Suthi Sangkarat
Mahidol University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Suthi Sangkarat.
Case Reports in Oncology | 2009
Mongkol Benjapibal; Suthi Sangkarat; Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Boonlert Viriyapak; Pattama Chaopotong; Atthapon Jaishuen
An elevated serum CA125 level in association with a pelvic mass, pleural effusion, and massive ascites usually signifies a dismal prognosis in a postmenopausal woman. However, surgery and histopathological examination are required for the correct diagnosis and treatment, since an elevated CA125 level can be falsely positive for ovarian malignancy. We present a case of Meigs’ syndrome due to right ovarian fibroma with elevated CA125 level in a postmenopausal woman.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2014
Suthi Sangkarat; Irene Ruengkhachorn; Mongkol Benjapibal; Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Weerasak Wongthiraporn; Manee Rattanachaiyanont
AIM To evaluate the operative, oncologic and obstetric outcomes of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in cases with cervical neoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who were suspected of cervical neoplasia and therefore undergoing LEEP at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, during 1995-2000. Outcome measures included operative complications in 407 LEEP patients and long-term outcomes in the 248 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) who were treated with only LEEP. RESULTS There were 407 patients undergoing LEEP; their mean age was 39.7±10.5 years. The histopathology of LEEP specimens revealed that 89 patients (21.9%) had lesions ≤CIN I, 295 patients (72.5%) had CIN II or III, and 23 patients (5.6%) had invasive lesions. Operative complications were found in 15 patients and included bleeding (n=9), and infection (n=7). After diagnostic LEEP, 133 patients underwent hysterectomy as the definite treatment for cervical neoplasia. Of 248 CIN patients who had LEEP only, seven (2.8%) had suffered recurrence after a median of 16 (range 6-93) months; one had CIN I, one had CIN II, and five had CIN III. All of these recurrent patients achieved remission on surgical treatment with re-LEEP (n=6) or simple hysterectomy (n=1). A significant factor affecting recurrent disease was the LEEP margin involved with the lesion (p=0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) estimates of 99.9%. Twelve patients became pregnant a total of 14 times, resulting in 12 term deliveries and two miscarriages - one of which was due to an incompetent cervix. CONCLUSIONS LEEP for patients with cervical neoplasia delivers favorable surgical, oncologic and obstetric outcomes.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2014
Molpen Tatiyachonwiphut; Atthapon Jaishuen; Suthi Sangkarat; Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Weerasak Wongtiraporn; Perapong Inthasorn; Boonlert Viriyapak; Malee Warnnissorn
AIM To evaluate the agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology a retrospective chart review was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 437 patients who underwent colposcopy and cervical biopsy or conization at Siriraj Hospital from October 2010 - December 2012. The patient clinical characteristics, cervical cytology results, colposcopic diagnoses, cervical pathology results were recorded and correlations between variables were analyzed. RESULTS Agreement of colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology was matched in 253 patients (57.9%). The strength of agreement with weighted Kappa statistic was 0.494 (p<0.001). Colposcopic diagnoses more often overestimated (31.1%) than underestimated (11%) the cervical pathology. Agreement of colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology within 1 grade was found in 411 patients (94.1%). Positive predictive value (PPV) of high grade colposcopy or more was 75.5%, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) of insignificant and low grade colposcopy was 83.8%. False positives of high grade colposcopy or more were 21%. False negatives of insignificant or low grade colposcopy were 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS Strength of agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology was found to be only moderate. A biopsy at colposcopy should be performed at a gold standard level to detect high grade lesions.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2014
Suthi Sangkarat; Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Manee Rattanachaiyanont; Pattama Chaopotong; Mongkol Benjapibal; Weerasak Wongtiraporn; Sujera Laiwejpithaya
