naïve to intensive chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients (AML=29, MDS=10) received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (days 1–5) and oral panobinostat (starting on day 5, thrice weekly for seven doses) in 28-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicities during the phase Ib stage were observed in 0/4 patients receiving 10 mg panobinostat, in 1/7 patients (fatigue) receiving 20 mg, in 1/6 patients (fatigue) receiving 30 mg and in 4/5 patients (fatigue, syncope, hyponatremia and somnolence) receiving 40 mg. In phase II, an additional 17 patients received panobinostat at a MTD of 30 mg. The overall response rate (ORR=CR+CRi+PR) in patients with AML was 31% (9/29) and that in patients with MDS was 50% (5/10). After a median follow-up of 13 months, the median overall survival was 8 and 16 months in patients with AML and MDS, respectively. Increased histone H3 and H4 acetylation was a useful early biomarker of clinical response. Combining panobinostat with azacitidine was tolerable and clinically active in high-risk MDS/AML patients, warranting further exploration.

Effectiveness of a single fixed dose of rasburicase 3 mg in the management of tumour lysis syndrome

Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) is a life-threatening oncological emergency characterized by hyperuricaemia, hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemia, and hypocalcaemia [1, 2] due to the rapid lysis of malignant cells, following the initiation of anticancer therapies [3]. Traditionally, therapy for TLS involved intensive hydration, urinary alkalinization and administration of allopurinol [4–6]. Newer guidelines now include rasburicase, with monitoring of electrolytes, white blood cell counts (WCC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentrations [1, 7, 8]. Rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase enzyme, effectively decreases existing serum uric acid (UA) by oxidizing it to allantoin which is readily soluble and excretable [3]. Although the recommended dose is 0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 for 5–7 days [9], studies have shown the efficacious use of reduced doses for shorter periods of time and subsequent cost savings [5, 6, 10–17]. Expert guidelines by Coieffer et al. [7] in 2008 and Cairo et al. in 2010 [1] on the management of TLS recommend a rasburicase dose of 0.1–0.2 mg kg−1 on the first day, then repeated for up to 7 days [1] or as necessary [7]. We present an analysis of a fixed 3 mg dose of rasburicase administered to adult patients, treated at a tertiary referral centre. The study was approved by the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee and the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee. Demographic data were collected. Biochemical parameters (serum creatinine, serum UA, phosphate and LDH concentrations), at baseline, 24 h and 72 h after initial administration of rasburicase were recorded and compared. The institution guideline indicates rasburicase to be given before the first dose of chemotherapy in patients considered high risk for TLS. This includes a diagnosis of Burkitts lymphoma, acute lymhoblastic leukaemia, bulky non-Hodgkins lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma or acute myeloid leukaemia with one or more of the following: serum UA>0.46 mmol l−1, white cell count (WCC) >50 × 109 l−1 or LDH >two times normal. Patients who were at an ongoing risk of TLS (i.e. elevated UA or LDH or multiple days of aggressive cytoreductive chemotherapy) were allowed a repeat dose of rasburicase 3 mg. Adherence to the guideline was measured. Forty-one patients received 42 courses of rasburicase over a 40 month period (Figure 1A). Diagnosis, demographic and baseline biochemical data are presented in Table 1. Figure 1 Summaryof rasburicase courses and uric acid concentrations. A) Summary of rasburicase courses administered. B) Median uric acid concentrations over time stratified by presentation a baseline. ♦, normal; ▪, hyperuricaemic; ▴, all ... Table 1 Patientcharacteristics Rasburicase was administered as per institution guidelines in 40 (95%) of the patients. Median serum UA concentrations were within normal range at 72 h in all groups; in those who presented with hyperuricaemia, in those who presented with normal baseline serum UA concentrations and overall (Figure 1B). The majority of patients received one dose of rasburicase 3 mg (Figure 1A). In 34 patient episodes requiring one dose only, there was a decline in the median (range) UA concentration from 0.44 mmol l−1 (0.13–1.15) at baseline to 0.22 mmol l−1 (0.02–0.66) at 24 h. This decrease was maintained at 72 h (P < 0.0001) with a median of 0.21 mmol l−1 (0.02–0.52). Serum creatinine concentrations were within normal range (60–105 μmol l−1) at baseline in 74% of patients, with 82% having a normal creatinine at 72 h. Hyperphosphataemia was present in 29% of patients at baseline and increased to 44% at 72 h. Eight patient episodes required more than one dose due to the ongoing risk of TLS. In these patients the median (range) baseline UA was 0.50 mmol l−1 (0.02–2.0), 0.33 mmol l−1 (0.02−1.10) at 24 h and 0.24 mmol l−1 (0.02−1.10) at 72 h (P < 0.0001). Of these patients only 52% had a normal creatinine at baseline, increasing to 83% at 72 h. Mean phosphate concentrations decreased over time but all patients remained hyperphosphataemic at 72 h. No hypersensitivity reactions were noted, no patients required haemodialysis and no deaths were related to the administration of rasburicase. Our results demonstrate that a single fixed dose of rasburicase 3 mg, repeated if required, should be the standard regimen in the management of TLS. Recent studies and published guidelines have shown cumulative support for the safe and efficacious use of off-label dosing regimens of rasburicase [1, 5–8, 10, 11, 16, 17]. A quarter of our patients presented with a baseline WCC>100 × 109 l−1 (Table 1), which is considered a high risk for developing TLS [1, 7]. The Product Information recommends rasburicase 0.1–0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 for 1–7 days [9]. We successfully used a fixed 3 mg dose for these patients. Our data support that presented by Trifilio et al. [11] in a recent study of 287 episodes, the largest published series at this time, of raised UA concentrations successfully treated with a single 3 mg dose of rasburicase, repeated if required. In our cohort, which was smaller in size, a single 3 mg dose was equally effective in both patients who had a normal baseline UA and those with hyperuracaemia. This differed from that published by Trifilio et al., where the single dose was more successful in patients with a lower baseline UA concentration. Our patient cohort also had a higher median LDH. Suboptimal management of hyperphosphatemia was identified in our cohort. More stringent monitoring of patient phosphate concentrations may be warranted in the future to minimize the risk of renal impairment. Serum creatinine, showing a gradual decrease with time, was used as a surrogate maker to indicate an improvement in renal function. Rasburicase was used in conjunction with allopurinol, urinary alkalinazation and intravenous hydration. This strategy is also supported by recent studies and recommendations [1, 11, 16], although the benefit of administering alkalinization with rasburicase needs further investigation [1, 7]. A single fixed 3 mg dose of rasburicase, in the setting of an institution guideline, was efficacious in the management of TLS.

