Suzanne E. MacDonald

Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans: II. Generality Across Search Tasks

Pigeons and humans searched for a goal that was hidden in varied locations within a search space. The goal location was fixed relative to an array of identical landmarks. Pigeons searched on the laboratory floor, and humans searched on a table top or an outdoor field. In Experiment 1, the goal was centered in a square array of 4 landmarks. When the spacing between landmarks was increased, humans searched in the middle of the expanded array, whereas pigeons searched in locations that preserved distance and direction to an individual landmark. In Experiment 2, the goal was centered between and a perpendicular distance away from 2 landmarks aligned in the left-fight dimension. When landmark spacing was increased, humans, but not pigeons, shifted their searching away from the landmarks along the perpendicular axis. These results parallel those obtained in touch-screen tasks. Thus, pigeons and humans differ in how they use landmark configuration.

Learning the Configuration of a Landmark Array: I. Touch-Screen Studies With Pigeons and Humans

Pigeons and humans searched on a touch-screen monitor for an unmarked goal located relative to an array of landmarks presented in varied screen locations. After training with the goal centered in various square arrays of 4 landmarks, humans, but not pigeons, transferred accurately to arrays with novel elements. Humans searched in the middle of expanded arrays, whereas pigeons preserved the distance and direction to a single landmark. When trained with the goal centered below 2 identical horizontally aligned landmarks, humans responded to horizontal expansions or contractions of the array by shifting their search vertically, preserving angles from landmarks to goal. Pigeons did not adjust their search vertically. Humans trained with a single landmark adjusted search distance when landmark size was changed. Both pigeons and humans use the configuration of a landmark array, but the underlying processes seem to differ.

Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task : win-stay versus win-shift strategies

The spatial memory of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) was explored in 3 experiments with a simulated foraging task. In Experiment 1, individual monkeys foraged among 8 baited food sites. They appeared to use spatial memory to accurately avoid revisiting previously depleted sites. There was no difference in accuracy between the adult monkeys and a juvenile monkey tested on the same task. In Experiment 2, a win-stay paradigm was used. The adult monkey subject very accurately remembered locations that had previously contained food. The monkey tended to visit adjacent correct sites when retrieving food and thus minimized the total distance travelled. In Experiment 3, a win-shift paradigm was used with 2 adult monkeys. Although both monkeys performed at above-chance levels of accuracy on the win-shift task, they made many errors. These results suggest that marmosets may prefer tasks that require a win-stay strategy.

Gorillas' (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) spatial memory in a foraging task.

The spatial memory of 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) was explored in a simulated foraging task. Trials consisted of 2 parts separated by a delay. In the 1st part, half of the total number of food sites were baited with a highly preferred food, and the subject was allowed to search, find, and consume these items (search phase). During the delay the same locations were again baited. After the delay the animal was reintroduced to the test enclosure and allowed to search through the sites again (re-search phase). In Experiment 1, an adult gorilla was very accurate in remembering locations that had previously contained food at delay intervals of 24 hr or more. In Experiment 2, a juvenile gorilla was also accurate in remembering locations that had previously contained food at delays up to 10 min. The adult gorilla appeared to use a counting strategy during the search phase to minimize the number of sites visited.

Levels of Abstraction in Orangutan (Pongo abelii) Categorization

Levels of abstraction have rarely been manipulated in studies of natural concept formation in nonhumans. Isolated examples have indicated that animals, relative to humans, may learn concepts at varying levels of abstraction with differential ease. The ability of 6 orangutans (Pongo abelii) of various ages to make natural concept discriminations at 3 levels of abstraction was therefore investigated. The orangutans were rewarded for selecting photos of orangutans instead of humans and other primates (concrete level), primates instead of other animals (intermediate level), and animals instead of nonanimals (abstract level) in a 2-choice touch screen procedure. The results suggest that, like a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) tested previously (Vonk & MacDonald, 2002), orangutans can learn concepts at each level of abstraction, and unlike other nonhumans, most of these subjects rapidly learned the intermediate level discrimination.