BACKGROUND To evaluate the performance of Siriraj liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical neoplasia screening after increasing use of this technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cytological reports of 103,057 Siriraj-LBC specimens obtained in 2007-2009 were compared with those of 23,676 specimens obtained in 2006. RESULTS Comparing with the year 2006, the 2007-2009 patients were slightly older (43.4 ± 12.yr vs 42.7 ± 12.2 yr, p <0.001), and their specimens had much lower proportion of unsatisfactory slides (OR=0.06, 95%CI 0.04-0.09) with comparable detection rates (3.96% vs 3.70%, p=0.052) but different proportions of various cytological abnormalities (p<0.001). The 2007-2009 Siriraj-LBC had a negative predictive value (NPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) of 97.6% and an overall positive predictive value (PPV) of 43.9%. The PPV for CIN2+ varied with types of abnormal cytology, from 13.7% to 93.8% in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), atypical glandular cells (AGC), to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), respectively. The PPVs for CIN2+ in ASCUS and LSIL were comparable, but the PPV for CIN1 was higher for LSIL than for ASCUS (41.63% vs 16.32%). CONCLUSIONS Siriraj-LBC has demonstrated a stable detection rate and NPV for CIN2+ of >95% since the first year of use. The comparable PPVs for CIN2+ of ASCUS and LSIL suggests that these two conditions may undergo similar management; other cytological abnormalities need immediate evaluation.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2014
Weerasak Wongtiraporn; Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Suthi Sangkarat; Mongkol Benjapibal; Manee Rattanachaiyanont; Irene Ruengkhachorn; Pattama Chaopotong; Sujera Laiwejpithaya
AIM To report long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in Thai women. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing laser conization due to abnormal cervical cytology suggesting neoplasia during 1989 to 1994 and having follow-up data until December 2010. Conization was performed under colposcopy using a 0.5-mm CO2 laser beam with power density of 18,000-20,000 watts/cm2, and the surgical base was vaporized using a low power defocused beam. The follow-up protocol included cervical cytology and colposcopy. Long term outcome measures were failure rate (persistence and recurrence), post-conization status of transformation zone, and obstetric outcomes. RESULTS Of 104 patients undergoing conization, 71 had therapeutic conization for high grade CIN and were followed up for a median time of 115 (range 12-260) months. There was one case of persistent and one of recurrent disease comprising a failure rate of 2.8%. The post treatment transformation zone was well visualized in 68.3% of 63 patients with an intact uterus. Sixteen patients achieved 25 pregnancies; none had second trimester miscarriage. The obstetric outcomes were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS Laser conization under colposcopic visualization for the treatment of high grade CIN in Thai women has a low failure rate of 2.8%. The post-conization transformation zone could not be evaluated completely in approximately 30% of cases; therefore the follow-up protocol should include both cytology and colposcopy. Obstetric outcomes are not adversely affected by this therapeutic procedure.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2015
Irene Ruengkhachorn; Suwanit Therasakvichya; Malee Warnnissorn; Chairat Leelaphatanadit; Suthi Sangkarat; Jutatip Srisombat
BACKGROUND To evaluate the rate of pathologic high-risk factors, intermediate-risk factors, and treatment outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL). MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical records of stage IA-IIA1 cervical cancer patients who underwent RHPL during the 2006 to 2012 time period and patient follow-up data until December 2013 were reviewed. RESULTS Of 331 patients, 52 women (15.7%) had pathologic high-risk factors and 59 women (17.8%) had intermediate-risk factors without high-risk factors. All studied patients had an initial complete response. At median follow-up time of 40.9 months (range 1-103.3 months) and mean follow-up time of 43.3±25.3 months, 37 women had disease recurrence and 4 women had died of disease. The most common site of recurrence was the pelvis (64.8%). Five- year and 10-year disease free survival rates were 96.1% and 91.5%, respectively. Five-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 100% and 99.4%, respectively. Independent factors related to recurrence were pelvic node metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 2.670; 95%CI, 1.001-7.119), and >1/3 cervical stromal invasion (OR, 3.763; 95%CI, 1.483-9.549). CONCLUSIONS The rates of pathologic high-risk and intermediate-risk factors should be considered and disclosed when counseling patients regarding primary treatment by RHPL. Oncologic outcomes of primary surgical treatment for early-stage cervical carcinoma were found to be excellent.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet | 2000
Mongkol Benjapibal; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Suphanit I; Suthi Sangkarat
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2008
Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Manee Rattanachaiyanont; Mongkol Benjapibal; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Suthi Sangkarat; Weerasak Wongtiraporn
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2009
Somsak Laiwejpithaya; Mongkol Benjapibal; Sujera Laiwejpithaya; Weerasak Wongtiraporn; Suthi Sangkarat; Manee Rattanachaiyanont
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2016
Irene Ruengkhachorn; Suchanan Hanamornroongruang; Chairat Leelaphatanadit; Suthi Sangkarat