Suzanne de Cheveigné
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Suzanne de Cheveigné.
Nature Biotechnology | 2000
George Gaskell; Nick Allum; Martin W. Bauer; John Durant; Agnes Allansdottir; Heinz Bonfadelli; Daniel Boy; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Björn Fjæstad; Jan M. Gutteling; Juergen Hampel; Erling Jelsøe; Jorge Correia Jesuino; Matthias Kohring; Nicole Kronberger; Cees J. H. Midden; Torben Hviid Nielsen; Andrzej Przestalski; Timo Rusanen; George Sakellaris; Helge Torgersen; Tomasz Twardowski; Wolfgang Wagner
The latest European sample survey of public perceptions of biotechnology reveals widespread opposition to genetically modified (GM) food in much of Europe, but public attitudes to medical and environmental applications remain positive.
Science | 2008
Hans Peter Peters; Dominique Brossard; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Sharon Dunwoody; Monika Kallfass; Steve Miller; Shoji Tsuchida
A survey reveals that media contacts of scientists in top R&D countries are more frequent and smooth than was previously thought.
Science Communication | 2008
Hans Peter Peters; Dominique Brossard; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Sharon Dunwoody; Monika Kallfass; Steve Miller; Shoji Tsuchida
An international mail survey of 1,354 biomedical researchers in five countries has revealed that interaction with the media is widespread among this group and that this interaction is largely perceived in a positive light. Possible reasons are offered as to why the perception persists that the scientist-journalist relationship remains troubled, despite the apparent reality. This reality may have negative as well as positive implications; the potential for too much control by the scientific community of media coverage about it, as well as that for too much media influence on inner-scientific processes, are also addressed.
Archive | 2010
Liisa Husu; Suzanne de Cheveigné
Women continue to be a minority among European researchers. Access to funding is one of the keys to success in academic careers, both for women and for men, providing essential support for research and publications. Indeed, the role of competitive funding is increasing in many European national settings and success in the competition for research funding is now often used as a measure of scientific excellence at both individual and institutional level. Those who decide on allocation of research funding play thus an important gatekeeping role shaping the research system.
Public Understanding of Science | 1994
Suzanne de Cheveigné; Eliseo Verón
We have examined the manner in which the main French daily newspapers reported the announcement of the Nobel physics prizes given to P. G. de Gennes in 1991 and to G. Charpak in 1992. We found that their enunciative strategies could be distinguished according to two independent criterial whether or not the enunciator presents itself as familiar with scientific matters, and whether or not it attempts to explain the scientific content of the discovery. The different combinations of these strategies correspond to different relationships proposed by the newspapers to their readers. Different theories of scientific discovery also appear: discovery as the work of a team and an institution, or as the invention of a matchless individual.
Les Annales de la recherche urbaine | 2015
Florence Bouillon; Sandrine Musso; Johanna Lees; Suzanne de Cheveigné
Cet article est bâti autour d’une enquete ethnographique sur la precarite energetique conduite a Marseille et dans sa region (2007-2012). Il aborde successivement les modalites d’emergence de cette categorie d’action publique en France au cours de la derniere decennie, en comparant avec le cas britannique, la maniere dont les acteurs sociaux dits «de premiere ligne » s’en sont saisis et les realites empiriques que recouvre le phenomene du point de vue des habitants concernes. La precarite energetique peut etre analysee comme une nouvelle maniere de designer des phenomenes anciens, relatifs a la pauvrete et au mal logement, voire comme une euphemisation de ces derniers. Elle temoigne cependant aussi d’une opportunite pour penser ensemble des questions relatives aux inegalites sociales et environnementales, longtemps abordees par les sciences sociales et les pouvoirs publics de maniere separee.
Biotechnology. The making of a global controversy | 2002
Arne Thing Mortensen; Jan M. Gutteling; Aanna Olofsson; Björn Fjæstad; Matthias Kohring; Alexander Goerke; Martin W. Bauer; Timo Rusanen; Agnes Allansdottir; Anne Berthomier; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Helle Frederiksen; George Gaskell; Martina Leonarz; Miltos Liakopoulos; Andrzej Przestalski; Georg Ruhrmann; Maria Rusanen; Michael Schanne; Franz Seifert; Angeliki Stathopoulou; Wolfgang Wagner
Biotechnology. The making of a global controversy | 2002
Edna Einsiedel; Agnes Allansdottir; Nick Allum; Martin W. Bauer; Anne Berthomier; Aigli Chatjouli; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Robin Downey; Jan M. Gutteling; Mattias Kohring; Martina Leonarz; Federica Manzoli; Anna Olofsson; Andrzej Przestalski; Timo Rusanen; Franz Seifert; A. Stathopoulou; Wolfgang Wagner
Social Studies of Science | 2009
Suzanne de Cheveigné
Archive | 2001
Nicole Kronberger; Urs Dahinden; Agnes Allansdottir; Nina Seger; Uwe Pfenning; George Gaskell; Nick Allum; Timo Rusanen; Lorenzo Montali; Wolfgang Wagner; Suzanne de Cheveigné; Carmen Diego; Arne Thing Mortensen