Spatial memory and foraging competition in captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Spatial memory and foraging competition were investigated in three mother/offspring pairs of western lowland gorillas,Gorilla gorilla gorilla, using a naturalistic foraging task at the Toronto Zoo. Sixteen permanent food sites were placed throughout the animals’ enclosures. All of the sites were baited and a pair of animals was free to visit the sites and collect the food. Five of the subjects collected the food with accuracy better than chance. Most of the subjects visited the sites using a pattern, and for half the subjects this was one of adjacency. The high accuracy of five of the subjects and the lack of a consistent adjacency pattern suggest that the animals did in fact use spatial memory. Furthermore, the gorillas tended to avoid visiting food sites that had been previously depleted by their partner. They also appeared to split their search of the enclosures, each visiting only a proportion of the food sites. This indicated that the animals were competing and altering their foraging behaviour based on the behaviour of their partner. Therefore, accuracy was recalculated to take this into account. When the sites depleted by either animal in a pair during a given trial were worked into the accuracy calculations for individual animals, three of the animals still maintained accuracy above chance. This suggests that the animals were not only able to remember which sites they had depleted, but those sites depleted by their foraging partner as well.

Information seeking by orangutans: a generalized search strategy?

Recent empirical work has suggested that some species of non-human primates may be aware of their knowledge states. One finding to support this claim is that they seek information about the location of a hidden food item when they are unsure of its location, but not when they already know where it is, which purportedly demonstrates metacognition. However, this behaviour may instead reflect a generalized search strategy, in which subjects reach for food when they see it, and search for it when they do not. In this experiment, this possibility was addressed by testing orangutans in three conditions in which the location of a food item was sometimes known to subjects, and other times required subjects to visually seek the missing information. All subjects exhibited behaviour consistent with a metacognitive interpretation in at least two of the three conditions. Critically, in two of the conditions, subjects refrained from seeking visual information, and correctly found the hidden food item without ever seeing it, using inference by exclusion. The results suggest that animals that succeed in this information-seeking task are not merely acting according to a generalized search strategy, and instead seek information adaptively according to their knowledge states.

The use of perceptual features in categorization by orangutans (Pongo abelli)

The extent to which categorization of natural classes in animals reflects a generalization based on perceptual similarity versus an abstract conceptual representation remains unclear. Here, two experiments were conducted to identify the perceptual features used by orangutans when categorizing pictures. In Experiment 1, subjects were trained and tested for transfer on a concrete discrimination (gorillas or orangutans vs. other primates). Analysis of performance on both positive and negative exemplars revealed that performance was best on photos with faces, particularly close-ups. Moreover, error trials did not seem to reflect instances of mistaken identity, but rather, exemplars that may have been distracting for other reasons, such as novel coloration or morphology. In Experiment 2, photos were modified to test the effects of various features. Color modifications caused the biggest decrease in performance, and eye modifications also affected performance deleteriously. Therefore, two perceptual features, namely eye regions and color, played a key role in subjects’ ability to categorize. However, performance based on an underlying concept cannot be ruled out, because both of these features are highly relevant in terms of defining category membership. Although a subset of features was identified as playing a key role in categorization, these features differed depending on whether feature-use was studied indirectly, as in Experiment 1, or directly, as in Experiment 2.

Strategies in landmark use by orangutans and human children

Landmark use has been demonstrated in a variety of organisms, yet the manner in which landmarks are encoded and subsequently used appears to vary between and sometimes within species, even when faced with identical landmark arrays. In the present experiments, orangutans and human children were shown a square array of identical landmarks and were trained to locate a hidden goal in the centre of the array. In Experiments 1 and 2, the search space appeared to be discrete, with white gridlines dividing up the space, and in Experiments 3a and 3b, the search space was uniformly coloured, making it appear continuous. In all experiments, following training, subjects were given a single expansion test, to determine their landmark strategy use, based on peak search activity. The orangutans appeared to use absolute directional vectors from individual landmarks, with peak search activities on the inner corners of the square array, and they used this strategy persistently. In contrast, human children showed two landmark-based strategies, absolute directional vectors and a relational or “middle” strategy, with the majority of children starting their search in the middle region. Although some children, especially young children, persistently used one strategy like the orangutans, many changed strategies when the original one failed to yield the hidden goal.

Delayed matching-to-successive-samples in pigeons: Short-term memory for item and order information

Short-term memory for order information in pigeons was explored by using a delayed matching-to-successive-samples task (DMTSS). Experiment 1 indicated that pigeons can accurately report the order of two successively presented samples. Experiments 2, 3 and 4 specifically addressed the representation of order information in short-term memory. Experiment 2 showed that when the duration of the first sample (S1) was very long, or when the duration of the second sample (S2) was very short, order errors increased relative to baseline (S1 and S2 of equal duration), suggesting that memory strength plays an important role in the discrimination of order. The possibility that strength information is necessary for accurate DMTSS performance was tested in Experiments 3 and 4. Pigeons continued to match accurately when memory strength and order were uncorrelated.