Maintenance lenalidomide in combination with 5-azacitidine as post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia

In this Phase 1b study, the safety and tolerability of maintenance therapy, comprising lenalidomide (0–25 mg, days 5–25) in combination with azacitidine (50–75 mg/m2, days 1–5) every 28 d, was explored in 40 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission after chemotherapy. Eligibility included AML in first complete remission (CR1) with adverse risk karyotype (n = 8), fms‐related tyrosine kinase 3‐internal tandem duplication (FLT3‐ITD) (n = 5), age ≥60 years (n = 31) or AML in second remission (CR2) (n = 14). Dose‐limiting toxicity was not reached. Common toxicities were haematological, infection, injection pain, constipation, fatigue and diarrhoea. In CR1, median relapse‐free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was 12 and 20 months, respectively. In CR2, median RFS was 11 months, with median OS not yet reached. Among 29 patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk, RFS was 50% at 24 months. There were five patients with concomitant FLT3‐ITD and nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutation; none have relapsed and all are still alive after 17–39 months. Maintenance lenalidomide/azacitidine augmented the function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, particularly in patients with NPM1 mutation. The lenalidomide/azacitidine maintenance combination was effective in suppressing residual DNA (cytosine‐5‐)‐methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A)‐positive disease, resulting in sustained remission in patients with concurrent NPM1 mutation. Azacitidine/lenalidomide as maintenance therapy for high‐risk AML warrants further exploration.

The mTOR inhibitor everolimus in combination with azacitidine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase Ib/II study

Therapeutic options are limited in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus (days 5–21) in combination with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (days 1–5 and 8–9 every 28 days) in 40 patients with relapsed (n = 27), primary refractory (n = 11) or elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy (n = 2). MTD was not reached following everolimus dose escalation (2.5, 5 or 10 mg; n = 19) to the 10 mg dose level which was expanded (n = 21). Major adverse events (grade > 2) were mostly disease-related: neutropenia (73%), thrombocytopenia (67%), mucositis (24%) and febrile neutropenia (19%). Overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.5 months, and overall response rate (ORR; including CR/CRi/PR/MLFS) was 22.5%. Furthermore, a landmark analysis beyond cycle 1 revealed superior OS and ORR in patients receiving 2.5 mg everolimus with azoles, compared to those without azoles (median OS 12.8 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.049, and ORR 50% vs. 16%, P = 0.056), potentially due to achievement of higher everolimus blood levels. This study demonstrates that everolimus in combination with azacitidine is tolerable, with promising clinical activity in advanced AML.Therapeutic options are limited in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus (days 5-21) in combination with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (days 1-5 and 8-9 every 28 days) in 40 patients with relapsed (n = 27), primary refractory (n = 11) or elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy (n = 2). MTD was not reached following everolimus dose escalation (2.5, 5 or 10 mg; n = 19) to the 10 mg dose level which was expanded (n = 21). Major adverse events (grade > 2) were mostly disease-related: neutropenia (73%), thrombocytopenia (67%), mucositis (24%) and febrile neutropenia (19%). Overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.5 months, and overall response rate (ORR; including CR/CRi/PR/MLFS) was 22.5%. Furthermore, a landmark analysis beyond cycle 1 revealed superior OS and ORR in patients receiving 2.5 mg everolimus with azoles, compared to those without azoles (median OS 12.8 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.049, and ORR 50% vs. 16%, P = 0.056), potentially due to achievement of higher everolimus blood levels. This study demonstrates that everolimus in combination with azacitidine is tolerable, with promising clinical activity in advanced AML.

Fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and amsacrine: an effective salvage therapy option for acute myeloid leukemia at first relapse

Abstract Improved therapeutic options for relapsing patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are urgently needed. Poor outcomes following salvage therapy have been reported in those with short initial remission duration, adverse risk karyotype, prior allograft, older age, FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) AML and prior high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) induction therapy. We present a cohort of 58 patients (aged 18–70) treated with fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and amsacrine (FLAG-amsacrine) as salvage chemotherapy for AML at first relapse. 83% had received prior HiDAC-based therapy. The overall complete remission (CR/CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]) rate was 59%, with median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 6.9 and 10.6 months, respectively. FLAG-amsacrine was an effective bridge to allogeneic transplant with 38% successfully transplanted with excellent outcomes (median OS not reached). FLAG-amsacrine was also effective in elderly patients (≥60 years), with 61% achieving second remission. The regimen was well tolerated, with 30- and 42-day treatment-related mortality of 3.4% and 13.8%, respectively. Outcomes remained poor in those with short initial remission duration (<6 months). We conclude that FLAG-amsacrine is a useful salvage option for AML at first relapse.

Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Nivestim is a biosimilar approved for the same indications as Neupogen including the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). The clinical efficacy and safety of Nivestim for this use have not been formally assessed in clinical trials.

Fludarabine Melphalan reduced-intensity conditioning allotransplanation provides similar disease control in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: analysis of 344 patients.

This was an Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR)-based retrospective study assessing the outcome of Fludarabine Melphalan (FluMel) reduced-intensity conditioning between 1998 and 2008. Median follow-up was 3.4 years. There were 344 patients with a median age of 54 years (18–68). In all, 234 patients had myeloid malignancies, with AML (n=166) being the commonest indication. There were 110 lymphoid patients with non-hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) (n=64) the main indication. TRM at day 100 was 14% with no significant difference between the groups. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between myeloid and lymphoid patients (57 and 50% at 3 years, respectively). There was no difference in cumulative incidence of relapse or GVHD between groups. Multivariate analysis revealed four significant adverse risk factors for DFS: donor other than HLA-identical sibling donor, not in remission at transplant, previous autologous transplant and recipient CMV positive. Chronic GVHD was associated with improved DFS in multivariate analysis predominantly due to a marked reduction in relapse (HR:0.44, P=0.003). This study confirms that FluMel provides durable and equivalent remissions in both myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. Disease stage and chronic GVHD remain important determinants of outcome for FluMel allografting.

Health economic impact of high‐dose versus standard‐dose cytarabine induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia

Induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is one of the most resource‐intensive cancer therapies delivered in hospitals.

High-dose cytarabine (24 g/m2) in combination with idarubicin (HiDAC-3) results in high first-cycle response with limited gastrointestinal toxicity in adult acute myeloid leukaemia.

Although induction chemotherapy comprising high‐dose cytarabine (HiDAC) in combination with idarubicin and etoposide or ‘ICE’ for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) produces a complete remission rate of nearly 80%, gastrointestinal toxicity is significant. Omission of etoposide may produce similar clinical outcomes with potentially less gastrointestinal toxicity.

Natural killer cells--new understanding of basic biology may lead to more effective allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The natural killer (NK) cells are part of the innate immune system and are responsible for initial defences in the surveillance against malignant cells and virally infected cells. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, cytokines produced by NK cells amplify the immune response and help control the neoplasm/pathogen. Several activating and inhibitory receptors responsible for NK cell activation are recently characterized and play a crucial role in tumour eradication. These include, but are not limited to, the killer immunoglobulin‐like receptors, C‐type lectin receptors and natural cytotoxicity receptors. The downstream signalling of some of these receptors is also characterized. The net balance in the sum of the signals generated by ligation of activating and inhibitory receptors determines the final outcome, cytotoxicity versus tolerance. NK cell‐based immunotherapy can be successfully exploited in the haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of haematological malignancies and has a potential to separate the beneficial graft versus leukaemia effect from, often dangerous, graft versus host disease. This article reviews the NK receptors important in NK‐mediated cytotoxicity in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.